As Armenia Pivots Towards France and India, Putin Says EU Membership Referendu

The Eurasian Times
May 10 2026

Russian President Vladimir Putin said it would be “logical” if Armenia held a referendum on EU membership, after it hosted a European summit for the first time.

The former Soviet republic froze its membership in the Russian-led CSTO military alliance in 2024 over Russia’s failure to defend it against Azerbaijan, and has expressed an interest in joining the European Union, angering the Kremlin.

Asked at a press conference about Yerevan’s EU aspirations, Putin said it would be “quite logical to hold a referendum and ask the Armenian citizens what their choice would be. Based on that, we would make our own choice as well”.

“And then we would have gone down the path of a gentle, civilized, and mutually beneficial separation,” the Russian president added.

Putin also drew a parallel with Ukraine. “We are all going through everything that’s happening in the Ukrainian direction right now. But how did it all start? With Ukraine’s attempt to join the EU.”

From May 4-6, Yerevan hosted the 8th European Political Community (EPC) summit and used the two-day gathering of European leaders in its capital to push its top priority, security, and to accelerate its shift away from Russia and towards Western partners.

Meanwhile, the French President Emmanuel Macron used the occasion to further deepen its defense partnership with the beleaguered country that has lost two wars to Azerbaijan in the last six years, lost control of the historically Armenian-speaking territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, and is desperate to come out of the shadow of Russia.

In fact, as the European Union and Armenia laid the groundwork for deeper integration during the landmark EPC summit in Yerevan, France’s presence loomed large – diplomatically, economically, and culturally.

For decades after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the landlocked Armenia did Russia’s bidding in the South Caucasus, providing it with military bases and serving as Moscow’s loyal outpost south of the Black Sea.

Crucially, Armenia also provided Russia with a land bridge to Iran, Moscow’s key ally in West Asia.

Armenia also joined the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a post-Soviet Russian equivalent of NATO.

However, Armenia has frozen its participation in the Russia-led collective security organization since 2024 and is gradually pivoting towards the EU and NATO.

This historic shift has the potential to rewrite the balance of power in this strategic region that sits at the crossroads of Europe, West Asia, Central Asia, Russia, and South Asia.

In fact, Armenia and the South Caucasus are at the heart of both India-supported International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and Europe’s plans to link Central Asian gas fields with its markets.

No wonder India and France have emerged as primary military and diplomatic backers of Armenia as it navigates a challenging neighborhood and tries to balance its historical dependence on Russia with new partnerships in the West and East.

Armenia’s Pivot Towards France

Bordering openly hostile Azerbaijan to the East, historical adversary Turkey to the West, and war-torn Georgia and Iran to the North and South, Armenia finds itself in a challenging and sometimes openly antagonistic neighborhood.

This challenging neighborhood meant that Armenia depended on Russia for its security.

However, Moscow’s failure to safeguard Armenia’s security and interests despite its CSTO membership during the two wars with Azerbaijan forced a strategic rethink in Yerevan.

Under Article 4 of the CSTO Treaty, analogous to NATO’s Article 5, member states are obligated to give each other “the necessary help, including military” in the event of foreign aggression.

Despite this explicit cause, Moscow did nothing to protect Armenia during its two recent wars with Azerbaijan.

Russia proved itself an unreliable security partner, and Yerevan has since tried to balance its dependence on Moscow by cultivating defense and security partnerships with diverse countries.

However, France has emerged as a key partner for Yerevan.

The visit of President Macron, timed to coincide with the first EU‑Armenia summit, underscored France’s ambition to anchor itself in the small, landlocked country as it turns away from Moscow.

France is positioning itself as a key player in Armenia’s emerging role as a regional hub for trade, energy, and digital connectivity.

The EU‑Armenia connectivity partnership, signed during the summit, aims to strengthen transport and energy links and interlocks French and European interests in routes between Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, and Europe – notably the Trans-Caspian route.

France and Armenia also signed a joint declaration establishing a strategic partnership and agreed to expand cooperation in the defense sector.

A memorandum of understanding between the defense ministries of Armenia and France provides for cooperation in research, development, and advanced military technologies.

In addition, Armenia’s defense ministry signed a contract with the French group Sofema to supply equipment.

An agreement was also concluded with Airbus Helicopters for the delivery of transport helicopters. According to local media, this involves six multi-purpose Airbus H145 helicopters.

Notably, France has emerged as Armenia’s largest arms supplier in recent years.

Paris has delivered CAESAR howitzers, GM200 radars, and Bastion APCs to Armenia.

During his trip, President Macron also called on Europe to help Armenia independently secure its borders.

“There are still 4,000 Russian soldiers on Armenian territory, including over 1,000 border guards. Europe must, therefore, commit to helping the country secure its borders more independently,” Macron said.

Russian forces are stationed in Armenia under a bilateral agreement that established the 102nd military base in Gyumri. This facility serves as Russia’s military presence in the South Caucasus region.

The base was established in 1995 for a 25-year period. However, the agreement was renewed later, and Russian troops can now remain in the country until 2044.

Macron suggested that Europe should provide this support to Armenia to reduce its dependence on Russia.

Notably, Armenia has already accepted a European Union (EU)–led civilian border-monitoring force, rejecting a Russian proposal for the same. Numbering around 200, this is the first such EU Common Security and Defense Policy mission in a Russian-allied country.

Armenia has also acceded to the International Criminal Court (meaning that, in theory, Putin could be arrested if he sets foot on Armenian soil).

Russia’s failure to safeguard Armenian interests has also led to the downfall of Russia’s image in the Armenian public.

