DECIPHERING TURKEY’S DELAY TACTICS IN OPENING THE BORDER WITH ARMENIA
By Harut Sassounian
AZG DAILY
20-03-2009
Armenia-Turkey
While some Armenians are dismissing Pres. Obama’s solemn campaign
pledge to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, Turkish leaders have
taken the president’s promise very seriously.
Ankara has dispatched to Washington several high-level delegations,
both before and after Obama’s inauguration, with the express purpose
of lobbying key decision-makers in the White House and Congress on
this issue.
The Turkish scheme to induce Pres. Obama not to acknowledge the
Genocide, however, was dealt a serious blow after Prime Minister
Erdogan harshly criticized Israel’s invasion of Gaza and angrily
confronted Pres. Shimon Peres in Davos. Incensed by Erdogan’s words,
Israeli and American-Jewish leaders told visiting Turkish dignitaries
that they would no longer oppose the pending congressional resolution
on the Armenian Genocide.
As April 24 gets closer, Turkish leaders have accelerated their
two-pronged campaign, trying to block the congressional resolution as
well as Pres. Obama’s anticipated statement on the anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide. Beyond Turkey’s persistent efforts in Washington
through its Ambassador, lobbying firms, and parliamentary delegations,
Turkish leaders also pressured American officials passing through
Ankara in recent weeks, such as U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell
and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
After returning home from their lobbying junkets, Turkish officials
said they were repeatedly told in Washington that unless Turkey
opens the border with Armenia promptly, there is a good chance that
Pres. Obama would use the term genocide in his April 24 statement. This
may be the reason why Foreign Minister Ali Babajan admitted last week
that there is a "risk" the American President would acknowledge the
Armenian Genocide next month.
Why is Turkey then seemingly going against its interests by continuing
to keep the border closed and risking a presidential acknowledgment
of the Armenian Genocide?
In my view, highly experienced Turkish diplomats are playing a
sophisticated game of delay tactics to gain maximum benefit from the
eventual opening of the border with Armenia.
The Turkish game plan is to block or dilute Pres. Obama’s April 24
statement, either without opening the border at all or by delaying the
opening as much as possible. Turkish officials create the impression
that relations between Armenia and Turkey are steadily improving, as
demonstrated by "secret" meetings which are then leaked to the press
as well as publicized high-level meetings. Such encounters, including
"football diplomacy," have scored public relations points for Turkey
and given credibility to its claim that relations are indeed improving.
The Turks have several reasons for preferring to give the impression
that they are about to open the border, without actually doing so.
First, any conciliatory move towards Armenia would damage Turkey’s
relations with Azerbaijan. Turkish officials have tried to manage this
problem by making the return of Artsakh (Karabagh) to Azerbaijan a
pre-condition for opening the border. Since the Armenian side appears
to have rejected this proposal, Ankara has been forced to abandon
any direct linkage between the border opening and the Artsakh conflict.
Second, by constantly repeating that they are engaged in "delicate
negotiations" with Armenia, Turkish officials have sought to prevent
other countries, particularly the United States, from acknowledging
the Armenian Genocide, even though these two issues are completely
unrelated.
Third, Turkish officials realize that opening the border promptly would
not be in their best interest. The more they drag the negotiations,
the more concessions they hope to secure from Armenia — a time-honored
Turkish diplomatic practice!
Fourth, by delaying the border opening, Turkey also gains more time
to negotiate with the Obama administration and reach a favorable
understanding on both the congressional resolution and the President’s
April 24 statement.
Fifth, another important reason why Prime Minister Erdogan and his
ruling party are using delaying tactics is that any deal with Armenia
before the March 29th local Turkish elections would harm their standing
in the polls.
Sixth, Turkish officials would probably wait until the first week of
April, when Pres. Obama is expected to visit their country, to discuss
directly with him the linkage between the border issue and granting
transit rights to U.S. troops leaving Iraq, sending additional Turkish
soldiers to Afghanistan, as well as blocking U.S. acknowledgment of
the Armenian Genocide.
Even though Armenian-Americans can neither match Turkey’s vast
resources nor its powerful clout in Washington, they are naturally very
concerned about these Turkish ploys and are hard at work to ensure that
Pres. Obama carries out his campaign promise on the Armenian Genocide.
Despite reports from reliable sources that Armenia and Turkey will be
signing an agreement when Foreign Minister Ali Babajan visits Yerevan
on April 16, one would hope that Armenian officials would delay
signing any document with Ankara just before April 24. Otherwise,
the Armenian leadership would not only desecrate the memory of the
Armenian martyrs, but would also provide the perfect excuse to the
Obama administration not to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide in
April. After waiting for the opening of the border for 16 years,
Armenia could well afford to wait a few more days!