Sunday, April 16, 2006
****************************************
ANOTHER HOJA STORY
**********************************
The following Nasredin Hoja story is my own version based on what I heard many years ago as a child. Like all truly wise men, the Hoja didnât write a single line for publication. As a result there are as many versions of his stories as there are tellers. Most so-called Hoja stories, moreover, are not even his stories but counterfeits. In his anthology, THE SUBTLETIES OF THE INIMITABLE MULLA NASRUDING (London, 1973) Idries Shah, the foremost authority in the English language, includes even stories about the Hoja in an airplane, and another on a psychoanalystâs couch, and still another about Hoja in London. I wouldnât be in the least surprised, therefore, if an expert writes to say that the story that fellows does not belong to the canon. The only reason I am recounting it here is that âSe non vero, ben trovatoâ (freely translated: if untrue, itâs as good as true, because itâs goodâ).
*
When on his way home late one night Nasredin Hoja sees a man bent over looking for something, the following exchange takes place: âWhat did you lose?â âMy gold ring.â âWhere did you lose it?â âIn the barn over there.â âIf you lost it in the barn, why are you looking for it in the street?â âBecause there is more light here.â
*
This story has several morals, among them:
(i)Most people pretend to solve a problem because pretending is easier even if completely useless. (ii) Before men hit on the right solution, they will try all the wrong ones first.â (iii) Common sense is the least common of all faculties. (iv) Before you act, consider your motives and the consequences of your actions. (v) Action without contemplation is meaningless.
#
Monday, April 17, 2006
*************************************
JESUS AND HITLER
**************************
According to scholars who have studied the underlined passages and marginalia of Hitlerâs private library, one of the subjects that interested him the most was, âWhere did Jesus derive the power that has held his followers for all eternity?â For more on this subject see, EVERY BOOK ITS READER: THE POWER OF THE PRINTED WORD TO STIR THE WORLD by Nicholas A. Basbanes (New York, 2005).
*
POETRY
*****************
I donât read much poetry, especially that of our vodanavorjis, whose number probably exceeds that of our self-appointed pundits, but I love these lines by Salvatore Quasimodo: âYour eyes have seen my depths / Unto the darkness of my bowels.â
*
THE LIFE AND DEATH OF A FORUM
********************************************
Some years ago I was a member of an Armenian discussion forum whose moderator did not allow four-letter words, abusive language, and aliases. Any member that did not abide by his rules was immediately and unceremoniously removed. As a result, after dwindling from over a hundred members to only one, the forum was terminated. Moral: Armenians are better at sharing insults than ideas.
*
TOLERANCE, ARMENIAN STYLE
*****************************************
A fascist thinks he is being tolerant when he allows the free exchange of fascist ideas. Tolerance of anti-fascist ideas he equates with treason.
*
JESUS AND TURKS
********************************
In his memoirs, Zaroukian quotes the following two lines from an unidentified Armenian poet: âThe Turk did not yet exist / When Jesus said, Forgive your enemy.â
#
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
************************************
ACADEMIC MAFIAS
******************************
After publishing a genocide-related book, a friend of mine complained that no one had bothered to review it. âI know something I didnât know before,â he went on. âWe have a genocide mafia that treats non-members as interlopers.â
*
EGO TRIP
*********************
In his memoirs, Zaroukian writes that Nikol Aghbalian not only contributed scholarly essays to an Armenian academic periodical but also paid his annual subscription fee. When asked why he did that, he is said to have replied: âThis is one of those publications whose sole subscribers are its contributors. If we donât pay, it will cease to exist.â There you have a typical failing of our academics: instead of educating the masses, they try to impress one another with their erudition.
*
I REMEMBER
*************************
When I write about mafias, fascists, and dupes, I write about myself. I imagine nothing. I guess even less. I only remember.
*
Z/Z
***************
Zarianâs fans outnumbered his detractors; but whereas his fans were silent, his detractors were not, probably because he was an outsider, an interloper â an Armenian from Karabagh among Armenians from Istanbul and Yerevan. He could never qualify as a member of the club. Anywhere else he would have been a best seller. Among Armenians, his status continues to be marginal. For every positive statement that Zaroukian makes in his memoirs of Zarian, there are more than a dozen negative ones. Had I known Zarian only through Zaroukianâs, or for that matter, Oshaganâs writings, I wouldnât even have bothered to read him.
#
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
************************************
MORE ON ZAROUKIAN
*****************************
One of the most astonishing aspects of Antranik Zaroukianâs memoirs is the degree of seriousness he and his contemporaries took themselves. Their internecine tempest-in-a-teacup disagreements and quarrels are treated as if they were historic events with serious repercussions. Case in point: When the three political parties agree to sign a document, the argument that erupts is about whose signature will appear on top. The wisest words in the book are spoken by a gifted poet who, when asked why he has quit writing, replies: âTo write what? To what end?â
*
I REMEMBER
**********************
Once upon a time when I was young, naĂŻve, and ignorant, I too treated our elder statesmen with some respect and believed what they said. But when in time I decided to rely more on my own observations and experiences, the Tashnaks assumed I was a Ramgavar, the Ramgavars assumed I was a Tashnak, our bishops assumed I was an atheist, and our capitalists, or rather their flunkeys, assumed I was a communist. It never even occurred to these gentlemen that one could be anti-partisan, anti-clerical, and anti-capitalist and be a decent human being able to have oneâs own thoughts and to be independently poor by surviving on bread and books.
#