WHERE WILL AGHVAN HOVSEPYAN GO?

264.html
11:45:57 – 22/09/2009

Political processes on these days seem to be touching upon the factor
of the prosecutor general Aghvan Hovsepyan very slightly. It seemed
to be sleeping for a very long period but it was also obvious not
to be able to sleep forever because there is the factor of March
1 which would make the prosecutor’s office appear in the field of
events. Though, interestingly, the prosecutor’s office appeared in
this "traffic" zone in connection with another issue. In other words,
Aghvan Hovsepyan became a topic of home political discussions not
from the point of his profession.

The point is about what happened within the Heritage party. Aghvan
Hovsepyan was found out to have played a role in the party for
many years. At least, the information that the head of the Heritage
parliamentary faction whose candidature by the way, the party wanted
to promote as a joint candidate of the opposition for mayor, Armen
Martirosyan was the board member of Nig-Aparan patriotic union. And
the honorable president of Nig-Aparan union is Aghvan Hovsepyan who
made use of this patriotic union as a support to the government of
course proceeding from his personal political or other interests.

Arman Martirosyan, recently, during hearings in the parliament
criticized strictly the work of the prosecutor’s office with regards to
the March 1 case trying to disperse the accusation of having worked on
the prosecutor general. But Aghvan Hovsepyan’s name remained as the
destroyer of the party. Can never say what rating he had among the
public before but his happening will surely harm his reputation. But
nevertheless, it is a fact that the outrageous reputation of the
prosecutor general in relation with the March 1 topic was enhanced
with the image of a destroyer of the opposition: a thing Aghvan
Hovsepyan did not need at all.

But he is possible to become opposition very soon. At least, Aghvan
Hovsepyan’s management subjects had very serious problems with Judicial
Acts Compulsory Execution Service. It is difficult to say whether
it will be an instant or permanent phenomenon. They are not excluded
to be spices to the dish being cooked for the prosecutor general in
connection with the March 1 issue. The point is that this case harms
the prosecutor’s office more than those who were the direct organizers
of the March 1 slaughter. And the impression is that Aghvan Hovsepyan
will feel the main consequence of March 1 who will lose his office
of prosecutor general.

At least, the propaganda basis of this fact is being preserved, a
necessary atmosphere is formed. After all, it has been long since the
main topic of the Armenian media is Serge Sargsyan’s dissatisfaction
of Aghvan Hovsepyan. The mode the prosecutor’s dismissal will happen
is not so important because if a political decision is taken in this
connection, we may be sure that an optimal way of execution will
be found. Moreover, taking into account that Serge Sargsyan has not
finished yet the construction of his governmental pyramid after being
elected, hence the change of prosecutor fits this logic completely.

Everyone knows what an important role the prosecutor’s office plays
in the formation of the governmental pyramid. And moreover, from
this point, this system failed concerning the March 1 case. But
Aghvan Hovsepyan is doubtless to resist seriously to the attempts
of his dismissal. And resources to resist he will find at least in
connection with the March 1 topic on which the prosecutor will have
much information.

But on the other hand, everything is so connected in Armenia that
sometimes having and not having information is the same because
almost everyone are equally vulnerable from the point of possessing
information and here only levers count. After all, the former
prosecutor Gagik Jhangiryan had information on October 27 too but
this did not hinder the government to dismiss him from his office
and to keep him in prison for more than one year.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress