Mixed Response For Free Speech Reform In Turkey

MIXED RESPONSE FOR FREE SPEECH REFORM IN TURKEY

Euronews.net, France
April 30 2008

Turkey’s parliament has voted to amend a controversial law which
the European Union has criticised for restricting free speech. But
pro-reformers say the softening of Article 301 of the penal code does
not go far enough.

The article has been used to prosecute hundreds of writers for
"insulting Turkishness," among them the Nobel Literature Laureate
Orhan Pamuk. His comments on the mass killing of Kurds and Armenians
infuriated Turkish nationalists. But following an international outcry,
the charges against him were dropped.

Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink was convicted under Article
301. His remarks on the alleged "genocide" of Armenians by Ottoman
Turks earned him death threats from nationalists. In January last year,
he was murdered in Istanbul.

The EU says easing limits on free speech is a test of would-be member
Turkey’s commitment to political reform. And Dink’s murder strengthened
reformers’ resolve to get Article 301 scrapped.

Decried by the far-Right as a betrayal of the country’s identity,
the revision is merely cosmetic say critics on the other side of the
political spectrum.

Changes include making it a crime to insult the Turkish nation,
rather than Turkishness.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Emil Lazarian

“I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose wars have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, literature is unread, music is unheard, and prayers are no more answered. Go ahead, destroy Armenia . See if you can do it. Send them into the desert without bread or water. Burn their homes and churches. Then see if they will not laugh, sing and pray again. For when two of them meet anywhere in the world, see if they will not create a New Armenia.” - WS