IF OUR FRIENDS DO IT, IT IS NOT GENOCIDE
Corporate Crime Reporter, DC
Nov 13 2007
21 Corporate Crime Reporter 45, November 13, 2007
The Genocide Prevention Task Force was unveiled at the National Press
Club this morning.
The task force is being co-chair by former Secretary of State Madeline
Albright and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen.
It’s being convened by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
the American Academy of Diplomacy, and the United States Institute
of Peace.
In addition to Cohen and Albright, its members include: John Danforth,
Tom Daschle, Stuart Eizenstat, Michael Gerson, Dan Glickman, Jack
Kemp, Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, Tom Pickering, Julia Taft, Vin Weber,
and Anthony Zinni.
"The world agrees that genocide is unacceptable and yet genocide
and mass killings continue," Albright said. "Our challenge is to
match words to deeds and stop allowing the unacceptable. That task –
simple on the surface – is in fact one of the most persistent puzzles
of our times. We have a duty to find the answer before the vow of
‘never again’ is once again betrayed."
"We are convinced that the U.S. government can and must do better in
preventing genocide – a crime that threatens not only our values but
our national interests," Cohen said.
But after the opening remarks, Cohen and Albright hit a buzz saw of
skeptical questioning from reporters in the First Amendment Room.
"How do you reconcile your work in trying to build a moral American
consensus against genocide when just very recently each of you signed
letters urging America not to recognize the Armenian genocide?" a
reporter asked Cohen and Albright.
"This mission is about the future," Albright answered. "We want to
look at ways to try and prevent genocide and mass killing. That is the
purpose of this task force. The former Secretaries of State recognized
that terrible things happened to the Armenians and tragedies. The
letter was primarily about whether this was the appropriate time to
raise the issue."
"The fact is that all of us who signed were concerned about the level
of killings and the human suffering that took place between 1915 and
1923," Cohen said. "There was also a very deliberate decision to say
that we are engaged in warfare at the moment. We have our sons and
daughters who are at risk. And we felt that to have the resolution
brought might result in reactions on the part of the Turkish government
that could place our sons and daughters in greater jeopardy. It was
a very practical decision that was made. This was not to say that
we overlooked what took place in the past. We are saying – at this
point forward, what do we do? How do we marshal public opinion? How
do we marshal political action? How do we generate the will to take
action in a society that has been reluctant to do so in the past? It
involves multiple levels of complexity."
"If we are saying that this isn’t the right time to acknowledge
this genocide, does that mean that you are arguing that for political
expedience purposes, we are not going to be taking action on nor should
we take action on future genocides because of what are perceived to
be U.S. interests?" another reporter asked.
"We are saying there are no absolutes in this," Cohen answered. "We
are going to try and set forth a set of principles that will serve as
a guide. And hopefully that guide will allow political leadership in
this country and elsewhere. This is not something where the United
States is advocating unilateral action. We are talking about the
United States taking a lead to help shape public opinion – certainly
domestically but also internationally. And this will involve multiple
considerations, multiple political factors that have to be taken into
account. We hope this endeavor will be successful in pursuing mass
killings and genocide in the future."
"I also do think that it is important to recognize that even if
terrible things happened in the past, they do not need to happen in
the future," Albright said. "And that is what this is about. In no
way does it put the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval on anybody’s
behavior. On the contrary. It is to examine people’s behavior. It is
very important for us to move forward."
"It sounds as if you are both saying – if our friends do it, it is
not genocide," said another reporter. "And if our enemies do it,
it is genocide. Professor at the University of Haifa, Ilan Pappe,
has written recently that he believes there is genocide ongoing in
Gaza and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. But you folks wouldn’t
agree with that because Israel is our friend and we couldn’t say that
about Israel. Secretary Cohen, you say – we can’t say that about Turkey
and the Armenian genocide because our boys and girls are in harm’s way.
If you are going to define genocide by who does it, not by what it is,
your task force is in trouble."
"I don’t know that even the UN has declared that genocide occurred in
the Armenian situation," Cohen said. "We are trying to look forward
rather than backwards. On the issue of whether genocide is taking
place in the West Bank and Gaza – certainly that will be part of
[what] the task force [is] looking at."
"Yes, there is an element of pragmatism," Cohen said. "If someone
else’s son or daughter is in harm’s way, that is a factor that I as
an American citizen and as a former Secretary of Defense would have to
take into account. And would. And I think anyone serving public office
necessarily has to have a set factors to take into account. It is not
absolute. This will not be a document that says – this is when the line
is crossed, this is the action that will be taken. These are going
to be guidelines. They themselves will serve a valuable purpose. It
will help to at least raise the issue to a level of both domestic and
international concern – hopefully stirring action. That is our goal."
"When you are in the government, and you have to make very tough
decisions, you have to look at the overall picture," Albright said.
"Otherwise, we are not going to get off the ground. These are very,
very hard issues. I would definitely not accept your definition – if
friends do it, it’s okay, and if enemies do it, it is not. I find that
just an unacceptable premise. This task force is going to set forth
guidelines for practical action by the United States government. Which
is why we want to present this by the end of next year."
"You can have all kinds of emotional arguments why something is wrong
and then you never get it off the ground," she said. "You ultimately
have to take practical action. That is what is happening in the
United States. We are not going to get ourselves into emotional
appeals. Because that is not going to work. We are interested in
practical steps."
"The experience of the Armenians does indeed conform with the UN
Convention," another reporter shot back at Cohen. "In fact, Elie Wiesel
has said that the denial of the genocide is the final stage of the
genocide. The two of you have personally worked toward ascertaining
that the United States government does not take a stand recognizing
the Armenian genocide. This is of course based on real, practical
political considerations, that you mentioned. However, taking on this
new role, how can you reconcile your positions and the U.S. foreign
policy? How can you provide credibility that your recommendations
will be of use to the United States in its foreign policy and will
not be words on a piece of paper that will be acceptable but the US
will not follow up on?"
"You talk about political expediency," Cohen responded. "As Secretary
of Defense, I had responsibility for every man and woman who was
serving in our armed forces. And yes, I would have to take into
account whether or not I was placing them in greater jeopardy in
order to make a declaration for something that happened back between
1915 and 1923. I would have to weigh that. And frankly, I think the
former Secretaries of Defense – Republicans and Democrats alike –
all came to the same conclusion. We could not put our men and women
in greater danger under these circumstances. Does that mean that
we are not in a position to look forward and say – here are some of
the things that happened in the past, here are some of the things we
did not do in the past, here is something that needs to be done in
the future? There is no absolute right or wrong. It’s not all black
and white. We are going to have to take these into account. You as
a private citizen will be in a position to say – here is a document
issued by this esteemed group. What do you Mr. President, what do you
Mr. Secretary, intend to do about the atrocities currently taking place
in x-country? Are your abdicating your moral leadership, abdicating
the U.S. responsibility to lead? To gather and galvanize international
support to do something – disinvestment in that particular country,
condemning the leadership of that country? Having dealt with ethnic
cleansing in the past, to take that experience, as well as what took
place in Armenia, as well as what took place in Rwanda, now in Darfur,
and say – this is how we have to lead on this issue."
"It’s important to recognize what we said in the letter," Albright
said. "While we were secretaries, we recognized that mass killings
and forced exile had taken place, and we also said that the U.S.
policy has been all along for reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia
on this particular issue. I do think that one of the things that this
task force will ultimately recommend is that the parties to the problem
have to acknowledge what happened. That is part of the issue. There
is not one answer to fit all. This task force is about the future –
about preventing genocide."
http://www.corporatecrimereporter .com/genocide111307.htm
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