Between 2019 and 2023, according to an International Republican Institute poll, the number of Armenians who described the country’s relationship with Russia as “good” fell drastically, from 93 percent to 31 percent. France is now regarded by the Armenian public as the country’s most important political partner, with the United States in second place.

In recent years, Armenia has taken several steps to pivot towards the EU, and EU officials have reciprocated. In March 2024, the European Parliament welcomed Armenia’s application for candidate status to the European Union.

Armenia also hosted a training exercise with U.S special forces in September 2023.

India has also emerged as another crucial partner for Armenia.

India: The New Security Partner for Armenia

After France, India has emerged as the second-largest arms exporter to Armenia. In fact, Yerevan is now India’s single largest arms export customer.

In recent years, Armenia has purchased Pinaka multi-barrel rocket launchers, Akash-1S surface-to-air missile systems, ATAGS 155mm towed howitzers, Swathi weapon-locating radars, and MArG truck-mounted artillery.

Besides, Armenia is considering signing deals for the Akash-NG and Astra Mk2 AAMs. Armenia is also considering signing a contract with New Delhi to upgrade its Su-30 fleet to India’s Su-30MKI specifications.

In 2025-26 alone, Armenia imported roughly US$2 billion worth of Indian systems, helping propel India into the world’s top 25 arms exporters.

Indian systems now form the backbone of Armenia’s artillery, air defense, and counter-battery capabilities.

Notably, till one decade ago, Armenia used to import nearly 90% of its arms from Russia. Currently, Russia’s share has dropped to less than 10 percent, even as France and India have moved quickly to fill in the vacuum.

The message to Moscow is clear: Yerevan is hedging its bets in a multipolar world.

As Armenia hosted its first-ever ECP summit and French President Macron on a two-day state visit, the message to Moscow was clear: Armenia sees its future in the West.

While EU membership remains a distant dream, the era of Russia as Yerevan’s sole security provider is over.

Macron has sent a clear message that Yerevan should remove the 5,000-odd Russian soldiers from its territory, as Moscow has failed to protect its interests; instead, the EU should fulfill that role.

As Russian influence wanes in Armenia, a new constellation of states, the EU, France, and India, have moved in to fill the breach.

The South Caucasus will never be the same.

  • Sumit Ahlawat has over a decade of experience in news media. He has worked with Press Trust of India, Times Now, Zee News, Economic Times, and Microsoft News. He holds a Master’s Degree in International Media and Modern History from the University of Sheffield, UK. 
  • With AFP Inputs

Turkish Press: Armenia, Türkiye build ties, one bridge at a time

Daily Sabah, Turkey
May 10 2026

Türkiye and Armenia move toward normalization as a deal on joint restoration of an ancient border bridge marks a new step in the process that, though fragile, may be full of opportunities, according to experts

Remnants of two abutments of a bridge on the border perhaps symbolize best the state of relations between Türkiye and Armenia, or rather, how they could have been after the fall of the Soviet Union. So, it is fitting that the two neighbors decided to turn a new page in their efforts to normalize ties in this very location. Ani Bridge spanning across Arpaçay or as it is known in Armenia, Akhuryan River, will be jointly restored by Türkiye and Armenia under a deal signed by representatives of the two countries last Monday in Yerevan. Experts say that the new steps include profound opportunities for both countries and the region, though they also underline the need for cautious optimism, instead of expecting a swift normalization.

A visit by Vice President Cevdet Yılmaz to the Armenian capital to attend the European Political Community summit brought the memorandum of understanding for joint restoration to fruition. Yılmaz, the first high-ranking leader from Türkiye to visit Yerevan since then-President Abdullah Gül in 2008, had kind words for his hosts and, in remarks to journalists after a meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, said peace and normalization in the South Caucasus would benefit every country, including Azerbaijan, which advanced its own peace process with Armenia after years of hostilities.

For the better part of the last decade, Türkiye has sought to re-establish ties with countries with which it had sour relations, in line with changing circumstances and as part of its “peace diplomacy.” For instance, it rebuilt ties with Egypt and reached out to Greece after decades of tensions. Now, Armenia may join this growing list of countries with which Türkiye hopes to reconnect for the sake of mutual interests.

A bridge beyond restoration

Professor Yıldız Deveci Bozkuş of Ankara University says Yılmaz’s participation in the European Political Community summit is a significant and symbolic development for the normalization process between the two countries. Speaking to Daily Sabah, Bozkuş noted that a new diplomatic process was underway in the aftermath of the 2020 Karabakh war. The said war led to Azerbaijan’s victory against the Armenian occupiers of Karabakh and paved the way for a budding peace between Baku and Yerevan. Türkiye, a close ally of Azerbaijan, runs a parallel process. Over the past six years, Ankara and Yerevan have assigned special representatives to further normalize their relations and have taken steps to establish a lasting diplomatic relationship, reopen land borders and establish transportation and commercial links. Bozkuş highlighted noticeable progress in the process. She pointed out that a recent meeting between Turkish and Armenian delegations on the two countries’ border was followed in days by Yılmaz’s visit, adding that those were important indicators of the sides’ will to keep channels of dialogue open and their commitment to normalization.

“(The deal on Ani Bridge) is not purely a restoration project; it is also a symbolic reflection of years-long problems between Türkiye and Armenia, closed borders and disrupted contact. The bridge is a metaphor of a new concept of relationship, a ‘bridge’ between the past and future, between the memory and normalization,” Bozkuş added.

As a matter of fact, Türkiye was one of the first countries to recognize the independence of Armenia within months of its declaration in 1991. In the following years, it sought to help Armenia integrate with the international community. One such step was the invitation of Armenia to the Organization of Black Sea Economic Cooperation, which was founded in Istanbul in 1992. Yet, one year later, Türkiye started cutting off ties with Armenia and shut down the border when Armenia attacked Azerbaijan.

It took 15 years for the first steps to be taken for normalizing relations. In 2009, they signed protocols to that extent, but the political climate of the time in Armenia stalled the normalization efforts. Another sticking point that prevented restoration of ties has been a different interpretation of a shared history, or rather, the history of Armenians during the Ottoman rule in Anatolia. The infamous 1915 incidents, which are recognized by Armenia as an “Armenian genocide,” have been another obstacle in relations. The former governments of Armenia and the Armenian diaspora in Europe and the United States pushed the “genocide” agenda and its recognition by Türkiye for years before mending ties.

Under Nikol Pashinyan, Armenia has largely changed this rhetoric and introduced the “Real Armenia” doctrine, which touts peace with neighbors. Though not openly declared, this was a step toward abandoning Armenian claims to Karabakh, something also symbolized by a lapel pin worn by Pashinyan that shows Armenia without Karabakh, as was the case in the former maps of the country. Last year, Pashinyan was also quoted by Turkish journalists visiting Yerevan as saying that “genocide recognition” was not a foreign policy priority for them.

Win-win potential

Nigar Göksel, the International Crisis Group’s Türkiye/Cyprus director, says normalization will be a win-win situation for both countries for a wide variety of reasons. She pointed out that especially the opening of the Türkiye-Armenia border would reduce Armenia’s isolation, vulnerability and dependence on Russia. “(It would) strengthen Türkiye’s role and soft power across the Caucasus, and solidify Azerbaijan’s connection to Nakhchivan. It would also create new opportunities in trade, logistics, tourism, energy and digital infrastructure. Provinces in eastern Anatolia are expected to benefit economically, which can also positively spill over into security,” Göksel told Daily Sabah.

The issue of Nakhchivan also figured prominently in Yılmaz’s remarks to the Turkish media in Yerevan. This exclave of Azerbaijan inside landlocked Armenia will be linked to mainland Azerbaijan as part of the Zangezur Corridor, a project that aims to bring economic prosperity to the two countries and Türkiye while strengthening regional trade and transport networks. It is part of the Middle Corridor, a logistics network spanning thousands of kilometers and connecting China to Europe via Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Türkiye. Yılmaz noted the strategic importance of the Middle Corridor and how it would present a strong connection between Türkiye and the Caucasus and Turkic states. “This is not only about roads, but it is also about strengthening connectivity in fields ranging from telecommunications and digitalization and energy,” he said. He said making Zangezur functional would lay the groundwork for wider regional cooperation.

Bozkuş says Yılmaz’s visit had multiple messages on the regional and global levels as well. “In recent years, the South Caucasus has been a geopolitical field of attraction in international politics, in terms of energy lines, transportation corridors, connectivity projects and competition of major powers. At a time when conflicts on a global scale, energy crises and geopolitical fractures escalate, the South Caucasus’ strategic position has become more apparent. This is clearly observed in competition around transportation and connectivity projects oriented in the region,” she said.

Armenia will hold elections on June 7, a vote Pashinyan branded as a choice “for peace or non-peace” last year as he pushes to achieve the said peace with Azerbaijan and Türkiye.

Göksel says that after the elections and in parallel with momentum in Azerbaijan-Armenia normalization, technical and infrastructure preparations for opening the border may accelerate. “While Baku has been expecting Armenia to first remove the reference to its 1991 Declaration of Independence from the Constitution’s preamble, as it includes a claim over Karabakh, we are already seeing de facto openings pick up pace. This is important for giving Armenian society confidence that Pashinyan’s constructive path is delivering results,” she said.

For Türkiye, the restoration of ties is part of wider regional ambitions, that is, increasing the connectivity for peace, as former Ambassador Serdar Kılıç, Türkiye’s special representative for the process, implied during an event in Yerevan earlier this week. Kılıç told the Yerevan Dialogue Forum on May 5 that Türkiye was “building confidence” with Armenia, and this cannot be separated from general initiatives for connectivity in the region. “The connectivity, too, cannot be confined to fields such as transportation. A more comprehensive approach is needed, just as we need a comprehensive approach for ensuring peace and stability in the region,” he said, adding that the ideas to improve relations and maintaining lasting peace and stability should “come from the region itself,” something in line with Türkiye’s advocacy for ‘regional ownership’ in matters regarding the relations in the region instead of relying non-regional actors to resolve the issues.

“In the new era, South Caucasus’ strategic importance is not merely security-oriented. It is also being redefined in the framework of connectivity, sustainable transportation networks, energy security and geoeconomic integration,” Bozkuş said. “In this context, Türkiye’s effort to contribute to the solutions to regional problems, continuing normalization process with Armenia and playing an active role in several transportation and commerce projects, particularly the Middle Corridor, can be counted among elements boosting Türkiye’s clout in the South Caucasus,” she added.

She noted that diplomatic and geoeconomic initiatives were crucial for reinforcing Türkiye’s position as an actor strengthening connectivity between Europe and Asia. “This in turn contributes to Türkiye’s regional influence and makes its strategic importance amid changing global geopolitical balance more visible.”

Likely challenges

This “regional ownership” and bolstering the peace prospects may have its detractors as well, as Göksel points out.

“As with any such change, there will also be actors who lose; those that benefit from the current closed borders might not be able to retain their advantage. From a security perspective, completion of these normalizations, both between Türkiye and Armenia, and between Armenia and Azerbaijan, would reduce the scope for external powers to exploit unresolved conflicts for leverage, further lower the risk of renewed war between Azerbaijan and Armenia, and enable regional connectivity, contributing to a more predictable order in the South Caucasus. That said, short-term security risks should not be underestimated. Both internal and external actors may attempt to trigger provocations to disrupt the process, so vigilance will need to remain high. Dialogue channels, hotlines and coordination among security officials will undoubtedly need to be tight,” she said.

Bozkuş pointed out that the increasing strategic importance of the South Caucasus in terms of energy security, transportation corridors and connectivity projects made the region one of the most critical geopolitical rivalry areas in international politics. “This might carry some risks and fragility for normalization, but it also means new diplomatic and economic potential,” she added.

“In other words, the South Caucasus’ rising geopolitical importance is something both limiting and encouraging Turkish-Armenian relations,” she noted. That “geopolitical importance” emerged in a thinly veiled pragmatic approach by the U.S. under the Trump administration, which boasts advancing the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process. The U.S. apparently aspires to curb the Russian influence in the South Caucasus. Armenia under Pashinyan further distanced itself from Russia, and this was most evident when the Kremlin lashed out at Yerevan for hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the same summit Yılmaz attended.

Speaking about the U.S., Bozkuş highlighted that the Armenian diaspora may impact the normalization process. The United States, along with France, hosts the largest Armenian diaspora in the West. Bozkuş stated that the diaspora was well-organized in the Western countries and maintained a distance from the normalization. Nevertheless, she added that the diaspora was not “homogenous” and highlighted differing political approaches within the diaspora, as well as changes among generations, the impact of regional developments and security concerns of Armenia made more pragmatic and dialogue-focused approaches more visible within the community.

Another major obstacle may be ultranationalist circles in Armenia and the “Karabakh clan,” members of a political tradition who also kept their distance from the process. The said clan refers to powerful political and military figures who came to dominate Armenian politics for years. All are connected to the region, either born there or served there as military or political leaders. Indeed, Pashinyan’s “Velvet Revolution” in 2018 ended this domination, while Azerbaijan’s victory in Karabakh further eroded the influence of the clan in Armenian politics. Still, they are the most formidable rivals of Pashinyan in the upcoming elections. Bozkuş, however, is optimistic and says the clan’s approach to the matter does not reflect the reality of wider Armenian society. She referred to increasing expectations, especially among younger generations, for the development of economic relations, the opening of borders, the revival of transportation networks and the strengthening of regional integration. “This indicates that public support for normalization increased to an extent,” she said.

Pro-Russian political circles in Armenia are also cautious toward the process, according to Bozkuş. “In this context, the June elections are important not only for domestic politics but as something that will define Armenia’s foreign policy and regional vision. Under Pashinyan, steps taken to improve relations with the West and normalization process with Türkiye and Azerbaijan had a response to an extent among the public. The Pashinyan era has been a time of important opportunities for these processes,” she underlined.

Bozkuş also warned against adopting an overly optimistic approach or hoping for short-term expectations regarding the process. “There are still many sensitive issues that need to be resolved between the two countries, from historical matters to the establishment of diplomatic relations, regional developments and the lack of full mutual trust. So, it will be more realistic to assess the normalization as a multi-dimensional, fragile process that should need more time.”

Armenia’s Deputy Prime Minister reported on the progress of border demarcation

Caucasian Knot
May 10 2026
Armenia’s Deputy Prime Minister reported on the progress of border demarcation with Azerbaijan.
The state commissions of Armenia and Azerbaijan have agreed on draft technical documentation that is essential for demarcating the border between the two countries.

As reported by the “Caucasian Knot,” on November 1, 2024, a meeting was held at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border between Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafayev, during which the parties agreed on the border delimitation regulations. On January 16, 2025, it was announced that Azerbaijan and Armenia had agreed on the sequence of border delimitation work: work will be carried out from north to south.

In April 2024, the state commissions of Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed to coordinate a section of the border along the line at the time of the collapse of the USSR, and in May of that year, they agreed on a protocol describing the sections of the border line between four villages on each side. Following this, Armenian and Azerbaijani border guards began guarding these sections. In the village of Kirants in the Tavush region, this sparked mass protests, but in August, local residents were satisfied with the compensation. The “Caucasian Knot” has prepared the reports “Protests on the Border: What Discontent Are Residents of Armenian Villages” and “Villages of Discord: What Territories Are Disputed Between Armenia and Azerbaijan”.

13:52 21.01.2025
Analysts in Baku assess the prospects for border delimitation with ArmeniaAgreeing to begin border delimitation work between Azerbaijan and Armenia will demonstrate the parties’ political will to resolve contentious issues, Azerbaijani analysts noted.
The state commissions of Armenia and Azerbaijan have agreed on a draft document on border demarcation work, Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan announced.

“We have agreed on a draft document that is important for further work. Essentially, it describes procedural matters. They are more technical in nature, but are still important, since we must continue to act in accordance with these documents,” Novosti-Armenia quoted him as saying on May 9.

Grigoryan clarified that the document will be public, but must be approved in both countries “in accordance with domestic procedures.”

Responding to a question about the timing of the demarcation completion, Grigoryan stated that “there are no new details yet.”

According to him, when the need arises to “specify the crossings [border] related to TRIPP, demarcation will be carried out separately in these areas. “I think this process will not take much time,” Grigoryan was quoted as saying in the publication.

As a reminder, Armenia and the United States are discussing two scenarios for granting the right to build the Trump Route project in Armenia: 99 and 49 years, while the land will remain the property of Armenia. Construction work is expected to begin in 2026, but the implementation of the project may require border delimitation.

