BAKU: South Caucasus Needs "Helsinki-Type" Security Conference

SOUTH CAUCASUS NEEDS "HELSINKI-TYPE" SECURITY CONFERENCE
Leyla Tagiyeva

news.az
Nov 24 2009
Azerbaijan

Alexandros Petersen News.Az interviews Alexandros Petersen, Dinu
Patriciu fellow for Transatlantic Energy Security and associate
director of the Eurasia Energy Centre at US think-tank the Atlantic
Council.

How do you see the state of the Karabakh conflict settlement process,
considering recent events?

There is no doubt that the Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan
and Armenia is not only of bilateral but also of regional concern,
since Turkey is now normalizing relations with Armenia which affects
the situation. Russia is involved in the process, supplying Armenia
with money and arms. Moreover, this assistance is provided at the
diplomatic level. We should not forget Iran either.

Another factor that makes the conflict of international concern is
the interest of the superpowers, primarily, the United States, the
transatlantic community and the EU in its resolution.

We should also realize that not only the West but also the East –
the countries from the other side of the Caspian Sea and further to
the East – are interested in the settlement.

Azerbaijani authorities call the conflict a threat not only to regional
but also international security. Do you agree with this?

Yes, this conflict is a hindrance to the East-West transportation
corridor from Asia to Europe. So there is no doubt that this
is an international conflict. To be honest, it should not be
viewed as a purely regional problem. It is odd that despite the
international importance of this problem, little is being done to
achieve a settlement, at least by the countries that call themselves
"superpowers". I think Russia plays a big role here, hampering progress
on the part of the Minsk Group, but there are other reasons too.

What changes are needed to make the superpowers take effective measures
to settle the conflict?

There are several important aspects here. First of all, we should
step up the work of the Minsk Group, especially the United States and
France. Moreover, we should let Turkey become active in the process
as a Minsk Group member and a country that plays an important role,
especially in relations with Armenia. I think these three powers –
the United States, France and Turkey – should put consolidated pressure
on Russia to play a constructive role in the Minsk process.

But Russia has repeatedly proposed several initiatives on settlement of
the problem, in particular, promoting meetings between the presidents.

Yes, in recent years we have seen Russia playing a leading role here
by promoting high level meetings, including between the presidents of
Azerbaijan and Armenia without involving other Minsk Group co-chairs.

Yet, in the current situation, Russia’s attempts to become the only
arbiter in the conflict settlement are counterproductive. Therefore,
we should strengthen the Minsk process and put pressure on Russia
not to replace this process.

There is another aspect related to the medium and long-term. In order
to achieve a settlement of the conflict, regional integration and
cooperation between the three states in the South Caucasus, a kind of
a conference on regional security based on the Helsinki process needs
to be created. I think by doing this we would achieve settlement not
only of the Karabakh problem but also the South Ossetian and Abkhaz
conflicts, thereby promoting the interests of all the aforementioned
superpowers.