So far Azerbaijan has failed to implement very important point of November 9 declaration – Pashinyan

Save

Share

 18:55,

YEREVAN, APRIL 29, ARMENPRESS.  Caretaker Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan again referred to the issue of the Armenian war prisoners in a meeting with Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin in Kazan. ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan notes that so far Azerbaijan has failed to implement a very important point of the November 9 trilateral declaration.

''It's about the return of POWs, hostages and other detainees. And I want to express gratitude for the efforts the Russian Federation makes to solve this issue'', Pashinyan said.

Ceremony marking the 1915 Armenian genocide takes on special meaning this year

Magic Valley, Idaho

Idaho View:

Scott McIntosh – Idaho Statesman        

Idaho View: | Columnists | magicvalley.com

oise’s small but active and growing Armenian community gathered Saturday for its annual memorial marking the national Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day.

Held every year locally, this year’s commemoration carried special meaning.

“Each year on this day, we remember the lives of all those who died in the Ottoman-era Armenian genocide and recommit ourselves to preventing such an atrocity from ever again occurring,” according to a statement from President Joe Biden, the first time an American president has formally acknowledged what took place from 1915 to 1923 as a “genocide.”

President Ronald Reagan in 1981 referred to the atrocity as a “genocide,” but later backtracked. Presidents since have been urged each year to refer to what happened as a genocide, but all have buckled under fears of upsetting and offending Turkey, which denies the deaths of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians as genocide.

Why is this important?

Adolf Hitler, in a precedent to the extermination of millions of Jews in the Holocaust, knew full well what happened to the Armenians and knew full well what it meant to deny and hide the atrocity.

“Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” Hitler said in a speech in 1939.

The 1915 Armenian genocide is considered the first genocide of the 20th century and served as a precursor to the genocides that followed around the globe.

It was fitting that Greg Hampikian, a Boise State University professor and head of the Idaho Innocence Project, whose job involves analyzing genes and DNA, spoke at Saturday’s commemoration. He noted that the word “genocide,” itself, addresses his very work: It is the attempt to destroy a gene lineage, wipe out those who share a common genetic code. He became emotional several times, but particularly as he referred to the 75 or so people gathered at the Anne Frank Memorial as a testament that the genocide was not successful, that those gathered continued to carry the Armenian heritage forward.

The United States is home to a large Armenian population, particularly in Southern California (most Americans are familiar with the world’s most famous Armenians, the Kardashians, and, for you literary types, you may be familiar with the writers Chris Bohjalian and William Saroyan).

Dan Prinzing, executive director of the Wassmuth Center for Human Rights, which maintains the Anne Frank Memorial, gave a wonderfully impassioned speech Saturday about why it’s so important to acknowledge the 1915 Armenian genocide.

“When there is still denial, there can be no justice,” he said, adding that when a country can deny a genocide with impunity, it serves only to embolden those that later commit such atrocities.

The first phase of the Armenian genocide began on April 24, 1915, as the Ottoman government arrested and murdered hundreds of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople, or modern-day Istanbul, according to the Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities. The killing expanded into brutal massacres of the male Armenian population across Ottoman lands and the deportation of Armenian women, children and the elderly into the Syrian Desert.

Jo-Ann Kachigian, of Boise, recounted her mother’s story of being led, as a 12-year-old girl, on one of those death marches, only to be “saved” by a Turk in Aleppo, Syria, where she was sold into servitude. She considered herself to be saved because the next stop on the death march was a mass execution.

Jo-Ann’s mother eventually made her way to the United States, where she was reunited with her brothers, who had escaped the genocide.

Many have similar stories of escaping persecution, including my wife’s family. Our son is named for his great-grandfather Luke Dohanian, who fled the region with his family and made his way to America, leaving a long lineage of proud Armenian Americans.

The New York Times reported Sunday that in its ardent denial of what happened as a genocide, Turkey ensures that schoolchildren are taught that the atrocity was not a genocide, but rather a quelling of an uprising.

It’s important that President Biden — and all of us — reject Turkey’s attempts to erase the stains from its own history.

Because if there is one lesson we can learn from the denial of the 1915 Armenia genocide, it is that old adage, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

Biden recognized the Armenian genocide. Now to recognize the American genocide.

MSNBC
The U.S. tried to extinguish Native cultures. We should talk about it as the genocide it was.

