A FLAG FLAP
By Arthur I. Cyr

Korea Times
2009/11/137_54781.html
Nov 3 2009
S. Korea

What’s in a name? Plenty, and the same goes for a nation’s flag.

The national flag remains a potent emotional symbol, demonstrated this
month by intense â~@~U and underreported â~@~U conflict among Turkey,
Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The flag flap has important bearing on international relations,
especially U.S. foreign policy.

Azerbaijan flags were removed from a stadium in Bursa, Turkey, where
a World Cup match between Armenia and Turkey was being held. They
were found in a trashcan.

In retaliation, Azerbaijani officials in Baku removed Turkey’s
flag from a war memorial commemorating Turkish troops who fell in
fighting for Azerbaijan independence in 1918. On Oct. 27, the flags
were raised again.

Turkey is making strong efforts, so far reciprocated, to resolve
fundamental conflict with Armenia, dating back to the Armenian genocide
early in the 20th century.

On Oct. 10, the two nations signed a protocol to open their shared
border. Turkey closed the border in 1993 as a gesture of solidarity
with Azerbaijan. In mid-October, President Serkh Sarkisian became
the first head of state of Armenia to travel to Turkey.

Armenia-Turkey rapprochement in turn has antagonized Azerbaijan,
which has been losing to Armenia in a border dispute involving the
territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. This has occurred despite repeated
assurances from national officials in Ankara that relations with Baku
would remain strong.

This interplay may be difficult to follow, involving complex politics
as well as obscure geography, but Turkey’s vital strategic importance
provides a powerful incentive to understand developments.

Despite current tensions between a religious government and a secular
constitution and state, Turkey remains a strong, stable representative
democracy.

Eventually, the nation may serve as a bridge between East and West,
which brings essential economic and political modernization to the
Arab world.

Turkey’s relative isolation within Europe is a problem. The European
Union has turned the nation’s application for membership into seemingly
endless agony.

No doubt concern about Islamic extremism contributes to caution,
but more general long-standing European prejudice against outside
populations undeniably is involved. Condescension is combined with
inertia.

Developments within Turkey overall have been reassuring. The people
remain committed to representative government, an effective counter
against al-Qaida and other extremist movements. To date, terrorist
acts in Turkey have boomeranged.

The government in Ankara has placed priority on good relations with
Israel as well as with Arab states. Turkey commands vital sea lanes
and trade routes, including the Straits of Bosporus and potential
oil and gas lines from the Caucasus.

Ankara-Washington cooperation is strongly rooted. Turkey has been
actively engaged in Afghanistan, including major military command
responsibilities. During the first Persian Gulf War, U.S. B-52 bombers
were deployed on Turkish soil, a potentially risky move by Ankara.

Turkey played a vital Allied role during the 1950-53 Korean War; the
U.N. military cemetery at Busan, the largest port city in South Korea,
contains a notably large number of Turkish graves.

This background is of even greater importance given that ties between
Turkey and the United States are currently badly strained. The Bush
administration invasion of Iraq was bitterly opposed by Ankara.

Attacks by anti-Ankara Kurdish terrorists based in Iraq have led to
Turkish military strikes into the northern region of that country.

The Obama administration is giving some priority to rebuilding frayed
relations with Turkey, along with Israel our most important ally in
the region. This may reinforce positive steps in southeast Europe.

Arthur I. Cyr is Clausen distinguished professor at Carthage College.

E-mail him at acyr@carthage.edu. For more stories, visit Scripps
Howard News Service ().