Turkey: Justice For Hrant Dink

TURKEY: JUSTICE FOR HRANT DINK

ewsID=17403
Posted: 02 July 2007

Amnesty International today (2 July) called for all the evidence and
circumstances to be considered as the trial of 18 people accused of
involvement in the killing of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink
begins in Istanbul. Hrant Dink was shot on 19 January 2007. The case
will be heard in closed session at Besiktas Heavy Penal Court No.14,
because one of the defendants is under 18 years of age.

Andrew Gardner, Amnesty International’s researcher on Turkey, said:

"The Turkish authorities must ensure that, in examining the case,
no stone is left unturned. All those involved in the killing of Hrant
Dink – those actively involved in planning and carrying out the fatal
attack and those who failed to prevent it – must be brought to justice.

"Hrant Dink’s killing took place in the context of an increasing
pattern of deadly intolerance of freedom of expression."

Amnesty International considers that Hrant Dink was targeted because
of his work as a journalist who championed freedom of expression and
promoted the universality of human rights. He had been repeatedly
prosecuted under Article 301 of the Penal Code that criminalises
‘denigrating Turkishness’.

The suspected gunman is alleged to have stated that he killed
Hrant Dink after seeing him on television making statements which
"denigrated Turkishness".

Hrant Dink had been receiving death threats for several months prior
to his death. He had reported these to the Sisli public prosecutor
in Istanbul.

Reportedly one of those on trial in connection with his death had
also acted as a police informer and had repeatedly told police of
the plan to assassinate Hrant Dink in the months leading up to his
death. Nevertheless, the authorities failed to take the necessary
steps to ensure protection for him.

Before the investigation into Hrant Dink’s death started, the Istanbul
Police Chief made a statement to the effect that Hrant Dink’s murder
was not politically motivated or organised but rather the act of a lone
gunman on the basis of nationalist sentiments. Amnesty International is
concerned that such a statement, coming so quickly after the incident,
not only could have jeopardised the impartiality of the subsequent
investigation but also illustrated an official reluctance to examine
the full scope of the case.

Amnesty International is also concerned about footage that appeared
in the media of law enforcement officers posing with the suspected
gunman in front of a Turkish flag as if he was a ‘hero’. Such footage
contributes to the perception that some sections of law enforcement
agencies may be biased.

While a number of officials have already been removed from office on
grounds of negligence or failure of duty, Amnesty International is
not aware of any proceedings taken against them to date.

Amnesty International is sending a representative to Istanbul for
the first day of the hearing in the criminal case. Interviews with
him can be arranged through the Amnesty International UK press office.
From: Baghdasarian

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?N