The U.S.'s moral standing in the world depends on acknowledging its own sins.Anjali Nair / MSNBC; Getty Images

, 9:30 AM UTC

On Saturday, President Joe Biden did what no president had done before when he acknowledged that the Ottoman Empire's massacre of the Armenian people in 1915 was, in fact, genocide.

"The American people honor all those Armenians who perished in the genocide that began 106 years ago today," Biden said in a statement commemorating Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. It was a move that was too long coming, put off for years to nurture what has become a crumbling relationship with Turkey.

April 25, 202104:58

But now it's time for the United States to finally acknowledge a genocide much closer to home.

After Biden's declaration, an article from 2019 began circulating on Twitter. Back then, soon after the Senate had passed a resolution recognizing the Armenian genocide, Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, had threatened to give the U.S. a taste of its own medicine:

Speaking on the pro-government A Haber news channel, he said: “We should oppose [the US] by reciprocating such decisions in parliament. And that is what we will do.

“Can we speak about America without mentioning [Native Americans]? It is a shameful moment in US history.”

Setting aside his blatant whataboutism, the fact that he mentioned one atrocity only to deflect from another, Erdoğan was correct. The U.S. government's treatment of Native Americans is a shameful moment in America's history, one that we need to address more openly if we're ever to move forward with any moral weight in the world. There needs to be an equivalent reckoning with America's own sins as we speak out against those perpetrated outside our borders.

Americans in the 19th century weren't shy about their beliefs or discriminating in their tactics to subjugate the different tribes on land that the U.S. claimed as its own. Less than 20 years after the Trail of Tears killed 4,000 Cherokees on their march west, Peter Burnett, the first governor of California, told lawmakers that "a war of extermination" that will "continue to be waged between the two races until the Indian race becomes extinct must be expected."

There needs to be an equivalent reckoning with America’s own sins as we speak out against those perpetrated outside our borders.

Some may try to argue that what took place in the U.S. shouldn't qualify as genocide, given that Native Americans still live here. After all, as of the 2010 census, 5.2 million people identifying as American Indian and Alaska Natives lived in the U.S., either alone or in combination with one or more other races. That's more people than live in Ireland or New Zealand.

But Raphael Lemkin, who coined the word "genocide," was clear from the start that a people need not be annihilated fully for his word to apply. "It takes centuries, if not thousands of years, to create a national culture but Genocide can destroy a culture instantly, like fire can destroy a building in an hour," Lemkin once wrote.

White Americans were the fire Lemkin warned of, blazing through dozens of Native cultures until only the most resilient structures remained, surrounded on all sides by ash and burned-out frames. From decades of forced resettlements to scores of treaties made and broken, American history is littered with attempts to eradicate Native groups from America's borders, a policy of ethnic cleansing and forced cultural amnesia that lasted well into the 20th century.

Former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., inadvertently made that policy of erasure sharply clear Friday in a speech about religious freedom to the Young America's Foundation. Santorum, comparing the U.S. to older countries like Italy and China, claimed that America is different because their cultures evolved slowly over time. In contrast, Americans "birthed a nation from nothing."

"I mean, there was nothing here," he said. "I mean, yes we have Native Americans, but candidly, there isn't much Native American culture in American culture," Santorum told his audience.

The response from the National Congress of American Indians was rightfully blistering, especially toward CNN, where Santorum is a paid commentator. "Make your choice," it wrote in its statement to HuffPost. "Do you stand with White Supremacists justifying Native American genocide, or do you stand with Native Americans?"

And if you think that acknowledging that history doesn't matter today, I point you to China's persecution of its Uyghur population. The Chinese government has built massive detention centers around Xinjiang, where its mostly Muslim occupants are being trained to reject their culture and religion through a program of abuse, deprivation and force-fed propaganda. Beijing has also recently been accused of using Uyghurs as forced labor to pick cotton, drawing backlash from Western corporations, which have in turn been blacklisted by Chinese censors.

China has claimed that these facilities are merely vocational training centers, even though the few detainees who have escaped and spoken out describe a mass campaign to eliminate all traces of Uyghur culture — which is exactly what Lemkin described. After years of dithering, the U.S. has finally decided to call what's happening in China what it is. Just last month, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said China "continues to commit genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang."

For the last three years, I've been fascinated by the parallels between these detainment camps in Xinjiang, with their "re-education," and the Native schools that were run in the U.S. in the 19th century. The Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Carlisle, Pa., actively recruited children from Native tribes to teach them Western ways, shearing their long hair and forcing them to take on new, meaningless names. Under the tutelage of the white military instructors, the children and young adults created inauthentic "Native" crafts for sale at local and international fairs.

Chiefs sent their children east to learn European ways out of desperation, because of hunger and other suffering in the face of the U.S. military's pacification campaigns. And yet the school's founder, along with other well-meaning — but still racist — white Americans, were sure that their facilities were the only hope for survival for Native peoples, encouraging their swift assimilation into the predominant culture. This belief — "Kill the Indian in him and save the man" — was the mantra of a people intent on wiping out another's history and spirt.

When the U.S. commits atrocities against its own, the world notices. The horror at realizing that the Nazis built their eugenic and racist policies using America's treatment of Blacks and immigrants as a template doesn't diminish over time. China may not have directly modeled its methods on the American Indian schools, but the effect is the same.

There have been a few halting efforts to truly face down America's past. Congress slipped an apology into the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, citing "years of official depredations, ill-conceived policies, and the breaking of covenants by the federal government regarding Indian tribes." California Gov. Gavin Newsom came closer in 2019:

“It’s called a genocide. That’s what it was. A genocide. [There’s] no other way to describe it, and that’s the way it needs to be described in the history books,” Newsom said at a blessing ceremony for a Native American heritage center. “And so I’m here to say the following: I’m sorry on behalf of the state of California.”

But that's not the same as an acknowledgment on the level of Biden's last weekend. He has already appointed the first Native American Cabinet member, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland. In doing so, he placed Haaland in charge of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. I wrote to the bureau Monday, asking whether Secretary Haaland is in favor of acknowledging the treatment of Native groups here as genocide. I hope that she does — and that Biden follows suit.

Recognizing the Ottoman genocide of Armenians was the right thing to do, and it has been for decades. So, too, is it right to speak the truth about our own country's genocidal efforts, if not for the clearing of our collective conscience, then so we may more forcefully speak out against those who would follow in our footsteps.

Pres. Biden expected to formally recognize Armenian genocide; Rep. Valadao urges action

KGET

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — President Joe Biden is preparing to formally acknowledge that the systematic killing and deportation of hundreds of thousands of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire in modern-day Turkey more than a century ago, was genocide.

The anticipated move, something Biden had pledged to do as a candidate could further complicate an already tense relationship with Turkish leadership.

It it happens, it would make President Biden the first U.S. president to acknowledge the situation as genocide.

Rep. David Valadao was one of more than 100 lawmakers to send a letter to President Biden urging him to make an announcement.

In a statement, Rep. Valadao said:

“Formal recognition of the Armenian genocide is long overdue in the United States where so many Armenian-Americans continue to feel the pain of this tragedy. I urge President Biden to formally honor those affected by this atrocity and offer the Armenian-American community this validation they deserve.”

The National Day of Remembrance of the Armenian Genocide is observed each year on April 24.

Video at link:

Gulf’s geopolitics twist and turn in new alignments

Asia Times



[Biden administration's regional rethink is helping to reshape
relations and dynamics in previously unimagined ways]

By MK Bhadrakumar


The geopolitical alignments of the Persian Gulf region are rapidly
transforming both in bilateral and multilateral formats.

Starting with the rapprochement between Qatar and Saudi Arabia in
January, the common thread is that the shift in the regional strategy
under US President Joe Biden has been critical one way or another.

The thaw discernible in Saudi-Turkish relations lately and the
dramatic meeting this month in Baghdad between the top security
officials of Saudi Arabia and Iran can be seen as “derivatives” of the
shift in the United States’ policies.

Anwar Gargash, advisor to Emirati President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed,
said last week that “the changing face of the Middle East” is to be
attributed to the Abraham Accords of last August, which he described
as “an alternative strategic view” aimed at bolstering regional
security. But such tall claims are not without an element of truth,
either.

Indeed, the historic transformation of relations between Israel and
the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has provided an anchor sheet for the
new unprecedented regional grouping that has appeared on the horizon
comprising four countries of the wider Eastern Mediterranean, West
Asia and the Persian Gulf – Greece, Cyrus, Israel and the UAE.

However, fundamentally, it is the shift in the locus of the United
States’ traditional regional Gulf security strategy away from the past
pattern – dividing the region into rival camps to fuel any antipathy
toward Iran and take advantage of it for advancing American interests
– that is already having a calming effect on the region.

