Financial Time – Dubai
Arshile Gorky at Tate Modern, By Jackie Wullschlager

Published: February 13, 2010 23:18 | Last updated: February 12 2010
23:18

American art’s favourite story is that of its own invention, which
gives special place to Arshile Gorky. The Armenian was the hinge that
swung Parisian surrealism into New York abstract expressionism, and so
to US dominance of visual culture. Philadelphia Museum’s extensive,
finely tuned retrospective, just arrived at Tate Modern, is therefore
a full-blown, triumphal affair and, as European museums possess only
half a dozen major Gorkys, a vivid, rare pleasure.
Britain’s sole example is Tate’s 1942 `Waterfall’, turpentine-thinned
lush green paint coursing down a canvas iridescent with natural forms
and body shapes, mimicking a cascade. Reproduction cannot convey the
effect: Gorky is one of those non-cerebral artists whose agenda is inseparable
from the way he applied paint to canvas. This show brings him alive as
painterly painter as well as art-historical pivot, fleshing out how
his impassioned, very American theme – the trauma and opportunity of
exile and immigration – is drawn into his every stroke.
Mid-20th-century America was full of influential émigrés – Léger,
Mondrian, Max Ernst – but they arrived middle-aged and fully
formed. Gorky by contrast reached Ellis Island as a teenager, fleeing
the Armenian genocide that claimed his mother (who died from
starvation), and he developed as an American painter. In their
free-wheeling energy, sense of space, all-over compositions and
liberation from classical order, the mellifluous late abstractions
here – the delicate oil and Conté crayon `Soft Night’, the lyrical
grey-cream `The Limit’, the fiery `Agony’ – could not have been made
by a European artist burdened with modernism’s formal ancestry.
Gorky’s paradoxical love affair with this heritage opens Tate’s
show. The first rooms, including Gorky’s Cézannesque `Pears, Peaches
and Pitcher’, his copy of a Matisse, `Antique Cast’, and the
schematised `Woman with a Palette’, recently discovered and echoing
Picasso’s 1920s nudes, read like an abbreviated history
lesson. Self-taught through 20 years’ absorption in the modern
masters, Gorky presented himself in New York as a Paris-trained
prodigy. But he never set foot in France=3B nor did he know
Russian. Born Vosdanig Adoian, he renamed himself Gorky to camouflage
his provincial roots, pretending instead glamorous kinship with the
Soviet writer Maxim Gorky.
In fact, the second Gorky was unaware that the first, too, had taken
the name as pseudonym, attracted by its meaning – Russian `bitter’. It
fits the painter perfectly, for the bitterness of loss threads through
his oeuvre. Tate acknowledges as much in the central, persuasive drama
of its hang: a face-off, through arches across five galleries, between
the velvet-black lines of erotic biomorphic creatures engaged in
frustrated battle in `Nighttime, Enigma and Nostalgia’, and the flat,
steely portrait `The Artist and his Mother’.
The abstract work muses on the unattainability of Armenia, and Gorky’s
sense of being an outsider in the west, sexually and socially. (`I
made a terrible mistake getting in with these Surrealist people,’ he
said.
`The husbands sleep with each other’s wives. The wives sleep with each
other. And the husbands sleep with each other. They’re terrible
people.’) The realist one is based on a proud, rigid photograph sent
by Gorky’s mother in Armenia to remind his father, long emigrated to
America, of the family’s existence.
Both works showcase Gorky’s technique through the 1920s and 30s of
building up then scraping away `hundreds and hundreds of layers of
paint to obtain the weight of reality’. It is hard not to see these
dense, pasted, smoothed-over surfaces as enactments of remembering,
forgetting, attempting to recover the irretrievable. `I place the same
colour or line until my soul comes out and my head aches,’ Gorky
said. Confident in making a mark repeatedly, he was also uncertain
that it would ever be right.
Stark as a Byzantine icon, `The Artist and his Mother’ illuminates
this entire show. Gorky’s instinct for modernist flatness lay – like
Warhol’s a generation later – in childhood exposure to hieratic styles
of Orthodox Christian art. The portrait is displayed here alongside
drawings dramatising how he simplified and monumentalised the
composition, his mother becoming a sadder, more remote figure at each
turn. In a later oil version in pallid pinks and salmons, softer and
more amorphous, she seems to fade away, famished or emotionally shut
down after manifold disasters.
Fixated on mother and motherland but cut off from the direct stimulus
of Armenian motifs, Gorky transformed recollection into fantasy. The
surrealist vocabulary of `Image in Kharkom’ and `Garden In Sochi’,
built around womb and breast shapes, fruits, leaves, patches of rock
or sky, fabulises his mother’s nurturing presence and the fecund
landscape of his father’s orchard. `How My Mother’s Embroidered Apron
Unfolds in My Life’, bathed in the apricot and violet hues of that rural
paradise, takes flight through a new gestural spontaneity as Gorky
dared improvise around these familiar elements in diluted washes of
liquid oil paint. Pigments run, blur, pool to create evanescent veils
of colour.
`I tell stories to myself while I paint … often from my childhood,’
Gorky explained. `My mother told me many stories while I pressed my
face into her long apron with my eyes closed. Her stories and the
embroidery on her apron got confused in my mind. All my life her
stories and her embroidery keep unravelling pictures in my memory.’
Even when rapture with the American countryside, and brief marital
happiness, intensified Gorky’s work in the 1940s, this vision remained
his chief source. In the sleepy, bucolic `The Plow and the Song’, a
vertical figure and female torso are entangled with hints of field, barn,
haystack. Looping sexually charged forms in `The Liver is the Cock’s
Comb’ suggest an Eden pierced with shafts of darkness, but also recall
the rich abstract ornamentation of Armenian carpets.
Surrealist high priest André Breton called this `the most important
picture done in America’. He told Gorky that `art must spring from a
source and that people who do not have a homeland do not contribute
much to culture’. Gorky, agreeing, said nothing of his own
origins. That secret inner life was surely his twin strength and
sacrifice. `No joy, no black despair ever wrung from him the admission
that he was born Vostanig Adoian,’ his wife Mougouch wrote after his
suicide in 1948. `He was the painter Arshile Gorky to the very limit
of his life … his entire personality a pure creation of the will to
paint.’
`Arshile Gorky: A Retrospective’, Tate Modern, London, to May 3,
Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, June
6-September 20,
Jackie Wullschlager on German artists
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010.

`Colored picture of `Garden in Sochi’ (1943) shows Gorky’s fertile
surrealist vocabulary’