On August 8, 2025, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a declaration on the cessation of hostilities at a meeting in Washington. US President Donald Trump stated that the key issue that prevented the signing of a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan has been resolved, and this is the issue of the Zangezur corridor. The “Caucasian Knot” has prepared a report “Trump Route” (TRIPP): transport corridor through Armenia”.

Source: Caucasian Knot
Source: Caucasian Knot

Putin proposes a referendum on Armenia’s accession to the EU, the Ukrainian s

lngin Northern BC, Canada
May 10 2026

Putin talks about a logical referendum on Armenia’s entry into the EU. He also hints at a possible peaceful separation of Yerevan from Russia and recalls the parallel with Ukraine.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday that it would be “logical” for Armenia to hold a referendum on membership of the European Union. He made his comments after Armenia, a long-time ally of Russia, hosted the summit of the European Political Community (EPC). TASR informs about it according to the report of the AFP agency.

  • Vladimir Putin described the referendum on Armenia’s membership in the European Union as logical.
  • Putin proposed that Armenian citizens decide on their geopolitical direction in a referendum.
  • The Russian president compared Armenia’s ambitions in the EU to the situation in Ukraine.
  • Russia summoned the Armenian ambassador for the participation of Volodymyr Zelensky at the summit in Yerevan.
  • Armenia froze membership in the OZKB after dissatisfaction with Russian support against Azerbaijan.

When asked about Yerevan’s ambitions to join the EU, Putin replied that it would be “quite logical to hold a referendum and ask the Armenian citizens what they prefer. Based on that, we would also make a decision.”

Putin and the parallel with Ukraine

“And then we would go down the path of a peaceful, civilized and mutually beneficial division,” Putin said.

AFP notes that the head of the Kremlin pointed to a parallel with Ukraine. “We are all now experiencing what is happening in connection with Ukraine. But how did it all begin? With Ukraine’s attempt to join the EU,” he declared.

On Monday, Armenia hosted dozens of country leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, at the EPC summit. Subsequently, a separate EU-Armenia summit was held in Yerevan on Tuesday.

Tension in relations with Russia

After these negotiations, Russia summoned the Armenian ambassador in Moscow to protest against Zelensky’s participation in the meeting.

Last year, Armenia adopted a law declaring its intention to apply for EU membership. However, the Russian president pointed out in April that Yerevan cannot be part of the European Union and at the same time the customs bloc led by Moscow.

AFP recalled that relations between the two countries have significantly deteriorated in recent years. Armenia froze its membership of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in 2024 after accusing Moscow of failing to protect it in an armed conflict with Azerbaijan.

source

168: How we liberated Shush

May 102026

On May 8, 1992, the operation to liberate Shushi began. The liberation of the city began with the participation of the Armenian armed forces and volunteer detachments from the settlements adjacent to the city.

On May 8, the liberation of Shushi begins, with attacks launched from four directions of the city. From the moment the hostilities began, the press of the time reported detailed information from Shushi. Looking through the press of that region, we understand in more detail how we managed to liberate Shush. We also understand the scope of the military operations and the hourly changes observed in Shushi and the town’s streets.

 

Read also

  • Pashinyan was forced… Armenia will become a sacrificial tool. Hayk Nahapetyan
  • Delivered holiday
  • “Heydar Aliyev used to announce: ‘Forget Artsakh, Shushi is no longer ours,’ but the people organized against his will.” Mayor of Shushi

“On May 8, at 5:00 a.m., immediately after the heavy shelling, Armenian formations with the support of dozens of armored vehicles from Stepanakert and Shosh village launched an attack on Shushi.

As of 9 o’clock, the leading groups of Armenians entered the suburbs of Shushi, where street battles began. The attackers were supported by two military helicopters. At the same time, Armenians attacked the nearby village of Kyosalar, trying to encircle the city. Armenian armored vehicles are shelling the Shushi-Lachin road from Karintak village. (“Azg”, Yerevan, 1992, May 9).

 

As of the afternoon of May 8, the data show that the Armenian forces are rapidly breaking through the enemy’s defenses in the Shushi foothills and are already preparing for urban battles.

According to the information of “Pro Armenia” news center, as of 15:00, the Armenian detachments broke through the defense of Shushi from the north and east. Fierce fighting is taking place in the western part of Shushi, where the prison is located. Armenian troops have captured the hill near Lisagor village and control the Shushi-Lachin road.

According to preliminary data, 8 fighters from the self-defense forces were killed and more than 80 were injured. The Azerbaijani army continues shelling the border villages of NKR. At 3:00 p.m., military helicopters bombarded Norshen, Murishen, Avdur villages of Martunu region and Shosh and Krasni villages of Askerani region with Nurs missiles.

According to the NKR press center, as of 5:30 p.m., fighting continued in the streets of Shushi. At the same time, heavy shelling of Stepanakert continued from four military helicopters and a Cy-24 attack aircraft. There are victims and wounded in the city.” (Ibid.).

The data of May 8 at 18:00 shows that the Armenian troops are already in the city, they are clearing the city from the Azerbaijani troops, heavy urban battles are going on, but the last remnants of the Azerbaijani troops continue to shell Artsakh from different places.

“As of 18:00, the Armenian armed groups were neutralizing the Azerbaijani positions step by step in Shushi. Battles are going on in the center of the city. ARF MTC reported that a large part of the city was occupied after midnight. The shelling of Stepanakert continues from the remaining firing points in the city. At the same time, Mi-24 helicopters, using Nurs missiles, participate in the shelling. According to some data, the Armenians shot down one helicopter.” (Ibid.).

On the morning of May 9, the Armenian press, the Armenian press of the diaspora and the world’s authoritative media are already writing about the liberation of Shushi. The news spreads especially quickly in the Armenian diaspora.

