Veneer of normality
As George Bush visits Rwanda,
Chris McGreal reflects on a country still locked in a struggle to come to
terms with its past beneath the gloss of economic success
Chris McGreal
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday February 19 2008

Kigali is booming. Shopping centres, glistening new glass office towers and
luxury hotels are – quite literally in some cases – paving over the
country’s immediate past of mass murder.

Among the grandest of the new buildings is the sprawling Serena hotel, a
testament to the birth of a new Rwanda. As are its clientele. The hotel is a
favourite of foreign businessmen riding an aid-driven economic boom and
American tourists hoping for a glimpse of the region’s famed gorillas. The
visitors spend their evenings in the hotel bar with its faux Africa
trappings to hear stories of Dian Fossey. What no one tells them is what
happened right beneath their feet.

Where the Serena now stands was once the Hotel des Diplomates. It was a
scrawny affair even before the 1994 civil war and genocide, with threadbare
1970s furniture, a dark and uninviting bar in the basement and dire food. It
was also, for a few murderous weeks, the seat of government.

When Tutsi rebels took a large part of Kigali, the Hutu extremist regime
overseeing the genocide retreated into the Hotel des Diplomates. Its meeting
rooms became ministries. Governors and mayors were summoned from across the
nation to meetings with the prime minister, Jean Kambanda, and his cabinet
colleagues where they were variously congratulated on the scale of the
slaughter in their home provinces or upbraided for not having sent enough
Tutsis to their graves.

The memos that flew out of these meetings carried all the code words –
‘work’ was a euphemism for killing – but they are clear enough in their
intent.

Eventually the rebels were close enough to force the administration out of
Kigali altogether. It trekked west until finally re-establishing itself in
Gisenyi on the border with what was then Zaire. There the administration set
up in what is now another luxury hotel, though by this time it governed
almost no territory and commanded no authority.

But before leaving the Hotel des Diplomates, the retreating regime saw to it
that a group of its opponents was butchered on the top floor of the
building. The bodies were later buried in the hotel grounds.

Weeks later the stench of the blood of those murdered there ran throughout
the hotel. It was open again for business to anyone who would pay despite
the smell and even though there wasn’t a room in the place with a lock on
the door after the fighting and looting as the capital fell to the rebels.

Eventually the Hotel Des Diplomates was bulldozed and South African money
built the palace that now stands in its place. There’s nothing there to mark
the terrible and very recent history. But it’s impossible to escape, if you
know.

That is the reality across Rwanda today. To the casual eye the country has
made a remarkable recovery from a tragic past. The genocide is not forgotten
but it is compartmentalised into selected sites where some of the worst
atrocities took place and in a memorial in the heart of Kigali where 250,000
of the victims from the city are interred in 14 graves.

There is some form of monument to the "jenoside", as it is called in
Kinyarwanda, in every village. But the real memorials are in the heads of
the survivors, the witnesses and even the killers as they pass churches and
schools transformed into extermination centres or street corners where the
Hutu militia cut down those with the wrong ethnicity written on their
identity cards.

Walk out of the Serena, turn left and after a few hundred yards you come to
the military barracks where ten Belgian peacekeepers were tortured and
butchered by the Rwandan army on the first day of the genocide. Turn right
at the barracks, follow the road round and after a few minutes you reach
Kigali hospital, where the army dragged Tutsis from their beds and bayoneted
them. Some time after the genocide, a mass grave with 2,000 bodies was
discovered in the hospital grounds.

Move on down the road – past the French embassy where diplomats were more
concerned about saving the ambassador’s dog than human beings – and you
reach a large roundabout. Half way around is the St Famille church where a
notorious priest, Wenceslas Munyeshyaka, stood at the entrance with a cross
around his neck, a gun on his hip and a list in his hand, ticking off the
names of those he had chosen to hand over to the waiting militiamen and
their machetes.

It is possible to travel through most of the west and south of Rwanda and
encounter such reminders of mass murder every few miles or even every few
yards, though few of them are formally marked.