Certainly, each of the recent trends in Gulf alignments also would
have specific features. Thus the “normalization” between Saudi Arabia
and Qatar was mostly due to Riyadh’s concerns about the incoming Biden
administration’s foreign policy.

Riyadh wants some goodwill with Biden in the context of the severe
damage to the image of Saudi Arabia – and specifically its Crown
Prince – in the eyes of many Democratic lawmakers in Washington.

The improved relations between Riyadh and Doha may not necessarily
lead to dense bilateral cooperation or breathe new life into the
moribund Gulf Cooperation Council, but it leads to more diplomacy,
and, therefore, fewer threats and acts of violence.

Interestingly, Ankara played a critical role in terms of giving Doha
the confidence to stand strong in the face of the Saudi blockade, but
the very prospect of Saudi-Qatari relations moving in a positive
direction also raises hope for Ankara that it can build a stronger
relationship with Riyadh without undermining the Turkish-Qatari
alliance.

Again, Qatar’s ability to bust the Saudi-led embargo indirectly
boosted Turkey’s regional standing as an increasingly influential
power. The Turkish-Qatari military base and the presence of Turkish
military personnel in the sieged Gulf Arab country no doubt
contributed to Qatar’s deterrence.

Most Western pundits made a hasty conclusion that Iran would be the
“loser” out of the Saudi-Qatari reconciliation. But they
underestimated the pragmatism of Gulf Arab states.

For although Tehran was a major beneficiary of the Gulf dispute when
it erupted three and a half years ago and the crisis offered Iran an
opportunity to bring its partnership with Qatar to new heights, the
warmth in the Iran-Qatar relationship has now become an enduring
feature of Gulf diplomacy.

Meanwhile, the signs are that the talks in Vienna to work out the
return of the US to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and
the lifting of Iran sanctions are progressing well.

This will prompt a further rethink in Riyadh, which may partly explain
the meeting in Baghdad on April 9 between Khalid bin Ali Al Humaidan,
chief of the Saudi General Intelligence Directorate, and General
Ismail Qaani, the head of the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps.

Alas, this meeting could have been held much earlier but for
Washington undermining it with the assassination of Iranian general
Qasem Soleimani in January last year. Suffice to say, the Saudi
rethink on Iran is independent of the US strategies toward Iran. Now,
that gives reason for hope.

Of course, an easing of Saudi-Iranian tensions may not blossom
overnight into amity, as acute contradictions bedevil that
relationship. Nonetheless, a suspension of mutual hostility alone is
bound to improve the Gulf security situation.

Indeed, the trajectory of the US-Iranian engagement through the coming
one-year period is going to be decisive. For if the US sanctions are
lifted and Iran’s integration into the international community
accelerates, the West Asian landscape will change phenomenally.

Notwithstanding the locus of power in Iran after the coming
presidential election, there should be no doubt that Iran’s
willingness to be a factor of regional stability is genuine.

For a start, Iran never had any intentions to make a nuclear bomb.
Second, its priority does not lie in the projection of power in its
neighborhood but in the reconstruction of Iran’s economy, which has
been ravaged by decades of Western sanctions and isolation. As a
responsive regime, the domestic public expectation is to be taken
seriously.

Third, the Biden administration has resuscitated the Palestine file.

With all this, the scope for expanding the gyre of the Abraham Accords
in the Gulf region in an anti-Iran direction has shrunk. That partly
explains the “Look West” policy by Israel and the UAE to team up with
Greece and Cyprus to form a new regional security grouping.

The foreign-minister-level meeting of the four countries on Friday in
Paphos, on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, can be seen in this
light.

The host, Cypriot Foreign Minister Nikos Christodoulides,
grandiloquently described the event as signifying a new era for the
region, driven by the common vision “of the wider Eastern
Mediterranean, Middle East, and Gulf as an area of stability,
prosperity and peace.”

He claimed that this new era will help dispel “the prevailing,
restrictive narrative of our neighborhood as a region of turmoil,
conflict and crisis” and unfold a “radically different” one with a
positive and inclusive agenda that will promote “cooperation, peace,
stability and prosperity.”

Quintessentially, however, the four participants hope to acquire
strategic depth in the pursuit of their shared antagonism toward
Turkey by pooling their resources and strengthening all-around mutual
cooperation.

On Sunday, Israel and Greece announced their biggest ever defense
procurement deal, which includes a US$1.65 billion contract for the
establishment and operation of a training center for the Hellenic Air
Force by Israeli defense contractor Elbit Systems over a 22-year
period.

The Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz has said, “I am certain that
[this program] will upgrade the capabilities and strengthen the
economies of Israel and Greece and thus the partnership between our
two countries will deepen on the defense, economic and political
levels.”

Meanwhile, the UAE and Greece too have a significant defense
cooperation program. Greece plans to acquire 40 fighter aircraft
inclusive of French Rafales and US-made F-35 stealth fighter jets. The
Biden administration has reportedly cleared the sale of 50 F-35s to
the UAE.

Clearly, Greek, Israeli and Emirati interests are converging on
containment of Turkey’s vaulting ambitions of regional dominance, with
which Cyprus also is in agreement. Importantly, it also enjoys US
backing.

But, significantly, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have kept out of the
four-nation grouping and are instead prioritizing the stabilization of
their relationship with Turkey.

Israel anticipates that the momentum toward the US-Iranian engagement
is becoming unstoppable and any new Gulf security paradigm would
inevitably visualize Iran’s inclusion. Israel needs to think hard and
fast as the Iran bogey has outlived its utility. Clearly, Iran’s
anti-Zionist policies never really added up to “anti-Semitism,”
either.

There must be a way forward to put aside the sword and take up the
plowshare to turn the loosened soil.


 

Protest against copper mine exploitation held in Armenia’s Lori

Panorama, Armenia
April 16 2021

Residents of the Margahovit community in Armenia’s Lori Province on Friday staged a protest against the exploitation of a copper mine near the village.

Citing media reports, the protesting residents said starting from today public hearings on the mine operation are set to be held in the settlements of Debed, Yeghegnut, Vahagni, Vahagnadzor and Margahovit.

They expressed regret that supporters of environmental programs are now not against public discussions on the operation of the mine.

“There are so many mines in Lori Province alone, what should we do other than opposing [the exploitation],” said one of the residents.

Another citizen noted, however, that the mine would not have a tailing dump and would be 20 km away from Margahovit.

“It would have some sort of dry tails,” he said.

However, the protesters assured that they will not allow the operation of the new mine.

“There are mines in Teghut, Akhtala and Shamlugh; we are suffocating from the smell of acid. So, the mine shall not be exploited, there will be no public hearings,” the citizen said. 

Negotiations underway on potential joint production of Sputnik V, says Armenian health minister

Save

Share

 15:06,

YEREVAN, APRIL 12, ARMENPRESS. Negotiations are underway to start a joint production of the Sputnik V vaccine with Russia, Armenian health minister Anahit Avanesyan said.

She denied media reports claiming that Armenia has refused from the joint production.

“Armenia hasn’t refused anything. Our partners are negotiating with the economy ministry to organize the production in Armenia,” she said.

Avanesyan emphasized that the production would require certain specialized, industrial and other infrastructural presence. “And I hope that our pharmaceutical companies will appreciate the important circumstance of the production of a very important vaccine and will be interested in investing and opening joint production,” she said.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Canada cancels permits for high-tech arms exports to Turkey

CBC News, Canada
Government says it has 'credible evidence' tech was diverted to the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh

Parents of missing soldiers gathered outside the Ministry of Defense

Panorama, Armenia
April 8 2021

Parents of soldiers, who went missing during the recent war in Artsakh, staged on Thursday a protest outside the Armenian Ministry of Defense, blocked entries to the building, demanding that the authorities take urgent action to find their children.

"We have been promised to get answers to number of pending questions about our sons but no response has been received thus far," Arsen Ghukasyan, one of the participants of the protest said during a Facebook live from the scene. He added that they plan to stay outside the ministry until the issue of their son is solved.

Sports: Armenian lifter Karen Avagyan crowned European champion

Panorama, Armenia
April 8 2021
Sport 20:41 08/04/2021Armenia

Armenian athlete Karen Avagyan won gold at the European Weightlifting Championships in Moscow on Thursday after lifting a total of 375 kg.

Meanwhile, Armenian weightlifter Andranik Karapetyan took bronze with a result of 365 kg.

Both were competing in the 89 kg weight category.

A total of 15 Armenian athletes are taking part in the tournament.