US military chiefs eye confrontation with Iran
By Philip Sherwell in Washington,
Sunday Telegraph/UK
04/02/2007
America’s military chiefs are at loggerheads with the country’s
diplomats and spies over tactics for confronting Iranian agents in Iraq
over their role in lethal attacks on US forces.
American drones are flying over Iran in search of intelligence about
its nuclear facilities
The rift has spilled over into a dispute about how and when to publish
alleged evidence of Iranian backing for Iraqi militias and Iran’s
provision of supplies and technology for roadside bombs, the biggest
killer of American soldiers in Iraq, a White House adviser revealed.
It is fuelling fears among some US diplomats – shared by Britain and
its European allies – that hawks within President George W Bush’s
administration are preparing the ground for military action against
Teheran before he leaves office in 23 months.
Angered by the mounting toll of troops killed by ever-more
sophisticated devices, US commanders insisted last month that the White
House give them authority to target and kill Iranian operatives in Iraq
as part of the new 21,500-troop "surge" strategy ordered by Mr Bush.
But the State Department, headed by Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, and the CIA had argued against openly targeting Iranian agents,
most of whom claim to be diplomats based at Teheran’s network of
consulates, liaison offices and cultural offices in Iraq.
They contended that this approach could escalate into direct armed
conflict with Iran, which is under intense international pressure to
give up its nuclear programme.
The State Department and the CIA, which both objected to the way the
Bush administration used pre-war intelligence on Iraq, also wanted to
publicise clear evidence of Iranian interference in Iraq as a way of
justifying the US stance.
"The military’s highest echelons really do not want the release of
details of what Iran is up to as they don’t want the Iranians to know
what’s working and what’s not," the administration adviser said.
"The military and the State Department and CIA are coming at this from
very different approaches. State and the CIA believe we should respect
the supposed diplomatic immunity of these Iranians. But the military
has had enough and they say ‘to hell with their fake diplomatic
immunity’."
The splits within the administration come as reports emerge of new
variants of "explosively formed projectiles" allegedly made with
Iranian help.
The Pentagon said the first soldier was killed by one of the devices on
Jan 22, but it is refusing to give further details of their use because
it wants to limit the information available to its enemies.
The US has also suggested that Iranian operatives may have been
involved in the abduction and killing of five soldiers in Kerbala, a
potentially explosive accusation. But Stephen Hadley, Mr Bush’s
national security adviser, acknowledged on Friday that the intelligence
briefing on Iranian interference in Iraq – publication of which has
been delayed twice – was still being refined.
The build-up of anti-Iran rhetoric and despatch of two US aircraft
carriers to the region has echoes for some of the run-up to the
invasion of Iraq, prompting suspicions about the intentions of the
remaining hawks within the administration, led by the vice-president,
Dick Cheney.
The defence secretary, Robert Gates, sought to play down these concerns
on Friday, saying that the US was not planning for a war with Iran but
was determined to stop Iranians supplying bombs for attacks on American
troops in Iraq.
Dan Goure, a Pentagon consultant, said that targeting Iranian
operatives in Iraq was crucial to Mr Bush’s "surge" strategy. "You
cannot try to deal with the militia if you’re not dealing with the
Iranians backing them," he said. "The message now is that the gloves
are off. This is Bush’s last chance in Iraq and he isn’t going to hold
back."
The US has also increased flights of unmanned spy planes over the
border corridor between Iraq and Iran, to track movements across the
frontier to back up its claims about Teheran’s behaviour.
The drones were being flown into Iran from bases in Iraq to maintain a
24-hour check on a corridor running along "much" of the Iranian side of
the border, an American intelligence officer told this newspaper.
The US is intent on not launching any attacks that could inadvertently
hit Iranian soil. But once suspects were a few miles from the border
inside Iraq, they would be "whacked", the officer said.
John Pike, director of the military think-tank GlobalSecurity.org, said
there were 600 or 700 drones operating in Iraq and "the air is thick
with them".
The Iranian military had upgraded gun and missile posts a few miles
into its territory and was trying to bring down the drones, the
intelligence officer said. The US is also believed to be flying drones
above Iranian territory in search of intelligence about its nuclear
facilities. The drones can use radar, video, still photography and air
filters designed to pick up traces of nuclear activity to gather
information that is not accessible by satellites.
Teheran claims it developed its secret atomic programme for civilian
energy purposes, but Western governments believe it is pursuing a
nuclear bomb.
¢Mr Bush has asked Congress for an additional $245 billion (£125
billion) for Iraq and Afghanistan for the next two fiscal years. If
approved, the overall cost of the "war on terror" since the Sept 11
2001 attacks will rise to nearly $750 billion (£381 billion) – more in
real terms than was spent on the Vietnam war.