Precedent Of Kosovo And Karabakh Conflict

PRECEDENT OF KOSOVO AND KARABAKH CONFLICT
By A. Manvelian

AZG Armenian Daily
11/12/2007

Yesterday, December 10 was the deadline of the negotiations about the
situation in Kosovo. The special group, which includes representatives
of the USA, Russia and the EU proved unsuccessful in bringing the
sides of the conflict to mutual consensus. The stances of both
Beograd and Pristina on the matter are diametrically different,
and the international mediators are pessimistic about coming to a
multilateral peace agreement in the observable future.

The international interest to the Kosovo issue is caused not only
by Kosovo’s chances to achieve independence, but also the issue’s
opportunity of becoming a precedent in international legal practice.

The present situation is a paradox: the United States, which stand for
Kosovo’s independence, are against considering the issue a precedent of
international law, and Russia, which is against Kosovo’s independence,
presses that the issue must be considered a precedent.

President of Kosovo Fatmir Seydiou stated that it is impossible to
make two million people to change their minds and make them obey a
government, with which they have been ever in conflict. It is hard
to disagree with this opinion, as one nation cannot live under the
rule of another nation. The history shows that subjection of one
nation by another always ended up in armed conflicts. Nevertheless,
the European politicians are aware that the precedent of Kosovo
may cause a chain reaction and shake the foundations of a number
of European states. Basques and Catalonians in Spain, Corsicans in
France, Irishmen and Scotsmen in Britain – all of them may start
fighting for independence under certain circumstances.

The international mediation group had given four months the
governments of Beograd and Pristina to come to agreement. Today it
became clear that the negotiations were no success. Now the USA and
the EU have to decide whether they are to give four more months
to Beograd and Pristina or implement the resolution suggested by
Marti Ahtisaari. According to this plan, Kosovo is to be recognized
as and independent state de-facto, and remain a part of Serbia
de-jure. Kosovo is to be authorized to realize its won inner and
foreign policy, irrespective of the policy of Beograd. Such kind of
solution, implying the recognition of Kosovo’s independence without
discussing the matter at UN Security Council, may become a precedent
for Russia to recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia
and for Turkey to recognize the independence of North Cyprus, etc.

Such kind of development of events is the notion preventing the West
from making a final decision on Kosovo. In case Ahtisaari’s plan is
adopted, there will be no way of blaming Russia, or any other states,
for accepting the independence of certain unrecognized states and
establishing diplomatic relations with them. Armenia is interested in
this way of settling the Kosovo issue, as in this case the precedent
of Kosovo shall become applicable to Karabakh conflict.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Emil Lazarian

“I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose wars have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, literature is unread, music is unheard, and prayers are no more answered. Go ahead, destroy Armenia . See if you can do it. Send them into the desert without bread or water. Burn their homes and churches. Then see if they will not laugh, sing and pray again. For when two of them meet anywhere in the world, see if they will not create a New Armenia.” - WS