ANKARA: Erdogan: Kurdish Citizens In Turkey Are Not Minority,

Cihan News, Turkey
June 28 2004

Erdogan: Kurdish Citizens In Turkey Are Not Minority, But One Part Of
The Whole

ISTANBUL (CIHAN) – Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said
on Monday that Kurdish citizens in Turkey are not minorities but are
one element of the whole.

Attending the Youth Summit in Istanbul, Erdogan said that as NATO and
the European Union (EU) extend east, Turkey’s geographical distance
is less significant and it plays a more important role. Expressing
the increased importance of Turkey, Erdogan stated that Turkey can
help with its experience that comes from the past and its effort to
engage with the west.

Erdogan noted that, “Turkey is important to the security of Europe.
NATO has fulfilled its mission to provide security and to struggle
against to terror and Turkey is working its align itself in the
direction of this target”.

Responding to a the question concerning the status of Kurdish people
in Turkey, Erdogan said that, “Our Kurdish citizens in Turkey are not
a minority but are one element of the whole. All elements contribute
to the integrity of Turkey. I am from the Black Sea region but my
wife is from the eastern Turkish city of Siirt where the Kurdish
citizens predominate”.

Erdogan said that they have worked to fulfill the Copenhagen criteria
since November 3, 2003 and have completed a large part of the
reforms. The implementation of these reforms has now been started.

Erdogan also evaluated relations with Armenia saying that, “Turkey
aims to be a country that has no problems with its neighbors, but the
problems between Turkey and Armenia result from Armenia’s attitude.
Armenia has problems with Azerbaijan even though it is occupies part
of Azerbaijan. We want to improve relations with Armenia but Armenia
is a fractious country and the Armenian administration has a
difficult attitude. We cannot say why Armenia will not attend NATO
Summit in Istanbul, but the assertion of an Armenian genocide cannot
be accepted”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Azerbaijan-Armenia-Turkey trilateral meeting of FMs

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
June 28 2004

AZERBAIJAN – ARMENIA- TURKEY TRILATERAL MEETING OF FOREIGN MINISTERS
[June 28, 2004, 15:29:29]

Foreign Ministers Elmar Mammadyarov of Azerbaijan, Abdulla Gul of
Turkey and Vartan Oskanyan of Armenia met in the framework of the
Istanbul NATO Summit on 28 June.

After the meeting, the Ministers briefed journalists. Foreign
Minister of Turkey Abdulla Gul described the meeting as very
fruitful, and noted that it had been aimed to assist peace talks in
the framework of the OSCE Minsk group. He pointed out that the
enlarging Europe and NATO are very interested in ensuring stability
and peace in the South Caucasus, including the resolution of the
Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. The parties, he
finalized, have decided to continue such meetings.

Foreign Minister of Armenia Vartan Oskanyan noted they had exchanged
views on providing stability in the region. He pointed out that in
light of enlarging Europe and NATO, it is very important to define
parameters of a new strategy in the South Caucasus. The Minister
confirmed that the parties are going to continue making efforts of
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh problem. Turkey, Azerbaijan and
Armenia are interested in stability in the region, he said.

Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov emphasized that the
parties once again expressed their positions in the matter. Special
attention, according to him, was paid to active involvement of Turkey
in the peace process. The Minister noted that they had agreed to
develop a special mechanism for that and continue the trilateral
meeting 1-2 months later. This meeting is another step forward, such
meetings bring us closer to the problem’s resolution, he said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Poll shows Armenians want unification with Karabakh

Poll shows Armenians want unification with Karabakh

Yerkir web site, Yerevan
26 Jun 04

A poll conducted by the Armenian Centre for National and International
Studies (ACNIS) has revealed that Armenians are ready to participate
in the defence of Karabakh if the war resumes.

Stepan Safaryan of the centre told a discussion on Friday [25 June]
that the poll, conducted among 1,950 individuals, indicates that 73
per cent of the respondents are in favour of the settlement of the
confrontation by Armenia, Karabakh and Azerbaijan. Most of the
respondents consider the Karabakh issue to be part of the Armenian
Question.

Answering “why Karabakh does not belong to Azerbaijan”, 38 per cent
said that Karabakh was annexed to Azerbaijan under the Soviets, 27.6
per cent said Armenians have been living in that region for centuries,
and 12 per cent pointed out that Armenia has won the war over
Karabakh.

As for the status of Karabakh, 59.7 per cent see Karabakh as part of
Armenia, whereas 38.6 per cent sees it as an independent state.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Lessons in history: Controversial Turkish Historian argues

The Gazette (Montreal, Quebec)
June 26, 2004 Saturday Final Edition

Lessons in history: Controversial Turkish Historian argues that
recognizing the Armenian Genocide is a political necessity for his
country

by LEVON SEVUNTS

It’s sometimes hard to explain to non-Armenian friends the need to
recognize the 1915 Armenian genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman
Turkish government.

“Why don’t you let it go?” I often hear. “Get on with your life. It
happened 90 years ago, for God’s sake.”

But for Turkish historian Taner Akcam, the need to recognize and
learn from the Armenian genocide is as acute now as it was when the
modern Turkish Republic was founded 80 years ago, particularly in
Turkey itself.

Akcam, a controversial historian at home whose views have made him
the target of death threats, argues that Turkey is approaching a
second crucial stage in its nation-building process and if it doesn’t
learn from past mistakes, it is bound to repeat them.

Akcam contends the collapse of the Soviet Union and the U.S. invasion
of Iraq have reawakened the Eastern Question, the redrawing of the
political map of the Middle East at the expense of the Ottoman Empire
and now the Turkish Republic.

Equally dangerous, Akcam argues, is the reawakening of revanchist
ideas among Turkey’s military-bureaucratic elites. Coupled together,
these tendencies could lead to another calamity, he warns.

>From Empire to Republic is certain to create controversy, especially
in Turkey, where discussions of the Armenian genocide are still
taboo. But what makes Akcam’s book stand out among other works on the
subject – apart from the fact that the author is a Turk – is that it
is the first serious scholarly attempt to understand the genocide
from the perspective of the perpetrator, rather than the victim.

Akcam uses a curious mix of historical research, sociology and
psychoanalysis to examine the cultural, ideological and political
climate that led to the genocide and argues it was a carefully
planned extermination, not an unfortunate byproduct of the First
World War, as is the official Turkish position.

His analysis of Turkish national identity and its past and present
propensity for political violence is shocking even for a reader who
does not see the country through the rosy glasses of Turkey’s tourism
ads.

But Akcam is not a “self-loathing Turk.” On the contrary, he comes
across as somebody who cares deeply about his native country. In
fact, one could argue that for Akcam, the issue of recognition of the
Armenian genocide by Turkey is not just a question of a moral
imperative, but of a political necessity for Turkey’s transformation
into a truly democratic country and its integration into the European
Union.

“It is a quest for Turkish national identity,” Akcam writes. “The
emergence of this Turkish national identity was one of the important
reasons for the occurrence of the genocide and today is one of the
important obstacles on the way to integration with Europe. The
existence of the same mindset that caused the Armenian genocide seems
today a major hindrance to solving the Kurdish question, and,
therefore, to membership in the European Union.”

>From Empire to Republic is also a passionate plea for a dialogue and
reconciliation between Armenians and Turks.

Akcam’s book is available online at

Levon Sevunts is a Montreal writer.

[email protected]

——-

>From Empire to Republic:

Turkish Nationalism & the Armenian Genocide

By Taner Akcam Zed Books, 273 pages, $32

GRAPHIC: Photo: RICHARD ARLESS JR. THE GAZETTE; Robert Kouyoumdjian,
a member of the Armenian National Committee of Canada, near the
Armenian National Monument in Montreal after the federal government
agreed in April to recognize the Armenian genocide during the First
World War.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.zoryan.org/

Labor Minister Calls For Bolstering Iran-Armenia Ties

Tehran Times, Iran
June 28 2004

Labor Minister Calls For Bolstering Iran-Armenia Ties

TEHRAN (IRNA) — Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Safdar Hosseini
here on Sunday met with the head of the Presidential Staff of
Armenia, Artashes Toumanian, and called for bolstering of
Iran-Armenia ties.

Alluding to an upcoming visit of President Seyyed Mohammad Khatami to
Armenia, he expressed hope the fifth Iran-Armenia Joint Commission
session will be held without delay.

Hosseini referred to the several signed agreements on electricity,
energy, gas and oil between the two countries and praised the
countries’ “outstanding” bilateral cooperation. The minister of
labor, while praising the increasing volume of trade exchanges
between Tehran and Yerevan, said: “Both sides can bolster their
relations due to the existence of many potential.”

Toumanian lauded the efforts of the Iranians to bolster relations and
expressed hope these relations would serve the interests of both
countries even more.

Toumanian also said the project to construct the “Kajaran” tunnel is
one of the most viable joint projects under way and would have no
problems going into operation.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

AESA: Armenian Schools Connectivity Project (ASCP) w Project Harmony

Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America, Inc.
417 W. Arden Ave., Suite 112C, Glendale, CA 91203
TEL 818-547-3372,

PROJECT HARMONY

Presents

Armenian Schools Connectivity Project (ASCP)

by

Mourad Mouradyan (Technical Manager)
Knarik Nazaryan (Senior Regional Coordinator)
Bryan Wockley (The US program Coordinator)

Tuesday 29, 2004 7:00PM
at
Armenian Society of Los Angeles
221 South Brand Blvd, Glendale, CA 91204.

Admission Free

The presentation will include past achievements of Project Harmony in
Armenia, over the last 2 years, through which 270 out of the 1400 total
number of schools have been equipped with computer labs and internet
connectivity. Recently a Mobile Computer/Internet Lab has been added to
this program to serve outlying regions that have not yet been equipped with
permanent labs.

There are several purposes for the trip around the US this summer.
Primarily, the visiting team is seeking to update the Diaspora community as
well as others interested in the development of technology education and
business in Armenia on the status of the Armenian Schools Connectivity
Project (ASCP). There have been several exciting developments recently in
ASCP including the launch of a Mobile
Computer Lab that will travel and provide internet access and training to
some of Armenia’s most remote regions on a rotating basis via satellite
uplink.

In general, the main purpose is to meet with individuals who are aware of
the ASCP network, have an interest in tech education and proliferation in
Armenia, and may be willing to serve as advisors to the program to preserve
this valuable resource.

Separately, the visiting team is looking to promote partnership
opportunities between schools and communities in the US and those within
the ASCP network in Armenia. The ECA has recently approved the proposal
for increasing the number of teacher exchanges and training opportunities
we can offer to US teachers in support of our partnership building process.
Teacher exchanges will continue for the coming three years, including
annual national follow-up training conferences for those participating in
collaborative school partnership programs.

Recently, the grant renewal for the ASCP has been approved by the State
Department to begin July 1 of this year. However, part and parcel to the
grant provision is a required plan for scaling down US Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) funding to internet school centers
over the course of the coming years.

There is a great interest in meeting with representatives of
schools in the Glendale and greater LA area who might be interested in
participating in Project Harmony facilitated school partnerships with
schools or communities in Armenia. Participation in these training
conferences, collaborative projects, and teacher exchanges is fully funded
by the ECA grant awarded to the Project Harmony ASCP.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.aesa.org

Internationally renowned quartet to perform in Yerevan

armenianow.com
25 June 2004

>From the World Stage to Armenia: Internationally renowned quartet to perform
in Yerevan

By Gayane Abrahamyan

ArmeniaNow arts reporter After three years of effort to get them to Armenia,
the world-renowned Kronos Quartet is scheduled play in Yerevan June 29 at
Aram Khachatryan Philharmonic Hall.

As far back as 2001, the Armenian Informational Music Center has been trying
to get the quartet to Armenia. For a number of reasons, including
scheduling, and the musicians’ concern that Armenia was in an “unstable”
region, invitations have been turned down.

“We simply cannot count how many and what kind of numerous letters we have
sent to the quartet’s manager telling about Armenia and about the rich
Armenian cultural background,” says chief manager of the center Sona
Hovhannisyan.

“Only in the end of 2003 we got an answer to our letters and it seemed to be
unbelievable that their managing director Janet Cowperthwaite wrote that
‘thanks to your latest letter the musicians gave in and agreed to visit
Armenia’.”

The quartet, comprised of David Harrington on first violin, John Sherba on
second violin, Hank Dutt on viola, and Joan Jeanrenaud on cello, is known
for its experimentation and its ability to cross genres of rock, jazz and
classical music. The group, formed in San Francisco in 1973, has won
numerous international awards, including three Edison Prizes ( Netherlands),
Rolf Schock Prize in Music ( Sweden), a Grammy Award for Best Chamber Music
Performance, amongst others.

Tuesday night’s performance is part of Perspectives XXI International Music
Festival, the fifth in Yerevan.

Over the years, more than 450 pieces have been written or arranged for
Kronos. The quartet’s extensive repertoire includes Alban Berg, Alfred
Schnittke, George Crumb, Astor Piazzolla. As early as 15 years ago, the
quartet ordered a composition from Armenian composer Avet Terteryan and
within the past few years, composers Ashot Zohrabyan and Tigran Tamezyan
have written compositions performed by Kronos.

While it is not unusual for Armenia to host the occasional regionally-famous
classical musician or conductor, getting an internationally-known group is a
rarity.

“This is our cultural policy to invite music stars to Armenia,” says
director of Armenian Information Music Center composer Stepan Rostomyan. “Of
course, it is very hard. Every time it takes two-three years for
successfully finishing negotiations but Armenia with its cultural potential
and history is as good as other countries where visits of stars are a usual
and habitual thing.”

The sanctioning of Perspectives XXI identifies Armenia as a “serious country
and organization”, Rostomyan says, making it easier to negotiate with
world-class artists. During last year’s festival London Symphonietta and
Jury Bashmet performed in Yerevan.

“It would be more impressive if the festival was carried out under high
patronage of the country’s president,” Rostomyan says. “In general when such
musicians are invited to a festival then these kind of events are carried
out precisely. We haven’t gotten consent yet but we still have hope,” says
Rostomyan.

The Khachatryan hall holds 1600 seats. Ticket prices for the concert range
from $5 to $35- higher than average for Yerevan concerts, but according to
one vendor, ticket sales are high.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

No, really — that is my real name, darnit!

Glendale News Press, CA
LATimes.com
June 26 2004

FROM THE MARGINS
No, really — that is my real name, darnit!

by PATRICK AZADIAN

We all have our stereotypes of what certain names should mean, and
what kind of names people should possess. It is perhaps human nature
to try to conform everything to our set of understandings, otherwise
we may feel uncomfortable or even intimidated.

My first name often evokes the question, “Hey, how did you get an
Irish name?” This particular inquiry is understandable, considering
more Americans trace their roots to the “green isle” than any other
region of the world. My curt response is often, “Well, it is actually
a Latin name. And I mean ‘Latin’ as in ancient Latium in central
Italy and not Central America.”

My initial research on the name confirmed my suspicion that it was
derived from the Latin patricius, from patres, plural of pater.
Recently a dear friend sent me a cynical note on this issue:

“Your attitude stems from your name:

patrician puh-TRISH-un,

noun:

1. A member of one of the original citizen families of ancient Rome.

2. A person of high birth; a nobleman.”

What are good friends for, right?

I also come across another type of inquiry: “What is your real name?”
Depending on my mood, I have different answers for this line of
questioning. If I have gotten off on the right side of the bed that
specific morning, the response can be as simple as, “It is Patrick,
although I should really spell it without the ‘c.’ ” And if I am
pressed with a follow-up question such as, “No, really, what is it?”,
my response can be as rude as: “What would you like my name to be?
Mohammed, Habib, Ahmet?”

Overall, I don’t mind explaining, as long as the question comes from
people whose initial experience with the name is via the Irish route.
What I was not prepared for, however, was when my Jewish Moroccan
associate asked me the same question: “Patrick, what is your real
name?” By the way, her name is Valerie! I tried not to react by a
counter question such as: “How come you don’t have a Sephardic or a
Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) name? Something more Hebrew, such as Yaffa
(beautiful), Zahava (gold) or Chaviva (beloved).

So I asked her if she had some time to go over this very important
issue.

“Yes I do, I have all the time in the world. Tell me how you got your
name.”

“Okey-Dokey.”

I was determined to make sure the story was long enough so that the
question never came up again.

When my grandfather, Sahak, settled in Iran after fleeing the
deportations from western Armenia, he eventually found time to go to
the Iranian authorities and get himself a birth certificate. The
official at the desk asked him for his last name.

“Petrossian,” Sahak replied.

“Petrossian, aye? You immigrant Armenians have too many of these
names. Petrossian, Petrossian, Petrossian! Why don’t you change it to
something else?”

“Like what?”

“Well, since you’ve fled mass murder and you are free now, why don’t
you change your last name to ‘Azad-ian.’ ”

Incidentally, the word Azad means free in Persian (the spoken
language of Iran) and Armenian, as well as many of the region’s
Indo-European languages. What a coinkidink!

“Hmmm, ‘Azadian.’ Has a nice ring to it. ‘Sahak Azadian.’ I’ll take
it.”

Years later, Mr. Azadian had second thoughts about changing his
family name, and when his first grandson was born, he was determined
to reverse the grave error. Per ancient Armenian tradition of Sahak’s
birthplace, every couple of generations, the last name of the family
reverted back to the first name of the grandfather. Sahak figured, if
he named me Petros (or Bedros), in a couple of generations our family
last name would be back to the original Petrossian. What he was not
prepared for was my mom’s fierce opposition.

So my parents, after consulting the extended Armenian dictionary,
conspired against Sahak and named me Patrik. Pronounced with “P” as
in spoon, “a” as in talk, “t” as in stalk, “r” as in car, “i” as in
chic, and “k” as in kernel. My mom had her mind set on something
“princely.” The second choice was Asbed (also “prince” in Armenian).

“Valerie, are you awake?”

“Yes, Patrik. I am with you. You still haven’t told me why it’s an
Armenian name.”

“Well, initially I thought the name entered the Armenian language, as
Rome and Armenia had close relations in ancient times. But it seems,
it was the Byzantines who introduced the term into the Armenian
vocabulary. Byzantines bestowed Armenian rulers with the title
Patrik, the most famous of whom was Vard Patrik Mamikonian, Patriarch
of Armenia in the early sixth century. From then on, the term patrik
was interchangeable with “princely.” And although the noun is not
Armenian in the absolute sense, it has Armenian memory, as well as
history.”

“I see.”

So is Patrick an Irish name? I would say so. Is it an Armenian name?
Well, I would also say so, certainly more Armenian than Hovhannes
(John), Bartoughi- meos (Bartholomew), Boghos (Paul) or Yeghsapet
(Elizabeth). But somehow, I know Bartoughi- meos would not have
elicited as many questions about my name as Patrick.

– PATRICK AZADIAN lives and works in Glendale. He is an identity and
branding consultant for the retail industry. Reach him at
[email protected].

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenpac Co-Chair Briefs Senate Leaders

PRESS RELEASE
June 24, 2004

ARMENPAC
421 East Airport Freeway, Suite 201
Irving, Texas 75062

CONTACT: Bryan Ardouny
Phone: (406) 546-5250
E-mail: [email protected]

ARMENPAC CO-CHAIR ANNIE TOTAH BRIEFS SENATE LEADERS
Attends historic evening honoring Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)

Irving, TX — ARMENPAC Co-Chair Annie Totah attended a historic
evening honoring Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Dean of the
U.S. Senate women. During the event, held at the National Aquarium in
Baltimore, Maryland, Senator Mikulski introduced Totah `as one of the
top leaders of the Armenian community. In addition to Senator
Mikulski, Totah also met with Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Maria
Cantwell (D-WA), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), Dianne Feinstein
(D-CA), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), and Patty Murray
(D-WA).

Totah emphasized the importance of strengthening U.S.-Armenia trade
relations and timely passage of S. 1557, which would extend permanent
normal trade relations to Armenia. This important legislation was
introduced by Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and
continues to gain momentum with the support of the Bush Administration
as well as 21 Senators. Totah also urged support of S. Res. 164,
which affirms the Armenian Genocide. Introduced by Senator John Ensign
(R-NV), S. Res. 164 is currently pending further action in the Senate
Judiciary Committee.

“On behalf of the ARMENPAC Board of Directors, I was pleased to attend
this landmark event to honor my home-town Senator,” said ARMENPAC
Co-Chair Annie Totah. “Each and every Senator was receptive to our
issues and I look forward to working with them throughout the
remainder of the 108th Congress and beyond.”

ARMENPAC is an independent, bipartisan political action committee and
was established to shape public policy by raising awareness of and
advocating for Armenian-American issues. ARMENPAC provides financial
support to federal officeholders, candidates, political action
committees and organizations that actively support issues of
importance to Armenian-Americans.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Mass Media – part of democratization

Azat Artsakh, Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
June 24, 2003

MASS MEDIA – PART OF DEMOCRATIZATION

The topic of the training `Mass Media During Elections’ held in
Stepanakert last week (organized by Stepanakert Press Club with the
assistance of the international organization `Article 19′) was not
only the role of the mass media during elections but also in the
process of democratization of the society in general. The mass media,
as one of the conductors of the training noticed, is like litmus
paper indicating the level of democratization of the society. On the
topic of the role of the mass media in the democratization of the
society and the practical implementation of this role in Ukraine and
Armenia we talked to the conductors of the conference Alexey Koshel
and Elina Poghosbekian.

THE MARKET OF FREE MASS MEDIA IS NOT COMPLETELY FORMED IN UKRAINE.

Alexey Koshel, expert of the international organization `Article 19′,
deputy chairman ofthe non-governmental organization `Committee of
Voters of Ukraine’. – Mr. Koshel, what changes took place in the life
of your society after independence and to what extent are they
principal? – I should say that the transition to new market
relationships is painful not only in our country but in the entire
post-soviet territory. And this is natural. The old always yields
hardly. Principal changes, however, happened. This refers first of all
to the process of democratization of the process of elections. The
second is the publication of the work of the government agencies. Each
citizen has the opportunity to read in the mass media and online the
texts of the speeches in the parliament and government meetings, the
results of voting. The third is structuring of the political processes
in the country the evidence to which is the institute of the
elections, transition of the mass media to market relationships,
freedom of moving, freedom in economy, religion and other spheres. –
During the training you told that governmental mass media should not
exist. Why? And what is the situation of the mass media in Ukraine? –
Governmental mass media cost too expensive to the state budget. 1600
journalists work on the TV and radio of Ukraine. And the largest
private TV channel has 200 journalists even with a greater volume of
work. By the way, these companies are going to make their work more
optimal reducing the number of journalists to 80. I think the numbers
say everything. Today in our country the governmental mass media are
a TV and radio channel and two newspapers which mainly publish state
documents. Among these there are also regional mass media, usually
with too big staff and little circulation. 80 percent of the mass
media are private, the largest are `Facti’ (800 thousand copies),
`Selskie Vesti’ (514 copies), `Vechernie Vesti’ (430 thousand) and a
great number of newspapers with little circulation. In brief,
economically the governmental mass media are not optimal. These should
be replaced by the public mass media. – Closing the training you said
that independent mass media in fact do not exist and these are
considerably dependent on those on whose expense they exist. – If
there are no objective mass media, consequently there is no objective
monitoring? – Yes, independent, therefore objective mass media do not
exist but this does not mean that we should not fight for
accomplishment of at least relatively independent mass media. In
Ukraine this process lasted for 10 years. The Ukrainian private mass
media already know that by disrespectful attitude they may lose their
readers and thus their source of funding. I may state with all
responsibility that there is, nevertheless, relative independence of
the mass media in Ukraine.

SITUATION CHANGED LITTLE.

Elina Poghosbekian, editor of the bulletin of Yerevan Press Club. –
What is the situation of the mass media in Armenia in terms of the
past decade? – After the declaration of independence up today the
situation changed little. And this is conditioned by the fact that the
mass media in Armenia are in great dependence on the political
forces. – Will it go on like that? Which is the way out? – In the
Soviet period the situation was much worse, presently the situation is
better. The way out, in my opinion, is financial independence and
profitability as an economic entity. Today this is very difficult in
the conditions of Armenia. The circulation of the newspapers is
small. Most of the population lives in poverty and purchasing ability
is law, even the small circulation newspapers are sold with
difficulty. I think you are acquainted with this problem. It is
possible to acquire money from advertisement but this is not much for
the same reason that the society is not rich. As long as the mass
media cannot step on their own feet, as long as the legislative sphere
is not accomplished, it is easy to make pressure on the mass media, as
it happened with the 24 hour oppositionist channel A1+. – They say the
mass media are the reflection of the society. To what extent do the
mass media of Armenia reflect the process of democratization and how
can they affect that process? – This is a complicated process for the
progress of which first of all our willpower is important. The
European assistance to our society in democratization is little: we
must first set the aim to achieve it. If at the beginning of the 90’s
the mass media were entirely under the influence of political forces
in the result of which they lost all the best qualities, at the end of
the 90’s and the beginning of the next decade the situation got more
or less better. Among positive changes I would mention the cooperation
of Yerevan Press Club with the Union of Journalists of Armenia
(actually a half-governmental organization), as well as `Internews
Armenia’ and the committee for protection of journalists. This
cooperation enabled to smooth the decision of closing down the channel
A1+, organize protest meetings connected with the bill `On the mass
media’ worked out by the Ministry of Justice after which amendments
were made to the joint project. At the second reading it already
corresponded to the international standards. The work on the third
reading was pure editing and in December the parliament adopted the
bill. There were unhappy attempts to affect the parliament. The above
mentioned organizations tried to oppose to the introduction of
regressive changes in the law `On television and radio’ but in
vain. Today we are attempting to set forth an amendment which would
allow to move the punishment for libel and offence from the criminal
to the civil code (fine instead imprisonment). – During trainings much
was said about the code of ethics of journalists. Are the rules of
ethics kept by the journalists? – Unfortunately we have little in this
sphere to be proud of. The code of ethics of journalists was adopted
by certain mass media and public organizations working in this
sphere. The adoption of the code is actually one of the ways of
self-regulation. However the unwritten laws of the fourth branch of
power have greater force than the written ones. And this is the
reflection of the actual state of the society. The more the rights of
each individual of the society are honoured, the more the journalists
will honour the written laws.

SUSANNA BALAYAN

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress