Oil-for-food inquiry claims Sevan took $150,000 in payments

Financial Times, UK
Aug 9 2005

Oil-for-food inquiry claims Sevan took $150,000 in payments

By Mark Turner at the United Nations
Published: August 9 2005 03:00 | Last updated: August 9 2005 03:00

Benon Sevan, former head of the United Nations’ Iraqi oil-for-food
programme, took almost $150,000 in illicit oil-related cash payments
in concert with two Egyptian businessmen, the UN’s independent
inquiry alleged yesterday.

The findings came a day after Mr Sevan resigned, insisting it was not
credible he would have compromised his career for such a sum.

The inquiry committee – chaired by Paul Volcker, former chairman of
the US Federal Reserve – also said it would continue to investigate
evidence that raised further questions about how much Kofi Annan, UN
secretary-general, knew of efforts by Cotecna, which employed Mr
Annan’s son Kojo, to win a UN inspection contract.

“Our conclusions are obviously significant and troubling,” Mr Volcker
said yesterday. He said he would ask the secretary-general to strip
Mr Sevan of his immunity from prosecution.

Mr Sevan “had knowledge that some of the oil was purchased by paying
illegal surcharges to Iraq in violation of United Nations sanctions”,
the committee said.

It had traced the trail of proceeds from African Middle East
Petroleum’s (Amep) sale of about 7.3m barrels of Iraqi oil to a Swiss
bank account that was controlled by Fred Nadler, a friend of Mr
Sevan.

It says about $257,500 (208,000, £144,000) in cash withdrawals were
made from this account between late 1998 and late 2001, during
periods when Mr Sevan and/ or Mr Nadler were in Geneva and preparing
to return to New York. These withdrawals were soon followed by cash
deposits totalling $147,184 to the bank accounts of Mr Sevan and his
spouse in New York, the committee said.

“On the basis of available evidence, the report concludes that Mr
Sevan corruptly benefited from his request and receipt of Iraqi oil
allocations, and that Mr Nadler and [Fakhry] Abdelnour [Amep’s head]
financially benefited from and assisted in Mr Sevan’s corrupt
activity.”

The panel added that Mr Sevan and Mr Abdelnour had stopped
co-operating with the inquiry, while Mr Nadler had declined to
respond to any of the committee’s requests.

A previous report said both Mr Nadler and Mr Abdelnour were related
to former UN secretary-general Boutros Boutros-Ghali. But the latest
findings should not be “construed as an opinion that other members of
the Sevan or Nadler families acted in a way that was wrong or
improper”.

Mr Sevan, who is in Cyprus, has expressed disappointment at Mr
Annan’s “expedient abandonment of Mr Sevan in the face of a
politically motivated investigation”. He says he would not have
compromised his career for so little.

But the report notes that “from mid-1997 through November 1998 the
Sevans’ finances were frequently stretched thin from the monthly
burden of funding two residences, debt obligations, credit card
charges, and related living expenses”.

During the period of alleged corruption, their situation improved,
with regular deposits made to their accounts. But “once the oil
stopped flowing for Amep, the cash soon stopped flowing into the
Sevans’ accounts”.

The report also says Mr Sevan played an important part in helping
Iraq win $300m for oil spare parts. It added that he expressed
displeasure in late 2000 at suggestions by the UN spokesman that the
Iraqi regime was imposing a surcharge on oil sales , saying it
“threatened to chill efforts by the secretary-general to entice the
regime to co-operate”.

And, as allegations of kickbacks mounted, Mr Sevan’s office told a
Security Council committee there was “no hard proof to corroborate”
them.

“If criminal charges are to be brought against Mr Sevan, the
prosecuting authority will need to obtain a waiver of Mr Sevan’s
immunity,” the report said. “The committee recommends that the
secretary-general accede to any properly supported request from an
appropriate law enforcement authority for such a waiver.”

The Volcker committee also found evidence that Alexander Yakovlev, a
UN procurement officer, “actively solicited” a bribe in connection
with the programme, as well as accepting illegal payments from UN
contractors outside the programme.

Mr Yakovlev, the report alleged, “secretly participated in a scheme
to solicit a bribe from Société Générale de Surveillance (SGS), one
of the companies that submitted a bid for the oil inspection
contract.

“Mr Yakovlev furnished confidential bidding information to a friend
of his in France, Yves Pintore, who in turn approached SGS to see if
SGS would work with him and influential people in the UN in New
York.”

There was no evidence SGS paid a bribe. Mr Yakovlev also received
more than $950,000 in payments from various other UN contractors, the
report said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress