JAMnews, Baku-Yerevan  

 

 

 

Russian President Putin is arranging a trilateral meeting with the President of Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of Armenia on January 11 in Moscow.

 

This will be the first meeting since the end of the second Karabakh war (September 27-November 10, 2020).

 

 

Armenia and Azerbaijan have radically different expectations from this meeting.

 

In Yerevan, discussions are expected on economic issues and the problem of returning prisoners and searching for the missing.

 

Azerbaijan considers the main issue to discuss further conditions for the stay of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh.

 

Below: a survey of opinions from Yerevan and Baku, as well as a commentary by a Russian political scientist who believes that “Armenians should leave Karabakh along with their weapons.”

 

•Armenia: protests over alleged Pashinyan-Aliev meeting, rumored territory surrender

•The road to Nakhichevan: is Armenia surrendering its territories to Azerbaijan or emerging from blockade?

 

 

News from Yerevan

 

Press Secretary of the Prime Minister of Armenia Mane Gevorgyan said on her Facebook page that during the meeting the issue of regional transport corridors would be discussed.

 

First of all, this concerns the issue of international cargo transportation, including from Armenia to Russia and Iran, as well as from the central regions of Armenia to the Syunik region bordering with Azerbaijan through Nakhichevan.

 

Gevorgyan says the active discussions in the society both in Azerbaijan and Armenia of the so-called “project of the Meghri corridor” – the possible construction of a new transit road that will connect the Azerbaijani autonomy of Nakhichevan – with Azerbaijan as misleading. This is a road that will pass through the territory of Armenia – through the city of Meghri.

 

“In the trilateral statement of November 9, 2020 (which stopped the hostilities) there is no clause on Meghri or any other provision on the creation of a corridor through the territory of Armenia,” wrote Mane Gevorgyan.

 

Another key topic for discussion at the meeting of the leaders in Moscow in Armenia is considered the issue of returning prisoners, rescuing soldiers who remained on the Azerbaijani rear, finding the bodies of the dead and clarifying the fate of the missing.

 

“Without resolving this issue or significant progress, it will be very difficult to achieve an effective discussion of the economic agenda,” Gevorgyan wrote.

 

As a result of the negotiations, she said, it is possible to adopt a joint statement if “an agreement can be reached on all the above issues.”

 

Within the framework of Nikol Pashinyan’s visit to Moscow, a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin will also take place.

 

Politicians and the public in Armenia fear “another humiliating agreement with Azerbaijan”

 

The announced meeting in Moscow has caused a stormy and mostly negative reaction in Armenia.

 

A few comments from social media:

 

“New meeting – new betrayal”

 

“The authorities say that nothing about Meghri is written in the trilateral statement (dated November 10, 2020). So there is not a word about the village of Shurnukh either. Then why did we give it away?”

 

“The agreement of November 9 did not contain provisions on many issues, but a lot of things were promised orally – for example, the clarification of borders with the help of GPS and the transfer of Armenian territories to Azerbaijan.”

 

The Armenian media has published information that during his visit to Moscow, Nikol Pashinyan is allegedly going to sign the following agreements on the:

•Opening of a corridor through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan

•Transfer of some territories of Armenia to Azerbaijan

•Withdrawal of Armenian troops from Nagorno-Karabakh

 

It is alleged that the relevant documents have already been prepared and sent to the Ministry of Justice of Armenia.

 

President Armen Sargsyan called on Prime Minister Pashinyan to be guided exclusively by national interests and to follow the requirements of the Constitution and legislation of Armenia when reaching any agreements.

 

“We demand that Yerevan not endanger the sovereignty, statehood and territorial integrity of Armenia by signing any agreement,” said the Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia Aram I, the spiritual pastor of the Armenian dioceses of Lebanon, Syria, Iran, the countries of the Persian Gulf, Greece , USA, Canada and Cyprus.

 

Ishkhan Saghatelyan, a representative of the opposition Dashnaktsutyun party, wrote on his Facebook page: “Nikol has become persona non grata in Armenia and the Armenian world. From now on, only the enemy will shake Nikol’s hand, and with the help of the enemy he continues to hold the post of Prime Minister of Armenia. But this is temporary. “

 

Vazgen Manukyan, the single candidate for prime minister from the opposition Movement to Save the Motherland, stated that “Nikol Pashinyan does not represent Armenia and Artsakh. Any decision that contradicts the interests of Armenia and Artsakh […] will not be ratified and will be canceled after the change of government.

 

Baku: Negotiations are needed on the duties and powers of the Russian peacekeepers

 

Head of the Center for Global and Regional Security Problems Gabil Huseynli in an interview with JAMnews about what should be at the center of discussions at the meeting between Ilham Aliyev, Nikol Pashinyan and Vladimir Putin.

 

“First, concrete negotiations are needed on the responsibilities and powers of the peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh. There is news that the peacekeepers are conducting exercises with the involvement of Armenian forces, although this has not yet been officially announced.

 

Sanctions should be stipulated for a peacekeeping mission if it goes beyond its mandate.

 

Second, there are frequent changes to the peacekeeping maps. Sometimes some territories under the control of Azerbaijan are passed off as territories under the control of the peacekeeping mission. This is unacceptable and strikes at the credibility of Russian forces in the region.

 

Thirdly, Azerbaijan will never recognize the “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic” and its “president” Arayik Harutyunyan. A governor-general of this territory should be appointed soon, taking into account the opinion of Azerbaijan. And Harutyunyan is charged under several points of the Azerbaijani Criminal Code and should be handed over to official Baku.

 

Fourth, a corridor between the main part of Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan should be opened in the near future. The Armenian side is trying to change the approach to this issue. A red line must be drawn along this corridor.

 

Fifth, Turkey should also be present at the next such meetings. Because Turkey is part of the process, and Russia recognizes this. I think that the presence of official Ankara in the negotiation process will not allow him to enter a dead end. “

 

Russian political scientist: “This is the territory of Azerbaijan, Armenians must leave it along with their weapons”

 

Political scientist, editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine Igor Korotchenko in an interview with the Moscow-Baku magazine:

 

“In the trilateral statement of the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, since it was elaborated in wartime and temporary time pressure, it was impossible to detail in detail all aspects of the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement after the end of the Karabakh war.

 

Therefore, in my opinion, [the upcoming January 11] trilateral meeting should more clearly, in detail, define the following issues.

1.Complete withdrawal of Armenian forces from the territory of Azerbaijan. This applies not only to the direct armed forces of Armenia, but also to illegal Armenian armed formations of the so-called NKR, which de facto does not exist, but which is trying to pretend to be something of itself.

2.Determination of state borders between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

3.Transport corridors that should work in the region. The Trilateral Statement [Nov 10, 2020] clearly fixes the transport corridor between the main part of Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan. And the creation of such a transport corridor is also in the interests of Armenia.

4.Control in Karabakh should be in the hands of the Russian peacekeepers, and not the self-proclaimed so-called leaders of the non-existent NKR.

 

That’s it, the war is over. The status of Nagorno-Karabakh has not been determined, but this is the territory of Azerbaijan, therefore, the Armenians must leave this region with their weapons.”