Some Rwandans choose to go on as if nothing happened. Pious congregations
assemble each Sunday in churches like the one in Kibuye where the 11,500
people who had sought sanctuary there were killed in a single day in April
1994, including the parish priest, a Hutu who turned down the opportunity to
save his own life.

But for others the appearance of normality is an added torture.

A year after the genocide, Esther Mugawayo, a Tutsi mother of two small
children whose husband and parents were murdered, told me that she had
experienced many tortured moments since the killings. She watched her young
daughter trying to summon her daddy from the night sky, and she was haunted
by images of dogs eating her mother. Most of Esther’s family were murdered,
including her older sister, who was stoned to death, and a cousin who was
thrown into a latrine pit. As she tried to climb out, a man chopped off her
arms. Thirty-one of Esther’s relatives lie in a single mass grave in her
village, Mwirute.

For her, one of the hardest things to handle was the way it seemed as if
almost everyone went on as if nothing had happened.

"Everything looks so normal," she said. "All of those lights and all of
those cars. All those trees and all those flowers. Sometimes I want to stop
people in the street and ask: ‘Don’t you know?’"

More than a decade on, other survivors walking the streets of Kigali have
that same repressed fury at what passes for normality. One is Olive
Rutayisire, now 45, widowed and with two adopted children in their teens to
care for in place of her four-year-old daughter, who was murdered with her
father.

Like many survivors she lives with a mix of anger, grief and fear that her
world might implode again. She is also not alone in saying she is "condemned
to live".

Olive said she has a hard time walking the streets of Kigali because the
ghosts of the past are everywhere, but it seems to her that others are blind
to them. Hutus would rather forget what was done in their name, and a
younger generation of Tutsis – now politically dominant – seem more
interested in the pursuit of fine clothes and mobile phones than remembering
the past.

"There are two kinds of Tutsis now. The survivors and the others – those who
came back from exile after the genocide or who were too young to know. I
think they don’t really want to know. They want to go to the memorials and
say we are all Rwandans now so this mustn’t happen again, and then they go
home and forget until the next time. I want to shake them and say: ‘Can’t
you see? It’s all around us, the genocide is everywhere.’ How can people
just go on as normal?" she asked.

Next to the mass graves at the main Kigali memorial is a museum that seeks
to explain, or at least lay out the facts. It is no fault of the museum that
the terrible pictures of mutilated bodies and the heart-rending accounts of
survivors telling of the fate of relatives cannot convey the full horror of
the 100 days of murder. Even the most moving part of the museum, a hall
lined with family snaps of the dead – a wedding picture from the seventies,
nervous children on their first day at school with post-genocide captions
added: "Yvan Musabe, Murdered age 16 years. C’est inimaginable" – leaves you
more numb and disbelieving than anything.

But the museum does at least cast the genocide in the wider history of
inhumanity with an exhibition on the suffering of others, from the Armenians
and Cambodians to the people of the Balkans and the Jews murdered by the
Nazis. It is a context notably lacking in Jerusalem’s own memorial to the
Holocaust, which sees that mass murder as a "unique event" with no
comparison and no broader lessons for humanity other than the need to resist
the scourge of anti-Semitism.

Rwanda’s post-genocide government believes the wider context is important in
purging the ideology of extermination from the country by drumming home the
message that not only the Tutsis suffered. All Rwandans have paid the price
in some way or other and it must never happen again.

That is not, however, a universal view. Last month, the education ministry
said it had purged schools of about 50 teachers for continuing to spread the
"ideology of genocide" in their schools by making Hutu and Tutsi children
wear different uniforms and repeating the old canards that dehumanise
Tutsis.

The ministry said that Mataba secondary school, in the north of the country,
was teaching from a book that included the following turn of phrase: "Tutsis
are snakes, we’re sick of them and we will kill them". Gaseke secondary
school, about 30km from Kigali, was still circulating the Hutu Ten
Commandments published by extremists in the run up to the genocide. They
include: "Hutu must stop taking pity on the Tutsi" and "Hutu must stand firm
and vigilant against their common enemy: the Tutsi".

It is an important struggle to win for the day when no one is left alive who
can see the ghosts of genocide as they wander Kigali’s streets.