ArmInfo. Deputy head of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Armenian Parliament Hovhannes Igityan, commenting on the provisions of the US State Department report on Karabakh, made notable interpretations, assuring that the word "separatist" does not always have a negative connotation.
In an interview with ArmInfo correspondent, Igityan, in particular, tried to explain the vocabulary interpretation of the term "separatist":
According to him, applying the word "separatist" in relation to the Karabakh people, the State Department wanted to note that the Karabakh people had separated from Azerbaijan. Nevertheless, Igityan recognized that Artsakh and its people should not be called "separatists", since the republic has elected authorities, institutions of democracy and state governance. "In this regard, Artsakh is far ahead of Azerbaijan," Igityan said, shifting the attention from this chapter of the report to another, which refers to Armenia.
"The US Department of State is very positive about the events that occurred in the spring of 2018 in Armenia, considering this to be a huge breakthrough in the development of democracy in our country. They are very positive about not only political processes, but also electoral, as well as economic and legal reforms. The State Department considers the Armenian government its partner, with whom it is possible to cooperate further, " Igityan concluded.
Meanwhile, spokesman for Artsakh President David Babayan, in an interview with ArmInfo correspondent, on the contrary, considered the language used in the State Department report unacceptable and stressed the need to intensify the work of Armenia, Artsakh and Diaspora for the subsequent removal of such language in international reports.
To note, the US State Department's report on human rights for 2018 states: "The separatists, with the support of Armenia, continued to control most of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent territories of Azerbaijan." The report also notes that the final status of Artsakh remains the subject of discussion within the framework of the international mediation mandate of the OSCE Minsk Group.