Tuesday, Armenian Judges Asked To Analyze European Court Rulings • Naira Nalbandian The building of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France Armenia’s Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) has sent letters to all court chairmen, asking them to submit an analysis of the rulings against Armenia issued by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The move comes days after the Strasbourg-based body ordered Armenia to pay as much as 1.6 million Euros ($1.8 million) in compensation to an Armenian man whose house and land had been expropriated during a controversial redevelopment of downtown Yerevan in the early 2000s. “We need to understand what systemic gaps we have,” SJC member Hayk Hovannisian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service (Azatutyun.am). “Basically, [in ECHR rulings] we deal with either a violation of the right to a fair trial or a violation of the right to property,” said Hovannisian, adding that most ECHR rulings against Armenia concern the protection of these two fundamental rights in cases like controversial redevelopment projects in Yerevan or controversial mine development projects in the regions. Before ordering the massive compensation to the Armenian citizen, in 2016 the ECHR ruled that Armenian courts and other entities violated articles of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to a fair hearing and protection of property. Besides, it was stressed that the then chairman of the Court of Cassation Arman Mkrtumian did not show an objective position. Mkrtumian, who was appointed chairman of the Court of Cassation by the decree of Armenia’s third President Serzh Sarkisian in 2008, resigned in July 2018 two months after the change of government in Armenia. Despite the opinion expressed by the Strasbourg-based court, the SJC today has no jurisdiction to raise the issue of Mkrtumian’s lack of impartiality. “We have several issues here, the first being the legislative regulation. The former Judicial Code allowed for disciplinary action against a judge as a result of ECHR verdicts. The current Judicial Code does not provide us with such an opportunity because it says that if five years pass after judicial proceedings and the judicial act, then no disciplinary proceedings can be instituted,” said Hovannisian, adding that often officials have hoped to avoid sanctions because of that provision. According to the SJC member, the Ministry of Justice is currently working on an amendment to the Judicial Code which will restore the possibility for the Supreme Judicial Council to use disciplinary action against judges based on ECHR rulings anyway. In the time to come the Strasbourg-based court is expected to issue more rulings in disputes between citizens and the government of Armenia and predictably they will be in favor of Armenian citizens. The cases range from the 2008 post-election crackdown on the opposition to controversial redevelopment projects in downtown Yerevan in the 2000s. SJC member Hovannisian suggests setting up a commission to establish all those who are responsible for the decisions – be them from the former government or the Court of Cassation. Waste Management Company Rethinks Press Conference Venue • Artak Khulian An international company in charge of garbage collection in Yerevan has dropped its plans to hold a press conference in Tbilisi, Georgia, after hearing criticism over its decision in Armenia. Sanitek, a Lebanese-run operator that has been under fire for over a year for its poor waste management in the Armenian capital, originally planned the event in the Georgian capital on July 31. It had also offered to cover travel and food expenses for the Armenian journalists who decide to attend the event. In a press release on July 30 the company said the press conference will be held in Yerevan on August 2. “In order to avoid another occasion for anti-propaganda against the company and not to lose sight of the main goal, the press conference attended by representatives of the company will take place at Armenia Marriott Hotel in Yerevan on August 2,” Sanitek said. In explaining why it had initially chosen the Georgian capital as a venue for the press conference, Sanitek said there had been no guarantees that some ‘unlawful persecution’ would not take place against the company’s shareholders and representatives. The original plans of the company angered the opposition Luys faction of the Yerevan City Council. Urging Sanitek to revise its decision, Luys faction leader Davit Khazhakian said that otherwise it would send a bad message to foreign investors. “We believe that the holding of a press conference by a foreign investor in the capital of a neighboring state would directly affect the reputation of Yerevan,” Khazhakian said. Since last year Sanitek has complained of financial difficulties in organizing garbage disposal in Yerevan, blaming poor roads and excessive damage to its equipment for its woes. In the meantime, Yerevan authorities have fined the company seven times for a total of $90 million (nearly $190,000) for falling short of required standards. Yerevan Mayor Hayk Marutian has not concealed his dissatisfaction with the work of the waste management company. During consultations at the municipality on July 29 he accused Sanitek of ‘only seeking profits and having no feeling of responsibility.” Marutian, who has repeatedly said before that he was also mindful of the contract obligations related to Sanitek, also spoke about Yerevan authorities’ improving the waste management situation in the city through their own efforts. Commenting on Sanitek’s original