March 06, 2007 edition –
tml < .html>
Oil fuels more independent Azerbaijan
A railroad deal will soon link the ex-Soviet outpost to European markets.
By Daria Vaisman | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
TBILISI, GEORGIA
Only recently, Azerbaijan was just another former-Soviet outpost with
a Russia-sized chip on its shoulder. Today, it’s aglow with the
self-confidence that only an oil windfall can bring.
The recently completed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline – stretching
to Turkey via Georgia – has turned this country on the Caspian Sea,
which gained independence in 1991, into one of the fastest-growing
economies in the world with a GDP that leapt 32.5 percent last year.
And with oil revenues expected to top $100 billion in the next 10
years, Azerbaijan has been giving itself a makeover. As demands swell
for space and resources, the national overhaul will include nine new
bridges, a beltway that will loop around its capital, Baku, and a
multimillion dollar water pipeline.
But the windfall has had another effect – it has given Azerbaijan
unprecedented independence in dictating its own affairs, spearheading
the kinds of linkage projects the West has promoted and funded in the
Caucasus for a decade.
"Azerbaijan has been able to play a more independent role because of
its oil wealth and, quite frankly, a very able political leadership,"
says Stephen Blank, professor of national security studies at the US
Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. "That gives Azerbaijan a
certain amount of leverage."
Others are concerned that Azerbaijan’s newfound confidence will only
exacerbate the country’s dire record on corruption and human
rights. "Many people think that the international community has turned
a blind eye to Azerbaijan’s worsening democratic practices because of
commercial interests and its strategic advantage," says Baku-based
International Crisis Group analyst Vugar Gojayev.
The presidents of Azerbaijan and Georgia met with Turkey’s prime
minister on Feb. 7 in Tbilisi to inaugurate an ambitious new project –
a 160 mile, $420 million railroad linking the three countries and
providing the shortest distance for commercial traffic between Europe
and Central Asia. Construction should be complete by the end of 2008.
At the signing, Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili called the
railroad "a project that signals a geopolitical transformation in our
region," using language that echoed that of the US in the early 1990s,
when it first pushed the Baku- Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline to develop an
energy corridor that bypassed Russia.
This time around, though, the US refused to finance the railroad
unless neighboring Armenia, which has been in a 15-year standstill
with Azerbaijan following a brutal war over contested territory, was
allowed to take part.
Local officials said they didn’t need international aid. Instead,
Azerbaijan offered to pick up Georgia’s $220 million tab, to be repaid
over 25 years at an annual interest rate of 1 percent.
And while the railroad will bring modest gains to Georgia, it is
Azerbaijan that stands to benefit most. A link to Turkey will allow it
to ship up to 20 million tons of goods each year straight to its prime
target: Europe.
"Azerbaijan wants to be as close to Europe as possible," says Khazar
Ibrahim, spokesman for Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. "We
think that this railroad will be another step."
Europe wants closer ties to Azerbaijan, as well, at least according to
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose country holds the EU presidency
this year. Following a recent meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev in Germany, she announced a "serious interest in expanding our
mutual economic links."
The surest sign of Azerbaijan’s growing clout came this December, when
Russia announced that it had doubled Georgia’s gas prices – an
increasingly used pressure point for former Soviet countries on the
outs with Russia. Georgian and Russian relations reached an all-time
low this past year.
Azerbaijan intervened, promising to supply Georgia with low-priced
gas. "Azerbaijan made a very strategic decision to help Georgia out,
despite pressures from the Kremlin," says Baku-based political analyst
Fariz Ismailzade. "They’re securing a stable Georgia and, with it, a
stable transit zone for their own exports."
Afterward, Russia announced that gas prices for long-time ally
Azerbaijan would be doubled, too, despite previously solid relations
and a 2004 deal that promised stable prices until 2009. While some
argued that Russia raised prices to meet its own increasing gas
demands, Azerbaijani politicians saw the increase as Russia’s attempt
to stop it from exporting to Georgia.
In a Jan. 19 Wall Street Journal op-ed, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister
Elmar Mammadyarov wrote that Russia had given "more than a market
message" that it is "unacceptable for Azerbaijan" to help
Georgia. President Aliyev told a Moscow radio station that Azerbaijan
would not be "subject to commercial blackmail."
Instead, Azerbaijan shut off oil exports to Russia, while debating
whether to also pull Russian networks off the air in retaliation.
"If they didn’t have the margin for maneuver they now have, they
probably wouldn’t have taken the chance. They knew they could stand up
to Russia and not get hurt," says Mr. Blank of the US Army War
College.
| Copyright © 2007 The Christian Science
Monitor. All rights reserved.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
