SUMMER AGGRAVATIONS OF THE NEO-BOLSHEVIKS
LILIT POGHOSYAN
Hayots Ashkhar Daily
Published on June 21, 2008
Armenia
Impatiently rubbing their hands Levon’s supporters are getting prepared
for the coming battles. Some of them never leave the journalist’s
clubs, some stage their `liberation struggle’ directly from
`Yerevan-Kentron’ penitentiary, giving interviews to the
`freedom-striving’ press, suffering under the yoke of the violence.
Below we introduce some vivid examples from the latest aggravations of
the neo-Bolsheviks.
Who guided the crowd?
Head of Armenian Pan National Movement Administration Ararat Zurabyan,
in his free time during the hunger strike found out that it was
Armenia’s second President Robert Kocharyan who has planned beforehand
the `March 1 slaughter’.
Proofs? Please! Zurabyan says at around 9.00 p.m. when the first
firings were heard from Paronyan street a huge crowd was gathered near
Myasnikyan statue and there was no policeman there: `Later we learnt
that the police and the internal troops have gathered in Leo street and
Mashtots avenue. Thus we have to presume that using force by the
authorities was planned in that particular territory. That is why they
guided the people in that direction. It is evident that the actions
were aimed at organizing a demonstrative slaughter towards one part of
the demonstrators.
But, in this case, lots of questions appear. For example, was it by
Robert Kocharyan’s guidance that the `peaceful demonstrators’ armed
with cutting-pinching tools went to Myasnikyan’s statue? Why did they
decide to gather in that particular place full of police and internal
troops instead of choosing a more secure place?
Was it Robert Kocharyan or the Armenian Herostrat who ordered the
furious crowd not to leave the territory?
To Spoil The Elections Is The Principle Goal
This week `Radical’ Ara Sahakyan pleasantly surprised us. Very much
inspired of the forthcoming rally, the former vice Speaker of the
Parliament hurried to reveal the secret of the boss’s self-nomination.
To the question whether LTP is responsible for organizing the `bloody
feast’ of March 1. Mr. Sahakyan said: `Levon Ter-Petrosyan has a big
sin. It is his being nominated for presidency. Had he not done that the
authorities would have won a complete victory and laid a big table to
celebrate this victory. But Levon Ter-Petrosyan didn’t allow this to
happen. For this he shoulders big responsibility.’
With this words Levon’s companion-in-arm, in fact, gave away
Ter-Petrosyan, by confessing that the only goal of the latter’s being
nominated for presidency was far not to be elected (which is from the
sphere of fantasy). Something that the authorities used to speak about,
on the highest level.