Book Review: A dream within a dream; Istanbul’s reality, fantasy: Fi

National Post (Canada)
August 19, 2006 Saturday
Toronto Edition

A dream within a dream; Istanbul’s reality, fantasy: Fiction

by Michael Greenstein, Weekend Post

THE BLACK BOOK
By Orhan Pamuk
Translated from the Turkish by Maureen Freely
Vintage
480 pp., $21

– – –

Istanbul ranks high among the most interesting cities in the world,
its fascination attributable to its geographic location: a meeting
point between East and West, Asia and Europe, an imperial crossover
as Byzantium and Constantinople and a Mediterranean threshold among
the Bosphorus, Marmora and Black seas. Heaping detail upon detail in
the same way Dickens chronicled London or Joyce Dublin, Orhan Pamuk
puts Istanbul on the map. A Balzac (and Borges) of the Bosphorus,
with several novels to his name, Pamuk has become a cause celebre in
Turkey and abroad because of his outspokenness on the Armenian
genocide.

First published in 1990 and translated into English in 1995, The
Black Book now appears in a new translation by Maureen Freely, who in
her afterword discusses the complexities of the Turkish language,
with its "cascading clauses." Her meticulous translation captures the
Byzantine musicality of Pamuk’s prose in his multi-layered novel, a
metaphysical detective story that is a quest for meaning and identity
on personal, literary and political levels.

Like the city he writes about, Pamuk straddles modernity and
tradition, interweaving his chapters with allusions to and from many
sources. The epilogue is taken from The Encyclopedia of Islam (though
it could as easily be Pamuk’s postmodernist sleight of hand): "Ibn’
Arabi writes of a friend and dervish saint, who, after his soul was
elevated to the heavens, arrived on Mount Kaf, the magic mountain
that encircles the world; gazing around him, he saw that the mountain
itself was encircled by a serpent. Now, it is a well-known fact that
no such mountain encircles the world, nor is there a serpent."

The Black Book repeatedly calls into question what is real and what
is imagined, so that characters and readers often enter into a
dervish-like trance in the tug-of-war between centrifugal and
centripetal forces, cascading through lengthy narrative passages. If
the circular magic mountain undercuts itself, so, too, does the
epigraph to the opening chapter: "Never use epigraphs — they kill
the mystery in the work!" The author never ceases to pull the Turkish
rug from under his readers’ feet.

>>From the outset, the three major, incestuous characters are
introduced: Galip (a lawyer) watches his wife (and cousin), Ruya,
while thinking about another relative, Celal, a famous journalist
whose columns appear in every second chapter, in counterpoint to the
main narrative. The opening sentence seems innocent enough, but on
second reading the deceptions begin to appear: "Ruya was lying
facedown on the bed, lost to the sweet warm darkness beneath the
billowing folds of the blue-checked quilt." Only if we know that her
name means "dream" do we become aware that The Black Book is a dream
within a dream in which Istanbul is both realized and fantasized.

In contrast to Ruya’s warm, dreamlike world, the cold January morning
in 1980 invades the interior. "The first sounds of a winter morning
seeped in from outside: the rumble of a passing car, the clatter of
an old bus, the rattle of the copper kettles that the salep maker
shared with the pastry cook, the whistle of the parking attendant at
the dolmus stop." The narrator captures the sights and sounds of
Istanbul that play in Ruya’s mind, even as Galip remembers Celal’s
words that "memory is a garden." These early phrases are merely a
prelude to the lengthy lists the narrator accumulates from the
external world as well as from psychological realms.

The plot is fairly straightforward: Ruya and Celal disappear, Galip
searches for them for several days before they end up being murdered.
Skeletal as this detective summary appears, the novel dwells on so
many other matters that the reader loses sight of the plot. At what
point does one enter Istanbul’s labyrinth and when does one emerge
from its intricacies?

Paradox and contradiction abound in this hall of mirrors. Celal’s
first column begins with an epigraph: "Nothing can ever be as
shocking as life. Except writing." Which leads to: "Did you know that
the Bosphorus is drying up? I don’t think so." Celal’s apocalyptic
vision haunts the pages of The Black Book where life and art imitate
each other to an extreme degree. Celal’s next column, "Alaadin’s
Shop," begins with an epigraph from Byron Pasha: "If I have any fault
it is digression." If Pamuk’s prose seems digressive, rest assured
that everything he writes is to the point (as long as the reader
patiently awaits the point).

His "passion for the epic" takes the form of an urban odyssey, a
Joycean Ulysses, a picaresque tour of Istanbul. If Ruya is an avid
reader of detective fiction, Galip sleuths her and that fiction.
Pamuk is obsessed with the influence of Western cinema, which tends
to undermine traditional Turkish life. Turkish identity dominates The
Black Book. "Yes, it was because of those damn films — brought in
from the West canister by canister to play in our theatres for hours
on end — that the gestures our people used in the street began to
lose their innocence. They were discarding their old ways, faster
than the eye could see; they’d embraced a whole new set of gestures
— each and every thing they did was an imitation."

So what The Black Book boils down to is a quest for authenticity, for
the true self, but that goal remains elusive. Galip and Celal become
almost interchangeable, and all the stories about stories — the
search to end all searches, word games, surface versions and hidden
versions, dreams belonging to others — all of these, and others too
numerous to mention, add up to Istanbul’s labyrinth.

Dostoevskian doubles pervade the narrative, multiplying identities.
At once omniscient and ignorant, the narrator calls knowledge into
question. "We also knew that the Khazars were really Turks who had
converted to Judaism. But what we did not know was that the Turks
were as Jewish as Jews were Turkish. And wasn’t it amazing to watch
these two peoples travel through the 20th century swaying to the
rhythm of the same secret music, never meeting, always at a tangent,
but forever linked, however condemned, like a pair of helpless
twins." This tangential linkage lies at the core of this novel and
the country that oscillates between Ataturk and Muhammad. To
complicate matters further, The Black Book explores alphabetical
letters in the shapes of faces, a system derived from the
15th-century Sufi sect of Hurufism.

After the murders, Pamuk offers an anti-climactic twist: "Reader,
dear reader, throughout the writing of this book I have tried … to
keep its narrator separate from its hero, its columns separate from
the pages that advance its story … but please allow me to intervene
just once before I send these pages off to the typesetter." His human
intervention explains the black dream and black pages that form his
black book. Readers accustomed to black print on white pages should
adjust their focus to imagine floating letters without a white
background: low profile and high visibility. In 2003, Pamuk’s novel
My Name Is Red won the IMPAC Dublin Literary Award. Can the Nobel
Prize be far behind?

GRAPHIC:
Colour Photo: BOOK COVER: The Black Book by Orhan Pamuk; Black &
White
Photo: Staton R. Winter, AFP, File; Pamuk straddles modernity and
tradition in The Black Book, which has received a new translation.