ISTANBUL: From Harput to Lake Van, Erzurum and Trabzon with Henry Fa

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 4 2015

>From Harput to Lake Van, Erzurum and Trabzon with Henry Fanshawe Tozer (2)

Disembarking at the Black Sea port of Samsun in the spring of 1879,
the British geographer Henry Fanshawe Tozer made his way southwest
over several mountain chains to the Central Anatolia plateau. Here he
explored the fascinating remains around the Hittite capital of
HattuÃ…?a, east of Ankara, before riding southeast to the crucial
trading hub of Kayseri. After a quick detour west to the fairy tale
landscape of Cappadocia, Tozer and his party headed northeast to
Sivas, then southeast across the biblical Euphrates to Harput (outside
modern ElazıÄ?).

>From Harput onward, the territory the curious Tozer would venture
through was inhabited largely by Kurds and Armenians. It was a remote
and mountainous region that the Ottoman authorities were struggling to
keep a firm grip on — especially in the wake of the crippling 1877-8
war with Russia. Britain, motivated by its own interests in the
region, had stepped in to help Ottoman Turkey against imperial Russia.
In return, the ruling sultan, Abdul Hamid II, had been forced to
accept the presence of British officials roaming at will over Anatolia
— handy for British travelers’ such as Tozer in the short-term, but
the resentment caused by this partial ceding of independence to a
foreign power was to eventually have devastating consequences for
Anatolia’s Christian population.

>From Harput to MuÃ…?

>From Harput, Tozer headed east to the today little-visited town of
Palu. Here he was shown some rock-cut chambers in the Urartian
fortress, which his guides informed him `were the dwelling place of St
Mezrop, the Armenian saint, who invented the Armenian alphabet about
406 AD.’ The party then skirted the mountainous Dersim region (today
the Munzur Mountains around Tunceli). Having mainly fraternized with
Turks, Greeks and Armenians up until now, the party had their first
contact with Kurds. The group they met `hardly spoke a word of
Turkish, so that we had difficulty communicating with them, and we
found them very suspicious, and demanding high price for articles such
as milk and cheese, which we bought of them, and demanding the money
be paid on the spot.’

Today the Surp Garabet Monastery on the MuÃ…? Plain, the party’s next
destination, is completely ruined and desolate. Tozer reached it on
Aug. 24, 1879 and found this important monastery — believed by
Armenians to contain a very holy relic, the body of John the Baptist
— and pilgrimage stop `full of men, women and children ¦ picnicking
on the ground. ¦ Some of the women had one nostril pierced for a
silver ornament.’ The monastery was then home to 20 monks, the head
priest of which spoke fluent French, and 180 lay brothers.

The town of MuÃ…? was quite the contrast to the monastery, being `quite
the filthiest town we had met with in Turkey ¦ the pavements were
broken and ragged; every street was an open drain, and the stenches
were fearful.’ After lodging in MuÃ…? with a well-off Armenian, the
travelers set-off the next morning on fresh horses for Bitlis,
nestling deep down in a valley below Lake Van. Here they were hosted
by a well-known American missionary, Reverend George Knapp, who was
working with the local Armenian community. According to Tozer, Bitlis
— today a fascinating place clustered around its imposing old citadel
— consisted of `3000 houses, 2000 of which belong to Kurds, 1000 to
Armenians, 20 to the Turks and 50 to the Syrians.’

Up Mount Süphan and by boat across Lake Van

Every traveler to eastern Turkey today longs for their first sight of
Lake Van. Back in 1979, Tozer first saw it following a five-hour ride
from Bitlis. `A beautiful view, owing to the numerous bays, the
succession of headlands, and the finely cut outline of the ridges.’
The party rode around the north shore of the lake to Ahlat, famed for
its Selçuk tombs and gravestones, before reaching the pretty
settlement of Adilcevaz. Having conquered Mount Erciyes outside of
Kayseri, the lure of the even higher Mount Süphan, a volcanic cone
towering above the village, was irresistible. Despite camping 7,000
feet up on the slopes of the peak and leaving at 3 a.m. the next
morning, Tozer, who was weakened by the journey, failed to reach the
summit. He did, however, enjoy the splendid lake and mountain views
from the rim of this crater-topped, 4,058-meter-high peak.

