Status Of U.S. Ambassador To Armenia Questioned

STATUS OF U.S. AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA QUESTIONED
By Lisa Friedman, Washington Bureau

Los Angeles Daily News
Pasadena Star-News, CA
March 21 2006

WASHINGTON – Members of California’s congressional delegation are
questioning reports that the U.S. ambassador to Armenia is being
recalled because he referred to the 1915 massacre of Armenians in
Ottoman Turkey as a genocide.

In separate letters sent to Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice,
Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena and Grace Napolitano, D-Santa Fe Springs,
demanded answers about Ambassador John Marshall Evans’ status. Both
strongly opposed recalling him.

Schiff said he reiterated that message last week in a closed-door
meeting with State Department officials.

“I expressed my opposition to any disciplinary action being taken
against the ambassador for speaking the truth,” Schiff said. “I made
it very clear I thought any action taken against him would merely
compound the erroneous policy of the administration.’

A State Department spokesman insisted that Evans has not submitted
his resignation nor told to return. That, however, hasn’t quelled
persistent rumors in California’s sizable Armenian-American community.

“It’s a big issue here. It’s very concerning and very upsetting,”
said Zaku Armenian, a member of the Armenian National Committee’s
board in Glendale.

“The word that we have is pretty clear that this is in the works,”
Armenian said about Evans’ recall. “It’s clear that the State
Department is bowing to pressure from Turkey.”

Evans attracted wide attention in Armenian-American communities
last year when he unequivocally called the massacre of Armenians in
post-World War I Ottoman Turkey a genocide.

“I think it is unbecoming of us as Americans to play word games
here,” Evans said in February 2005 during a stop at the University of
California at Berkeley. “I will today call it the Armenian genocide.”

In doing so, Evans became the first U.S. administration official to
use the loaded word in an Armenian context. The Bush administration,
like its predecessors, refers to the killings as a massacre and a
tragedy, but never genocide.

“It felt like a breakthrough moment,”

Armenian said. “It felt like we were getting somewhere.”

Armenians contend the Ottoman Empire began a centrally planned
slaughter in 1915 under cover of World War I in which about 1.5
million Armenians were killed. Turkey, a key U.S. and NATO ally,
strongly opposes the genocide label.

Tuluy Tanc, minister counsel at the Turkish embassy in Washington,
D.C., called the killing and deportation of Armenians “terrible
events.” But, he said, it was precipitated by Armenians taking up
arms in eastern Anatolia and siding with invading Russian troops.

“For genocide to occur, there has to be a plan to annihilate a people
based on their ethnicity. That was not the case at all,” he said.

Tanc called Evans’ comments “personal views” and not a reflection
of U.S. policy. He said he did not have any knowledge about Evans
being recalled.

But Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National
Committee of America, said the State Department already is quietly
vetting a new ambassador to replace Evans in late spring or early
summer.

“I think it’s pretty clear he’s being ushered out the door,” Schiff
said.

Evans, for his part, has sidestepped questions about his tenure in
Armenia. In response to a query during a press conference last week,
he replied, “I serve at the pleasure of the president. Period.”