Pope uses word ‘genocide’ to describe Armenian killings

Pope uses word ‘genocide’ to describe Armenian killings

11:50 * 12.04.15

Pope Francis used the word “genocide” on Sunday to describe the mass
murder of Armenians in a move likely to severely strain diplomatic
ties with Turkey, news.yahoo.com reports.

“In the past century our human family has lived through three massive
and unprecedented tragedies,” he said during a solemn mass in Saint
Peter’s Basilica to mark the centenary of the Ottoman Turk killings of
Armenians.

“The first, which is widely considered ‘the first genocide of the 20th
century’, struck your own Armenian people,” he said, citing a
statement signed by John Paul II and the Armenian patriarch in 2001.

While many historians describe the killings as the 20th century’s
first genocide, Turkey hotly denies the accusation.

While Francis did not use his own words to describe the murders as
genocide, John Paul II’s use of the term provoked a sharp reaction
from Turkey at the time, and citing the beloved former pope will do
more than ruffle feathers.

“We recall the centenary of that tragic event, that immense and
senseless slaughter whose cruelty your forebears had to endure,”
Francis said.

“It is necessary, and indeed a duty, to honour their memory, for
whenever memory fades, it means that evil allows wounds to fester,” he
added.

The 78-year-old head of the Roman Catholic Church had been under
pressure to use the term publicly to describe the murders despite the
risk of alienating an important ally in the fight against radical
Islam.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their kin were killed between 1915
and 1917 as the Ottoman Empire was falling apart, and have long sought
to win international recognition of the massacres as genocide.

But Turkey rejects the claims, arguing that 300,000 to 500,000
Armenians and as many Turks died in civil strife when Armenians rose
up against their Ottoman rulers and sided with invading Russian
troops.

Francis said the other two genocides of the 20th century were
“perpetrated by Nazism and Stalinism.”

“And more recently there have been other mass killings, like those in
Cambodia, Rwanda, Burundi and Bosnia. It seems that humanity is
incapable of putting a halt to the shedding of innocent blood,” he
added.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/04/12/popegenocide/1643889

Italians will never forget about Armenia and the Armenians, Armenia’

Italians will never forget about Armenia and the Armenians, Armenia’s
Honorary Consul in Milan shares impression in Naples

20:26, 11 April, 2015

YEREVAN, 11 APRIL, ARMENPRESS. Italians will never forget about
Armenia and the Armenians again. This was the impression that Honorary
Consul of the Republic of Armenia in Milan Pietro Kuciukian got as he
participated in the re-placement of the remains (skull) of Gregory the
Illuminator and the church ceremony on the occasion of the blessing of
the cross-stone dedicated to the Armenian Genocide Centennial in
Naples. “This event served as another occasion to let Italians know
about the Armenians again, and the Italians will remember the
spiritual and cultural values of Armenia for a long time,” the
Honorary Consul said in an interview with “Armenpress”.

After the church ceremony in Naples, President of the Republic of
Armenia Serzh Sargsyan granted the Movses Khorenatsi Medal to the
Honorary Consul for his notable contributions to the recognition of
the Armenian Genocide, for the strengthening of Armenian-Italian
friendly relations, as well as for his pro-Armenian activities in
society and politics. The medal is binding and encouraging, and the
Honorary Consul is preparing to continue to let the world know about
the Armenian Genocide with new stories about the Ottomans who helped
the Armenians, even by risking their lives and being called traitors
and killed by the Ottoman Turks for that. He has a series of works
dedicated to the benefactors and missionaries of American, French,
German, Austrian and other nationalities who extended a helping hand
to the Armenians during the years of the Armenian Genocide.

From: A. Papazian

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/801389/italians-will-never-forget-about-armenia-and-the-armenians-armenias-honorary-consul-in-milan-shares.html

Raffi Arzivian, après << Havada >>, le chanteur arménien prépare son

CHANSON
Raffi Arzivian, après >, le chanteur arménien prépare son second CD

Raffi Arzivian est un chanteur arménien qui a beaucoup de succès en
France et à l’étranger. Né le 26 novembre 1978 à Alep (Syrie) installé
à Valence (Drôme-France) depuis une vingtaine d’années, Raffi Arzivian
est un chanteur qui dispose d’une voix extraordinaire et captive le
public par l’interprétation des chansons. Qu’elles soient des chansons
d’amour ou de vie, en passant par les chants patriotiques, Raffi
Arzivian saisit le public par la qualité de sa voix, de ses gestes et
de sa prestation. Un artiste qui met beaucoup de coeur et d’amour dans
lors de ses interprétations des chansons en langue arménienne, mais
également arabe. Raffi Arzivian se produit dans des bals ou soirées
concert à Valen ce, Lyon, Marseille notamment pour les fêtes du 28 Mai
(l’indépendance de la Première République d’Arménie) ou du Khanassor
(expédition punitive des Arméniens contre les tribus Kurdes). Il a
également donné des prestations outre la France à Genève et Zurich
(Suisse) ou Bielfeld (Allemagne).

En 2010 Raffi Arzivian a sorti son premier CD intitulé >
contenant 8 titres en arménien (Yetvoum em, Siroun Es, Siroum Em,
Havada, Gar Mi Jamanag, Badaskhan, Ashough Em, Aghatchoum Em Yar Kéz),
une compilation de chansons d’amour, pour la plupart très connues du
public arménien.

Raffi Arzivian chante également dans de nombreux autres styles et son
répertoire est riche de chansons de nombreux styles. Il prépare
d’ailleurs un second album. > (une chanson d’amour), le
single qu’il sortit il y a peu, sera présent dans son futur CD dont la
sortie est prévue en mai prochain. Raffi Arzivian a fait appel pour
cet album à Sarkis Kelkhatcherian (d’Alep) pour l’écriture des
paroles, et Hovig Adourian pour la musique et les arrangements.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 12 avril 2015,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=110186

ANCA statement on Pope Francis reaffirmation of the Armenian Genocid

ANCA statement on Pope Francis reaffirmation of the Armenian Genocide

20:01, 12 Apr 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) Executive Director Aram
Hamparian offered the following comment regarding Pope Francis
statement reaffirming the Armenian Genocide, made earlier today during
an unprecedented Vatican mass commemorating the 100th anniversary of
that crime.

“Turkey underestimates, at its own risk, the power of our worldwide
movement – a profoundly moral movement inspired by truth and driven by
our shared hope for a fair and enduring peace based on a just
international resolution of the Armenian Genocide,” stated Hamparian.

In remarks delivered at the opening of the commemorative mass, Pope
Francis noted, “In the past century our human family has lived through
three massive and unprecedented tragedies. The first, which is widely
considered “the first genocide of the twentieth century”, struck your
own Armenian people, the first Christian nation, as well as Catholic
and Orthodox Syrians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Greeks. Bishops and
priests, religious, women and men, the elderly and even defenceless
children and the infirm were murdered.”

Pope Francis went on to state that, “It is necessary, and indeed a
duty, to honour their memory, for whenever memory fades, it means that
evil allows wounds to fester. Concealing or denying evil is like
allowing a wound to keep bleeding without bandaging it!”

At the end of the mass, His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of the Great
House of Cilicia, thanked Pope Francis for his reaffirmation of truth,
and stated, “International law spells out clearly that condemnation,
recognition and reparation of a genocide are closely interconnected.”
He went on to note that the Armenian cause is a cause of justice, and
that justice is a gift of God. “Therefore, the violation of justice is
a sin against God.”

In his remarks, His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and
Catholicos of All Armenians, stated “Our ancient people were uprooted
from their cradle and historic homeland and scattered around the
world. Our centuries-old Christian heritage was torn down, destroyed
and seized. However, nothing — neither suffering, nor persecution or
even death — forced our people to renounce their sacred faith.”

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/04/12/anca-statement-on-pope-francis-reaffirmation-of-the-armenian-genocide/

Pope Francis Recognizes Armenian, Assyrian, Greek Genocide

Assyrian International News Agency AINA
April 12 2015

Pope Francis Recognizes Armenian, Assyrian, Greek Genocide

By Jethro Mullen
Posted 2015-04-12 17:04 GMT

Pope Francis leads a mass for Armenian Catholics marking 100 years
since the mass killings of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire (photo:
Andreas solaro).(CNN) — Pope Francis risked Turkish anger on Sunday
by using the word “genocide” to refer to the mass killings of
Armenians a century ago under the Ottoman Empire.

“In the past century, our human family has lived through three massive
and unprecedented tragedies,” the Pope said at a Mass at St. Peter’s
Basilica to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Armenian
massacres.

“The first, which is widely considered ‘the first genocide of the
twentieth century,’ struck your own Armenian people,” he said,
referencing a 2001 declaration by Pope John Paul II and the head of
the Armenian church.

His use of the term genocide — even though he was quoting from the
declaration — upset Turkey.

Turkey responded by summoning the Vatican ambassador for a meeting at
the Foreign Ministry, Turkish state broadcaster TRT reported.

In a tweet Sunday on his official account, Turkey’s Foreign Minister
Mevlut Cavusoglu called the Pope’s use of the word “unacceptable” and
“out of touch with both historical facts and legal basis.”

“Religious offices are not places through which hatred and animosity
are fueled by unfounded allegations,” the tweet reads.

More than a million massacred Armenian groups and many scholars say
that Turks planned and carried out genocide, starting in 1915, when
more than a million ethnic Armenians were massacred in the final years
of the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey officially denies that a genocide took place, saying hundreds
of thousands of Armenian Christians and Turkish Muslims died in
intercommunal violence around the bloody battlefields of World War I.

The Armenian government and influential Armenian diaspora groups have
urged countries around the world to formally label the 1915 events as
genocide. Turkey has responded with pressure of its own against such
moves.

Pope Francis said Sunday that “Catholic and Orthodox Syrians,
Assyrians, Chaldeans and Greeks” were also killed in the bloodshed a
century ago.

He said Nazism and Stalinism were responsible for the other two
“massive and unprecedented tragedies” of the past century.

CNN’s Gul Tuysuz in Turkey and Karen Smith in Atlanta contributed to
this report.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.aina.org/news/20150412130443.htm

Pope to mark 100th anniversary of Armenia WW1 killings

News Next
April 12 2015

Pope to mark 100th anniversary of Armenia WW1 killings

International Desk – Pope Francis is to mark the 100th anniversary of
the mass killings of Armenians under Ottoman rule in WW1 at a church
service in Rome, reports BBC.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan will be attending the ceremony which
is being held to honour a 10th century Armenian mystic.

The mass deportation of Armenians in 1915 remains a highly sensitive issue.

Turkey denies Armenian claims that up to 1.5 million people were
killed and that it constituted an act of genocide.

The dispute has continued to sour relations between the two countries.

From: A. Papazian

http://newsnextbd.com/pope-to-mark-100th-anniversary-of-armenia-ww1-killings/

Pope Francis calls Armenian slaughter ‘genocide’

Pope Francis calls Armenian slaughter ‘genocide’

Pontiff’s comments are likely to anger Turkey, which denies that the
killings 100 years ago constituted genocide

Pope Francis calls Armenian massacre `genocide’

Rosie Scammell in Rome

Sunday 12 April 2015 08.46 BSTLast modified on Sunday 12 April 201512.29 BST

Pope Francis has described the mass killing of Armenians 100 years ago
as a genocide ` a politically explosive pronouncement that could
damage diplomatic relations with Turkey.

During a special mass to mark the centenary of the mass killing, the
pontiff referred to `three massive and unprecedented tragedies’ of the
past century. `The first, which is widely considered `the first
genocide of the twentieth century’, struck your own Armenian people,’
he said, quoting a declaration signed in 2001 by Pope John Paul II and
Kerekin II, leader of the Armenian church.

`Bishops and priests, religious, women and men, the elderly and even
defenceless children and the infirm were murdered,’ the 78-year-old
pontiff said.

Historians estimate up to 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered in a
wave of violence that accompanied the fall of the Ottoman empire.
Despite the massacre being formally recognised as a genocide by Italy
and a number of other countries,Turkey refuses to make such a
declaration.

Although Francis chose to quote a former pontiff rather than speak in
his own words, he told Armenians there was a duty to remember to
killings.

`We recall the centenary of that tragic event, that immense and
senseless slaughter whose cruelty your forebears had to endure. It is
necessary, and indeed a duty, to honour their memory, for whenever
memory fades, it means that evil allows wounds to fester,’ he said in
St Peter’s Basilica.

During the mass Francis also declared a 10th-century Armenian monk, St
Gregory of Narek, a `doctor of the church’. The mystic and poet is
celebrated for his writings, some of which are still recited each
Sunday in Armenian churches.

The pope was joined at the Vatican by a number of Armenian
dignitaries, including the president, Serž Sargsyan, and the head of
the Armenian Apostolic church, Karekin II.

Advertisement

Theo van Lint, a Calouste Gulbenkian professor of Armenian studies at
the University of Oxford, said allowing Armenian leaders to speak in
St Peter’s Basilica was a strategic move.

`I think it’s very important to realise he gave space to the leaders `
the heads of the Armenian church and Armenian Catholics ` to fully
give their view of events. It’s very clear that the pope accepts that
it is a genocide,’ van Lint told the Guardian.

He said the pontiff’s decision to refer to the mass killing of
Armenians along with crimes perpetrated by Nazism and Stalinism gave
the Vatican’s `highest sanction’ to genocide recognition.

Igor Dorfmann-Lazarev, a researcher on Armenian history and culture at
the School of Oriental and African Studies, said the ceremony
demonstrated Francis’ attempt to put periphery Christian groups at the
centre of the Catholic church.

`This is the first time that Armenia is the centre of attention of
Catholic life and the Christian world. It’s meant to draw attention to
the Christian east,’ he said.

Francis’s use of the word `genocide’ was unlikely to change relations
between Armenia and Turkey, Dorfmann-Lazarev said, although it would
raise diplomatic concerns at the Vatican.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/12/pope-francis-armenian-slaughter-first-genocide-20th-century

US Leaders Would Rather Keep Turkey Happy Than Recognize The Armenia

US LEADERS WOULD RATHER KEEP TURKEY HAPPY THAN RECOGNIZE THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Quartz
April 10 2015

Written by Jake Flanagin @jakeflanagin

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the Armenian
genocide–when Ottoman authorities arrested more than 200 prominent
ethnic Armenians living in Constantinople in 1915. Also known as
the Armenian Holocaust, the Medz Yeghern (“Great Crime” in Armenian)
refers to the systemic extermination and mass deportation of ethnic
Armenians living within the Ottoman Empire during and after World War
I. Ultimately, more than 1.5 million were killed, and millions more
were displaced from their ancestral homelands in Anatolia. Each year,
on Apr. 24, Armenians all over the world honor the dead, along with
the governments of more than 20 nations, including Canada, Sweden,
Italy, France, Argentina, and Russia, to name a few.

The United States of America–home to the second-largest Armenian
community outside of Armenia–does not.

On Mar. 18, 2015, four US congressmen–representatives Robert Dold
of Illinois, Adam Schiff of California, David Valadao of California,
and Frank Pallone of New Jersey–introduced a bipartisan resolution
to formally recognize the Armenian genocide at the federal level.

According to a press release, the Armenian Truth and Justice Resolution
“calls upon the administration to work toward equitable, constructive
and durable Armenian-Turkish relations based upon the Republic of
Turkey’s full acknowledgement of the facts and ongoing consequences
of the Armenian Genocide.”

That last part is important. If you’re wondering what’s kept the US
government from recognizing the Armenian genocide all these years,
the answer is simple: the Republic of Turkey. The successor state
to the Ottoman Empire has adamantly denied the Armenian genocide
for decades–preferring to characterize the violence as part of the
broader chaos that broke out in the wake of World War I. Historians
generally agree that Turkey’s Armenians were targeted for supposedly
cooperating with the Russians during the war. Others, however, point
out that interethnic animosity between Turks and Armenians stretches
back hundreds of years.

In 2014, members of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
adopted a resolution to “remember and observe the the anniversary
of the Armenian Genocide on Apr. 24.” Turkey’s government objected
strongly, claiming the verbiage (referring to the conflict as a
“genocide,” to be precise) “distorts history and law.”

“We condemn those who led this prejudiced initiative,” the Turkish
foreign ministry wrote in a statement.

In January 2015, sitting Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan called
for an “impartial board of historians” to review the matter. “If
the results actually reveal that we have committed a crime, if we
have a price to pay, then as Turkey we would assess it and take the
required steps,” he told Turkish state media, according to Agence
France-Presse. “If [the Armenians] are really sincere in this matter,
let us give it to the historians. Let the historians deal with the
matter. We have opened our archive and presented more than a million
documents,” he added. “If Armenia also has an archive, then they
should open it too … Then we can sit and talk as politicians.”

Armenian leaders have refused any such arrangement, believing–along
with most of the world–the genocide to be a fact of history. The
concern therefore is that any supposed “impartial review” would
actually serve as an opportunity for the Turkish government to its
revisionisms into mainstream thought. Yerevan, rightfully so, is
not willing to compromise the truths of what is probably the most
definitive event in modern Armenian history.

And yet, despite what appears to be blatant doublespeak on the part of
Turkish lawmakers, the US government remains steadfastly silent on the
issue. At the same time, it’s not exactly difficult to determine why.

Given the fraught nature of US operations in the Middle East today,
it’s likely the nominal recognition of the Armenian genocide isn’t
a top priority for the White House or state department–Turkey being
a key regional ally.

These political considerations doesn’t cut it with everyone in
Washington, however.

“But we cant’t play politics with something this important,” Dold
insisted to Quartz. “This is about recognizing right versus wrong.”

For Dold, it’s also an issue that hits close to home–he represents
Illinois’s tenth congressional district, home to a sizable community
of Armenian diaspora. “I have constituents whose family members were
lost in the genocide,” he explains.

But, for Dold, the need for formal, US recognition of the genocide goes
far beyond even what it would mean to Armenian Americans. “It’s not
just an obligation to the Armenians, it’s an obligation to mankind,”
he says. The purpose of federal recognition is to create an official
framework to prevent such atrocities from reoccurring. He notes an
infamous quote attributed to Adolf Hitler, when briefing his generals
before the 1939 invasion of Poland: “Who, after all, speaks today of
the annihilation of the Armenians?”

“If we really want to believe ‘never again,'” Dold says, recalling the
popular slogan for Holocaust remembrance, “We first have to recognize
what’s gone on.”

From: A. Papazian

http://qz.com/379556/us-leaders-would-rather-keep-turkey-happy-than-recognize-the-armenian-genocide/

ANKARA: The godfather of Turkish photography: Ara Guler

Anadolu Agency. Turkey
April 11 2015

The godfather of Turkish photography: Ara Guler

Profile of Turkey’s legendary photographer Ara Guler, also known as
Istanbul’s eye.

By Handan Kazanci
ISTANBUL

“I am tired of taking photos.”

Turkey’s most popular photographer Ara Guler laboriously takes a seat
in Ara Cafe in Istanbul’s teeming Beyoglu district, where he has been
living since he was born.

A bit grumpy and foul-mouthed, Guler has difficulty walking and more
often than not needs someone to lean on.

Commonly referred to as “Istanbul’s eye,” – a term he does not like,
refusing to claim ownership of the historical city – Guler admits a
certain weariness.

He made his name mainly with his black-and white nostalgic pictures of
Istanbul, depicting the city’s wide range of emotions, photos that
have since been turned into paintings which are showcased in an
exhibition in the city’s high-class district of Bebek, open until
April 18.

With his gray hair and beard, the 86-year-old Istanbul native looks
like a character in one of his famous photos.

Suffering from renal failure, the legendary photographer is full of
stories about dialysis, since he has to take the treatment three times
a week.

“That dialysis makes me stupefied,” he says. “I cannot do anything
three days a week, it takes four hours each time and it is
unbearable.”

Still, Guler takes the occasional photograph. Earlier in the year, he
took pictures of the ongoing construction of Istanbul’s third bridge
on the Bosphorus.

Always wanted to be a playwright

Since his early childhood, Guler belonged to a social class made up of
Turkish intellectuals.

His mother came from an Istanbul native Armenian family, who owned
several houses around Beyoglu.

Guler’s father was left an orphan at six years old following the mass
relocation of Armenians from Anatolia at the turn of the century. He
was later a pharmacist for the Turkish army at the battle of Gallipoli
in 1915.

It was thanks to his father’s connections that he managed to land his
first job as an assistant film projector in one of Beyoglu’s many
theaters.

Indeed, in his father’s drugstore, where theater artists would gather
regularly to buy make-up material for plays, Guler met the founder of
modern Turkish theater, Muhsin Ertugrul, and was even able to work
with him.

“(Guler) always wanted to be a playwright,” wrote, Nezih Tavlas in a
2003 biography on Guler called “Photo Journalist.”

At 22 years old, he receives his first camera – a Rolleicord II. His
career as a photographer kicks off when he joins a local newspaper
called Yeni Istanbul in 1950.

The legendary photojournalist fondly recalls when he went to cover a
train accident at the end of 1950s.

“Three carriages had collided and there were more than 90 dead on the
ground,” he remembers.

“I saw an emergency handle and a hand which looked like it was
stretching out to it 20 centimeters away,” he recalls with enthusiasm.

He needs to show “the accident.”

“But to do that, I had to turn the body over,” he says, similar to
scenes in 2014 American neo-noir movie Nightcrawler, which portrays a
cameraman who tampers with crime scenes, i.e. by moving victims’
bodies, to get better shots.

He ends up soaked with the victim’s blood.

“Even my camera was in blood,” he says. But he managed to get the
picture he wanted: “I wanted to give meaning (to the photo). He
extended his hand but did not pull the handle and the disaster started
there.”

“Do you know how dry blood smells?” he asks. “It is disgusting and
sticky, the dried blood stuck like glue.”

What is journalism?

It is around the same time that Guler meets world renowned French
photojournalist Henri Cartier-Bresson – through his connection with
Romeo Martinez, editor-in-chief of the magazine Camera between 1956
and 1961– and becomes a member of Magnum Photos, an international
photography cooperative.

By the end of the 1950s, he works for world-renowned magazines such as
Time Life in the U.S., the French weekly Paris Match or Der Stern in
Germany, traveling around the world – from Pakistan to Kenya, from New
Guinea to Borneo. He is in Sudan in 1978 just before the second
Eritrean civil war to report on clashes between rebel groups. Just
before the 1980 military coup in Turkey, Guler goes to Mongolia, the
Turks’ homeland, to photograph 8th century inscriptions. In 1990, he
heads to Indonesia with his wife for a report on cannibal tribes.

But it is in Turkey that he makes one of his most astounding
discoveries: an ancient city called Aphrodisias in Turkey’s western
province of Aydin in 1958. As he is returning from a job involving the
inauguration of a dam, his driver loses his way ending up in a village
where locals used the antique architecture as part of their daily
life.

In 1957, he is in France covering the Cannes Film Festival. He meets
such legendary figures from the film industry as American filmmaker
Orson Welles or Italian writer Alberto Moravia and Spanish artist
Pablo Picasso.

While he manages to take a picture of Picasso on the red carpet in
Cannes, Guler has to wait until 1971 to take a true portrait of him.

First he tries through one of Picasso’s best friends, French painter
Edouard Pignon, but to no avail. Then he attempts to gain contact
Picasso through well-known Turkish artist Abidin Dino. Again, he is
unsuccessful.

Guler is losing hope when he meets the owner of Skira Publishing,
Albert Skira, who has just signed a contract with the Spanish artist
to publish his “Metamorphoses et Unite” book.

This means a visit to Picasso’s house, which Guler cannot miss. He
suggests to Skira that he join them during the four-day visit to
photograph Picasso’s daily life.

“Those four days broadened my horizons,” Guler said to Tavlas. “Just
like a magic wand. Picasso changed my view of the world.”

Guler also photographs the likes of Winston Churchill, John Berger,
Alfred Hitchcock and Salvador Dali, among many, many others.

Ever the grump, Guler downplays the importance of the portraits he has done.

“There is a guy, this guy is famous, and there is a necessity of
taking this guy’s picture and you take it,” he says. “But (taking a
picture of ordinary people in their environment) is like taking out a
part from reality and making it history.”

“That is journalism,” he adds.

‘The sunset is the same everywhere’

Although Guler is quick to claim that “photography is not art,” he
does concede that it is as complex as “structuring a painting.”

“It is not just taking a picture of a sunset or a sunrise,” he adds.
“The sunset is the same everywhere, even the sun itself is the same
one.”

“(But) you cannot think of this as an artwork,” he adds.

The New York Museum of Modern Art thought otherwise in 1968 organizing
an exhibition titled “10 Masters of Color Photography” with work by
Guler’s works in 1968.

When asked what he would like to photograph today, Guler elfishly
replies: “I want to take a picture of the Ebola virus.”

According to the legendary photographer, the perfect photograph has
never been taken: “There is no art piece that has reached perfection.”

“There is no best,” he says. “The best will always be in the future.
To reach the best is like to reach the deity.”

He shows a photo of himself taken by American photographer Imogen
Cunningham (1883-1976): “I am proud of this picture. She catches my
thinking moment,” he says in an unusual moment of demonstrative
satisfaction.

It is a frontal picture of the photographer. He holds a camera in his
right hand, of which the index finger barring his lips seems to
gesture a shush as if to encapsulate the silence. He does not look at
the camera. Instead, his eyes focus on something beyond the
photographer.

The more Ara Guler talks, the more animated he gets, the more the
passion reclaims him. But the dialysis, the disease, serve as constant
anchors back to reality.

“Either you have to live like this from now on or there is only one
expedience; one day you will pull a bullet into a weapon and shoot the
gun on your head. There is no other remedy,” he says.

But the man who started the interview saying he was fed up with taking
pictures remains a photographer at heart:

“How is your camera? Is it any good?” he asks The Anadolu Agency photographer.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/491956–the-godfather-of-turkish-photography-ara-guler

In Conversation With Principal Dancer Davit Karapetyan — San Franci

IN CONVERSATION WITH PRINCIPAL DANCER DAVIT KARAPETYAN — SAN FRANCISCO BALLET’S ‘SHOSTAKOVICH’

Huffington Post
April 8 2015

Sean Martinfield

San Francisco Ballet’s Program 6, Shostakovich Trilogy, opens
Wednesday, April 8 and will run for seven performances through Sunday,
April 19. A major hit of the 2014 season, the triptych choreographed
by Alexei Ratmansky is set to Dmitri Shostakovich’s Symphony
No. 9, Chamber Symphony in C minor, and Piano Concerto No. 1. The
choreography for the second piece is narrative and reflects on the
life of the composer. Previously acclaimed for his characterization
of Shostakovich, Principal Dancer Davit Karapetyan will appear in six
of seven performances, Ruben Martín Cintas debuts in the role Sunday,
April 11 at 2:00.

I saw Davit Karapetyan first in 2006 as Prince Siegfried in
the Company’s previous production of Swan Lake. It was the final
presentation of the program, Lorena Feijoo danced the dual roles of
Odette and Odile. Davit was then in his first season with SF Ballet,
but this particular role had been in his head and heart since
schooldays. His technical proficiency and classic allure were an
ideal match for the fiery dynamism of the internationally acclaimed
ballerina. The results were golden. The art was spectacular. “I love
Swan Lake,” said Davit.

“When I was in school, I was always thinking, ‘It would be great
if they would do a full-length Swan Lake.’ But it was a little too
soon – the strength, the skills, a lot of things. When I came here,
I felt ready. It was such a joy to dance it and Lorena was amazing. I
had a great time. Swan Lake is another ballet that requires a lot of
acting and with different interpretations to bring-out the character
and the story. But for Shostakovich – I had heard a lot of his works,
but I didn’t know much about his life.”

Davit Karapetyan in Ratmansky’s Shostakovich Trilogy. Photo, Erik
Tomasson

“His life was something that I had to feel deep inside – how he
was with his wives, how they left him. Alexei said he was really in
love with his first wife. When she passed away he was heartbroken,
devastated. The second wife was a little bit lighter, she was younger
– but it didn’t last long. The third was there when he was sick and
left with nothing.”

The Chamber Symphony consists of five overlapping movements and stands
out as the most biographical of the composer’s works. The talking
points include his startling musical genius, his troubled career under
the watch of the Stalin regime, three complicated marriages, miserable
health, his open defiance of Fascism expressed in state-ordered music,
and his fear of being forgotten. That’s a lot of passion to pack into
a piece that runs about twenty-two minutes and includes a death scene.

But passionate expression (maybe defiance) is nothing new to Davit
Karapetyan. His parents got a strong dose of it when he was six.

“My father was a dancer, my mother and sister were dancers. It was all
about dancing. And I didn’t want to hear about it! My father started
in ballet and went to a company in Armenia. But since Armenian folk
dancing was so popular, he changed to folkloric dance. My mom finished
at a big folkloric dance school and then joined a company there. I was
always fascinated when watching ballet, but I didn’t want to learn it.

When I was six, my parents wanted me to go to the ballet school. I said
I hated it and was not going to do it. ‘I am going to do everything
opposite of what they tell me so they don’t pick me!’ I did exactly
what I wanted and did not get picked for the ballet school. If you go
in when your six, then you join the ballet. But there is a folkloric
section in the same school which starts when you’re twelve.

So, I went into the martial arts, swimming, and a lot of sports. I was
a competitive person, but more with just myself. I wanted to be best
at whatever I was doing – and then I would try something else. I think
I might have continued with gymnastics if my trainer had not moved to
Los Angeles. I was seven and said, ‘I don’t want any other coach!’ –
and stopped. Then I tried taekwando. I loved it and got so into it.”

Davit Karapetyan and Yuan Yuan Tan in Neumeier’s The Little Mermaid.

Photo, Erik Tomasson

“When I was twelve, my parents tried again – ‘Let’s go back to the
school, but for the folkloric part.’ So – why not. The ballet school
is like a college. It was basically Russian training – it was the
Soviet time and my teachers had all learned in Moscow or St.

Petersburg. I started in folkloric dance but, at the same time, I’m
doing taekwando. After the second year, I saw a ballet class where the
guys were doing all these jumps. I stood in the doorway with my mouth
open. I went home and said I wanted to do ballet. ‘We took you and you
didn’t like it, it’s too late, just stick with the folkloric dance.’
No! I want to try!”

Two years later, Davit was on his way to St. Petersburg to enter a
competition. He had prepared excerpts from Giselle and Don Quixote.

Despite his determination, he soon realized he was out of his league.

Those lost years of early training were evident in the first round.

“I didn’t pass the competition, but I gained a lot of knowledge. The
guys were just in a different place. Coming back home, I had a whole
other mentality about how to work – how to keep myself, how to partner
a girl, how to talk to people. How to be a dancer.”

By sixteen – having put his black belt in taekwando aside – Davit was
on his way to Switzerland, to the Schweizerische Ballettberufsschule
(the Tanz Akademie Zurich). By submitting an audition tape, the school
had offered him the Rudolf Nureyev Scholarship.

“My parents didn’t want me to go. I didn’t fully understand, but
looking back, there are a lot of things that could have gone wrong.

When you’re by yourself, anything can happen. I promised it was not
going to be a waste, I wasn’t going just for fun. ‘I’m going to learn
what I need to learn to become one of the best dancers, to do the
roles I’ve dreamt about, to dance in one of the best companies.'”

Maria Kochetkova and Davit Karapetyan in Possokhov’s Bells. Photo,
Erik Tomasson

Since joining San Francisco Ballet, Davit has danced all the leading
roles in the major story ballets and a vast number of modern works
by choreographers including Helgi Tomasson, Val Caniparoli, William
Forsythe, Mark Morris, Jose Carlos Martínez, Alexei Ratmansky, Antony
Tudor, and Yuri Possokhov. I asked Davit about his favorite ballet,
a role he would like another shot at – perhaps one he might miss
repeating because of timing and schedules.

“Everything I do, I would want to do again. Every time you dance you
learn so much. You live differently, every performance. Each time,
you will find a different way of pursuing the movements and feel
comfortable and confident. First performances are about doing the
choreography – like being on the count. A lot of times – we don’t have
a lot of time. But by the second and third performance your emotions
are different, you are more confident. That will translate to the
audience. My favorite ballet? Everything I do becomes my favorite
ballet. It has to be. It is my job to dance, yes – but I’m dancing
because I want the audience to understand what I’m doing. It’s either
a physical or emotional piece. I want them to like what I am doing.

But, fifteen years ago? OK – I would have said, ‘Don Quixote is
my favorite, Giselle is my favorite’ – the classics that I was so
fascinated with. But right now, whatever I dance, becomes my favorite
ballet.”

Then that includes the final offering of the season opening May 1,
Helgi Tomasson’s Romeo and Juliet and the music of Sergei Prokofiev.

And another romantic partnering with his spouse since 2011, Principal
Dancer Vanessa Zahorian.

Vanessa Zahorian and Davit Karapetyan in Tomasson’s Romeo & Juliet.

Photo, Erik Tomasson

From: A. Papazian

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-martinfield/davit-karapetyan-san-francisco-ballet_b_7020890.html