UNINFO.GOV
19 November 2004
Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations
Bill also includes provisions on Laos, dumping law repeal, tariff
suspensions
Washington — The Senate has passed a bill that would make normal trade
relations (NTR) — otherwise known as most-favored nation status —
permanent for Armenia
The bill would also extend NTR to Laos and repeal a 1916 law that was ruled
by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a violation of U.S. obligations.
President Bush is expected to sign the bill into law.
The 299-page bill, passed by the House of Representatives October 8,
comprises hundreds of tariff suspensions on imports of goods not produced
domestically and traded in small volumes.
A provision of the bill would grant permanent NTR for Armenia, which has had
temporary NTR, approved year-to-year by the president.
“I hope that we will be able to consider similar treatment for Azerbaijan in
the very near future,” said Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican chairman of
the Finance Committee.
During Senate debate on normal trade relations for Laos, Grassley spoke in
favor and argued that it would help alleviate poverty and bring the country
into the global marketplace. Laos is one of only four countries worldwide
and the only least-developed country to which the United States has not
granted NTR.
Senators from Wisconsin, home of about 33,000 Hmong refugees, argued against
NTR because of what they called credible reports of Laotian army atrocities
against the Hmong, a people inhabiting the mountainous regions of southern
China and adjacent areas of Vietnam, Laos and Thailand.
The Bush administration had pressed for passage of the NTR provisions and
for repeal of the 1916 antidumping law.
The WTO had ruled against the 1916 law, which was challenged by the European
Union (EU) and Japan. Under the law — never actually used from 1916 until
the 1990s — U.S. companies can sue foreign producers for triple damages for
dumping goods on the U.S. market with the intent of injuring U.S. industry.
To date no plaintiff has ever collected damages under the 1916 law although
a recent verdict against a Japanese newspaper press manufacturer remains
under appeal.
The bill would repeal the 1916 law, but would not overturn any case already
decided or pending under it. Whether Japan or the EU would accept such a
non-retroactive change is not known.
Miscellaneous tariff bills typically pass each session of Congress
routinely, but this one was held up over a succession of issues for three
years.
Some other provisions of the bill would:
— Extend the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) to allow duty-free
treatment for hand-woven and hand-knotted carpets, a provision designed
primarily to help Afghanistan and Pakistan;
— Correct a mistake in the Trade Act of 2002 that inadvertently raised
duties on certain Andean goods under the Andean Trade Preferences Act
(ATPA);
— Clarify the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), extending
retroactively to October 2000 duty-free treatment for collars and cuffs;
— Prohibit U.S. imports of archaeological, cultural and other rare items
from Iraq to prevent illegal shipment of looted antiquities;
— Amend U.S. regulatory law concerning cellar treatment for both domestic
and imported natural wine in line with a 2001 international agreement to
eliminate testing of wine for reasons other than health and safety.
Congressional sources have indicated they intended this provision to provide
leverage in negotiations with the European Union to accept U.S. wine-making
practices.
(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: )