Pashinyan: Making decisions often does not depend only on us

panorama
Armenia – Dec 30 2021

2021 was the year of post-war repercussions, and very serious efforts were required to keep the situation in Armenia and around it controllable, Nikol Pashinyan told a cabinet meeting on Thursday, adding at the beginning of 2021 they faced that problem.

“It took huge efforts from the public administration system to be able to overcome the domestic situation in 2021 without shocks,” he said. “We encountered very serious problems in the external environment, and we still continue to encounter them. The invasion of the Azerbaijani armed forces into the Sotk-Khoznavar section since May 2021, the consequences of that act, and the incident of November 16 further underscore our security concerns.”

He proposed the participants of the meeting to observe a minute's silence to honor all those, who sacrificed their lives for the homeland in 2021 and in the past.

Afterwards, Pashinyan referred to the plans of the government for 2022.

“We must make every effort in 2022 to make it a year of prosperity and revival. This is our main message today. It is clear that the post-war agenda and the consequences will still be felt for a long period, and we must step by step, consistently overcome this situation and try to solve all the problems that are on the foreign policy agenda. My conviction is that we must do everything in our power to find solutions. We must do our best to leave inheritance to the next generations, to the next governments, not problems that are constantly becoming more complicated, but a stable and recorded situation, which is a key precondition for ensuring the further normal development of the country,” he said

“On the other hand, of course, this is not easy; no matter how much we are willing to take responsibility for making decisions, we must also state that making those decisions often does not depend only on us. This is the most important point. We must be able to bring to maturity a process that will finally give us the opportunity to record the situation and complete the agenda of opening an era of peaceful development for Armenia and our region," Pashinyan noted.

Ex-chief of aviation authority opens up on how Turkey opened airspace for Armenia in early 90s

Save

Share

 10:43,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 27, ARMENPRESS. The former chief of the aviation authority of Armenia Shahen Petrosyan says he is positively appreciating the reports on potential re-opening of the Yerevan-Istanbul flights.

Petrosyan served as Director of the General Department of Civil Aviation from 1993 to 1996.

Speaking to ARMENPRESS, he revealed a few details from the history of establishment of air connection between Armenia and Turkey in the early 90s, noting that at that time it was the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) that forced Turkey to open its airspace with Armenia.

Petrosyan said that when he was first appointed as GDCA chief in 1993, he asked specialists to elaborate why the Armenia-Turkey air border was closed, and it turned out that when Armenia gained its independence the aviation authorities did not warn that air borders are subject to confirmation as well. The Armenian government applied to ECAC, and meanwhile President Levon-Ter Petrosyan and his chief advisor Gerard Libaridian were engaged in negotiations with Turkey’s leadership.

“I notified the government about this and said that this issue must somehow be resolved because in addition to being in a land blockade we were also in an air blockade. And Turkey didn’t have the right to do so. Turkey was bringing forward justifications saying “the border which we have is the border of the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union doesn’t exist anymore.” And we were forced to approve that this is the border of Armenia. The ECAC helped us a lot. We struggled for it for more than a year, and eventually ECAC forced Turkey to open its air border with Armenia. The process was very difficult because of the absence of diplomatic relations. And suddenly one day my Turkish counterpart called me and said “Efendi Petrosyan, can you come? We’ve already prepared the paperwork to open the air border”. I answered “perhaps you could come?” He said “no, we’ve already finalized everything.”

A large Armenian delegation then took off from Yerevan on a small YAK-40 to Ankara and on April 20, 1995 the agreement on opening of the air border was signed between Armenia and Turkey, Petrosyan said.

“At that time we had two air corridors, the H50 and H51. One of them was passing above Mount Ararat, and the other above Kars. This was very beneficial for Armenia because transit aircraft began using this route when flying from Europe to the Far East. Armenia was getting 1 million dollars yearly for aero-navigation thanks to this,” Petrosyan said.

Thus, in May 1995 Armenian Airlines started regular, twice-a-week flights from Yerevan to Istanbul. There were plans to start the Gyumri-Kars flights, but the project failed.

From the early 2000s to 2016 the Turkish Pegasus airline was operating the Istanbul-Yerevan flights, but the flights were cancelled when the situation around Nagorno Karabakh flared-up when the 2016 April War began.

The Turkish authorities earlier announced that Pegasus will re-launch Yerevan flights, and meanwhile the Armenian aviation authorities confirmed that FlyOne Armenia airline will also operate the Yerevan-Istanbul flights.

Interview by Aram Sargsyan

How Karabakh was left out of peace talks?

 NEWS.am 
Dec 27 2021

Weren't the Madrid Principles better than the package version and than what we have today? Wasn't the Kazan document better than the phased version in 1997 and than what we have today? I think the answer is obvious. The second president of Armenia, leader of the opposition "Armenia" Bloc Robert Kocharyan stated this during his year-end press conference Monday—and referring to the question of how it turned out that the positions and opportunities of the Armenian side did not increase as a result of prolonging the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) conflict, and whether the package version was not better than what we have now.

Referring to the accusation that during his tenure Karabakh was left out of the peace negotiations as a full-fledged party, Kocharyan said as follows, in particular: "The last substantive discussion within the framework of the [OSCE] Minsk Group took place in October 1996, [when] I was the President of Karabakh. After that, there was one meeting that did not reach the content part. And that meeting took place on April 1, 1997, when I was the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia appointed 10 days ago.

In January 1997, the Co-Chairs changed, and the troika—Russia, the US, and France—was formed. Before that there was Russia, and the other countries were changing—Finland, Sweden. And the main discussions were within the framework of the Minsk Group. Ambassadors from nine countries were gathering, there was a discussion. They were more mental exercises. Turkey was there too.

The Co-Chairs decided in January 1997 to hold another meeting in the format of the Minsk Group—but the troika was already chairing that meeting. And on the last day of that meeting they announced that they were moving to shuttle diplomacy. They saw that the issue did not move forward in the format of the Minsk Group, and [therefore] changed the format of participation. The co-chairs have not assembled a Minsk Group since then. If the Armenian authorities do not know about it, it is the peak of cosmic ignorance. If they know, they do not say, they deceive, it is a knavery. I do not know which version it is.

They have not gathered the Minsk Group anymore. I had the next meeting with the president of Azerbaijan on April 1, 1999, in Russia, through the mediation of [then Russian President] Yeltsin. After that, a meeting took place during the NATO summit in late April.

(…) it was the decision of the troika not to assemble the Minsk Group anymore, they announced that they were pursuing shuttle diplomacy, and Karabakh has always been an active participant in it. During my 10 years [of tenure], there has not been a case when they [i.e., the mediators] came to Armenia and did not go to Karabakh," Kocharyan stated.

"Yes, Karabakh participated, but then that format disappeared altogether. The Minsk Group remained, but the discussions began to take a different format. If the co-chairs had gathered the same format, Karabakh would have been sitting at that table in the same way. They considered it ineffective and, to be honest, they considered it right," the second president of Armenia stated.

PM Nikol Pashinyan says reactions to his interview “at least puzzling”

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 26 2021

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said some of the responses to his December 24 interview are “at least puzzling” for several reasons. The Prime Minister took to Facebook to list the reasons:

  1. In that interview, I spoke about the content of the negotiations formed before I became Prime Minister in 2018, therefore, I could not have any influence on their formation.
  2. In response to a question, I denied Serzh Sargsyan’s assertion at the RPA Congress that the content of the negotiations left by them guaranteed that Nagorno Karabakh would be Armenian. I denied it because the right of Azerbaijanis living in the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic to participate in the decision on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh as a resident of Nagorno-Karabakh was enshrined in that content of the negotiations. Therefore, if they are residents of Nagorno-Karabakh according to the content of the negotiations, then they had to live in Nagorno-Karabakh, and the Armenian side never objected to this content before the 2018 revolution. And if we take into account that according to the content of the negotiations formed before I became Prime Minister, the referendum on the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh could take place 100 years later, it is predictable what changes in the demographic picture of Artsakh would be under the mentioned conditions.
  3. As for the status of Nagorno-Karabakh before the potential referendum on status, I said in an interview that in 2016 the mediators had presented three negotiation packages (one before the April war, two after), where, unlike the 2011 Kazan document, the wording “Nagorno Karabakh gets an intermediate status” was missing. The third of these three packages, presented in August 2016, contains a provision stating that the decision on the legal and practical mechanisms for the organization of life in Nagorno-Karabakh will be made by the UN Security Council in consultation with the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, Azerbaijan, Armenia and the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office. This is what I considered to be a catastrophe in the negotiation process, because it is obvious that the UN Security Council would make all the decisions following the logic of its own resolutions on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, where Nagorno-Karabakh was recognized as part of Azerbaijan.
  4. Taking into account these and several other important negotiation issues, I have insisted from the Parliament tribune that under the negotiation content and realities existing before I became Prime Minister in 2018, Artsakh had lost both theoretical and practical opportunities not to be part of Azerbaijan.
  5. Becoming Prime Minister, I did not accept this, but fought against it. And this is one of the reasons why the war started.
  6. People saying that I should not negotiate on behalf of Nagorno-Karabakh have been criticizing me since 2018 for saying that I do not have a mandate to negotiate on behalf of Nagorno-Karabakh.
  7. I understand that many respectable people are now protesting against the negotiation content that is the cause and consequence of the 2016 war. At that time they either did not know or did not have the right to complain. I also complain against that content and I did everything possible to neutralize that content. I am sorry I can not hide the truth.

The comments come in the wake of Artsakh President Arayik Harutyunyan’s statement, in which he said the full recognition of the right of the Armenians of Artsakh to self-determination is not subject to reservation and concession. Therefore, he said, only the authorities of the Artsakh Republic are authorized to speak on behalf of the people of Artsakh.

Armenia’s Pashinyan: I refuse to discuss any issue related to the army publicly

News.am, Armenia
Dec 24 2021

I won’t repeat the mistake that I made in the past. I refuse to discuss any issue related to the armed forces publicly. This is what Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said during his online press conference today, touching upon the question about the arms and military equipment that Armenia has procured.

Asked if the radical reforms in the self-defense system are being considered, the Prime Minister said the following: “Again, I won’t discuss the subtleties and specific issues related to the army, and I advise everyone to not discuss such issues publicly. However, I will say that all of our thoughts about the army are expressed in the government’s action plan.”

As for the reason why the defeated high-ranking officers haven’t been relieved of their posts and why the ones who acted in the best way during the war aren’t appointed to positions, Pashinyan said the following: “As far as the officers are concerned, this is a very important issue. However, we need to be very careful to not mix things up. During the war, I was told that a certain commander had left a military post and escaped, and then, after a long investigation, it turned out that it was totally the opposite. There was also the opposite case when a certain commander was glorified, but the investigation showed that he shouldn’t have been glorified. Those who gave wrong reports have been punished, are being punished and will be punished. This is a major issue on the agenda, but I wouldn’t like to go into detail.”

Hate speech has nothing to do with freedom of speech – Armenian Ombudsman

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 21 2021

Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan has published a video on the negative consequences of hate speech, emphasizing that it has nothing to do with the freedom of speech.


This anti-hate speech awareness video was produced as part of the EU-funded Partnership for Good Governance II project “Promoting access to justice for victims of discrimination, hate crimes and hate speech through out-of-state compensation mechanisms in the Eastern Partnership countries” and implemented by the Council of Europe.


The message of the video is that we should all live together as a united and democratic society, respecting the dignity and rights of everyone.

Pro-government MPs boycott special parliament sitting initiated by opposition

Panorama, Armenia
Dec 15 2021

Armenia’s ruling Civil Contract faction on Wednesday boycotted a special parliament sitting initiated by the opposition to discuss issues related to the border delimitation and demarcation with Azerbaijan.

The sitting had been initiated by the Hayastan (Armenia) faction.

The attendance fell below the quorum of 54 MPs. Only 30 opposition lawmakers registered for the sitting.

Armenian army generals submit recommendation letter for release of detachment commander Ashot Minasyan

News.am, Armenia
Dec 15 2021

Former Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Armenia, Colonel General Yuri Khachaturov and former Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Armenia, Lieutenant General Norat Ter-Grigoryants have submitted a recommendation letter to release legendary commander of the Sisakan military detachment Ashot Minasyan from custody.

“Yesterday we learned from the presses that people with high reputation are willing to give recommendation letters for the release of Ashot Minasyan from custody. We, the undersigned army generals, personally know Ashot Minasyan, are well aware of his heroic past and assure that he has never committed and will not commit illegal acts. We certainly guarantee that Ashot Minasyan won’t hide, won’t obstruct the investigation and won’t commit any act prohibited by law,” the recommendation letter reads.

Right after the trilateral statement on the end of the 44-day war was signed on November 9, 2020, law-enforcement officers immediately began to detain several members of the opposition.

During those days, the National Security Service released a voice recording in which former director of the National Security Service and current head of the opposition ‘With Honor’ faction of the National Assembly Artur Vanetsyan, member of the Republican Party of Armenia Vahram Baghdasaryan, member of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaktsutyun political party Ashot Avagyan and commander of Sisian military detachment Ashot Minasyan are preparing to assassinate Nikol Pashinyan and are usurping power. Minasyan was also charged with acquiring and keeping illegal arms, ammunition and explosive substances to kill Pashinyan.

The Prosecutor General’s Office used all the tribunals to arrest Minasyan, and only at the end did Judge Tigran Simonyan decide to arrest Ashot Minasyan.

Armenian, Russian FMs discuss issues related to 3+3 format

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 8 2021

Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan had a telephone conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

The Armenian and Russian Foreign Ministers discussed a wide range of issues related to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The full restoration of the peace process for a lasting and comprehensive settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict under the mandate of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs was emphasised.

Ararat Mirzoyan and Sergey Lavrov also discussed the process of fulfillment of the obligations undertaken by the parties under the trilateral statements of November 9, 2021, January 11, 2021 and November 26, 2021.

Minister Mirzoyan stressed that the bellicose statements made by the Azerbaijani leadership and the threats of use of force seriously endanger regional stability and security.

The Armenian and Russian Foreign Ministers also discussed issues related to the “3 + 3” format, as well as issues of mutual interest on the regional and international agenda.