“On the morning of May 9, Saturday, L. The authorities of Karabakh (NKR) have announced that the neutralization of Shushi firing points has been completed. The largest military stronghold of Azerbaijani militants in the territory of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has passed under the control of Armenians. According to information received from military and other sources, in the early morning of May 9, Azerbaijani militants in Shushi stopped fierce resistance and slowly began to retreat, leaving their positions and firing positions. (“Alik”, Tehran, 1992, May 9).

The testimonies of the press of the time show that the liberation of Shushi was the result of the united will, organization and purpose of the Armenian people. Every phase of the battles, every hour of the recorded change testifies to the determination with which the Armenian forces were able to overcome the difficulties and achieve a strategically important victory. The liberation of Shushi became a turning point in the course of the Artsakh war.

It strengthened the military positions of Armenia and Artsakh, as well as national self-awareness and faith in one’s own forces.

The liberation of Shushi still remains in the historical memory of the Armenian people as a symbol of heroism, unity and victory.

Z. I hesitated




1.5 million drams for the singing of the national anthem at the opening of the Tavush eco-patrol department

May 102026

The Tavush Regional Department of the Eco-Patrol Service is ready for operation. they announced the other day from the Eco-patrol service. Nikol Pashinyan was also present at the opening of this department in the city of Ijevan.

 

We were informed that the ceremony started with a live performance of the RA national anthem, for which Chekijian’s choir went to Ijeva.

Read also

  • The business is caught in the tight grip of the government
  • Shushi’s loss did not begin during his defense, but much earlier. Pashinyan conveys a lot of information about his “efforts” during the 44-day period
  • Why is Armenian Ambassador to Russia Gurgen Arsenyan returning to Armenia?

We learn about the latter from the electronic procurement system.

Thus, the Eco-Parcel Service signed a contract with the “State National Academic Choir of Armenia” under a one-person non-competitive procurement procedure, delegating the presence of the choir and the performance of the RA national anthem within the framework of this event for 1.5 million drams.

“The campaign should be conducted in such a way that it does not turn into a clown, it is beneficial

May 102026

The political forces participating in the parliamentary elections on June 7 officially started the pre-election campaign on May 8. Most of the political forces started the campaign from marzes, some from Yerevan.

Gas technologist Armen Badalyan In other words, the political forces had unofficially started their campaign months ago, so it’s not like the start of the campaign was significantly different from the days of the unofficial campaign.

“All the forces started the campaign with the same methodology from the actual handwritten point of view, as months ago, there was no purely technological new development or some kind of start. Again, rallies, marches, meetings, that is, mass organizational events, which probably could not be otherwise, because when they start with the same methodology, they cannot give some intriguing process. Of course, they can do it, but they can’t, it’s not that easy.” of 168.am said Armen Badalyan in a conversation with

He found it difficult to say whether the campaign will be calm or whether there will be incidents, although it is possible that there will be tension during the campaign, because the “stakes” in the elections are quite high.

Read also

  • What do you say, Mr. Macron, that Sarkozy’s silhouette came to Armenia, or Hollande’s, or the honorable Jacques Chirac’s? Armen Hovasapyan
  • The European Union manages repression in Armenia. Hrant Mikayelyan
  • Pashinyan will turn his back on his team if the moment comes to free his head. Karine Nalchadjian

“The pre-election campaign of the ruling political force started on August 8, 2025, when the so-called “peace” document was initialed in Washington. And for other political forces, the pre-election campaign started from the end of last fall and the beginning of this year. When we observe the campaign during this period, we see that the political forces do not use their chances 100%, in many cases there are many mistakes, in many cases the methodology repeats the methodology of 1995.

Here the CP uses the “peace” methodology, says: “we came to power, it will be peaceful”, after that it uses the EU factor. In parallel, he says: “forget about Artsakh, let’s settle within the existing borders.” There are people for whom this is understandable and natural, following these slogans, they will vote for the government. There is a political force that promises to make the United States an ally for Armenia. The political forces of Samvel Karapetyan, Gagik Tsarukyan and Robert Kocharyan also offer different points: creation of jobs, reduction of drug prices, etc., added the technologist.

According to our interlocutor, none of the political forces at the moment has clearly shown the vision of what Armenia will have in case of the victory of their force. They do not show the picture of the country that they will build in case of their victory, so that people know what country they will vote for.

“The campaign should be conducted in such a way that it does not turn into “clownada”, it is beneficial only to the ruling political force. It is in the interest of the ruling political force to cheapen the electoral process as much as possible, that is, to trivialize it as much as possible, while these elections are of fatal significance: this will show the course of Armenia for the next 100 years,” emphasized Armen Badalyan.

Unexpected discovery: a new church, inscription tombstones are found in Kecharis

May 102026

An early medieval church was discovered in the Kecharis monastery complex during the renovation works and the excavations carried out within their scope. We talked about the details archaeologist Tigran Aleksanyan with.

– The new church was discovered during the improvement works. in which part is it located?

– The church was opened in the central part of the monastic complex, next to the Catholic and Saint Grigor Lusavorich churches. In the past, there were well-maintained, green paths leading to the monastery, and there was never any doubt that there was a church there. The roads have been repaired regularly.

Read also

  • Charity
  • St. Barsegh bishop’s admonition speech about baptism
  • Bishop St. Barsegh’s speech that God is not the cause of evil

2025 according to the previously prepared plan, improvement works were undertaken in the territory of the monastery. During the earthworks, gravestones from the 11th-13th centuries were regularly found, and we did a short excavation to understand how widespread they are, what kind of environment there is in the surroundings. And when we realized that the graves continue and we are dealing with the cemetery, we stopped all kinds of construction works on the site, and started large-scale excavations.

– In other words, both the cemetery and the church were discovered.

– Yes, they are from different eras. Tombstones dating back to the 11th-13th centuries were discovered around the Catholic church, which is very legitimate, because it is the stage of the Kecharis monastery’s foundation and flourishing. The buried persons are related to the activities of the monastery. And already to the east, when we continued the excavation, the new church was accidentally opened, which was built earlier, in the 6th-7th centuries.

I should mention that it is completely new. A church was discovered, about which there was no information until now, neither in inscriptions, nor among historians, nor in previous researches.

– What is the reason that there has been no information until now?

– I can’t say. It is also strange for us, because in the 11th century, when they started building the Church of St. Grigor the Illuminator, there are extensive testimonies about the foundation of the church, construction stages, builders, rebuilders, but to our surprise, there is no word about the church that existed before that.

– There were inscriptions on the tombstones.

– Yes, a part is a protocol, from the 11th, 12th, 13th centuries. Some have names on them. We made an interesting discovery. was a record stone, which was later turned into a khachkar plinth… the content was something like this. left the leader of the monastery, Barsegh Anetsi, who later became a Catholicos. There is talk about the brotherly death of his brother, who was killed in the fight against the Seljuks and was buried in the territory of the Kecharis monastery. We have not found that grave yet.

– We opened about 106 tombstones. There is a large cemetery under the entire southern wall of the Catholic church. The area was completely covered with soil, and that too was unknown.

– Is it known who is buried there?

– Yes. They are mainly spiritual persons. priests, holy fathers who served in the Kecharis monastery in the 12th-13th centuries.

– Do all tombstones have inscriptions?

– To some. There are gravestones with well-crafted, ornate patterns, but without inscriptions. In general, they have many similarities with the tombstone art of medieval Armenia. there are minor peculiarities of some lines, patterns, plant decorations.

– A toaster was also found. Do the church and the bakery have anything to do with each other?

– When the church was bowed down, in the later period there were attached buildings on the western side, probably residential or utility rooms. We have partially opened and already, if we continue the excavation, new rooms will be opened, because the walls are already outlined. Presumably, they are living rooms of the abbots of the monastery, and the toaster was a necessary everyday item in the household.

– You were working with a lithologist. Are all the records decoded?

– All the records I mentioned have been deciphered. In general, the lithographs of the Kotayk region, particularly of the Kecharis monastery, have also been studied, and the newly discovered inscriptions are under study, and the details will be published soon. The newly discovered church, unlike the other structures of the monastery, is built of tuff. And the monastery is made of basalt. What is interesting? there is no tuff in that region.  Through preliminary studies, we found out that the tuff was brought from the mines of Agarak village of Ashtarak region. It is an interesting circumstance. the stone was specially taken and built.

It is a construction art characteristic of the early Middle Ages, 5-7 centuries.  It is made of large tuff slabs, is notched, strong, but with certain plan deviations, which we are also studying. Maybe it is a consequence of the earthquake, because there are deviations of the walls in both vertical and horizontal direction. In our opinion, in 1003, when the first church of Kecharis Monastery was started to be built, they saw the new church. it was partially destroyed, they cleaned the rubble, conserved the walls, but did not restore it, maybe due to some technical problems.

The church was no longer restored, instead, new churches were built next to it, which were supplemented with new structures in the 11th-13th centuries, and the Kecharis monastery complex was formed.

It is interesting that the monastery was built on the site of an older church.  There is such a point of view in Armenology that apparently, at least in the case of important monastic complexes, they are built on the site of old sanctuaries. The results of these excavations seem to confirm this view.

When I say old church, I mean earlier, 5-8 centuries. There are many such cases. The most significant is Tatev Monastery. There was an older structure, later they constantly either rebuilt or built a new one next to it, and monastic complexes were formed. The choice of place is actually not accidental.

– I think in the 1980s and 2000s, renovation works were done in that area, but they didn’t find anything.

– Since the 1930s, regular restoration works have taken place in the territory of the monastery. In the 1940s, 1950s, 1980s, too. The Kecharis monastery was completely restored in 1998, 2001, ahead of the 1700th anniversary of the adoption of Christianity. But, along with that, archeological excavations have never been carried out in the area. There is a reason for this, because none of our previous explorers have any words, descriptions, anything in the old photos about possible earlier structures.

There was no doubt that there were earlier layers in the area.  Usually, excavations are carried out before such works, but since they have been restored regularly and nothing has come to light, they did not even suspect it.  We carried out extensive excavations and, in fact, there were very important results.

– Did you find any things in the church?

– We found items from different periods. 5th-7th centuries related to the church itself, mainly construction pottery, tiles, and in the rooms opened next to it, everyday household, economic pottery of the developed Middle Ages, various vessels, dishes.

– Is it possible that one day the newly found church will be restored?

– I cannot say, that is also being discussed. When we continue the excavations this year and the ancient site is completely opened, we will discuss this issue with the architects. does its technical condition allow it or not, maybe the walls are weak…

Maybe we should just leave it like that, just fix the existing one, that is also very interesting.  It is a ready-made ancient site, where you can see a half-destroyed church. Geological, technical, architectural studies should be carried out, combined with archaeological data and we will understand what we will do in the end.

– What are your expectations from the excavation?

– We started the excavation last year in autumn, this year we will continue it more regularly and for a longer period of time. Then a project of improvement will be drawn up, we will move on to the construction phase, because the project that was there actually disappeared.  The alleyways of that section must be completely transformed. they will approach from another side, but at the same time we will ensure the visibility of the newly opened church. Then we will understand how we solve the conservation issue.