plans for holding its press conference on major waste disposal issues connected with the Armenian capital in another country, Yerevan municipality spokesman Hakob Karapetian said: “I am not aware of any problem that could prevent [Sanitek] from holding its press conference in Yerevan. Perhaps they wanted more publicity. Perhaps they wanted to look like they are being persecuted.” Armenian Official Voices Support For Istanbul Convention Ratification • Susan Badalian Armenian Minister of Justice Rustam Badasian in Azatutyun TV's Yerevan studio, 14Jul2019 A senior Armenian official has spoken in favor of Yerevan ratifying a Council of Europe convention dealing with the rights of women and gender equality in spite of a campaign launched by some detractors claiming risks to family values. Thirty-four of the 47 Council of Europe member-states have already ratified the so-called Istanbul Convention. Armenia is among 11 members that have signed the document but not yet ratified it in parliament. The Convention has not even been put on the parliament agenda in Armenia yet, but its detractors have already launched an online-based campaign against it, claiming that the document undermines family values by promoting LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) rights and legally recognizing same-sex marriages and the so-called ‘third sex’ status. Proponents of the Convention in Armenia have called such views a misconception, seeking to debunk these claims. Armenia’s Ministry of Justice has presented tabulated arguments in favor of ratifying the Convention, describing the row kicked up over its possible ratification as “artificial”. “The goal is simply to hit the government from different sides and create a negative background to all this,” Justice Minister Rustam Badasian said. The Convention obliges participating nations to prevent violence without any discrimination, including gender-based discrimination. According to the Armenian Justice Ministry, “ratification of the Convention is not imposed from the outside, but is what we need ourselves.” “This is the commitment of the Republic of Armenia to its citizens to ensure the protection of human rights,” Justice Minister Badasian said. Chairman of the Chamber of Advocates Ara Zohrabyan, one of the most vocal critics of the Convention, has been rallying support for his campaign to “stop the Istanbul Convention” through a website. But Zohrabian says his struggle is not political and is not aimed against the current government as he also spoke about the issue before. “I actively opposed this bill and organized professional discussions also before... I spoke about it at that time. In other words, it means I do not pursue any political goals against the current government. I simply see a threat to family values and in this sense I’ve raised my concerns,” he said. Zohrabian stressed that he supports the prevention of violence and that the Convention has mechanisms in this regard that should be applied in Armenia’s legislation, but in his view, the Convention has some unacceptable wording. For example, he says, along with the word ‘family’ the Convention uses the term ‘domestic unit’. According to Zohrabian, this contains a risk that LGBT community members will also be able to create families. “Let them pass a separate law protecting the rights of LGBT people, if they find it necessary, but not write about domestic violence and include them in the family, because in that case tomorrow the conception of family will already imply these people as well,” Zohrabian said. Talking to RFE/RL’s Armenian Service (Azatutyun.am), Dr. Marceline Naudi, President of GREVIO, the Istanbul Convention monitoring body, said that the countries that have ratified the Convention have made significant progress in preventing violence against women. As for the debate in Armenia, Naudi said: “The Istanbul Convention does not define family. It does not promote a particular type of family. The Istanbul Convention does not say a family consists of X, Y, Z. It does not define family at all. What the Istanbul Convention tries to do is to protect women wherever they are – whether they are at home, whether they are on the street, whether they are at work, because violence against women sadly occurs everywhere and anywhere… Now we also say that the Convention should apply generally to all women regardless of who they are – whether they are Roma women, Muslim women, regardless of their ethnicity, their sexual orientation, if they are lesbian women, if they are heterosexual women, regardless of who they are, none of them should be excluded from receiving help and support and protection from violence against them.” The Council of Europe official thinks that like other nations Armenia would only benefit from ratifying the Istanbul Convention. “I would say that becoming a party to the Convention and working towards preventing, combating and eliminating violence against women and domestic violence would benefit all members of Armenian society – women, girls, men, boys. I think that everyone would stand to benefit if it is ratified,” she said. The Armenian Apostolic Church also has reservations about the Convention. In a statement bishops and diocesan leaders have called on the Armenian authorities not to ratify the Convention. Spiritual leaders say they see dangers in the subtext of articles that they claim imply freedom for people to choose their gender and contain wording that goes against the Armenian perception of what family is. According to the church doctrine, a family is a union between a man and a woman. The Ministry of Justice, meanwhile, reminds