IT’S NONSENSE WHEN A CONFLICT SIDE DOESN’T TURN INTO A NEGOTIATION SIDE
Panorama.am
14:25 19/04/06
Co-chair of the Committee of EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Armen
Roustamyan thinks the process of Karabakh conflict is not favorable
and constructive for us. One of the results is that Nagorno Karabakh
doesn’t participate in the negotiations.
“Karabakh conflict is recognized as an ethno-political one,”
A. Roustamyan mentioned at the session of the Committee of EU-Armenia
Parliamentary Cooperation in the NA today. He also stated that the
conflict is not going to be solved unless the main reason is not
removed. Thus, as he said, the question of Karabakh status shouldn’t
be omitted, otherwise the expectations of the regulation will be
exaggerated.
“First, the situation when a conflict side doesn’t become a
negotiation side is rather illogical if not absurd.” The co-chair
calls to make the negotiation process full and not yield to Azeri
rough and non-constructive negotiation position as a result of which
NK is being forced out of negotiation process.
Moreover, Armen Roustamyan also stated that it was NK who concluded
a truce in Bishkek. “The situation that we call a situation of
neither war nor peace or simply an incomplete ceasefire has in its
basis two agreements, and there is the signature of NK under those
two agreements,” the chairman of NA Permanent Committee of Foreign
Relations.
“The hostile announcements of Azerbaijan are going on as the
international community gives Azerbaijan the opportunity to continue
the process by the script they like.”
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