“A fundamental new step towards regulating Armenian-Turkish relations

May 102026

Turkish Vice President Cevdet Yilmaz arrived in Armenia on May 4 within the framework of the 8th European Political Community Summit. At Yerevan Zvartnots International Airport, the Vice President of Turkey was welcomed by the Vice President of the National Assembly, the special representative of Armenia in the Armenia-Turkey settlement process, Ruben Rubinyan.

During the visit to Armenia, the Vice President of Turkey and Nikol Pashinyan signed the protocol for the joint restoration of the Ani Bridge. Even before this visit, on May 28, a meeting of Armenian and Turkish delegates took place in Kars to discuss the works of restoring the Gyumri-Kars railway.

The Vice President of Turkey announced 3 days after his visit to Armenia that with the development of the “Middle Corridor” and the opening of the “Zangezur Corridor” there will be both greater security and greater prosperity.

“We want peace in the South Caucasus. Armenia and Azerbaijan have made significant progress in this matter. We say, “Peace is now very near.” With the establishment of this peace, the South Caucasus will play a different role at the regional and global level as a region of extremely high strategic importance. Especially with the development of the “Middle Corridor” and the opening of the “Zangezur Corridor”, there will be both greater security and greater prosperity. had announced Vice President of Turkey.

Read also

  • Gevorg Kalloshyan, the translator of the Armenian side in the Armenian-Turkish negotiations, was found dead in the car
  • The vice president of Turkey will visit Armenia
  • War and peace do not depend on one person. Aliyev throws our dignity into the mud. Armenia’s concessions must end. Hrayr Balyan 

Former director of the NAS Institute of Oriental Studies, academician, Turkologist Ruben Safrastyan summarizing the visit of the Turkish official to Armenia and the signed protocol, he noted that the visit is so important that a high-ranking Turkish official has come to Armenia, although many people in Turkey may not even know his name. However, this indicates that the “contact” between the two countries continues.

“Turkey’s vice president as a political figure does not represent anything, he is under Erdogan’s shadow. I don’t think that high-ranking officials from Turkey will come to Armenia in the near future, why, because if a high-ranking official comes, there should be a fundamentally important step towards regulating bilateral relations. However, I don’t see new fundamental steps aimed at regulating Armenian-Turkish relations, I think there won’t be any in the near future.

In my understanding, a decision was made in Turkey to regulate relations with Armenia. But taking into account the statements of the President of Turkey, by which he links the settlement of Armenian-Turkish relations with the signing of the “peace treaty” with Azerbaijan, I think that this is the main demand for the settlement.” 168.am–Ruben Safrastyan said in a conversation with

Continuing the thought, our interlocutor said, yes, there is a decision to normalize relations with Armenia in Turkey, which is due to the growing importance of the region, the South Caucasus, which is important for Turkey. There is also a second circumstance: Turkey always connects the settlement of relations with the settlement of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

“Until the peace agreement with Azerbaijan is signed, Turkey will not take any principled steps to regulate relations with Armenia. Instead, he will take small steps of a technical nature to show everyone that he has a positive attitude towards the process of normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations,” added Ruben Safrastyan.

Regarding the steps towards the works of the Gyumri-Kars railway and Armenia’s financial capabilities in terms of making investments to restore the railway, Ruben Safrastyan said that it is difficult to say how much money will be required for all this, but it is an opportunity for Armenia and one way to connect with the world.

“The problem here is that, yes, there are opportunities and there are also risks and these risks must be manageable. What I am saying is the result of these tens of years, because the problems related to the Armenian-Turkish border have been discussed many times. There have been various research and professional groups that have seriously investigated these issues from time to time, and I myself have been a part of them. My general approach, which was formed while working in those groups, is as follows: there are opportunities, and they will be positive for Armenia, but there are also risks that must be managed,” Ruben Safrastyan emphasized.

The blackmail of war does not work in the villages. our people do not forget about Artsakh

May 102026

Davit Ananyan, member of the management board of the Unity Wings party, representative of the pre-election list, general director of the “DS-EY Consulting Group” company, former head of the RA State Revenue Committee (SRC), candidate of economic sciences.in the “Pressing” program also spoke about the regional visits of their team and the problems affecting the villagers.

“The people are primarily interested in the security of the country. They also raise issues related to agriculture, irrigation water, arable land, procurement issues. People are skeptical, disappointed. The people feel cheated and abandoned.

We see this clearly. It is unfortunate that a part of our people sincerely believes in Pashinyan’s theses that the former are responsible for this situation. In the event that Pashinyan is the greatest ex. But when you calmly explain to a person what is after what, even our compatriots who follow CP change their thinking, they understand everything very well.

Read also

  • No luck to the next prime minister… the state budget is the pre-election budget of the KP. They will bring 300,000 to destroy Armenia. David Ananyan
  • The Armenian degeneration of Trumpism. struggle for the role of signer of the capitulation
  • Bruising in a ‘repaired’ memorial

Pashinyan’s blackmail with war does not work for the people of the villages, it works in the cities. Moreover, the higher the village is, the more sober is the thinking of its inhabitants,” said Davit Ananyan.

The latter noted that Pashinyan did not succeed in erasing Artsakh and patriotism among people.

“Our contacts show this. In general, our people do not accept the loss of Artsakh. And in many cases they demand us to say that we are going to bring back Artsakh. We explain that the priority today is the right of return of Artsakh residents, the protection of their other rights, and a dignified life. In such cases, we always tell our people that there is a time to throw the stones and collect the stones,” said Davit Ananyan.

Details in the video.