the clergy that this is the same as defined in Armenia’s Constitution. “According to Article 35 of Armenia’s Constitution, only a woman and a man who attain the marriageable age shall have the right to marry and form a family,” said Deputy Minister of Justice Rafik Grigorian. In a Facebook video Justice Minister Badasian said that a “constructive dialogue” is ongoing with the Church regarding the Convention. Kocharian Trial Judge Charged With Forgery • Naira Bulghadarian Armenia - Judge Davit Grigorian, 14May, 2019 An Armenian judge who presided over the trial of former President Robert Kocharian and released him on bail in May has been charged with forgery allegedly committed in relation to a separate case, the Special Investigation Service (SIS) told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service (Azatutyun.am) on Tuesday. On July 27, Armenia’s Supreme Judicial Council allowed for the investigation of Judge Davit Grigorian. The oversight body also decided to suspend the judge’s powers pending the investigation. On May 18, Grigorian controversially ordered Kocharian released from prison pending the outcome of the trial. He later suspended the trial, questioning the legality of coup charges brought against the ex-president and referred the case to the Constitutional Court. Prosecutors appealed against both decisions, which were condemned by political allies and supporters of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian. Armenia’s Court of Appeals overturned them on June 25, which led to Kocharian’s re-arrest. Earlier, Grigorian voiced suspicions that actions of the law-enforcement bodies could be retribution for his ruling in the high-profile case. The Prosecutor-General’s Office, however, insisted that the investigation was not related to the trial of Kocharian. The Prosecutor-General’s Office released more details of the criminal case on Tuesday, saying that Grigorian committed official forgery of protocols of hearings at which he was not even physically present. It again categorically denied that attention to the case that was first addressed in February was due to Grigorian’s ruling in the Kocharian trial. Earlier, Grigorian’s lawyer Yervand Varosian said that his client does not admit to the charge of forgery. He also said that Grigorian told the SIS earlier today that “the charge is a direct consequence of his two decisions in the [Kocharian] case.” Meanwhile, supporters of Kocharian and other critics of the current government claim that with actions like those against Grigorian law-enforcement agencies apply pressure on the judiciary, undermining its independence. Press Review “Zhoghovurd” refers to the weekend incidents at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border in which at least one soldier was killed and two others were wounded, suggesting that the kind of escalation of tensions outside the line of contact in Nagorno-Karabakh, at the internationally recognized state frontier is a rather rare occurrence. Hence, the paper says, is the rather rare tough reaction of the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that slammed Azerbaijan over “intentional and provocative ceasefire violations”. “This means that the situation at the Armenian border has changed, but this change appears to be unnoticeable for broader public and political circles, because no one has voiced any alarm in this regard. The impression is that the statement of Armenia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not concern Armenia’s borders,” the paper writes. Lragir.am claims that certain ‘pro-Armenian’ experts in Russia have recently been working actively to pit the ethnic Armenian authorities of Nagorno-Karabakh against the government of Armenia. The online paper suggests that one of the purposes of such efforts is geopolitical and is related to the possible deployment of Russian troops in the southern part of the territory controlled by Nagorno-Karabakh authorities. It tries to understand whether Samvel Babayan, a former Karabakh army commander who seeks to make a bid in the elections of Nagorno-Karabakh’s leader scheduled for next year, has anything to do with this, considering his statements about the ‘Russian mandate’. The paper equally questions the position of the current Karabakh authorities and their plausible candidate. “Participants of the current political process in Nagorno-Karabakh should take into account all possible scenarios and be mindful of their responsibility,” the online paper writes. The editor of “Aravot” cites a phone call from one businessman close to former Armenian authorities in which the latter complained that the paper ‘discredited’ him as more proof that last year’s change of government was a correct step. “As I often do, I suggested that this businessman lay out his vision in our newspaper. The businessman did not agree to that. Then, as an alternative, I suggested that he file a lawsuit to achieve justice. In reply, the man said that I discredit ‘our heroic nation’ and want ‘to turn everyone into informants.’ A short time afterwards the same businessman sent me an SMS with obscenities. I write about this story because it once again reassured me that regardless of what the current government is doing, the revolution that took place in April-May last year was right, in particular, because the so-called impudent way of communicating with the media mainly seems to be in the past… I say ‘mainly’ because some relapses still sometimes occur,” the editor writes. (Lilit Harutiunian) Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc. 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org