TURKEY SHOULD MAKE FRIENDS WITH ARMENIA TO WIN CONFIDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
ArmInfo
2010-03-02 11:45:00
Interview of Secretary General of the European Friends of Armenia
(EuFoA) Michael Kambeck with ArmInfo News Agency
The Europe-Armenia Advisory Council (EAAC), being a structure of
the European Friends of Armenia organization, sent an open letter
to the European political figures and EU representatives, urging the
European structures to get involved in the process of normalization
of the Armenian-Turkish relations.
In the letter, addressed to President of the European Parliament Jerzy
Buzek, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Catherine Ashton, Chairman of EP Foreign Affairs Committee Gabrielle
Albertini and EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus Peter
Semneby, contains an appeal to affect Armenia and Turkey for them
to ratify the Protocols without preconditions in a reasonable time
period of two months. What instruments may the EU use to urge Turkey
to ratify Protocols within a timeframe of no more than 2 months as
you recommended?
I am pretty sure that the new High Representative Baroness Ashton,
as quasi EU-Foreign Minister, will soon be more public on this issue
and make a statement that the EU welcomes the Armenian steps towards
ratification and invites Turkey to follow suit. Turkey needs to know
that the world is watching it. The EU is already quite tired about
Turkey signing treaties but never ratifying or implementing them, like
in the example of Cyprus. The unique thing about the ongoing process
is that an EU-US-Russia consensus has been reached, advocating for
unconditional and timely ratification of the protocols. That consensus
lays the basis for a very favourable environment for the EU action
given the latter’s commitment for an effective multilateralism in
the international arena. Let’s not forget that the EU has new and
much more effective rules for its foreign policy.
EU now has all necessary means to reach its declared ambitions
of becoming a stronger, more coherent and pro-active actor in
the Caucasus. The EU wants peace and growth and can achieve this
in co-operation with Russia and the USA. Practically this means: a
common statement of all 27 Member States urging Turkey to seriously
engage in the ratification of the protocols.
Moreover, a high level EU visit to the region in order to deliver
its firm message to the political actors concerned and setting
up mechanisms for cross-border cooperation and rehabilitation of
transport and communication infrastructure along the border. The US
and Russia have made some similar steps or are considering them. The
EU now has the tools to do all of this and I am happy that, not least
after the recent open letter by the EAAC (Europe-Armenia Advisory
Council), the EU is very committed to act in an even stronger and
more visible manner.
An issue of rapprochement between Armenia and Turkey and reopening
the border has never been a key issue in the process of Turkey’s
joining the EU. Yet, don’t you think the EU should clearly put such
a precondition in its own negotiation?
We must not forget that the Turkish accession bid is a very old one and
that when it was filed, Armenia was still part of the USSR. Since then
there has been a very vivid debate in the EU which conditions to apply,
but there was a consensus that Turkey should join! This debate always
included good relations with Turkey’s neighbours, but unfortunately
did not specify Armenia explicitly in the accession conditions.
However, the European Commission has made it clear several times that
it cannot imagine an accession with unresolved neighbourly problems,
especially with Cyprus, Syria and Armenia. The European Parliament has
been even more explicit making this condition in several resolutions
and this Parliament will need to vote on the accession treaty to ratify
it. So formally, it may not be a precondition, but Turkey knows very
well that it is a problem they need to resolve before being able
to join.
Let me add that it is a good thing that the normalisation of relations
with Armenia are not formally linked to the EU accession, because this
would only give more arguments to the nationalists in Turkey who want
to kill the EU-accession process. In reality, the EU is formulating
this question in a different way: does Turkey want to become a
mature, credible and modern international player or does it want to
have its foreign policy defined by its more extreme nationalists and
Azerbaijan? This fundamental question needs an answer, and this answer
is in the interest of Turkey and the EU and the whole region. It is
in Turkey’s interest to develop into a mature and reliable state,
which will make everyone gain. So there are many reasons why Turkey
will need to reconcile ties with Armenia before an EU accession,
but not necessarily because of the EU accession.
The open letter called upon Azerbaijan to contribute to the ongoing
Armenia-Turkey process. How practical it is to ask for efforts from
Azerbaijan taking into account the existing animosity between Armenia
and Azerbaijan?
It is my firm belief and that of the EAAC (Europe-Armenia Advisory
Council) that the implementation of the provisions of the protocols
will promote peace, stability and progress in the entire region.
Azerbaijan’s efforts to derail the Armenia-Turkey rapprochement is
a direct threat to this positive perspective of regional stability.
It is clear that the vital condition for such a positive development
consists in decoupling the Armenia-Turkey normalisation from the final
resolution of the NKR conflict. In other words, linking these two
issues will certainly kill the prospects of solution for both of them.
The EU, Russia and the US know that and say this more or less openly.
The EAAC called especially upon Azerbaijan to turn towards a
constructive policy in order to remind publicly that Azerbaijan
currently is a key obstacle! I think Azerbaijan has done a great
job in recent years to create a hostile and undemocratic image of
its country and this call and similar calls can only be an appeal
to their reason: it is in Azerbaijan’s interest to improve its image
and to achieve more stability and growth in the Caucasus.
Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair in the Annual Threat
Assessment of the US Intelligence Community, stated that "Although
there has been progress in the past year toward Turkey-Armenia
rapprochement, this has affected the delicate relationship between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, and increases the risk of a renewed conflict
over Nagorno-Karabakh". What do you think about this alarming
prediction that actually threatens the development of two processes?
The news is that in this year’s Annual Threat Assessment of the
US Intelligence Community the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has had
the attention it deserves and is not overshadowed by other regional
confrontations. Therefore, there are chances that such an assessment
will trigger a stronger commitment of the US, alongside with France
and Russia, for the resolution of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.
However, I cannot agree with this assessment. The key factor missing
to achieve a breakthrough is political will on the Azeri side to sign
what has already been agreed upon in the framework of the Minsk group
negotiations. Azeri war rhetorics repeatedly threatening to take back
NKR by force, don’t really prepare the Azeri public for a peaceful
solution – there is no such political will.
In fact, the only thing that I can imagine to convince Azerbaijan
to agree to a durable compromise is if they don’t feel that Turkey
will at all costs always be on its side, even allowing Azerbaijan to
determine much of the Turkish foreign policy. This means that any
success registered on Armenia-Turkey bi-laterals has the potential
to contribute to the security in South Caucasus and not to hinder it.
Swedish Parliament prepares to vote on a motion that describes the
killing of Armenians during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire as
Genocide. Another motion is under the way in the American Congress.
Meanwhile, Turkey believes such motions hamper its efforts to normalize
its fragile relations with Armenia. What do you think? Why it is
important to pursue this issue in the foreign Parliaments?
The alleged linkage between the international recognition of the
Armenian genocide and the steps to be undertaken for the normalisation
of Armenia-Turkey relations seems to be the latest excuse fabricated
by some Turkish political circles to obstruct the ratification of the
protocols in the Turkish Parliament. We at EuFoA, together with EAAC
(Europe-Armenia Advisory Council), reject any such linkage.
In other words, the international recognition and acknowledgement of
the Armenian genocide, and genocides in general, is not only a right
of the victims and their descendants, it is rather a universal duty
of any civilised society, genocides being a crime against humanity.
Besides, Turkey only developed the necessary energy to move ahead in
the rapprochement last April, just before the Genocide memorial day. I
think it is clear that potential international recognitions don’t
slow down the process but can actually make a positive contribution,
including educating the Turkish public about its past and its neighbor.
Interview by Oksana Musaelyan, February 26, 2010.