World Socialist Web Site, MI
Oct 8 2005
X-Sender: Asbed Bedrossian <asbed@usc.edu>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 — ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Turkey: trampling on free speech continues
Novelist Orhan Pamuk faces jail terms
By Kerem Kaya
8 October 2005
The prominent Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk will be tried on December
16 and faces up to four years imprisonment on charges of `public
denigration’ of Turkish identity for publicly speaking out about the
Armenian genocide. It is estimated that more than one million
Armenian were killed between 1915-1918 during World War I when the
Ottoman Empire – the precursor of the Republic of Turkey – was crumbling.
In an interview with the Swiss daily Tagesanzeiger published on
February 6, Pamuk was quoted as saying, `Thirty thousand Kurds and a
million Armenians were killed in Turkey. Almost no one dares speak
but me, and the nationalists hate me for that.’ This was the evidence
of his `crime.’
On February 18, after filing charges at the Kayseri state
prosecutor’s office, Kayseri Bar Association attorney Orhan Pekmezci
said, `Pamuk has made groundless claims against the Turkish identity,
the Turkish military and Turkey as a whole. I think he should be
punished for violating Article 159 and 312 of the Turkish Penal
Code.’
Despite having made the statements in February, Orhan Pamuk is
expected to be tried under the new Turkish Penal Code Article 301/1
passed only last June. According to this article, a person who
`insults … the Republic’ can be jailed for between six months to
three years. If `the insult’ was executed abroad, as Pamuk has done,
then Article 301/3 imposes a one-third increase in the length of
sentence.
The new Turkish Penal Code was passed by the parliament after a
two-month delay due to widespread opposition. It includes harsh jail
terms not only for journalists (as in the old code) but also for all
members of the media deemed to have insulted the state and/or any of
its institutions, such as parliament, the army, etc. It also
introduces a new clause that equates any member of these institutions
with the institution itself, should they be individually insulted. A
clear definition of insult is not included in the law – the only escape
clause being Article 301/4, which declares that any `critical
opinion’ does not constitute a crime.
The actions taken against Pamuk come amidst a wave of nationalistic
sentiment whipped up by the Turkish establishment (See `Turkey:
military’s nationalist campaign conceals rapprochement with US’). The
Turkish press was full of attacks on Pamuk in recent months, which
resulted in his receiving death threats.
The killing of Armenians between 1915-1918 is not disputed by the
Turkish state, but the number of the dead and the definition of
genocide are. Successive Turkish governments, Britain and the United
States, have never acknowledged genocide. In the recent discussions
of Turkey’s possible entry into the European Union, France and other
countries demanded that Turkey acknowledge the Armenian genocide as a
pre-condition for entry.
The victimization of Pamuk throws light on Turkey’s rejection of even
the limited demands of the EU to improve its record on democratic
rights. In fact the opposite is the case. It is the EU that has made
the concessions regarding democratic rights during the negotiations
and allowed the recent penal code to pass without opposition. Human
right abuses in Turkey are hardly news in the Western media unless
they are extremely dramatic, such as the beating of women at the
Women’s Day celebrations this year, or unless they represent a timely
bargaining chip in the EU negotiations for France or other countries
that view Turkey as too close to Washington.
In Britain, a close ally of Washington and therefore a backer of
Turkey’s bid for EU membership, the press has reacted nervously to
the charges against Pamuk. The Sunday Times wrote that `Pamuk’s case
has been an embarrassment for the Turkish government.’ The
Independent was concerned that Turkey is giving excuses to her
enemies.
The last thing on the minds of Europe’s ruling elites is Pamuk’s
right to free speech.
Pamuk is a household name in Turkey and he has gained prominence in
international literature over the last decade and a half, with his
novels translated into 20 languages. When he won the Independent
Award for Foreign Fiction in 1990 the New York Times confidently
noted, `A new star has risen in the east.’ He went on to win
international literature’s most lucrative prize, the IMPAC Dublin
Award, for his novel, Benim Adim Kirmizi (My Name Is Red), published
in 2000.
Pamuk has consistently opposed right-wing forces in Turkey. He once
wrote in an academy journal, `Turks gripped by romantic myths of
nationalism are keen to establish that we come from Mongolia or
central Asia…. scholars have come no closer to offering definitive
or convincing evidence to link us with a particular time and place.’
Against this right-wing theory of Turkish identity reaching back
thousands of years, Pamuk, in his novel Kar (Snow), chose the venue
of Kars – a formerly Armenian city – and made sympathetic references to
Armenian culture.
In 1999, he refused to accept the highest cultural accolade awarded
by the Turkish government – the title of state artist. He said, `For
years I have been criticizing the state for putting authors in jail,
for only trying to solve the Kurdish problem by force, and for its
narrow-minded nationalism, I don’t know why they tried to give me the
prize.’
Turkey has never been a safe country for artists. Virtually every
prominent writer who has something to say about the repression in the
country has been targeted for persecution by the state. Nazim Hikmet,
arguably the best poet the country has ever produced, was charged in
1925 as a secret (Communist) party member and sentenced to 15 years
hard labor. His works were banned between 1938 and 1965, until two
years after his death in exile in Moscow.
In 1939, Orhan Kemal, one of the most prominent Turkish writers of
the last century, was sentenced to a five-year jail term for his
political views. Having stayed in the same jail as Nazim Hikmet,
Kemal was intensely influenced by him.
On 1 July 1993, the humorist Aziz Nesin barely escaped with his life
from Madimak Hotel where he was staying with other artists attending
the traditional Pir Sultan Abdal festival in Sivas. The hotel was set
on fire by fundamentalist mobs, killing 36 artists and injuring 24. A
6,000-strong military brigade situated near the hotel did nothing for
eight hours, until the mobs achieved their mission. A group of
artists was finally rescued by the fire brigade, but when they
realized that Aziz Nesin was amongst them the firemen and the police
joined the mob attack – inflicting injuries to his head and body.
Eventually the military moved in to stop the lynching. Nesin’s crime
was to speak out publicly and consistently on behalf of secularism.
He too was jailed several times as a result of his socialist views.
More recently, a local administrator in the city of Isparta, Mustafa
Altinpinar, sent a circular to all libraries in the region demanding
that Pamuk’s books be seized and burned. The government was
negotiating at the time with the EU over membership. It was spared
further embarrassment because none of the libraries in the region
actually stocked Pamuk’s books.
Apart from these high-profile cases, literally thousands of
journalists and writers have been prosecuted and jailed over the
years. Only recently, a few days after the new laws were passed,
journalist-writer Emin Karaca was charged with `condemning the
execution of the three leaders of revolutionary youth’ – referring to
the executions of Deniz Gezmis, Yusuf Aslan and Hüseyin Inan, 30
years ago. PEN American Center, an organization that defends free
expression, reported that, according to their records, there are
today over 50 journalists, writers and publishers before the courts
in Turkey.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress