Asbarez: As Berdzor (Lachin) Falls, Aliyev and Ankara Rejoice

Aghavno residents gather their belongings to leave the village in Artsakh's Berdzor region (Armenpress photo by Tatev Duryan)

The Armenian residents of the Aghavno village in Artsakh Berdzor left their homes and evacuated the area ahead of the August 25 deadline, and thus Berdzor (Lachin) fell under Azerbaijani occupation.

Images and videos of desolate Armenian leaving Berdzor with only their belongings and the undignified manner they were forced out of their homes peppered social media.

However, President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and the Turkish government rejoiced at this indignity.

“We returned to Lachin,” Aliyev proclaimed in a Twitter post.

“Today we, Azerbaijanis, returned to the city of Lachin and the Azerbaijani army are positioned in Lachin. The villages of Zabukh (Aghavno) and Sus are under their protection,” Aliyev said in his post.

Artsakh authorities on Thursday said the road linking Armenia to Artsakh through Berdzor is open and safe passage was being guaranteed by the Russian peacekeeping contingent.

Meanwhile, Turkey expressed hope that the “return” of Aghavno and Berdzor will benefit Azerbaijan in its efforts to normalize relations with Armenia.

“We are happy that the city of Lachin and the villages of Zabukh [Aghavno[ and Sus have returned to Azerbaijan under the provisions of the tripartite declaration of November 9, 2020,” the Turkish foreign ministry said in a statement on Friday.

“We hope that this important step in the direction of establishing peace and stability in the South Caucasus will contribute to the improvement of regional, as well as Azerbaijani-Armenian relations,” said added official Ankara.

The Turkish foreign ministry also stated that “Ankara has defended and will continue to defend the territorial integrity and sovereignty of brotherly Azerbaijan.”

Ankara to demand price for success in normalization process with Armenia – Ruben Safrastyan

ARMINFO
Armenia – Aug 24 2022
David Stepanyan

ArmInfo. The small steps forward following the fourth meeting between the Armenian and Turkish special envoys, Ruben Rubinyan and Serdar Kilic, in the Armenia- Turkey  normalization process were obviously Ankara's initiative, expert in  Turkic studies, Professor Ruben Safrastyan said in an interview with  ArmInfo.

"I think it is the result of Ankara's tactics in its negotiations  with Yerevan. Unwilling to open the border and establish diplomatic  relations with Armenia as soon as possible, Turkey is making small  steeps to produce an impression it is prepared for final  normalization," he said. 

In fact, however, at a certain stage, Ankara will demand that Yerevan  pay for its last step toward a successful completion of the process.  And the price is Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan and, of course, the  "Zangezur corridor". Evidence thereof is Recep Erdogan's repeated  attempts to link the Armenian-Turkish talks with Armenian-Azerbaijani  relations, particularly with the notorious "corridor problem."

Turkey in tandem with Azerbaijan is pushing ahead with the "corridor"  logic of unblocking transport links in the region, it being primarily  Ankara's strategic policy and far-reaching designs, with the aim to  rule out both Russia and Armenian control over the extraterritorial  corridor via Syunik, for unimpeded shipment of any cargoes via  Armenia and across the Caspian Sea to Central Asia. This proceeds  from Turkey's pan- Turkic policy. 

"Russia will not agree to an extraterritorial corridor, but it will  insist on unblocking the transport links under its border guards'  control, in line with the November 9 statement, which is in conflict  with Ankara and Baku's interests," Mr Safrastyan said. 

The conflicting desires of Moscow and Ankara are accompanied by  Armenia strongly rejecting the corridor logic. Another issue to be  specified is the safety of the transport links running to Russia via  Azerbaijan, th expert said. 

Putin, Armenian PM focus on Nagorno-Karabakh during phone call — Kremlin

TASS, Russia
Aug 24 2022
Vladimir Putin and Nikol Pashinyan also touched on some relevant issues on further cultivating the strategic partnership and alliance between Moscow and Yerevan

MOSCOW, August 24. /TASS/. Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the situation around Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan by phone, with the conversation taking place at the initiative of the Armenian side, the Kremlin press service reported on Wednesday.

"The discussion on the situation around Nagorno-Karabakh continued. The importance of the consistent implementation of the trilateral agreements reached by the leaders of Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan on November 9, 2020, January 11 and November 26, 2021, was confirmed. The role of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in ensuring stability in the region was also noted," the press service said.

Putin and Pashinyan also touched on some relevant issues on further cultivating the strategic partnership and alliance between Moscow and Yerevan.

In early August, Pashinyan noted that a number of events that have taken place in Nagorno-Karabakh since 2020 raise questions among the Armenian public about the content and nature of the peacekeeping operation in Nagorno-Karabakh. In this context, he pointed out, there is an urgent need to agree on the details of the peacekeeping operation. Earlier, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that the situation in the area of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in Nagorno-Karabakh was deteriorating. According to the ministry, the ceasefire regime was violated by Azerbaijani Armed Forces near Sarybaba heights. The peacekeeping command, together with representatives of the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides, are taking measures to stabilize the situation.

The situation in Nagorno-Karabakh escalated on September 27, 2020. On November 9, 2020, Vladimir Putin, Ilham Aliyev and Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on the full cessation of hostilities. The sides stopped at their positions at that moment, a number of districts went under Baku’s control, and Russian peacekeepers were deployed at the contact line and at the so-called Lachin corridor.

Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Cyprus discuss regional security issues

Save

Share

 17:56,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 18, ARMENPRESS. On August 18, Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan held a phone conversation with Foreign Minister of Cyprus Ioannis Kasoulidis, ARMENPRESS was informed from MFA Armenia.

During the phone conversation, Ioannis Kasoulidis expressed his condolences regarding the human casualties caused by the explosion in the Surmalu trade center on August 14 and wished a speedy recovery to the injured.

The Foreign Ministers commended the high level of Armenia-Cyprus relations. Prospects for further expansion and strengthening of cooperation in bilateral and multilateral formats were discussed.

The interlocutors also touched upon issues of regional security.

Armenian Ministry of Emergency Situations: There are 5 citizens of Iran and one citizen of Russia among the missing persons

ARMINFO
Armenia – Aug 15 2022

ArmInfo. The Ministry of Emergency Situations of Armenia has added to the list of persons considered missing as a result of the explosion in the Surmalu  shopping center. There are 5 citizens of Iran and one citizen of  Russia among the missing persons Thus, according to the Ministry of  Emergency Situations of the Republic of Armenia, the following  citizens are listed as missing:  

1. Aram Hayrapetyan, born in 1981

2. Marat Shahbazyan

3. Sirarpi Khachatryan

4. Mariam Khachatryan

5. Harut Garakyan

6. Gagik Karapetyan

7. Artavazd Hayrapetyan

8. Erna Grigoryan, born in 1980

9. Hrachya Sargsyan, born in 1976

10. Vachagan Egoyan, born in 2000

11. Vanik Amirkhanyan

12. Ksenia Badalyan, born in 1981

13. Aram Harutyunyan

14. David Mkhitaryan

15.Vanik Karapetyan

16. Mehri Tareri (Iranian citizen)

17. Meline Taloyan, born in 1997

18. Lyubov Gribova (citizen of the Russian Federation, born in 1959)

19. Mariam Fathi,

20. Vania Fathi (born 2016),

21  Edris Fathi (born 2002),

22. Kiomars Fathy (born 1972),

23. Monire Naderi.  

On August 14, the National Center for Crisis Management received a  message that an explosion had occurred in the Surmalu shopping  center. The death toll under the rubble of the shopping center has  reached 7 people, another 61 were injured. A criminal case has been  initiated under Part 2 of Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the  Republic of Armenia (violation of fire safety rules that negligently  caused the death of a person or other grave consequences), as well as  Part 2 of Article 358 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia  (violation of the rules for the storage, transportation, delivery or  use of flammable or combustible materials, entailed by negligence the  death of a person or other grave consequences).  In connection with  the tragedy, condolences continue to be received from foreign  countries. Embassies of Lithuania, Vatican, Estonia, Mexico, Serbia,  China, the Netherlands, Russia, USA, Iran, Bulgaria, Czech Republic  in Armenia expressed their words of support.  Condolences were also  expressed by the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Georgia,  Moldova, Montenegro, Greece and Cyprus. 

Turkish press: No tangible results in Azerbaijan, Armenia relations so far: Aliyev

Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev is seen during a speech in Baku, Azerbaijan, July 16, 2022. (IHA Photo)

No tangible results have been achieved in relations between Baku and Yerevan since the 44-day war over the Karabakh region in 2020, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said on Monday.

“Even though certain steps towards the normalization of Azerbaijan-Armenia relations were taken in the first six months of this year, unfortunately, there are no tangible results yet. Although a year and eight months have passed since the Patriotic War, unfortunately, Armenia has yet to fulfill the obligations it was forced to take upon itself,” he said during an evaluative meeting.

Aliyev said that the first meeting of working groups on delimitation was a positive development, but that it was only possible thanks to Azerbaijan.

“The Armenian side was not particularly inclined to do this. However, the first meeting was held. Of course, this meeting was more of an introductory nature. A second meeting is scheduled for next month. I believe that the second meeting will be devoted to the discussion of specific issues,” he said, indicating that although no quick results are expected, the process starting is a success in itself.

Touching on what he described as another positive development, Aliyev also highlighted that Armenia officially accepted the five basic principles that will form the basis of a peace treaty, adding that the issue was also discussed with several neighboring countries including Türkiye, Russia and Iran as well as the European Union and the United States.

“Again, Azerbaijan put forward the initiative, we are the ones who developed these five principles, and if we had not taken this initiative upon ourselves, there would have been no progress in this direction to this day.”

Furthermore, according to Aliyev, the foreign ministers of the two countries are set to meet tomorrow.

“This will be the first meeting between the ministers and we look forward to the meeting producing results. I have had several meetings with the prime minister of Armenia, representatives of Azerbaijan and Armenia have also had a meeting. But there hasn’t been a meeting between foreign ministers, this will be the first such meeting,” he elaborated, noting that Baku’s expectation from the meeting is that Yerevan establishes its own working group for the preparation of the peace treaty.

He went on to say that although a year and eight months have passed since the war, no other positive developments have been recorded.

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military illegally occupied Karabakh, previously referred to as Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

Clashes erupted on Sept. 27, 2020, with the Armenian Army attacking civilians and Azerbaijani forces and violating several humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the 44-day conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and around 300 settlements and villages that had been occupied by Armenia for almost 30 years.

The fighting ended with a Russian-brokered agreement on Nov. 10, 2020, which was seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia.

In January 2021, the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a pact to develop economic ties and infrastructure to benefit the entire region. It also included the establishment of a trilateral working group in Karabakh.

After the conflict ended, Azerbaijan launched a massive reconstruction initiative in the liberated Karabakh region.

Aliyev said that Yerevan refuses to address the issues identified in the declaration signed on Nov. 10, 2020, which represents an act of capitulation for Armenia as the defeated side in the war which bears certain obligations.

“One of them is the withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from Karabakh. This issue has not been resolved to this day. We have raised this issue many times, but Armenia keeps delaying it,” the president said, adding that Russia had promised a few months ago that the Armenian Armed Forces would withdraw from Karabakh by June.

“It is the middle of August now, but this issue has not been resolved yet. It is completely unacceptable for Armenian armed forces to remain on the territory of Azerbaijan. We are a victorious country and we have restored our territorial integrity.”

Moreover, according to the Nov. 10 declaration, contact was to be established between Azerbaijan and the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan, which Armenia also agreed to but there is still no progress.

“The Lachin road is open, and we made a commitment in the declaration of Nov. 10 that the Lachin road would work and that Azerbaijan guarantees the safety of that road. But we do not have the opportunity to go to Nakhchivan from the main part of Azerbaijan,” he emphasized.

The Azerbaijani president also said that a feasibility study is needed for the railway to be built in the Mehri section of the Zangezur corridor and that the Armenian side has to provide a route within this context.

Aliyev said he raised this issue many times, including three times during meetings with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian the president of the Council of Europe, Charles Michel. “Work in this direction has not been carried out, the feasibility study has not been prepared – Armenia does not want to fulfill this obligation, but it does not admit that.”

He said that if Azerbaijan is implementing the articles of the declaration, the same is expected of the Armenian side.

Aliyev also criticized the Armenian side for bringing up the issue of the status of Karabakh, saying that a verbal agreement had been reached following the war that its status is not open to discussion. “We can also start talking about status, we can demand status for Zangezur, the Zangezur that was severed from us in November 1920.”

He said that attempts are still being made “to revive the now-defunct Minsk Group.”

“The Minsk Group has now left the stage. We, a country participating in this process, are saying that there is no need for the Minsk Group. There is no need for a group that has not produced any result in 28 years.”

He said that on one hand, Armenia accepts and acknowledges the five principles, including the mutual recognition of territorial integrity, the relinquishment of territorial claims against each other and other provisions, but on the other hand, “it seems that the Minsk Group needs to be kept busy.”

Prior to the 2020 war, diplomats from France, Russia and the United States – the so-called Minsk Group working under the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) – had for decades led fruitless negotiations to resolve the Karabakh issue.

Aliyev has frequently emphasized that although the Minsk Group was active for years, it failed to achieve any concrete results that would bring peace to the region.

Armenpress: “Flagrant lie” – Armenia denies any involvement in Greece wiretapping case

“Flagrant lie” – Armenia denies any involvement in Greece wiretapping case

Save

Share

 17:03, 7 August 2022

YEREVAN, AUGUST 7, ARMENPRESS. Armenia never requested any foreign government to wiretap anyone’s phone, the Armenian Ambassador to Greece Tigran Mkrtchyan told the Tribune newspaper when asked to comment on allegations by a Greek politician reported by Kathimerini.

Kathimerini newspaper reported that PASOK party leader Nikos Androulakis claimed that an attempt was made to wiretap his phone using the Predator spyware. Afterwards, the Greek spy chief – who has resigned after the allegations – allegedly claimed that the monitoring of Androulakis was done at the request of the Ukrainian and Armenian intelligence services.

When asked to comment by the Tribune newspaper, the Armenian Ambassador to Greece Tigran Mkrtchyan slammed the report as a flagrant lie.

“That is a flagrant lie. Armenia never asked any government to wiretap anyone’s phone,” the ambassador said in a statement.

Inside Nagorno-Karabakh’s new refugee crisis

Aug 9 2022
A discarded book left behind in a former Armenian school in Nagorno-Karabakh. (Credit: Gabriel Gavin)

On Sunday, Nina Shahverdyan took her students’ drawings down off the walls and burnt them in a bin behind the school where she works. 

Along with dozens of children she teaches English, and their families, the 22-year-old now has to pack up whatever she can carry and leave the village she calls home. Aghavno, on the edge of the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, is being handed over to Azerbaijani troops, and ethnic Armenians like her are being forced out.

“We spent energy, time and effort on these artworks,” Shahverdyan says. “And we don’t want to see videos of soldiers stepping on them or tearing them up. Each picture carries memories – our memories. If it has to come to an end, we want to do it by ourselves.”

Thirty years ago, the village was known as Zabukh, and populated almost entirely by Azerbaijanis. But, during the First Nagorno-Karabakh War that followed the fall of the Soviet Union, it was captured by forces loyal to the unrecognised, Yerevan-backed ‘Republic of Artsakh.’ The locals were exiled and Armenians came from far and wide to settle what both sides see as their ancestral homelands.

In the years since then, Azerbaijan has boomed on the back of its oil and gas revenues, becoming a major regional power and setting its sights firmly on the breakaway region, inside its internationally-recognised borders. In a brief but bloody war in 2020, Baku’s well-armed troops took back virtually all the territory lost three decades before, leaving Artsakh in control of only its capital, Stepanakert, and the communities around it.

Azerbaijan accuses the breakaway state of illegally occupying the region, and the UN has previously passed resolutions calling for its troops to leave the area. The Armenians, though, say they can’t be trespassers on land they are indigenous to and inhabited long before the Russian Empire carved it up.

Locals in the village of Aghavno have been given just weeks to uproot their lives. Credit Nina Shahverdyan

As part of a Moscow-brokered ceasefire deal, the defeated Armenians agreed to hand over settlements such as Aghavno that lay along the Lachin corridor – currently the only route between Stepanakert and Armenia – before giving up the highway itself in favour of a new, as-yet unfinished alternative road. 

However, locals point out that they were supposed to have more than a year left to prepare themselves to leave. They’ve now been given just 20 days. Armenia is denying that it is handing over territory ahead of time, but it seems the pressure is building on Yerevan to make concessions.

Last week, Azerbaijan launched “Operation Revenge,” claiming its forces had come under fire from the outnumbered, outgunned Artsakh units. As part of the new offensive, its soldiers pushed into the buffer zone that is supposed to be protected by Russian peacekeepers. Despite accusing Baku of violating the ceasefire, embroiled in the war in Ukraine, its reputation in tatters, Moscow seems unwilling or unable to do anything about it.

“If we have peacekeepers, why don’t they keep the peace?” Shahverdyan asks. “The residents of this village are not really from one place – some were born here and had children here, but most relocated. Some don’t have any relatives here because we have Syrian Armenians, Lebanese Armenians and so on. They now don’t know where they can go.”

Worse still, both Armenia and Artsakh are running short on homes to rehouse displaced people, many having been allocated to those forced to flee the 2020 war. A wave of Russian emigrés fearing repression back home since the start of the invasion of Ukraine have also driven up demand. Villagers leaving Lachin were reportedly told that if they destroyed their homes ahead of the advancing Azerbaijanis, they wouldn’t receive a penny in support to find a new one elsewhere. Even those who comply though face an uncertain future.

That story is altogether too common in this part of the world. Just a few miles along the mountain, Azerbaijanis are returning to the places they themselves were displaced from in the 90s. Many of the 600,000 forced to leave have spent decades living in harsh, impoverished conditions, longing to return to their villages. But the settlements they remember no longer exist, their homes stripped back to the foundation stones and carted off piece by piece over the last thirty years.

Ali, a police officer in his thirties, says being deployed to the region is the greatest honour of his life. “I went to look for my parents’ house from before the war,” he adds. “There was nothing there but rubble.” Does he feel sorry for the Armenians now finding themselves being made homeless? “It’s hard to,” he replies. “We have been through so much, and we are looking after ourselves first.”

While the international community recognises Azerbaijan’s sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh, many states have criticised it for the way in which it is trying to take it back. 

In March, the EU Parliament condemned a “pattern of a systematic, state-level policy of Armenophobia, historical revisionism, and hatred towards Armenians promoted by the Azerbaijani authorities.” And yet, Brussels also appears to have few options available to cool the crisis.

Last month, on a visit to Baku, EU Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, signed a memorandum of understanding that will mean the bloc buying more gas from Azerbaijan. With embargoes on Russian fossil fuels, and Moscow choking off the flow of gas through the Nord Stream pipeline, the country is becoming a vital partner in the fight to bring down high prices and get through a potentially catastrophic winter.

Teachers in Aghavno strip the school of students’ work, torching it before leaving. Credit Nina Shahverdyan

Facing overwhelming odds and with international support waning, Armenia is intent on avoiding another war, and its Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, has been accused of leaving Azerbaijan to take back the territory. Protests have raged in Yerevan over the summer, with hardliners marching to shouts of “Nikol is a traitor.” In reality, embroiled in a conflict he cannot win and only lukewarm support from the outside, Pashinyan seems to have few options on the table.

Under the terms of the ceasefire, Armenia is required to withdraw all its troops, which it insists it is doing. However, Azerbaijan argues that also applies to the local fighters loyal to the self-declared Republic of Artsakh, who they say are assigned commanders from Yerevan. Locals fear Baku will demand they lay down their arms before it moves in to take charge and the result, many living in Stepanakert fear, would be that 100,000 ethnic Armenians are forced to flee or face “ethnic cleansing.”

Now though, with Azerbaijani troops on their doorstep and their own leaders calling for them to leave, those living in villages such as Aghavno have no choice but to pack up their possessions and go. The long and bloody history of Nagorno-Karabakh, it seems, will have yet another tragic chapter.

British lawmakers share concerns over the situation in Artsakh with Foreign Secretary Liz Truss

Public Radio of Armenia
Armenia – Aug 11 2022

In a letter to UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, a group British lawmakers have raised concerns regarding the deteriorating security situation in Nagorno Karabakh. The letter sets out six urgent concerns, all of which should be urgently addressed.

The letter reads:

Dear Foreign Secretary,

The security situation in Nagorno Karabakh is now critical. We have six urgent concerns, all of which require an immediate and meaningful response.

1) Azerbaijani military offensives
Escalating numbers of Armenian villagers are threatened and ordered to leave their homes. As recently as 3 August, Azerbaijani Armed Forces reportedly used drones, grenade launchers and anti-aircraft weapons along the north-western border of the Line of Contact. Two Armenian soldiers were killed and 19 others injured. The attack follows similar Azerbaijani military offensives in the direction of Parukh, Hin Tagher and Khtsaberd villages. These are blatant and recurring breaches of the 2020 ceasefire agreement, which commits each party to “stop at their current positions.”

2) Dangerous rhetoric
Recent military offensives by Azerbaijan are a practical outworking of President Aliyev’s avowed commitment to take “timely steps”, “liberate lands” and “crush the enemy’s head”. During his victory speech after the 44-Day War in 2020, he claimed that territories beyond Nagorno Karabakh – including Armenia’s capital Yerevan – “are our historical lands” and belong to Azerbaijan. He made similar claims in 2013, 2014, 2016 and 2018, promising the return of these territories to Azerbaijan. The UK Government has made no attempt to condemn such provocative rhetoric, nor have OSCE Minsk Group initiatives resulted in a cessation of hostilities.

3) Maltreatment of detainees
Armenia has returned all Azerbaijani prisoners captured during the 44-Day War. Yet many Armenians remain in Azerbaijani custody, a significant proportion of whom are undergoing speedy criminal trials. Some have been filmed or photographed in captivity but with no indication as to their current whereabouts. Tens of others remain vulnerable to killings, torture, indefinite imprisonment or enslavement, with widespread evidence of humiliating treatment and desecration of corpses by Azerbaijani soldiers – a war crime and a further breach of the ceasefire agreement, which commits each party to “the exchange of prisoners of war and other detainees.”

4) No accountability
During the 44-Day War, civilians in Nagorno Karabakh endured almost-daily military offensives by tanks, helicopters, cluster munitions and Smerch multiple rocket launchers – weapons incapable of precision targeting – in breach of international humanitarian law and Geneva conventions. Civilians also suffered widespread destruction of non-military objects, including medical emergency service centres and ambulances, schools and pre-schools, religious sites, food stocks, crops, livestock, electricity and gas plants, and drinking-water installations and supplies. These are war crimes, horribly reminiscent of what is happening in Ukraine.

5) Lachin humanitarian corridor
We continue to receive reports that Azerbaijan prohibits free passage of the Lachin humanitarian corridor (currently the only road linking Armenia to Nagorno Karabakh), all the while seeking to force Armenia into more concessions and further capitulation agreements. Any plans by Azerbaijan to construct a new route along the Lachin corridor must be approved by Armenia, as per the ceasefire agreement.

6) Destruction of Armenian heritage
Serious concerns remain over the fate of hundreds of Armenian Christian monuments and ancient cultural heritage sites, which are now under Azerbaijan’s control – some of which were shelled or erased during the 44-Day War. The sites include 161 churches, the ancient city of Tigranakert, Azokh Paleolithic Cave and the Nor Karmiravan tombs. UNESCO is denied access to the sites by Azerbaijan.

There is an urgent need to end the impunity with which Azerbaijan has carried out such systematic violations of the 2020 ceasefire agreement and international law. Perpetrators of atrocities must be held to account. We must no longer turn a deaf ear to the suffering of the people of Nagorno Karabakh.

The letter was signed by Baroness Cox (Crossbench), Tim Loughton MP (Conservative), Tim Farron MP (Liberal Democrat), Lord Boateng (Labour), Christopher Cocksworth, Lord Bishop of Coventry. Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench), Marie Rimmer MP (Labour), Lord Singh of Wimbledon (Crossbench), Derek Thomas MP (Conservative), Lord Loomba (Crossbench), Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) and Lord Curry of Kirkharle (Crossbench).

Armenia ex-MP: Residents of villages along Lachin corridor are unlawfully being dispossessed of their homeland

NEWS.am
Aug 10 2022

The resettlement of residents from villages along the Lachin (Berdzor) corridor contradicts any logic and is an unlawful process; people are unlawfully being dispossessed of their homeland. Gagik Minasyan, representative of the former ruling Republican Party of Armenia and an ex-MP, told this to a press conference Wednesday.

He stated that the illegally built new road is located at a maximum distance of one kilometer from Aghavno village, the latter is located in the Lachin corridor whose width is 2.5 km on both sides, and therefore the safe travel of people to and from Armenia and Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) should be ensured by the new road.

In this regard, the politician expressed bewilderment that the authorities of Armenia, Karabakh, Azerbaijan, and Turkey are telling the local residents to leave their homes.

"This is nothing but dispossession of the homeland. The authorities of Armenia and Karabakh are implementing this very program according to the plans of Turkey and Azerbaijan. All the guilty will be held accountable for this," added Minasyan.

He noted that Turkey and Azerbaijan are constantly talking about the need to fulfill the arrangements.

"What arrangements are we talking about? Obviously, there are unpublicized agreements, as a result of which Kovsakan [(Zangelan)] and other territories were handed over, which, according to the [trilateral] statement of November 9, [2020] should not have come under the control of Azerbaijan.

It is possible that the Armenian authorities received money in exchange for these arrangements, and therefore Turkey and Azerbaijan speak with them in the ‘language’ of blackmail. Otherwise, the representatives of the incumbent regime in Armenia would at least deny these statements. If they don't do it, the Armenian authorities have obviously agreed to these arrangements," Minasyan emphasized.

The former lawmaker noted that the current Armenian authorities are implementing the Turkish-Azerbaijani plan and keeping Armenia under their occupation.

"Therefore, it is necessary to show an appropriate attitude towards them, declare a national liberation struggle, and get rid of them. Any way to liberate the homeland from invaders is permissible. It is necessary to achieve a change of power [in Armenia] in any way, as the process overseen by the treacherous regime leads to irreversible losses," concluded Gagik Minasyan.