Tozer and his companions reached Van by sailing from Adilcevaz and
lodged in the old, walled town at the foot of the dramatic Rock of
Van. Today Van is an undulating sea of rubble, bar a couple of
well-restored Ottoman mosques and the scant remnants of a church and a
couple of caravanserais, but it then had a prosperous population of
some 30,000 `of whom three fourths are Armenians.’

The Rock of Van

Eager to explore the Rock of Van, Tozer first had to get permission
from the commandant of the Ottoman garrison then stationed atop it.
Then, as now, the view from the summit of the sheer, 100-meter-high,
1.5-kilometer-long rock was spectacular: `The panorama from the
highest point was enchanting, for on one side lay the expanse of the
blue sparkly lake, with its circuit of mountains, among which Siphan
[Süphan] and Nimrud Dagh [Nemrut] were conspicuous, while on the
opposite direction the broken Varak Dagh [Erek] formed a noble
object.’

The oldest historic remains on the rock are now known to be Urartian,
a unique civilization centered in Van between 900 and 600 B.C. At the
time of Tozer’s visit, they were thought to be Assyrian and the
cuneiform inscriptions that mark the rock-cut tomb of Urartian King
Argishti I that Tozer saw were `still a riddle to philologists.’
Before leaving Van, Tozer visited another American missionary
promoting the Protestant variant of the Christian faith to the
sometimes unwilling Apostolic Armenians led by Dr. Reynolds.

Past Kurdish encampments and a biblical peak to Erzurum

They left Van on Sept. 6, riding north along the eastern shore of the
lake and then following the gorge of Bendimah River. Led by a local,
they overnighted at a Kurdish encampment `with numerous tents forming
a long line, some large and black, others smaller, round and white.
The men who were hanging about them were a wild and surly looking set,
with hair streaming down in long locks ¦ all of course were armed.
Their possessions might be seen about the encampment — sheep, goats,
oxen and cows, herds of horses, big mastiff dogs, and greyhounds
clothed in small coats. The whole formed a highly picturesque scene.’

Avoiding DoÄ?ubeyazıt, which according to the locals had been ruined in
the war with Russia, they headed across high, volcanic peaks to
Diyadin — today known for its hot springs — reveling in the fine
view of 5,165-meter-high Mount Ararat (AÄ?rı DaÄ?) en route. From
Diyadin they continued westward towards Erzurum, passing `a long line
of 170 laden camels.’ Tozer was impressed with Erzurum as they
approached, noting, `As seen from without, it seemed the most imposing
city, with the exception of Amasia, that we had reached on our
journey, owing to the numerous minarets and other striking buildings
that rise from its midst.’

In Erzurum they were `received with the greatest kindness by our
consul, General Major Trotter, who entertained us during our stay.’
Trotter had been in the city during the recent Russian siege during
which the strategically crucial outpost nearly fell, and according to
Tozer, the population had fallen to around 20,000 as a result of the
recent difficulties. Tozer reported that the whole region was in
disarray as the Kurds were taking advantage of the lack of central
control (the Ottoman troops had not been paid in four years) to
pillage the Armenians. Worse, the Circassians (Çerkez) who had arrived
as a result of Russian advances `came with nothing but their arms ¦
they follow no pursuits save those of highway robbers and petty
pilfering, and being well-armed with rifles, revolvers and swords,
whilst the Zapitehs (Ottoman police) often have nothing better than
flintlock guns.’

Uzungöl, Trabzon (Photo: Cihan)

Over the Pontic Alps to Trabzon

>From Erzurum Tozer’s party headed north, over the Kop Pass, to the top
of the Pontic Alps from where they `looked down into a deep valley, in
which were cheerful, well-built villages, with walls of stone and
red-tile roofs; beyond this rose forest clad mountains ¦ delicately
cut ridges ¦ the snow-topped mountains of Lazistan and, completing
all, the expanse of the soft-blue Euxine (Black Sea).’ The cultural,
topographic and climatic contrast between the arid Anatolian Plateau
and the Black Sea hinterland still shocks travelers today, how much
more marked it must have been in Tozer’s day.

Tozer waxed lyrical about their next stop, the famous cliff-hanging
monastery of Sumela, then still inhabited by Greek Orthodox monks.
They were hosted by the gracious monks and as they left the next day
for Trabzon the normally reserved Brit was moved to write that it was
`one of the loveliest spots we had ever seen.’ It remains a
picturesque place with the monastery recently restored. The monks,
though, are long gone, prey to the post-WWI population exchange
between Greece and Turkey.

Finally they reached Trabzon, or Trebizond as Tozer knew it: `We came
in sight of the city, which was the term of our wandering. We had
concluded a ride of 1,500 miles, which had been accomplished without
illness or incident of any kind.’ It was indeed quite an achievement.
In Trabzon they explored the various Byzantine churches turned
mosques, but couldn’t gain access to the famous Haghia Sophia (Aya
Sofya) as it `had been appropriated for military purposes.’ Then on
Sept. 27 Tozer and his companion, TM Crowder, boarded a French
steamship bound for Constantinople.

Sümela Monastery, Trabzon (Photo: Cihan)

Henry Fanshawe Tozer’s `Turkish Armenia and Eastern Asia Minor’ can be
read online at

From: A. Papazian

https://archive.org/details/turkisharmeniaea00tozeuoft.
http://www.todayszaman.com/anasayfa_from-harput-to-lake-van-erzurum-and-trabzon-with-henry-fanshawe-tozer-2_377007.html

Un récit poignant sur les orphelins arméniens

Sud Ouest- France
3 avril 2015

Un récit poignant sur les orphelins arméniens

Jean Péfau

Samedi dernier au matin, la médiathèque de Marciac s’est intéressée à
l’Arménie, dont l’animatrice est Saty, la petite-fille d’une
Arménienne qui a vécu le génocide (commencé en 1879), ses massacres,
pillages, incendies et déportations.

Ce jour-là, Florence Giroir Cotonat a présenté son livre autour de la
culture arménienne, fruit d’importantes recherches. Il évoque
l’arrivée des 193 orphelins arméniens dans le Gers, en 1923, 1924,
habillés en haillons et affamés. Après plusieurs années de recherches,
elle a retracé la vie de ces enfants.

Arrivé par hasard dans le Gers

Parmi eux, Florence s’est intéressée à Méguerditch, un jeune émigré de
6 ans, perdu dans la tourmente, arrivé par hasard dans le Gers à la
fin de l’année 1923. Malgré la Seconde Guerre mondiale, les mauvaises
rencontres et les difficultés professionnelles, il a su rester digne
et a effectué un beau parcours au service des gens en difficultés.

C’est un récit poignant de tout ce que ce peuple, que beaucoup
voulaient exterminer, a vécu : la faim, la soif, la souffrance d’être
arraché aux siens, le viol, la mort.

Cette présentation a été enrichie du témoignage de quatre descendants
d’Arméniens : Serge Sarkissian et ses trois soeurs, qui vivent
actuellement en Gironde. Leur père était arrivé en 1923 dans le Gers
et avait été placé dans une ferme à Miélan.

Florence a également évoqué l’action d’un employé de la préfecture du
Gers de l’époque, M. Mengelle, qui avait fait beaucoup pour ces jeunes
et leur intégration, allant même jusqu’à les recevoir à sa table.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.sudouest.fr/2015/04/04/un-recit-poignant-sur-les-orphelins-armeniens-1881316-2481.php

UCI student leaders condemn denial of Armenian genocide

Daily Pilot
April 3 2015

UCI student leaders condemn denial of Armenian genocide

By Nicole Knight Shine
April 4, 2015

The UC Irvine student legislative council on Monday unanimously passed
a resolution to commemorate the Armenian genocide and “condemn its
denial.”

The measure follows similar resolutions passed at UCLA and other state
campuses meant to mark the 100th anniversary of the massacre of about
1.5 million Armenians starting in 1915 amid the chaotic collapse of
the Ottoman Empire.

Over the years, measures put forward in the U.S. Congress to recognize
the killings as genocide have failed in the face of stiff opposition
from Turkey.

Turkey acknowledges that many Armenians died in the fighting but
denies the widely accepted number and the term genocide, which is
nonetheless used by many foreign parliaments and Western historians.

“The cycle of genocide continues with that denial,” said Carla
Kekejian, a UCI junior and one of three students who petitioned for
the resolution.

The resolution calls on the campus to set April 24 as the official day
of remembrance for the Armenian genocide. It also “condemns those
attempts made by governments as well as other entities, both public
and private, to distort the historical reality and legal relevance of
the Armenian genocide to the descendants of its survivors and humanity
as a whole.”

“When we put in writing like that,” Kekejian said, “it ensures that
every year it is going to be remembered and commemorated on campus.”

,0,4438017.story

From: A. Papazian

http://www.dailypilot.com/news/tn-dpt-me-0404-uci-resolution-20150404

Les Journées dédiées au poète Hovhannès Toumanian du 4 au 11 avril à

ARMENIE-CULTURE
Les Journées dédiées au poète Hovhannès Toumanian du 4 au 11 avril à Erévan

Les Journées dédiées au > Hovhannès
Toumanian mises en place depuis plusieurs années déjà ont débuté hier
4 avril à Erévan. Des rencontres au thétre, des lectures des oeuvres
du poète à des conférences dans les universités de la capitale
arménienne, les manifestations vont se succéder. Hovhannès Toumanian
restant l’un des poètes préférés des Arméniens. Ces Journées Hovhannès
Toumanian se termineront le 11 avril (jour où il fut enterré en 1923).
Le 11 avril lors de cette clôture, des poèmes seront lues près de la
statue d’Hovhannès Toumanian à Erévan.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 5 avril 2015,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=109875

Armenians all over the world celebrate Easter

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
April 5 2015

Armenians all over the world celebrate Easter
5 April 2015 – 12:08pm

Today, the parishioners of the Armenian Apostolic Church all over the
world are celebrating the glorious feast of the resurrection of Christ
– Easter.

The Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians, Karekin II,
addressed believers with congratulations. “The pace of our nation at a
crossroads of history was often the likeness of Christ. We often went
to the Golgotha of suffering, were crucified with the Lord and raised
with a faith in His Resurrection. By the grace of God our people
overcame machinations and destructions, persecution and slaughter and
kept bright hope for our revival, our prosperous and bright life,” the
Armenian Patriarch said in congratulations.

He also stressed that “to the world, to all of humanity, with their
martyrdom and their resurrected life, our people testified the truth
of the miracle of the resurrection. They were crucified, were
exhausted with grief, but did not become desperate, were wounded, but
not weak, scattered throughout the world, but did not lose the
Motherland. With love for the lost homeland, our people, restored
statehood in the eastern part of historical Armenia, and began a new
life in Diaspora communities, confirming that the tree of our life,
growing on the unshakable pillar of faith, with life-giving power
gives birth to children who beautify the nation.”

“Today, human life is shaken by conflicts and bloodshed. The desired
peace and universal goodwill and solidarity in the cradle of humanity
remains an unfulfilled dream on planet Earth. Humanity is in debt, it
must wipe profusely pouring tears in the world, before the helpless
eyes, cries and screams of orphans and disadvantaged children who
dream of a bright childhood, to silence the rumblings of lethal
weapons, eradicate poverty. We must overcome the crucifixion in the
world and replaced it with resurrection,” Karekin II noted.

From: A. Papazian

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/society/68986.html

‘We expect US federal authorities’ position on recognition of Armeni

‘We expect US federal authorities’ position on recognition of Armenian
Genocide’ – Artak Zakaryan

15:55 * 05.04.15

In an interview with Tert.am, Chairman of the Foreign Relations
Committee, Parliament of Armenia, Artak Zakaryan particularly spoke of
last week’s events involving the recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

The House of Representatives of Georgia, USA, declared April 24
Remembrance Day for Armenian Genocide victims. Moreover, Hawaii’s
State Senate last week unanimously passed a resolution recognizing the
Armenian Genocide and declaring April 24 as a day of remembrance and
commemoration of the Armenian Genocide. Does it mean that the USA may
officially recognize the Armenian Genocide?

“We appreciate the attitude each US state showed to the Armenian
Genocide. All of them have made essential contribution to the struggle
against crimes against humanity. We continue expecting the US federal
authorities’ official position on the recognition and condemnation of
the Armenian Genocide. It would be the American people’s unanimous say
for panhuman values and restoration of justice. It would be great
moral support to the Armenian people, as well as a solid legal basis
for struggling against denial of genocides to prevent further
genocides.

“We expect the United States to recognize the fact of the Armenian
Genocide in Ottoman Turkey in 1915-1923, in the foreseeable future –
just as more than twenty states have done. Fifteen US Senators, both
Republicans and Democrats, addressed a letter to US President Barack
Obama, calling on him to recognize the Armenian Genocide and pay
respects to victims.

“We are well aware of the role of US-Turkey relations, just as many
states consider their relations with Turkey important. However, there
are values that must not be in conflict with interests. Otherwise, new
Talaats, Kemals, Hitlers will be born and the human history will once
again feel the shame of genocide.”

From: A. Papazian

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/04/05/artak-zaqaryan/1637728

ISTANBUL: Foreign policy in shambles

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 5 2015

Foreign policy in shambles

Å?AHÄ°N ALPAY
April 05, 2015, Sunday

In its first two terms in power, both the domestic and foreign
policies of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government were
broadly in line with Turkey’s national interests.

While the country seemed to move in the direction of consolidating a
liberal and pluralist democratic regime, foreign policies based on the
`zero problems with neighbors’ (ZPN) concept proved to be highly
successful.

The ZPN paradigm, whose architect was then-foreign policy adviser and
later Foreign Minister Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu, rested briefly on the
following principles: Disputes with neighbors were to be solved
without the use or threat of force but with diplomacy and negotiation.
Peace and security would be secured through the promotion of economic
interdependence with all. Ankara was also to facilitate diplomatic,
negotiated solutions to regional disputes. ZPN was not in conflict
with or an alternative to accession to the European Union; it was to
actually help Turkey’s convergence through enhanced economic growth
and stability.

The ZPN paradigm did in fact serve improved relations with all
neighbors on an unexpected scale. Relations with Syria and Iraqi Kurds
changed from hostile to friendly. War with Greece became unthinkable,
even if bilateral disputes remained unresolved. Steps were taken
toward a solution on Cyprus and normalization with Armenia. Ankara
spent considerable effort on peace between Israel and the Palestinians
on the one hand and Syria and Israel on the other. ZPN policies
greatly enhanced Turkey’s international prestige, and Turkey, as a
stable democracy negotiating for membership in the EU, began to be
viewed as a model country for the Muslim world.

The ZPN paradigm was based largely on the assumption of stable regimes
in the Middle East and did not foresee the toppling of autocratic
regimes with the so-called Arab Spring, now turned winter. It thus
required adjusting to the new circumstances. The AKP government,
however, instead abandoned ZPN altogether.

The general election of 2011 in Turkey, which coincided with the
upheavals in the Arab world, led to drastic changes in both the
domestic and foreign policies of the AKP. The AKP government, while
assuming an increasingly arbitrary and authoritarian orientation at
home, adopted an entirely new approach in foreign policy, largely
based on the assumption that the autocratic Arab regimes would be
replaced by popular governments led by parties affiliated with the
Muslim Brotherhood, enabling Ankara to enhance its influence in the
region through its close relations with these parties and thus assume
the leadership of the Sunni Muslim world.

Today, on the eve of the general election of 2015, due to growing
authoritarianism and political polarization under the leadership of
President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an, Turkey is faced with the rising risk
of serious instability. Foreign relations have worsened in almost all
directions. Relations with Syria, Egypt and Libya have all broken off,
while even Tunisia has recently accused Ankara of `supporting
terrorism.’ Diplomatic relations with Israel are at the lowest level
since 2009, with only growing trade between the two sides. There are
no parties in the region outside of Hamas, Iraqi Kurds and Qatar with
which Ankara has good relations.

In the current crisis over Yemen, ErdoÄ?an (for inexplicable reasons)
— in the company of Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt, whom he has
antagonized — took sides with Saudi Arabia and upset Tehran (which he
will soon visit) by accusing Iran of trying to establish dominance in
the region. The nuclear deal to be finalized between the West and Iran
is likely to increase the influence of the latter in the region and
may bolster the position of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, whose overthrow
ErdoÄ?an has openly demanded. Ankara today finds itself further away
from a solution on Cyprus and normalization with Armenia. Relations
with the United States have soured, and those with the EU are at risk
of a total breakdown. It may be said that it has been decades since
Ankara has been internationally isolated to such an extent.

It would not be a prophecy to say that much trouble lies ahead for
Turkey unless it manages to refocus on democratization and foreign
policy based on the abandoned ZPN concept.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist/sahin-alpay/foreign-policy-in-shambles_377175.html

System of a Down lance son combat pour la reconnaissance du génocide

REVUE DE PRESSE
System of a Down lance son combat pour la reconnaissance du génocide
des Arméniens

“De nombreux membres de ma famille des deux côtés ont été exterminés,”
a déclaré le batteur de System of a Down John Dolmayan. “Mon
grand-père a été abattu devant sa famille. Et les enfants ont été
tués. Les gens ont été violées. Tout ce qu’il y a de plus horrible que
vous pouvez imaginer est arrivé.”

John Dolmayan récite calmement la liste des atrocités commises contre
sa famille quand l’Empire ottoman a commencé à exterminer
systématiquement il y a exactement 100 ans sa minorité arménienne. Son
ton neutre est durement gagné, le produit d’années à parler aux
journalistes à propos d’un traumatisme qui a été enterré dans
l’histoire.

Ce mois-ci, System of a Down embarque pour le Wake Up the Souls tour,
qui débutera le 6 Avril au Forum et se termine par la première
représentation du groupe dans la ville d’Erevan la capitale de
l’Arménie le 23 Avril.

From: A. Papazian

Emergency in Azerbaijani Army

Emergency in Azerbaijani Army

Siranuysh Papyan, Interviewer
Interview – 02 April 2015, 16:21

The situation at the state border can be defined as stable escalation.
I think there is no reason to think that the Azerbaijani side will
observe the ceasefire.

The fact is that since the crackdown in the forest of Gyulistan a few
weeks ago the enemy has not attempted another attack against us. It is
also a fact that what happened on those days was one of the biggest
failures of the Azerbaijani army in the recent time. Over this time
Baku has been busy with “selling its losses”. Considering the
demoralizing potential of one-time high toll, this time too the enemy
used its frequent trick, i.e. inform the public on part of the losses,
gradually, with intervals of several days.

