Expert: Tehran is well aware that the implementation of the "Zangezur corridor" means blocking the north of Iran

ARMINFO
Armenia – Aug 16 2022
David Stepanyan

ArmInfo. Tehran is well aware that the implementation of the Turkish-Azerbaijani "Zangezur Corridor" project means the final blocking of the northern borders of  Iran.  Expert in Iranian studies Armen Vardanyan expressed a similar  opinion to ArmInfo.

"In the event of such fairly large geopolitical changes, the  consequences of which will go beyond not only Armenia, but also the  South Caucasus, Iran will fall into dependence on Turkey and  Azerbaijan.  Meanwhile, today, taking into account the transit  significance of Iran for the tandem, the opposite process is taking  place. In this light, it is clear that the next geopolitical  breakdown of the region clearly does not correspond to the interests  of Tehran," he stressed.

Nevertheless, Vardanyan does not undertake to forecast an unambiguous  military intervention by Iran in the event that Turkey or Azerbaijan  violates the integrity of the Armenian-Iranian border. The reason is  Tehran's rather warm relations with Ankara and Baku, despite all the  problems that periodically arise between them.

But on the other hand, the expert recalled last year's unprecedented  maneuvers of the Iranian army, in particular, the "Islamic  Revolutionary Guard Corps" on the border with Azerbaijan in response  to the threat of an Azerbaijani invasion of the Syunik region of  Armenia, which Baku understood well.

In this light, in the opinion of the Exert, one way or another, but  Iran is determined to defend its own position in favor of the  inviolability of the borders with Armenia. Which, in his opinion,  despite all the objective geopolitical difficulties along this path,  raises the need for new steps by Yerevan to deepen relations with  Tehran to a strategic level. 

Armenpress: Yerevan blast death toll rises to 8

Yerevan blast death toll rises to 8

Save

Share

 23:24,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 15, ARMENPRESS. As a result of the explosion in Yerevan's "Surmalu" shopping center, the number of victims has reached 8, ARMENPRESS reports spokesperson of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hayk Kostanyan said.

"Rescuers have just pulled out another body from the ruins," Kostanyan said, noting that the number of victims has reached 8.

Search and rescue operations are going on.

The California Courier Online, August 18, 2022

The California
Courier Online, August 18, 2022

 

1-         Armenia’s
Leaders Continue

            Capitulating
to Azerbaijan

            By Harut
Sassounian

            Publisher,
The California
Courier

           
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-         Raymond
Damadian: physician, inventor of MRI dies at 86

3-         Charny's
book explores why Israel
failed to recognize Armenian Genocide

4-         Vahan
Chamlian Passes Away

5-         Armenia
Continues Fight Against COVID-19

************************************************************************************************************************************************

            Armenia’s
Leaders Continue

            Capitulating
to Azerbaijan

            By Harut
Sassounian

            Publisher,
The California
Courier

           
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

Azerbaijan’s order to evacuate
around 150 families from three Armenian villages in the Lachin Corridor, which
connects Armenia
to Artsakh, has alarmed Armenians worldwide.

As a result of Azerbaijan’s
ultimatum, Armenians in the villages of Bertzor, Aghavno and Sus are obliged to
move elsewhere in Artsakh or Armenia.
After losing a devastating war in 2020, Armenia
and Artsakh, both suffering from poor leadership, are demanding that the
villagers comply with Azerbaijan’s
demand to leave their homes and churches by the deadline of August 25.

The source of the problem is the joint “statement” of
November 10, 2020 signed at the end of the war by the Prime Minister of
Armenia, President of Azerbaijan, and President of Russia. Even though the
first line of that “statement” declared “a complete ceasefire,” this is the
most unusual kind of ceasefire in the history of all wars. Instead of stopping
where the opposing armies had reached, the Armenian side agreed to turn over to
Azerbaijan large areas of
land not conquered by Azerbaijan.
Furthermore, the Prime Minister of Armenia, without any authority, signed a
document relinquishing lands, including most of Artsakh and its surrounding
territories, over which he had no legal authority. Therefore, the Nov. 10, 2020
trilateral agreement should be considered null and void.

Paragraph 6 of that agreement stated that “The Lachin
corridor (5 km. wide), which will provide for communication between
Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia and at the same time will not affect the city of
Shushi, shall remain under the control of peacekeeping troops of the Russian
Federation. The Parties have agreed that a plan for the construction of a new
route along the Lachin corridor shall be determined within the next three
years, providing communication between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia, with
the subsequent redeployment of Russian peacekeeping troops to protect the
route. The Republic
of Azerbaijan shall
guarantee traffic safety for citizens, vehicles and goods in both directions
along the Lachin Corridor.”

This paragraph, like many others, has created problems due
to its unclear wording. Almost two years after signing this agreement, during
which the leaders of Armenia
and Azerbaijan
had several face to face meetings, the Armenian government did not bother to
clarify the language of Paragraph 6. Armenian officials, after approving Azerbaijan’s plans, kept repeating that the
alternate route to bypass the Lachin Corridor was to be built only after three
years and that Azerbaijan
hastily built its segment of the alternate route. In fact, the 2020 agreement
stated that the alternate road will be built within, not after, three years. Armenia is
planning to complete its section of the alternate road to Lachin after 250 days
from this month.

Armenian officials falsely reassured the families of the
three Armenian villages within the Lachin Corridor that they have plenty of
time to resolve their problems, assuring them that they may remain in their
homes. When Azerbaijan
insisted on the immediate removal of these villagers, the Armenian families
were given less than three weeks to move without having anywhere to go.

To make matters worse, Artsakh’s Minister of Territorial
Management and Infrastructure, Hayk Khanumyan, warned the residents of the
three Armenian villages that should they burn their houses before leaving, they
will not receive the promised 10 million dram ($24,000) compensation, which is
insufficient to purchase a new house. The Minister was referring to the
practice of many Artsakh Armenians who burned their homes before leaving their
houses after the 2020 war. Burning one’s home is a heartbreaking decision, but
it is equally upsetting to leave your own house to your sworn enemy. I watched
this week the disturbing video of a father burning his family home before
leaving. What did the Minister expect these villagers to do? To clean their
houses, leave a cooked meal on the dining table with a bottle of champagne, and
a welcome sign on the door for their Azeri enemies?

In addition to turning over to Azerbaijan
large parts of territories in and around Artsakh which Azerbaijan had not occupied at the time of the
ceasefire, Azerbaijan
conquered additional lands in both Artsakh and inside Armenia’s
borders since the end of the 2020 war. Furthermore, Azerbaijan,
contrary to the 2020 agreement, is still holding Armenian prisoners of war,
whereas Armenia
foolishly turned over all the Azeri prisoners of war shortly after the
ceasefire. Armenian authorities not only do not make any efforts for the return
of the Armenian prisoners and the liberation of Armenia’s occupied territories,
they do not even talk or complain about them. Before complying with any of
Pres. Ilham Aliyev’s orders, Armenia
should first demand that Azerbaijan
keep its own obligations under the 2020 agreement. It is understandable that
after losing the war Armenia
is in a weakened and subservient position. However, mismanaging the situation
due to Armenian leaders’ incompetence and capitulating to the enemy’s every
whim and desire is unacceptable. Such spineless behavior encourages Azerbaijan to
demand and obtain more concessions.

With the shutting down of the Lachin corridor which connects
Armenia to Artsakh, the
remaining Armenians of Artsakh will be isolated, surrounded by Azerbaijan.
They will lose their access to Armenia,
will be cut off from electricity, heat and internet, and will be sooner or
later taken over by Azerbaijan.
Sadly, Artsakh and Armenia,
after losing the 2020 war, are on a downward spiral. Competent new leaders may
not be capable of reversing Armenia’s
calamitous situation, but at least they won’t let it get any worse.

 

************************************************************************************************************************************************
2-         Raymond Damadian: physician,
inventor of MRI dies at 86

(Combined Sources)—Raymond Damadian, an Armenian-American
physician, scientist and inventor of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), died
aged 86, on August 3.

Modern healthcare, from diagnosis to treatment, is hard to
imagine without Damadian’s discovery.

Dr. Damadian was born on March 16, 1936 in New York City to Vahan and Odette (Yazedjian)
Damadian. He earned his bachelor's degree in mathematics from the University of
Wisconsin–Madison in 1956, and an M.D. degree from the Albert Einstein College of
Medicine in New York City
in 1960.

Damadian was 10 years old when he watched his grandmother
die of breast cancer, but he turned the negative into a positive like few
others.

It was then that he made detecting cancer his life’s work,
founded Melville-based Fonar Corporation and invented the Magnetic Resonance
Imaging (MRI) scanner in the 1970s. “Without Damadian’s discovery, it could not
be known that serious diseases like cancer could be detected by an NMR [nuclear
magnetic resonance, the prior term used for the MRI] scanner,” said James
Mattson, author of The Pioneers of NMR and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: The
Story of MRI. “Or that tissue NMR signals possessed sufficient contract to
create medically useful images.”

Damadian also operates his own MRI scanning office, Stand-up
MRI of Melville, P.C., as an internist on Long Island.
But Damadian didn’t always study medicine. He originally studied math and
science as a violin student at Juilliard School of Music when he was 15. He
studied the violin at Juilliard for 8 years, and played in Junior Davis Cup
tennis competitions. Dr. Damadian met his future wife, Donna Terry, while he
had a job as a tennis coach. They had three children.

Dr. Damadian's research into sodium and potassium in living
cells led him to his first experiments with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
which caused him to first propose the MR body scanner in 1969. Damadian
discovered that tumors and normal tissue can be distinguished in vivo by
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Dr. Damadian was the first to perform a
full-body scan of a human being in 1977 to diagnose cancer.

He invented an apparatus and method to use NMR safely and
accurately to scan the human body.

Dr. Damadian was widely recognized for his groundbreaking
inventions. In 2001, the Lemelson-MIT Prize Program bestowed its $100,000
Lifetime Achievement Award on Dr. Damadian as "the man who invented the
MRI scanner." He went on to collaborate with Wilson Greatbach, one early
developer of the implantable pacemaker, to develop an MRI-compatible pacemaker.

The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia gave its recognition of Dr.
Damadian's work on MRI with the Bower Award in Business Leadership.

Dr. Damadian received a National Medal of Technology in 1988
and was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame in 1989.

Ten years ago, Damadian, now 81, improved upon his invention
when he introduced the stand-up MRI machine.

Dr. Damadian is survived by his children, Timothy Damadian
(Helen), Jevan Damadian (Victoria)
and Keira (Markus) Reinmund. He was the grandfather to Caitlin (Mike), Brianna
(Matt), Ben, Serena, Jesiah, Eliza, Kaia, Viki and Jonathan, and great
grandfather of Jack, Elizabeth and Emma.

************************************************************************************************************************************************
3-         Charny's book explores why Israel failed
to recognize Armenian Genocide

 

By Glenn C. Altschuler

 

(The Jerusalem
Post)—In the spring of 1982, shortly before the First International Conference on
the Holocaust and Genocide was scheduled to begin in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, the Turkish
government demanded that the six sessions on the Armenian Genocide (out of 150
overall) be canceled, and Armenian speakers prohibited from participating. If
the Israeli government, which was co-sponsoring the conference, did not comply,
Turkish authorities threatened to end protection to Jews escaping from Iran and Syria through their country.

Under pressure from Israeli officials, Elie Wiesel resigned
as president of the conference; Yad Vashem withdrew its offer to host the
opening ceremonies; Tel Aviv University backed out as a co-sponsor; the Szold
National Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences in Jerusalem and
Hunter College of the City University of New York stopped participating; many
speakers, including professors Yehuda Bauer and Alan Dershowitz canceled;
donations from philanthropists dried up; pre-conference coverage in the Jewish
press was curtailed; and the number of registrants shrank from 600 to 300.

Nonetheless, Israel Charny, the originator and director of
the conference, decided to go ahead. The proceedings are now regarded as an
important event in the development of the field of genocide studies, marking
the first recognition of the Armenian Genocide in an international setting.

In Israel’s Failed Response to the Armenian Genocide,
Charny, an American-Israeli psychologist, co-founder of the International
Association of Genocide Scholars, author of How Can We Commit The Unthinkable:
Genocide: The Human Cancer and editor-in-chief of the two-volume Encyclopedia
of Genocide, revisits the conference, attempts by the Foreign Ministry to
torpedo it, and issues a scathing indictment of Israel’s refusal, then and now,
to officially recognize genocidal wars against other peoples.

Understandably, perhaps, even after 40 years, Charny
approaches his subject with a mixture of pride and pain. Intent on setting the
record straight and speaking truth to power, he steps on his analysis by going
over familiar ground, repeating himself in clumsy prose, and inserting long
lists of panels, presenters, book titles and extended excerpts from essays
written by him and other human rights advocates in the 1980s and 1990s. And on
occasion, Charny seems determined to settle scores.

That said, serious consideration of Charny’s claim – “the
basic and horrendous commonality” in all genocides, including the Armenian
tragedy, should override obsessions about uniqueness and a consensus definition
of the “category name” – is as urgently necessary as it has ever been.

Because he defied the Israeli government in 1982, Charny
states, the rector of Tel Aviv University
denied him tenure at the School
of Social Work, despite
favorable recommendations by the relevant committees. The decision “hurt
deeply” and “may have contributed psychosomatically” to “the development of
cancer a few years later.” Charny sued Tel
Aviv University,
was appointed a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and for a time
collected a TAU pension along with his Hebrew University
salary. Grateful in retrospect for being forced to choose between personal,
professional and financial security and fundamental ethical values, the
experience, he now believes, was “a Turkish delight.”

Charny maintains that in response to Turkey’s
threats and the Israeli government’s intervention, he considered reducing the
visibility of the Armenian sessions at the conference, but not eliminating
them.

He indicates as well, rather contradictorily, that he was
convinced that “threats of this sort should never be honored to any extent
whatsoever.” And then lets himself off the hook by adding that an official of
the US State Department assured him, “almost without any reservation or
uncertainty,” that the Turks were bluffing.

In any event, Charny makes a compelling case that the
principal reason Israeli leaders opposed the conference was their determination
to keep the Holocaust, the “unbearable cataclysmic tragedy” of the Jewish
people, “at the ultimate untouchable apex of a hierarchy of genocidal
suffering… the greatest evil ever seen in human history.”

Wiesel, who “believed entirely – naively and, one might say,
messianically – in the virtue, decency and integrity of the miraculous State of
Israel,” Charny writes, warned him “not to use genocide in plural.”

Charny emphasizes that he is a Zionist, proud of Israel’s
survival in the face of enemies determined to destroy the Jewish state, and its
efforts “to achieve a secure country that is basically still largely
democratic.” He also blasts Israel’s quest for exclusivity and superiority; for
refusing to acknowledge “the genocidal massacre of unarmed civilian Arabs” in
Kafr Kassem in 1956; for indifference toward the forced expulsion of the
Rohingya in Myanmar; persecution of Uighurs in China; and “genocidal orgies” in
Yemen; for arm sales to Azerbaijan, “where there are gathering storms of
potential genocide;” and for recent “fascist trends,” including discrimination
against non-Jewish people who are fully entitled citizens of Israel.

Irrepressibly candid and combative at age 91, Charny has
thrown down the gauntlet. Whether or not they “claim to be the most important
and chosen victim people,” he insists, those who have “experienced fiendish
genocidal destruction” should have “heightened sensitivity and caring for
others who became victims.” And it is unnecessary, unproductive and unjust for
them “to continue denying hard historical facts” about the commission of brutal
acts of genocide.writer is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Professor of American
Studies at Cornell
University.

**********************************************************************************************************************************************
4-         Vahan Chamlian Passes Away

Vahan Chamlian, who along with his wife Anoush, were the
benefactors in 1975 of an Armenian school in Glendale
that bears their name, passed away on August 11 in Fresno. He was 96.

Chamlian, a businessman, dedicated his life to advancing the
Armenian community and the Armenian Nation.

Chamlian was born in Lebanon
in 1926 and emigrated to the United
States in 1957. He became the world’s
largest dealer in second-hand clothing via his company Chamlian Enterprises.

He recounted to Asbarez in 2018 that one day he visited his
friend Garo Haddad who had also invited the then Western Prelate Archbishop
Yeprem Tabakian and long-time community leader Stepan Kabadayan, who proposed
that Chamlian sponsor a classroom in the school, which was operating in a
rented facility at the time. There, Haddad told him that he should sponsor not
just one classroom but the entire school. Chamlian liked that proposal and went
about purchasing the land and building what is now one of the preeminent
Armenian schools in Southern California. He
was awarded the “Prince of Cilicia” medal in 1983 by then Catholicos of the
Great House of Cilicia, Karekin II.

Vahan Chamlian is survived by his wife Anoush Chamlian,
daughters Katie and Monique, their husbands and children.

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Armenia Continues Fight Against
COVID-19

More than 2.2 million doses of the coronavirus vaccine have
been administered in Armenia
since commencing the vaccination program a year ago, authorities said on August
15. Armenia
has recorded 428,648 coronavirus cases as of August 15. Armenia has
recorded 8,637 deaths. There are 7,450 active cases; 412,661 have recovered.

 

************************************************************************************************************************************************

************************************************************************************************************************************************

California Courier Online provides readers of the Armenian News News Service with a
few of the articles in this week's issue of The California Courier. Letters to
the editor are encouraged through our e-mail address, .
Letters are published with the author’s name and location; authors are required
to disclose their identity to the editorial staff (name, address, and/or
telephone numbers for verification purposes).
California Courier subscribers can change or modify mailing addresses by
emailing .

Canadian FM Melanie Joly discusses NK conflict with Armenian community

Save

Share

 11:01,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 12, ARMENPRESS. Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly and Canadian lawmakers Jean Yip and Han Dong visited the Armenian Center of Toronto on August 11 and got acquainted with the everyday life of the Armenian community and the work of the spiritual-educational organizations, the Armenian National Committee said in a statement, adding that this is Joly's first visit to the Armenian community in her capacity as foreign minister.

During a meeting with the Armenian National Committee officials, a comprehensive discussion on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict’s current situation took place. The discussion also focused on the establishment of the Canadian Embassy in Armenia, Canada’s support in the development of Armenia, and the activities of the Armenian community in Toronto.

Employers to be required by law to adapt working conditions for people with disabilities

Save

Share

 14:21,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 12, ARMENPRESS. There are 196,000 people with disabilities in Armenia, and according to the latest data from the Statistical Committee over 27,000 people with disabilities are employed.

Many employers have already adapted working conditions for them.

Now, the Armenian Government is introducing legislation requiring employers to ensure reasonable adaptations at the workplace for people with disabilities.

The new regulations will take effect January 1, 2023.

“We’ve defined reasonable adaptation types, which I will present now so that employers don’t think that it implies big expenses. For example, a person with disability with diabetes can agree with their employer to change the lunch break hours from the 1 hour break to 15-minute breaks every 2 hours. Another example, the replacement of the door handle which must be lowered, and so on,” Deputy Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Tatevik Stepanyan said at a news conference.

Asbarez: Congressional Alarms Ringing Amid Renewed Azerbaijani Ethnic-Cleansing of Artsakh

Bipartisan Calls Continue for Cutting off U.S. Military Aid to Oil-Rich Azerbaijan

WASHINGTON—In the wake of renewed Azerbaijani attacks – on the eve of Aliyev’s most recent bid to ethnically-cleanse Artsakh and sever its links to Armenia – Members of Congress are demanding that the Biden Administration confront Baku’s belligerence by cutting off U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan, reported the Armenian National Committee of America.

“The Biden Administration – using our American tax dollars – is today materially contributing to the Azerbaijan military’s ethnic-cleansing of Artsakh, morally emboldening dictator Ilham Aliyev as he seeks to strangle Artsakh by cutting off the Lachin Corridor,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian.  “We thank each Senator and Representative who has raised alarms about Azerbaijan’s actions and join with them in demanding an end to American complicity in Azerbaijan’s genocidal drive to rid Armenians from their ancestral, indigenous Artsakh homeland.”

Hamparian issued a live call to action on the ANCA’s Facebook and Twitter platforms last week urging supporters of Artsakh freedom to call the White House and urge President Biden to enforce U.S. sanctions on Azerbaijan and stop sending U.S. military arms and aid to the brutal Aliyev regime.  Advocates can take action by visiting anca.org/907 and anca.org/907call.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Bob Menendez (D-NJ) called for the withdrawal of Azerbaijan troops, tweeting “Azerbaijan’s deadly attacks in Nagorno-Karabakh are not only in violation of the ceasefire but also an unacceptable continuation of its recent pattern of aggression. Azerbaijani forces must withdraw from the region & end hostilities against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.”

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Republican Marco Rubio concurred, noting “Troubling violence is escalating in the ethnic Armenian Nagorno-Karabakh region. #Azerbaijan must immediately put a stop to this conflict and work with #Armenia to reach a peaceful end to this dispute.”

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), called Azerbaijan’s public relations campaign rejoicing in the killing of two Artsakh servicemen “reprehensible.”  In his tweet, Sen. Reed stated, “I am deeply troubled by reports of a return to violence in Nagorno-Karabakh, especially the loss of life. For the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense to release footage of their air strike, as though it is something to be proud of, is reprehensible.”

Joining Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Jackie Speier in condemning Azerbaijan’s attacks last week are House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Representatives Katherine Clark (D-MA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Brenda Lawrence (D-MI), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Brad Sherman (D-CA), and Lori Trahan (D-MA).

Rep. Schiff issued a statement on the Azerbaijani attacks, noting, in part, “In this year’s national defense funding legislation and for years past, I have repeatedly called for the immediate release of all Armenian prisoners of war and captured civilians, tens of millions in humanitarian aid and economic assistance for Artsakh, a full prohibition on U.S. security assistance to Azerbaijan, and renewed American engagement through the OSCE Minsk Group to reinvigorate the peace process. Each of these actions is critical to defending the Armenian people, and sending a resolute message that America can and will defend democracy around the world.”

Rep. Clark tweeted, “Yet again, Azerbaijan is shamelessly violating the ceasefire agreement with Armenia. The State Department must hold the Aliyev regime accountable for its attacks on Artsakh. It is vital that we stand up for the innocent lives at risk, the sovereignty of Armenia, & secure peace.”

Rep. Eshoo noted, “Azerbaijan’s deadly drone strikes against Artsakh are a blatant violation of the 2020 ceasefire. I strongly condemn Azerbaijan’s aggression & urge the State Department to use every diplomatic tool available to prevent further escalation, including suspending U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan.”

Rep. Krishnamoorthi emphasized that “There is no place for the violent attacks that we are seeing from Azerbaijan. I urge the Aliyev regime to cease all attacks on Artsakh, and to return to the negotiating table to find a peaceful settlement for all parties.”

Rep. Lawrence urged the State Department to “use every diplomatic tool at our disposal to prevent further atrocities like this attack.”

Rep. Sanchez was disturbed by news of the attacks and condemned Azerbaijan’s unprovoked actions, tweeting, “I am disturbed by reports that Azerbaijan has violated its ceasefire agreement & launched an unprovoked attack on the people of Artsakh. I strongly condemn Azerbaijan’s aggression, & I join the international community in calling for an immediate end to hostilities in the region.”

Rep. Schakowsky demanded Azerbaijani accountability “for yet again violating its ceasefire agreement with Armenia. I urge the State Department to use all of its diplomatic tools to hold the Aliyev regime accountable for its attacks on Artsakh and to prevent future atrocities.”

Rep. Sherman was emphatic about the disastrous effects of closing the Lachin corridor, tweeting, “Allowing Azerbaijan to cut off the Lachin corridor would jeopardize the security & freedom of ethnic Armenians living in #Artsakh. It is not enough to just condemn this ongoing aggression – the United States must model its values by ending U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan.”

Responding to constituent concerns, Rep. Trahan tweeted, “I’ve heard from many Armenian Americans in #MA3 who are rightly outraged by Azerbaijan’s latest violent attack that has led to tragic and unnecessary loss of life. The U.S. and our allies must condemn this violence and work diplomatically to prevent future escalation.”

Congressional concerns come in the wake of Azerbaijan’s demand that Armenian residents of Aghavno and Berdzor – located in the strategic Lachin corridor connecting Armenia and Artsakh – leave their homes by August 25th.  This is the latest in President Aliyev’s efforts to ethnically cleanse Artsakh’s Armenian population.  The Lachin corridor is Artsakh’s lifeline to Armenia and the world, serving as the primary artery for travel as well as communication, trade, and energy.  Aliyev’s proposed route from Armenia to Artsakh traverses primarily Azerbaijani-occupied territory, making travel unsafe for Armenians and impeding normal trade and communication.

Historical and cultural monuments are evacuated from Berdzor, Aghavno and Nerkin Sus

NEWS.am
Aug 10 2022

Khachkar, dedicated to the victims of the Genocide, is removed from the territory adjacent to the Holy Ascension Church in Berdzor, Deputy Minister Lernik Hovhannisyan told Artsakh Public Television, adding that if the monuments remain under Azerbaijan's control, they will be destroyed. "Back in February 2021, in the courtyard of Tsakhkavank Church in Tsakuri village of Hadrut region, the President of Azerbaijan clearly stated that the monuments that have been erected for thirty years are to be destroyed. He also said that all Armenian monuments must be written off," he said. Most of the monuments evacuated from Berdzor, Aghavno and Sus will be in the yards of other churches. The martyrs' memorials on the grounds of the Church of Holy Martyrs in Aghavno will be evacuated and moved to the "Yerablur" military pantheon.

The situation in Artsakh heated up from August 1. The Artsakh Republic President Arayik Harutyunyan stated at the meeting of the Security Council convened on August 2 that Azerbaijan through peacekeepers demanded to set up the corridor connecting Artsakh with Armenia by a new route. The next day the Azerbaijani side roughly violated the ceasefire regime and opened fire at the combat positions of the Defense Forces and the permanent deployment of one of the military units with the use of mortars, grenade launchers and assault rifles. On the Armenian side 2 casualties and 19 wounded. Already on August 5 the Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure of Artsakh Hayk Khanumyan stated to the habitants of Aghavno and Berdzor that they should leave their houses till August 25.

It should be mentioned that point 6 of the trilateral statement of 9 November 2020 says that in three years' time a new alternative road will be built to connect Artsakh with Armenia. Armenian Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Gnel Sanosyan said on August 4 that the work on the construction of the Lachin corridor alternative road has already begun and will be completed by spring. Azerbaijan has built a 30-kilometer section of the road, which should connect with the road built by the Armenian side. Russian peacekeepers will be stationed on a 5-kilometer section of the new route.

Expert: No red lines in Russia’s relations with Turkey regarding concessions on Armenia

NEWS.am
Armenia – Aug 9 2022

There are no red lines in Russia's relations with Turkey with regard to concessions on Armenia. Andranik Ispiryan, a Turkologist, told NEWS.am. According to him, Russia will make as many concessions as the situation allows.

"However, Russia is not yet in a situation to make such serious concessions, but we see that everything is developing very quickly, and there are no guarantees in connection with what may happen with Russia. But there is no such danger in the near future," he said. According to Ispiryan's assessment, the worse Russia is doing in Ukraine, the less important the South Caucasus, including Armenia, becomes for Russia.

This creates threats in the region to Armenia's detriment. "History shows that decisions in the region have often been made at the expense of our interests. This threat still exists today. As the problems in Ukraine deepen, the most serious threat is posed by Russia's presence in the South Caucasus. Turkey, realizing the complexity of the situation, wants Russia to make concessions in the region to the detriment of Armenia and in favor of Turkey and Azerbaijan in an attempt to maintain its position in other directions," he added.

The meeting in Sochi for both Turkey and Russia the expert called a success. "Military action in Ukraine was a salvation for Ankara, because before that there were threats to the preservation of Erdogan's power at the end of the elections in 2023. The sanctions against Russia became a new direction for the Turkish authorities to increase their authority both inside the country and in foreign policy. At the end of the Sochi meeting, there was talk about energy cooperation, Syria, the food problem as a result of military actions in Ukraine. All this gave Turkey serious financial, energy opportunities, it became a hub for Europe against the backdrop of the energy crisis. For Russia, more markets have opened up in Turkey.

This means that Russia manages to break through Western sanctions through Turkey. This has been a source of concern around the world. Since the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine, relations between Russia and Turkey have been warming even more. But this relationship is not based on trust, but on mutual interests. Both countries are trying to spread their influence in the region, aiming for the maximum, but in the current situation they have to go for cooperation," noted Ispiryan.

Putin discusses Nagorno Karabakh escalation with Security Council members

Save

Share

 16:01, 4 August 2022

YEREVAN, AUGUST 4, ARMENPRESS. President of Russia Vladimir Putin discussed the situation in Nagorno Karabakh with members of the Security Council, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said.

Peskov said the escalation of the conflict in NK was discussed. “The high necessity to implement all provisions of the trilateral agreement was underscored,” Peskov added.

AW: Stand tall, beloved Armenia. “Pause” talks with Turkey.

Republic Square, Yerevan, April 2010 (Photo: Tony Bowden/Flickr)

The phase of “no preconditions” in normalization talks with Turkey has officially ended. The emphasis is on the word officially, since we should know that the day Turkish officials could no longer behave and play by the rules was long overdue. In a recent statement to Turkish television, Erdogan stated that “Azerbaijan has been our red line from the beginning. We will open our doors after the problems with Azerbaijan are resolved.” Does this sound like embracing the esteemed commitment of no preconditions? 

First let me state that I stand for and with Armenia. We must defend what is in the interests of the homeland and its future. Our intent is not to criticize our brethren or contribute to disunity, but to advocate actions that will support Armenia with dignity and usher in the fresh air of a future. It is obvious that Erdogan, by his own actions, has no respect for Armenia and is committed to its destruction. Some things don’t change regardless of the leaders and circumstances. When this process was announced in December 2021, Erdogan’s intent was to give up nothing and win credits with the west. The United States and Europe would be overjoyed to preside over the beginning of reconciliation between the two longtime adversaries through the establishment of diplomatic relations and the opening of the border. We should remind ourselves that the border closure was a unilateral action in 1993 by Turkey based on the Artsakh (Karabakh) crisis. Both Turkey and Armenia entered these sensitive discussions with a public commitment not to bring preconditions (agendas not mutually held) into the dialogue. This has never been an issue for Armenia despite the fact that Armenia has suffered from almost continuous oppression by the Turks from the Hamidian area through the 2020 war. Armenia is not in an advantageous position and has engaged in cautious good faith. The dialogue has been publicly cordial with both parties careful to express an optimistic tone despite the modest results thus far. The discussions have focused on a partial border opening and cargo flight resumption. The recent tone from Turkey has been demanding and degrading into an arrogance of mistrust. Armenia has expressed its expectation that the diplomatic normalization talks be separate from the ongoing talks with Azerbaijan on settlement of the Artsakh conflict. Armenia’s position remains consistent with the tenet of no preconditions.

Turkish Foreign Minister Cavusoglu has stated that the normalization talks with Armenia will take place in a “tripartite format” with Azerbaijan. He further stated that their activity is coordinated with Azerbaijan whether Armenia agrees or not. I may be from a small town, but this looks a lot like a precondition to me…a major one at that. Armenia has tried its best to take the high road by stating that it was already understood that this was Turkey’s position and that it was unacceptable to Armenia. It is important to understand that the reference to Azerbaijan in the normalization talks is no small matter. Turkey is determined to directly connect the so-called “peace treaty” with Azerbaijan (surrender in Aliyev language) and the infamous fantasy of the “Zangezur corridor” which would divide sovereign Syunik territory. Apparently, the foxes in Ankara could not keep their deceptive masks on long enough to reach agreement. The Turkish disdain and hatred of the Armenians is so visible that Cavusoglu blamed the lack of “concrete steps” on the diaspora and some domestic factions. In parallel with their attempts to turn this dialogue into one-sided demands, the Turkish government will continue all attempts to divide the Armenian nation with statements such as the aforementioned. This is a classic move by the duplicitous Turks; Armenians must be wise to remain outwardly united during this critical period. Erdogan has economic and popularity problems at home with elections in the next year. In Turkey, foreign policy bluster is always a way to improve popularity. He is a master at playing the west against Russia and is trying to position Turkey for geopolitical windfalls from Europe and the United States in return for his bartering on the Ukraine grain deal. Turkey is always looking for new opportunities to gain influence to support its criminal self interests. Turkey continues its aggressive policy in northern Iraq and particularly in Syria. They have found opposition from the United States as it relates to the Kurds and are playing a dangerous game with Russia and the Syrian government. The examples are endless with Libya, Greece, Cyprus and the Aegean. Meanwhile, Iran has made it clear that it will not tolerate any changes in its border region with Armenia. Iran has its own issues with Israeli monitoring in Azerbaijan and the political ramifications of its militant groups in the Middle East. These dynamics all have an impact on the Armenian/Turkish/Azerbaijani equation. The “normalization” talks for Turkey are nothing more than an opportunity to advance their agenda and build goodwill with the west.

What can and should Armenia do? We should not be critical of Armenia for engaging in this dialogue with Turkey. The pressure to participate has been enormous from all the world powers. It is easy for the stakeholders to encourage two longtime adversaries to talk. Who can be against that? Improving this regional problem is what big powers like to think they do well. The problem, of course, is that they never address the root cause. Band-aids make for excellent short term photo ops. They will tolerate almost any distraction to keep the process moving with empty rhetoric. Some of these countries actually think that having meetings and issuing obligatory press statements are accomplishments. We should have learned from 30 years of the OSCE Minsk process that the capacity for no progress and “keeping the light on for tomorrow” is almost endless. While thousands of hours of diplomacy were expended and commitment to peaceful solutions were reconfirmed, Turkey and Azerbaijan attacked the Armenians and the west was essentially boxed out. Turkey, in its classic cunning manner, initially waved a plastic olive branch in an attempt to trap the Armenians in a corner. When the Turkish officials state that they are waiting for “sincere” moves from Armenia, it clearly is not a good faith negotiation on Turkey’s part, but rather a reflection of a long-standing superiority complex that is focused on eliminating Armenia. We must appreciate that Armenia is in a difficult position. To their credit, Armenia has responded that any “corridor” is unacceptable and the Azerbaijani peace discussions must be decoupled from normalization talks with Turkey. The Turkish strategy of “one nation two states” is a racist fantasy that has no part in any legitimate dialogue. Armenia is in no position to completely break off discussions due to the concern that it will put Armenia in an untenable position. Emotionally, Armenia would be fully justified based on the public positions of Turkey that would simply be analogous to surrender. Their arrogance has created a volatile environment. On the other hand, Armenia should find a way to maintain its positions and effectively create a response that counters the Turkish aggression.

There is a middle ground that may provide Armenia with an option. It takes two parties for any semblance of bilateral talks. When Turkey goes overboard with destructive and irrelevant demands, Armenia should exercise a “pause” in the talks. Azerbaijan has used this approach to minimize the impact of its criminal behavior and optimize its messaging. When we pause a television program, it does not shut off the programming but merely delays continuance for a specific intent. In the case of television viewing, pausing enables the viewer to maintain the opportunity to continue after a reprieve. Referring to this diplomatic engagement, Armenia has the right to buy time if Turkish proposals are offensive or completely off topic. Utilizing this approach will allow Armenian leadership time to engage third parties to bring balance to the dialogue. The timing of meetings and the specific areas of focus are critical to the perceived momentum of the process. It is Turkey that has created the concerns by not conforming to the rules of engagement. Armenia has entered this dialogue in good faith and has every right to consider counter measures. Turkey can consult whomever they desire, but Azerbaijan has no direct role in this process. Realistically, both sides have preconditions. It is interesting to note that Armenia has maintained its discipline, while Turkey has continued to behave like a reckless bully with both their rhetoric and actions. Armenia has conditions that are all about peace, justice and redemption, while Turkey describes criminal self-interests that are acts of aggression and will continue to destabilize the region. If the west can get over its fear of alienating the Turks, they would see that most of their objectives would be met without the disruptive behavior of Turkey.

This is a time for Armenians to tone down the rhetoric within the nation. The Turks are waiting to exploit every sign of disunity by blaming the “lack of progress” on the diaspora or other factions. Our collective focus should be on the deceptive Turkish positions and exposing their criminal intent. Our voices become more faint when they are divided. Our role in the diaspora is to advocate and support the prosperity of Armenia. It becomes complicated when opinions lead to tension. We should consider the implications of our disunity on the behavior of Turkey and Azerbaijan. It is a challenging balancing act. We can help, but we need to remain disciplined. Advocating actions in a civil and responsible way can add value. The enemy with the western suits still carry a fez in their closets with the same mentality as their forefathers. This must be our central theme — the century old problem of surviving Turkish neighbors bent on the destruction of Armenia. Stand tall, beloved Armenian nation.

Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.