Turkish National Security Council failed to discuss Protocols

news.am, Armenia
Feb 20 2010

Turkish National Security Council failed to discuss Protocols

13:47 / 02/20/2010Turkish National Security Council failed to discuss
the Protocols on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between
Armenia and Turkey at its Feb. 19 sitting.

The Council discussed the policy of struggling against Kurdish rebels,
as well as Cyprus and Greece issues.

The meeting lasted for 4 hours and a half, whereupon the participants
arrived at Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s residence and
had a short meeting with him.

Turkish media report that the Council was to discuss the
Armenian-Turkish protocols at its Feb. 19 sitting.

L.A.

BAKU: Armenian armed forces shot dead two soldiers

APA, Azerbaijan
Feb 18 2010

Armenian armed forces shot dead two soldiers

Armenian armed forces have shot dead two Azerbaijani servicemen in an
exchange of fire near the breakaway Nagornyy Karabakh, according to
APA.

Azerbaijani soldiers Faracov Xayal Basar oglu and Mammadov Sahil
Novruz oglu died from Armenian bullets near Agdam and Goranboy
districts, APA news agency reported on 18 February.

The agency added that a skirmish was under way in Agdam and Goranboy
districts.

If the deal collapses, US Congress would pass Armenian Genocide res

The Economist: If the deal collapses, US Congress would pass Armenian
Genocide resolution

19.02.2010 14:37

Yerevan (Yerkir) – After Armenia-Turkey protocols were signed in
Zurich `it looked like a clear achievement for its policy of `zero
problems’ with its neighbors,’ an article in The Economist magazine
says.

It says that just a day after the deal was signed, `Turkey’s Premier
Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that it could not be implemented until
Armenia withdrew from Nagorno-Karabakh, which it has occupied since
the war.’

Commenting on the Armenian Court ruling that the Protocols are
constitutional, the Economist mentions that `Turkey is throwing a
fresh tantrum.’

`Turkey looks isolated. America, its most important ally (and the
deal’s biggest backer), has taken Armenia’s side. Russia argues that
Turkish-Armenian relations should not be linked to Nagorno-Karabakh, a
view shared in Washington,’ the article reads.

`If the deal collapses, the way would be left open for Congress to
pass a resolution recognizing the 1915 killings as genocide, something
it has long threatened. This in turn could trigger anti-American
feelings in Turkey strong enough to leave Ankara feeling that it has
no choice but to retaliate. One option would be to kick the Americans
out from the strategically located Incirlik airbase,’ the author
concludes.

World Bank Embarks On Elaboration Of New Strategy Of Support For Arm

WORLD BANK EMBARKS ON ELABORATION OF NEW STRATEGY OF SUPPORT FOR ARMENIA

ARKA
Feb 19, 2010

YEREVAN, February 19. /ARKA/. The World Bank is embarking on
elaboration of a new strategy of support for Armenia, WB Regional
Director on South Caucasus Asad Alam said Thursday at his meeting
with Armenian Parliament Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan.

The press office of Armenian National Assembly quoted Alam as saying
that the World Bank is interested in cooperation with Armenian
parliament and the speaker.

The WB regional director also voiced satisfaction at the fact that
Armenia is reckoned among the best performers of WB programs in last
10-15 years.

He thanked the speaker for cooperation with the World Bank and stressed
the necessity to deepen this cooperation.

Abrahamyan said he was pleased that the cooperation between the World
Bank and the National Assembly had intensified expressed gratitude
for support provided by the WB to the National Assembly.

The speaker also expressed appreciation of WB programs in Armenia
and stressed their effectiveness.

He said the World Bank has contributed a great deal to Armenia’s
efforts to come out of the financial crisis, recover the economy,
combat corruption and develop education and public health sectors.

Abrahamyan also pointed out the WB’s contribution to recovery of
roads and irrigation infrastructure.

Armenia’s future steps were discussed at the meeting as well.

Under its 2009/2010 strategic partnership program, the World Bank
earmarked $550 million for Armenia.

Some 100 million dollars of this amount will be sent to the budget
and the remaining $450 million will be targeted for investment
programs.

Armenian Ambassador Meets With UAR President

ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH UAR PRESIDENT

news.am
Feb 19 2010
Armenia

The cooperation between the Armenian Embassy in Russia and Diasporan
organizations will contribute to the preservation of Armenian
national identity, RA Ambassador to Russia Oleg Yesayan stated at
his meeting with Board members, Union of Armenians of Russia (UAR),
led by Ara Abramyan.

The press service of the RA Embassy in Armenia told NEWS.am that
Ambassador Yesayan pointed out the UAR’s important coordinating role
in uniting the Armenian community in Russia.

Ambassador Yesayan also held a meeting with Hero of the USSR and Russia
Artur Chilingarov, who expressed the confidence that the Armenian
Ambassador will contribute to the development of Armenian-Russian
relations. According to him, since it was established ten year ago,
the UAR has been carrying out large-scale activities to preserve
Armenian culture and traditions in Russia.

Once Again, Quest For Armenian Genocide Resolution Begins

ONCE AGAIN, QUEST FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION BEGINS
By Michael Doyle

McClatchy Washington Bureau
6530.html
Feb 19 2010

WASHINGTON — The latest version of an Armenian genocide resolution is
on track to win House committee approval, but its long-term prospects
remain uncertain.

This plot is familiar. Some characters have changed. The denouement
is still to be determined.

On March 4, the House Foreign Affairs Committee is set to vote on a
resolution declaring that "the Armenian Genocide was conceived and
carried out by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923." Some consider
the resolution diplomatically dangerous, but vote-counters consider
committee passage a foregone conclusion.

"We are confident of a positive outcome," said Bryan Ardouny, executive
director of the Armenian Assembly of America. "We have a track record
of the committee approving the resolution in the past."

Typically, congressional committee chairs will only bring up measures
they are confident will pass.

Residents of California’s San Joaquin Valley, and other regions with
large Armenian-American populations, are watching all of the action
closely, and in some cases participating directly in it. The House
panel’s members include a number of resolution co-sponsors, including
Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno.

Advocates of the resolution say it’s important to account for the
Ottoman Empire killings and depredations that occurred during and after
World War I, when by estimates upward of 1.5 million Armenians died.

"Genocide is not something that can simply be swept under the rug
and forgotten, and our nation cannot continue its policy of denial
regarding the Armenian genocide," Costa said.

Approval by the 45-member House Foreign Affairs Committee, though,
is a far cry from getting the diplomatically dicey resolution through
the full 435-member House of Representatives.

Currently, for instance, the resolution has only 137 House co-sponsors,
far short of the 218 needed for House approval. The last time the
issue arose, in 2007, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declined to bring
the resolution to the House floor until it had the requisite 218
co-sponsors.

Opponents are bringing out their big guns, warning the resolution
would interfere with good diplomatic relations. Turkish and Armenian
negotiators last year agreed to a set of protocols designed to smooth
diplomatic relations, but the respective legislatures have not yet
formally ratified them.

"That would be jeopardized by a political act of passing this
resolution," said David Saltzman, chief counsel to the Turkish
Coalition of America. "Passage of this resolution would be a
potentially impenetrable hurdle (to reconciliation)."

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has likewise recently
denounced the resolution as doing serious harm to U.S.-Turkey
relations.

This plea of bad timing is one of the many familiar elements in the
Armenian genocide fight.

In 2007, the Bush administration successfully argued the resolution
would undermine the use of Turkish bases to resupply U.S. forces in
Iraq. In 2000, then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert killed the resolution,
citing "unusually tense" conditions in the Middle East.

High-powered lobbying is another familiar plot line.

Hastert is now registered as a lobbyist for the Turkish government.

His firm, Dickstein Shapiro, has been paid up to $45,000 a month
for its work on Turkey’s behalf, public records show. One-time House
Minority Leader Richard Gephardt is likewise a registered lobbyist
for Turkey.

Some hope the arrival of the Obama administration will shake up these
familiar faces and oft-heard arguments.

"A lot of things have changed," said Aram Hamparian, executive director
of the Armenian National Committee of America.

While they were in the Senate and campaigning, Hamparian noted,
President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton all endorsed Armenian genocide recognition.

Presidents, though, often back away from their campaign-season
Armenian genocide resolution pledges. Obama, for one, avoided
the term "genocide" in his presidential Armenia proclamation in
April. Reading between the lines, one might see further hints of a
pending administration retreat on the resolution itself.

"Our view is that the negotiations that have been taking place between
Turkey and Armenia offer a positive path for the future," Defense
Secretary Robert Gates said in early February. "Anything that would
impede the success of those discussions and negotiations I think is
objectionable. I would just leave it there."

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/8

Dependence Day

DEPENDENCE DAY
By Tom Balmforth

Russia Profile
id=International&articleid=a1266520246
Feb 18 2010

Bagapsh Might Not Really Be a Moscow Puppet, but His Current Isolation
Gives Him Little Choice

On a trip to Moscow on Wednesday Sergey Bagapsh, the president of
the rebel region Abkhazia, inked a raft of deals with his Russian
counterpart Dmitry Medvedev, including one that will establish a joint
military ground force in the breakaway Georgian republic. Georgia
winced and NATO wagged its finger. The ten bilateral deals, apparently
signed to improve Abkhazia’s security, include plans to upgrade an
existing Russian base. Bagapsh also said the breakaway republic hopes
to join the Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia Customs Union.

Days after president Bagapsh was inaugurated for his second term
as president of the breakaway Georgian republic, he embarked on a
three-day visit to Moscow. He was received by Dmitry Medvedev at the
Kremlin yesterday to commemorate 200 years since Abkhazia, on one of
a number of past occasions, was absorbed into the Russian empire.

In the run-up to this historic moment, the leader of the breakaway
republic made some appropriate – and somewhat far-fetched – suggestions
of how to further interweave Russian and Abkhaz futures, for instance
bringing Abkhazia into the Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan Customs Union
(even though neither Minsk nor Astana have recognized Abkhazia as a
sovereign state). Bagapsh also suggested that restrictions might be
lifted to allow Russians to buy up Abkhazia’s prize real estate on the
shores of the Black Sea where the Soviet elite used to go on vacation,
the Kommersant news daily reported.

During the meeting, the leaders signed in a raft of deals
on bilateral cooperation between Russia and the rebel
region, recognized only by Russia, Nicaragua, Venezuela and
speck-on-the-map-in-the-middle-of-the-Pacific- Ocean Nauru.

Among other things, the presidents agreed to renovate the existing
Russian military base at Gudauta, 37 kilometers north of Sukhumi,
where 1,700 Russian troops are presently stationed. According to the
deal, the base on the shores of the strategically important Black
Sea will then host a "joint" ground force for the next 49 years. The
accord will be renewed automatically every 15 years from then on,
Itar-Tass reported.

The ten accords were promptly condemned by a disgruntled West. "All
agreements reached between Russia and the regions of Georgia are
invalid," said Carmen Romero, the deputy spokesperson for NATO.

Meanwhile Irakli Tuzhba, a spokesperson for the Abkhazian Foreign
Ministry, insisted that the base and Russian troops are necessary to
provide security.

Alexei Malashenko, a Caucasus expert for Carnegie Moscow Center,
said he wasn’t at all surprised by the news, but that it guarantees
Russia’s future in the country. "This basically is a permanent treaty.

It means that Russia will remain on the territory of Abkhazia as a
military presence," said Malashenko.

There are currently 4,000 Russian military servicemen stationed in
Abkhazia, Tuzhba said, but when asked how this will change with the
establishment of a base and a joint ground force, he declined to
comment. "I think the contingent will be increased if it becomes
necessary, but there is no need at the moment, so the military
contingent is not increasing," he said.

Both Medvedev and Bagapsh were full of warm rhetoric during their press
conference and keen to use weak points in cooperation as building
blocks in their relationship. While for instance admitting that the
$130 million bilateral trade between Abkhazia and Russia is somewhat
paltry, Medvedev said "it is only the beginning, the first phase in
developed trade links and the starting point for further work." In
fact the two leaders hope to sign in a further 22 deals to expand
cooperation, they said. Bagapsh even revealed that Abkhaz railways will
soon come under the full management of the Russian Railways company.

So is Abkhazia happily slipping from shaky pseudo-independence,
unrecognized by the vast majority of the international community, into
increasing dependence on Russia? Although this appears to be the only
way to interpret the events of Wednesday, it would be misleading to
see Bagapsh as a Moscow puppet, said Sergey Markedonov, an independent
political analyst and expert on the Caucasus. This has been clear,
he said, since Bagapsh won Abkhazia’s presidential elections in 2004,
despite the Kremlin directly backing his rival. But the trouble for
Bagapsh at the moment is that he has no other option, said Markedonov:
"if five or six European countries did support Abkhazia, then maybe
Bagapsh would favor European integration."

"[Abkhazia] is not going to beg anyone to recognize it," Bagapsh said
on Tuesday. So far Russia has kindly undertaken the job of lobbying
for Abkhazia’s "legitimacy." But it was a dubious amount of legitimacy
that was bestowed upon Abkhazia’s sovereignty when Moscow coaxed Nauru,
an island of 11,000 people, into recognizing Abkhazia and South Ossetia
in return for $50 million (150 million rubles) of humanitarian aid.

These additions are bound to do little to change Abkhazia’s situation,
so does Sukhumi have to continue fully relying on Moscow? Abkhazia
might find an alternative source of support in Ankara. Several analysts
suggest that Turkey may come to recognize Abkhazia’s independence
because of its large Abkhaz diaspora. "Turkey is ready to establish
special relations with Abkhazia. I don’t know if they will recognize
Abkhazia next year, but nonetheless they recognize the special position
of Abkhazia," said Malashenko.

To that extent, NATO members and Georgia are not the only countries
to be wary of Russia expanding its military presence in Abkhazia. "I
think Turkey is disappointed with this," said Malashenko. Turkey has
recently become increasingly influential in the Black Sea region. "The
Kremlin sees Turkey as a big rival as far as all conflicts and problems
in the region are concerned. Traditionally, Russia has played the
role of mediator in the ‘frozen conflict’ of Nagorny Karabakh, but
now Turkey is getting more involved," he said. Whether Turkey’s hand
could drag Abkhazia out of its total dependence on Russia is, however,
still unclear.

http://www.russiaprofile.org/page.php?page

Book: Genocide, Democracy And Development Under Focus

GENOCIDE, DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT UNDER FOCUS
By Pjj Antony, [email protected]

Arab News

Fe b 17 2010
Saudi Arabia

Democracy as a form of government has been praised and criticized with
equal passion and fervor by the common people and intellectuals alike.

The concepts behind democracy vary so much that a universally
acceptable format is non-existent.

However, it is to be noted to its credit that no government on our
planet is complete without an element of democracy in one form or other
at some level of governance. Be it a republic, monarchy, theocracy or
military dictatorship. Such is the panoramic versatility of democracy.

In her latest book "Listening to Grasshoppers — Field Notes on
Democracy", Arundhathi Roy passionately criticizes the way democracy
is practiced by its most ardent supporters among contemporary states
and questions its very credibility as the most acceptable form of
government.

She doesn’t condemn it but argues for the need to go beyond democracy
in search of a better form of government by the people and for the
people. It certainly makes for interesting reading. Her arguments find
fuel from issues related to the rights of minorities, refugees, people
displaced in the name of development, protection of environment etc.

Nearly a dozen essays included in this book were written by the
author in response to sociopolitical developments and were published
previously. But in-depth analysis and the author’s ability to touch the
very roots of controversial issues as well as her gifted capability to
present her argument amidst the backdrop of fundamental human concerns
make the book very much contemporary, relevant and widely appealing.

Roy is no ivory tower dweller. She is direct, transparent and forceful
and moors her writing boldly on her convictions. Her concern for
the underprivileged minorities and willingness to fight on their
side is well known. "Listening to Grasshoppers" is mainly about
the victimization of Indian Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis (Hindu low
castes) and people driven away from their habitat to make way for
mammoth dam projects.

According to Roy, a kind of perverted consensus exists within Indian
democracy that tolerates these injustices. She cites it as examples
of democracy facilitating fascism from within, nullifying its very
essence and spirit.

The book is certainly engaging but disturbing and provocative at
the same time with its threadbare observations about the vulnerable
underbelly of Indian democracy. It keeps on thinking the unthinkable
and speaking the unspeakable and questions the credentials celebrated
within Indian democracy. The author even ridicules democracy by
intentionally misspelling it as ‘demon-cracy’.

She pulls the reader from his comfort zone to face uncomfortable truths
from recent history. She dwells on the past to give an insight into
the unfolding world of democracy and development.

The ninth chapter, titled "Listening to Grasshoppers: Genocide,
Denial and Celebration" is a commemorative lecture Roy delivered in
Istanbul on assassinated newspaper editor Hrant Dink. This particular
chapter is the crux of her presentation. She shocks her readers while
she traces the undesirable but historical connection between genocide
and development. The history of genocide is as old as man himself. An
aggressive majority targeting a minority, blaming them for social and
economical ills and eventually forming a consensus to annihilate the
minority, is an oft-repeated scenario from human history.

In 1915 Ottoman Turks successfully targeted the Armenian minority,
killing nearly one and a half million in Anatolia. White Americans
targeted the original natives and systematically murdered 90 percent
of the Red Indian population. One method was the distribution of
blankets infected with small pox. America’s second biggest holocaust
took place when thirty million Africans were kidnapped and transported
to the US to be sold as slaves. Half of them died in the dirty dark
gallows of ships from starvation and diseases.

In October 1904 the German general Adolf Lebrecht ordered the genocide
of southwest Africa’s entire Herero tribe. They were driven into the
desert and cut off from food and water, eventually perishing.

Germany exterminated six million Jews during the Nazi regime. The
genocide of the Gypsies throughout Europe went unnoticed because they
were too soft and vulnerable. The British killed the entire Tasmanian
people of Australia. Massacres in Rwanda, Congo, Afghanistan and Iraq
are also recent examples of genocide. The same can be said about the
Indian state-supported 2002 mass murder of Muslims in Gujarat and
the killing of Christians in Orissa in 2007.

Narendra Modi, the brains behind the Gujarat massacre and elected
provincial chief executive is now being praised as an icon of
development. He has become the darling of the corporate India.

Everything, however heinous it is, can be pardoned in the name of
development. The core of Roy’s argument is the alarmingly strengthening
connection between genocide and development in the interests of a
corporate mafia.

Roy feels that the next target will be the Dalits and tribal people
(low caste Hindus) from the mineral rich provinces of southeast India.

Telugana, Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkand, Utharanchal, Orissa, among
others, are the most economically backward regions with sizable lower
caste populations.

They are disillusioned with mainstream political parties including
the institutional communist parties and are being mobilized under the
Maoist umbrella. One quarter of India is already under the control
of these resistance groups.

Corporate India is impatient to evict these poor people from their
mineral-rich land to harvest profits. Premier Manmohan Singh, Narendra
Modi and Communist Party secretary Prakash Karatt has already opined
publicly that these lower caste resistance groups are the single
largest threat to India’s unity and progress. The country is getting
ready for another genocide, which has already started thanks to right
wing militias such as the Salwa Judum, armed by the state and aided
by upper caste Hindus.

Genocides have a common pattern. Victims are initially marginalized and
later targeted for annihilation after the majority forms a consensus
to justify the genocide. In other words a kind of democratic process
underpins genocide.

Another common factor is the economical interests of the genocide
masterminds. In the post-modern era old empires have been replaced
with corporate giants. The drama goes on. Democracy is turning into
a dictatorship of the majority. Is there a way out? Is there life
after democracy? Shouldn’t we look for something more democratic than
democracy itself? Roy passionately raises these questions.

The book is certainly worth reading. However I find it strange to
find the author leaving the question of nationalism untouched. Does
she too consider it as a holy cow? If we analyze the origin and
development of democracy it is easy to observe that the encroachment
of nationalism into the concept of democracy has created oppression
against the minority, paving the way for eventual marginalization
and probable extermination.

The very concept of nationalism tends to be chauvinistic and fascist in
practice. Along with democracy, nationalism too needs some fundamental
revamping.

http://arabnews.com/lifestyle/article18301.ece

Ambassador Calls For High Wycombe To Get Armenian Twin

AMBASSADOR CALLS FOR HIGH WYCOMBE TO GET ARMENIAN TWIN
By Lawrence Dunhill

Bucks Free Press
ssador_calls_for_Wycombe_to_get_Armenian_twin/
Feb 17 2010
UK

THE ARMENIAN ambassador last night called for High Wycombe to be
‘twinned’ with two towns in his homeland.

He was visiting an exhibition of children’s art and ‘illuminated
manuscripts’ from the former Soviet Union republic, at High Wycombe
library, set up by the Chiltern Armenian Society.

The society was founded in 2003 and has been trying to forge links
with towns Igevan and Dilidjan with a view to getting a formal
twinning agreement.

The towns are known for furniture production as well as forestry and
nearby fauna.

His excellency Vahe Gabrielyan told the Bucks Free Press: "There’s a
small but very vibrant Armenian community here in Wycombe and we’ve
already signed a linkage agreement between the three towns.

"We see that there are special values that we share and common spheres
of interest.

"We have to come up with several projects like this exhibition before
twinning can happen, but we believe we can succeed."

Foremr mayor of High Wycombe Liaquat Ali visited Armenia in 2005 and
deputy mayor, Muhammad Abdul-Karim, welcomed the ambassador yesterday
and praised the Chiltern Armenian Society.

He said: "The work the society is doing is excellent and I’m in full
support of these events taking place."

But he said he was "not sure" about twinning the towns because High
Wycombe is already twinned with Kelkheim in Germany.

Errol Baker, the chairman of High Wycombe Twinning Association,
attended and said he would talk to members about the idea.

Odette Bazil, chairman of the Chiltern Armenian Society, said: "There
are a lot of similarities between the towns but British people know
very little about Armenia.

She moved to Britain 50 years ago and wants Britons to find out more
about her homeland, which is bordered by Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia
and Iran and is about the size of Wales.

Armenia was the first country to adopt Christianity as its state
religion in 301 AD. Its parliament was formed and a constitution
drawn up in 1995 after 70 years of Soviet rule.

Former health minister Lord Darzi is of Armenian Christian origin
and is a member of the Chiltern Armenian Society.

There are about 18,000 Armenians in the UK.

http://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/5013186.Amba

Armenia To Follow Initiative Policy: RPA Member

ARMENIA TO FOLLOW INITIATIVE POLICY: RPA MEMBER

news.am
Feb 17 2010
Armenia

"Armenia initiated reconciliation with Turkey and should continue the
process itself," Republican Party MP Rafik Petrosyan told journalists
on February 17.

"If we started the process, we have to prove that Armenia is ready to
bring this initiative to a close in accordance with Constitution and
its interests," he emphasized adding if Armenia ratifies the Protocols
earlier, than Turkey, it will show international community that keeps
its word and the country’s aspirations are sincere.

According to him, after the consideration by RA NA Standing Committee
on Foreign Relations, the Protocols will unequivocally be ratified
without any reservations. However, the documents will not be discussed
in the Parliament at February 22-25 four-day session. They will be
submitted for discussion three weeks later.