GEORGIA: HERITAGE BILL EVICTION FEARS

A1+
[01:22 pm] 21 April, 2007

A draft law could end up forcing residents of Tbilisi’s historic
centre out of their homes.

The Georgian parliament is set to pass a bill aiming to preserve
historic parts of the city, but critics say it could lead to the
eviction of people living in these areas.

The bill obliges people living and working in so-called cultural
heritage zones, to pay a monthly fee of around three laris (1.50 US
dollars) for every square metre of their property.

The initiators of the proposed legislation say its necessary to help
the reconstruction of the Georgian capital’s cultural and historic
zones. However, people living there together with the parliamentary
opposition believe that the authorities are trying to use the new
legislation to clear the city’s old centre of its population.

The bill has already passed its second reading in the Georgian
parliament, with deputies failing to agree only on the size of the
monthly fee. The opposition and the public demand that the latter
be revoked.

The initial version of the bill had the fee ranging between 10 tetris
(five cents) and three laris (1.50 dollars) per square metre. In
Georgia, where the average salary is just 200 laris, the average
pension 38 laris, and unemployment is high, not many can afford to pay.

The Gegechkori family has lived at No. 12 Chonkadze Street since
1924. Their house is one of the oldest buildings in Tbilisi. Tika, 28,
is the only surviving member of the family. Her mother died recently,
having been predeceased by her father several years earlier, leaving
her the sole occupant of the house.

Tika is an art critic. Her monthly income does not exceed 200
laris. The floor area of her house is 100 square metres. If parliament
approves the bill, Tika will have to look elsewhere to live.

"I can hardly cope with my utility bills, how am to pay this fee?" she
said, as she paced her room nervously. "I cannot sell the house of my
ancestors, this is the only thing I have left. For years, my parents
obediently paid all taxes, including property ones, which were to be
used to repair the house."

She said her family had repeatedly filed complaints, both during
Soviet times and after Georgia became independent, asking to have
their house repaired, but in vain.

"Since the house is regarded as part of the cultural heritage, the
ministry of culture wouldn’t allow us to repair it on our own," said
Tika. "Now I think that the state wants to reduce the house to such
a state of disrepair, that they could get hold of it for peanuts."

The author of the new bill is the Georgian ministry of culture. An
initial law was adopted in 1999, but since then it has become clear
that it left many questions unanswered.

The ministry says the old law prohibits selling state-owned cultural
monuments, which has stymied efforts to draw private investments
into the historic centre of the city and carry out large-scale
reconstruction works there.

"As a result, the state has born the burden of upkeep on its own, which
has had a negative impact on monuments and heritage as a whole. Because
of these flaws, it’s become necessary to adopt new legislative acts,"
the ministry said in an explanatory note.

The size of the fee will be determined after research is carried out
on which places need repairing.

"The bill is not seeking to introduce a universal tax," said Minister
of Culture Goka Gabashvili. "The rehabilitation tax will be levied
only on streets with a high number of buildings that have cultural
heritage status."

The minister said the total area to be rebuilt would be extremely
limited, as the government could not afford to repair all buildings
that are heritage sites.

"Payment of the tax and rehabilitation of cultural heritage buildings
is a privilege, not a punishment," said the minister.

Opposition politicians say the government is trying to drive people
out of the city’s historic centre.

Leader of the Conservative Party Kakha Kukava told IWPR, "The sum
collected from the fees will be paltry.

The government itself has admitted that the fee has no fiscal
significance. It’s clear that the real aim is to evict people from
the historic area. People won’t be able to pay the fee and will have
to sell their houses."

The leader of another opposition party New Rights David Gamkrelidze
said, "It should be noted that when they talk about the payment
depending on floor area, they mean not only dwelling premises, but
an entire building, including flights of steps, the roof and even the
basement. I think that if the fee is imposed, the residents will face
a big problem."

David Narmania, who heads the Young Economists Association, said
adoption of the fee was unacceptable from the economic point of view.

"When money is paid regularly, it’s not a fee, but a tax," he
said. "According to the bill, the population is expected to pay a
specific sum for a certain period of time – months, or even years."

Narmania said the initiative violated the constitutional rights of
Georgian citizens, as "people, who could not afford paying the fee,
would have to move, which was an infringement on their right to choose
their place of residence".

By Tamar Dvali in Tbilisi

Tamar Dvali is a correspondent with 24 hours newspaper in
Tbilisi. Institute for War and Peace Reporting’s Caucasus Reporting
Service

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress