National Public Radio (NPR)
SHOW: All Things Considered 9:00 AM EST NPR
May 23, 2005 Monday
Hugh Pope discusses his book, “Sons of the Conquerors”
ANCHORS: ROBERT SIEGEL
ROBERT SIEGEL, host:
This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I’m Robert Siegel.
Journalist Hugh Pope is Istanbul bureau chief for The Wall Street
Journal. That places him in the biggest, most cosmopolitan city of
modern Turkey. It also places him in the western end of a stretch of
countries and regions from Southern Europe to Western China where the
people are Turkic. Hugh Pope writes about some of those countries and
the people who are called `sons of the conquerors.’ That’s the title
of his book. It is about the Turks, a family of peoples who Hugh Pope
says can be described in different ways.
Mr. HUGH POPE (Author, “Sons of the Conquerors”): There’s many ways
to cut the cake. The Turkic world is basically a group of languages,
which is about 140 million people. The main countries, though, that
could be described as Turkic-majority states are six: There’s Turkey,
Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz
Republic.
SIEGEL: All but Turkey formerly Soviet republics.
Mr. POPE: Yes. And Turkey’s system of administration, of course, in
the old days was a single-party state, so their cultural and their
political background is not completely different from the other
Turkish states.
SIEGEL: Apart from distant roots in the steppes of Asia, what do all
of these countries have in common?
Mr. POPE: I think it’s an informal thing rather than any political or
ideological thing. It was the sum total of various things. Like, I
felt there was an opportunistic genius in the way people behaved. I
found the physical similarities, I found cultural similarities and,
of course, linguistic similarities. And it’s quite an amazing thing
for someone like myself, who had learned Turkish in Istanbul, and I
take a flight six hours east to Urumqi in China, get out of the plane
and, with very little preparation, can speak to people in the street.
SIEGEL: You’re speaking, in that case, to people who were members of
the Uighur minority.
Mr. POPE: That’s correct, yes, the Uighurs of Xinjiang, about eight
million people in that territory, which is one-sixth of China’s
landmass. And there’s still half of the population there, although,
of course, a drop in the ocean of Han Chinese in the whole of China.
SIEGEL: Nothing sums up the problematic self-image of the Turks than
the story of the word `Turk’ itself, which is–which didn’t mean the
same thing a hundred years ago that it means today. And there are all
kinds of connotations that we would consider, both negative and not
descriptive, of the people who live in Turkey.
Mr. POPE: It’s an extremely complicated word, many things bundled up
into it. But one thing that we tend to forget about the word `Turk’
is that a thousand years ago, it was already being used in Central
Asia to define the joint characteristics of the various different
Turkic groups and tribes. And it has its deep-rooted legitimacy in
the eyes–in Turkish. Now, of course, over the centuries, it became
diluted and especially in the Ottoman Empire, where the Ottoman court
developed a different culture and–initially based on Persian culture
and then later based on French culture in their government.
SIEGEL: And the Ottoman gentlemen would regard a Turk as some kind of
rube who lived out in the countryside.
Mr. POPE: Precisely. And that’s also the case in countries like Iran
today, where any Persian’s reaction to the idea of a Turk is Turkish
donkey. You see it on the Web sites, you see it in literature and
it’s because the Turks, as Turks, are uneducated. That culture has
never been developed. But now with six different independent states
all trying to create new Turkic identities–I call them Turkic; they
would call it Uzbek or Turkman, but it is Turkic. And even if you ask
someone like President Nazarbayev, `What are you?’ and his first
answer’s…
SIEGEL: He of Kazakhstan.
Mr. POPE: Yeah, the president of Kazakhstan. He says, `I am a Turk.’
And you look at him slightly oddly because Turk now means a citizen
of Turkey. He says, `No, not like that. We sent armies from here 500
years ago, a thousand years ago, to conquer Turkey. They married the
local population, and now they’re called Turkey. But the real Turks
are still here in Central Asia, and it’s us.’
SIEGEL: Well, the breakup of the Soviet Union has seemed to signal
the start of another round of, well, what was once known as the
`great game’: Whose influence would prevail in this stretch of
countries? Would it be Russian? Would it be Iranian? Would it be
Saudi? Would it be American? Would it be Turkish? How are the Turks
doing?
Mr. POPE: Politically, not a high profile at the moment. I think the
big change from a century ago–the great game you refer to when the
Russian Empire and the British Empire famously competed–is that the
local states now mean something. In the old days, no one really paid
much attention to the Kazakh Hans or the Uzbek tyrants that they met
there. But now these countries have their own identities. They’ve
managed to find a way of balancing themselves between the great
players of Russia, China. So I think that that has changed, that the
great game is a somewhat more complex game in which the Turkic
countries and Turkic peoples have more space.
But having said that, Turkey enters–it enters, by its own desire, a
step back from having a strong political big brother role. It wasn’t
wanted, and it caused problem. Turkey’s completely eclipsed Iran and
those countries because of simple matters of commerce. Turkish
businessmen are the single biggest community of businessmen in any of
these Turkic capitals.
SIEGEL: Turkey, until a couple of centuries ago, was a great imperial
power; had controlled the Balkans, a good deal of Southeastern Europe
and lots of other lands, the Middle East, and finally was reduced,
after the First World War, to its current state, the rump state of
Turkey. You observe at some point it is not unusual to talk with
Turks about the decline, the sense of, `What’s wrong here?’ This is a
preoccupation in Turkish discourse.
Mr. POPE: Yes. There’s a sense of inferiority and a sense of–that
the world has turned against them. In fact, the last two centuries
have seen rather less than conquests; it’s mainly seen Turks being
turfed out of the bases that they conquered, and that’s one of the
reasons that Turkey has been such a defensive kind of country and
perhaps even a militarist kind of country in a defensive way but
prickly and worried about losing more territory, being divided up. I
think America is suffering from this right now because the Turks are
convinced that America is trying to create an independent Kurdistan
in Iraq, and they see that as an extension of the European
19th-century efforts to divide the Ottoman Empire.
So, yes, they do remember that very clearly. And you see it, too, in
the Turkic world. Azerbaijan obviously lost territory in
Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia, and that memory is a very live one and
influences the way Turks view the world now.
SIEGEL: Mm-hmm. That the West, given a chance, will hive off lands
off of what Turks regards as theirs.
Mr. POPE: Indeed, yes. And historically ,that has been the trend.
SIEGEL: Well, Hugh Pope, thank you very much for talking with us
today.
Mr. POPE: Thank you.
SIEGEL: Hugh Pope is the author of “Sons of the Conquerors: The Rise
of the Turkic World.”
(Soundbite of music)
SIEGEL: This is NPR, National Public Radio.