THE SAD DESTINY OF PROJECT-STATES
Armen Tsaturyan

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
20 Aug 2008
Armenia

Many people argue about the issue of "why did Georgian president
Mikhail Sahakashvily invade South Ossia just before the Olympic games
in Beijing?" But it is a big question whether the Georgian President
takes decision by himself.

Actually if we observe the results of the invasion of the Georgian
army into South Ossia from the point of view of Georgian nationalist,
then we will come to a conclusion that Sahakashvily is either a
Russian agent or he has mental problems.

Judge yourselves the recent Georgian military drive led to the
following: South Ossia got rid of its Georgian inhabitants, Abkhazia
occupied Kodor gorge, and finally the Russian troops appeared in
Georgian territory – in Gory and Zugdidy. Which means that Russian
"hawks" fulfilled their dream of forcing Georgia to its knees.

We can find certain logic in the recent steps taken by Georgia, if we
observe them in the context of the orders received from its backer –
the US leadership.

It is not a secret that the US made great use of the results of
South-Ossian developments, by isolating its rival Russia in the
international arena. The meeting of NATO member country Foreign
Ministers, organized yesterday, was aimed at the before mentioned,
which put forward serious demands for Russia.

Later the USA and its20 allies can use this fact to deprive Russia
from the right of organizing 2014 Olympic games.

But this will not change anything for thousands of Georgians, who
over again appeared in the role of refugees.

Georgia is really a "special" country, as it is accepted in the present
international language, it is a project-state and the decisions are
taken in quite different places. By the way Ukraine is also considered
a project-state.

For the implementation of the recent bizarre decisions taken by the
Georgian leadership, all the means – arms and techniques and even the
"advisers" were imported from overseas. The last proof is the armaments
abandoned by the Georgian army, which has been found in South Ossia
and Kodor gorge, which costs hundred million dollars. The quantity
of those armaments was so big that Abkhazian leadership even intended
to officially thank Georgian President M. Sahakashvily.

But neither the latter nor the Georgian servicemen are concerned
about it because they are far not responsible for the recruitment of
their arsenals.

Moreover, recently Swedish journalist Wolfgang Hanson and Matthias
Carlson clarified that because of the recent developments in
South-Ossia Belgian PR-consultant Patrick Worm, who is also the
consultant of Aspect Consulting PR-Company visited Tbilisy to organize
a propaganda PR-campaign against Russia. Most of his partners in Aspect
Consulting are in NAT O’s headquarter in Brussels at the moment and
the preparation works of this propaganda campaign has started still
in November of this year.

It is quite understandable that in this sphere as well Georgia and
its people are in the role of simple puppets, because they don’t have
any idea from where this information comes and why they sow this much
hatred towards the neighbor countries and peoples.

It turns out that Georgia is, in reality, a virtual state, which
gets orders to attack South Ossia, to use certain amount of armaments
in order to completely annihilate Tskhenvaly, and later retreat, so
that their Western backers can have the possibility to hue and cry,
and spread misinformation by the help of their PR-Consultant who has
long ago visited Tbilisy from Brussels.

It is not excluded that tomorrow this virtual state, to be more
precise, those who lead this country, will come to a decision to
partake in US’s new geopolitical initiatives – against Russia, Iran
and other countries of the region. And every time we will record the
fact that Georgian people suffer over and over again having no idea
of the reasons.

American project-states, Georgia in South Caucasus and Ukraine in
Eastern Europe have turned into the sources of permanent instability,
for their neighbors.

But in our view the wars deriving from those countries are not as
dangerous as the threat of the export of20the political systems formed
in those countries.

It is especially dangerous for a small state like Armenia, which,
being located in the crossroad of serious geopolitical interests is
rather motivating for the superpowers, which create virtual states
by means of "colored revolutions".

Can you imagine what was going to happen in our country had they
managed to realize the "colored revolution" during the previous
presidential elections? No doubt in that case our country will also
be involved in Sahakashvily’s adventurousness with all the negative
consequences deriving from it.

By becoming the eyewitnesses of the sufferings and senseless victims
of the Georgian people we can come to a conclusion that sensible
nations learn on the mistakes of their neighbors and never allow
others to make their country a project-state that gradually turns
into a shabby tool for geopolitical games.