Sunday’s Zaman, Turkey
March 7 2010
US and Turkey: Time for the trading to begin
by AMANDA PAUL
Once again storm clouds have formed over US-Turkey relations. The
approval of the Armenian `genocide’ resolution by the US House Foreign
Relations Committee has left Ankara furious and on the warpath.
Turkey immediately launched an aggressive campaign, pointing the
finger at US President Barack Obama and making all sorts of threats.
Within the first 24 hours, Foreign Minister Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu warned of
a realignment of Turkish policy, accused Washington of a lack of
strategic vision and of not wanting the Turkey-Armenia rapprochement
to succeed and pulled Turkey’s ambassador out of Washington for
`consultations.’ While to many it may seem that Turkey is punching
above its weight, at the same time, one cannot underestimate the
importance of Turkey for the US in its foreign policy given that four
problems out of five on the US government’s agenda are related to
Turkey: the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, Iran’s nuclear
program, the AfPak issue, energy security and the turbulent Caucasus
region. Therefore Turkey feels quite unconcerned about its `bully boy’
approach toward the world’s only superpower.
Obama now finds himself in a rather uncomfortable position. Prior to
his election, he promised Armenians that he would recognize the
genocide, but once in office realities had to be faced. His need for a
strong relationship with Turkey outweighed this promise, and it seemed
he wanted it to disappear. So it is hardly surprising that during his
visit to Turkey in 2009, while he made it clear he had not changed his
mind on the 1915 events, he also threw his weight behind Turkey’s
normalization process with Armenia in the belief that success would
offer a way out from this genocidal cul-de-sac. As we know, the best
laid plans frequently go awry, and this one has certainly gone off
course. Unfortunately, now that the normalization process seems to be
on the rocks, `the g-word’ has come back to haunt Obama. Turkey has
deviated from the original framework of the agreement. Within a couple
of days of signing the protocols in October 2009, Turkey’s leadership
began openly linking ratification to the resolution of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. There is no doubt that the US supports the
peace process between Turkey and Armenia, but the big powers, the US
and Russia, have been clear from the beginning: The two processes are
separate, and they are not going to start pressuring Armenia to
withdraw its forces from Azerbaijani provinces. In fact, Turkey’s
approach is not only holding back the rapprochement, but it is also
having a negative effect on the Karabakh peace talks, as Armenia does
not want to be seen as doing anything that could be viewed as making
concessions on Karabakh in order to have its border opened with
Turkey.
In addition, Turkey has shot itself in the foot by shouting so loudly
over the decision of the Armenian Constitutional Court. The US did not
support Turkey in its complaints, but instead, Assistant Secretary for
European and Eurasian Affairs Philip Gordon stated that the US did not
see it as an obstacle to progress. Turkey has overreacted to the court
decision, making it even more difficult to move ahead and making it
look like Turkey is scratching around for any old excuse not to
ratify. This is all very bad for Turkey’s credibility.
The weeks leading up to April 24 will be full of tension and drama.
However, even though the committee has adopted the resolution, it is
very unlikely that it will be brought to the House floor, as was the
case in the past. Because the US badly needs Turkey on a whole host of
issues, the US cannot afford to alienate such a strong ally. Therefore
Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden will pull out all the stops —
but they will not do it for free, no matter what threats pour in from
Ankara. Turkey will need to deliver something in return — as has been
the case in other years. There is always some sort of trade off. The
US may ask Turkey to support it in the UN Security Council on Iran and
continue to insist that Turkey move ahead on the ratification of the
protocols in the Turkish Parliament — one way or another. If Turkey
does not move, Yerevan may decide to move first and ratify first,
which would leave Turkey in an even more difficult position.
And what about Azerbaijan in all of this? While I have sympathy for
Azerbaijan, I also strongly believe that Ankara should move ahead and
ratify. Further damaging the relationship between Turkey and Armenia
is in no way useful to Baku, contrary to what they may say. While
Turkey and Armenia are talking and engaged, it gives Turkey a voice
and a foot in the door. The alternative means the slamming of the
door, and Azerbaijan will be left alone on Karabakh again. Building
trust between Turks and Armenians should in the long term help
Armenians feel safer and less isolated, which could have a positive
impact on their relations with Azerbaijan and the peace talks. It’s
time to be brave and do the right thing and move to a future beyond
the past.
07.03.2010
day/yazarDetay.do?haberno3562