Currently, unprecedented attempts are made in Azerbaijan to prevent
spread of news on border incidents. There is information on total
control over the telephone conversations of soldiers. Even superficial
mentioning the situation at the border during telephone conversations
of soldiers will result in criminal liability. In other words,
everything is being done to keep the public unaware of the failures of
the Azerbaijani army and especially their enumerable losses. Judging
by this style, Baku is apparently afraid that the Azerbaijani
population will “break down” after such failures, the Transcaucasian
Turks will become convinced that they are dealing with a strong enemy,
will put up with the loss of the territory of Artsakh. Nevertheless,
we must be ready that as soon as the enemy comes round from this
failure, it will again resort to aggression.

Mr. Jamalyan, the servicemen killed at the border are mostly 18-20
year olds who are at the front line. What is your opinion, how should
this issue be resolved?

This issue actualizes regularly. Why are the conscripts standing along
the border? The concern of our compatriots is understood. What can I
say about this?

First, unfortunately, not only conscripts but also contractual
servicemen and commanders are killed at the border. A considerable
section of the border is guarded by contractual units. Moreover, the
process of recruitment of contractual units is actively going on.
Every citizen of the country can roll up for military service. As to
conscripts, they do their job well. Evidence to this is the failed
attacks of the enemy. After all, the front units accept the strike the
first.

We must be realistic. We cannot refrain from involving conscripts in
the protection of the state border – the country has limited
resources. Our goal is to make sentry duty safer. This is an ever
actual problem, Minister Ohanyan’s focus of constant concern. By the
way, Minister Ohanyan himself has authored a number of peculiar
engineering solutions for the improvement of military posts.

Freedom fighters announce now and then that they are beside soldiers,
they must be at the front line.

The readiness of the freedom fighters to defend the border is the
proof that we are strong, we are proud of this. Last August, as well
as on these days we understood that our freedom fighters are beside
our soldiers at the border. Last August my impression was that our
freedom fighters who visited the positions were missing the defeating
of Turks. But I would like to stress that our freedom fighters back
our army and are one of its main forces but the freedom fighters
cannot replace the professional army. A few days ago our front units
pushed back the offensive of the enemy’s elite units in the forests of
Artsakh, chased them and destroyed them. What other proof of defense
capability is needed to become convinced that our army is
professional. It is another issue that we should not be overwhelmed
with success. The army is a living being and sustaining such level of
defense capability requires daily, invisible work requiring immense
energy.

It is very important for the enemy to believe that our units on sentry
duty are capable. The point is that the enemy’s reconnaissance intends
to reveal the vulnerable spots of our defense. In this regard, our
victory at Gyulistan is notable because it prevented a large-scale
aggression.

What details of the incident of Gyulistan are known to you? How did
the Azerbaijani reconnaissance fail?

I think we need to go into detail. The reinforced commando could not
break through our defense, and shortly after the fight started it
recoiled and retreated chaotically. In addition, the fight began in
the area between the positions where we and the enemy were in equal
conditions, not near the position where our staff, being defended, has
an initial advantage over the commando. Even in this case the enemy
could not startle our conscripts. I would like to underline that the
guys fought in an organized way, were more resistant and with the help
of the forces sent from neighboring positions they were able to send
the enemy running.

It is also notable that high-ranking officials were participating in
the fight. Shortly after the fight began Lieutenant General Hakobyan,
the commander of the Defense Army, arrived. In other words, we kept
the situation under control. Our chasing units professionally used
controllable fire to force the enemy towards a minefield, in the
result of which the enemy sustained more losses. On the whole, the
enemy had around 20 losses, over ten were wounded. The greatest
success of the enemy was the evacuation of the bodies and the injured
personnel from the battlefield.

I don’t want to exaggerate what happened, paint it in brighter colors.
We had painful losses and we bow to their families. But we also have a
reason to be proud. It is very important for our compatriots to learn
about the feat of our front units, trust that work is being done in
the army which is producing results. I have had an opportunity to say
and I repeat that such an army deserves the trust of its people.

What are the conclusions from the failure of the enemy’s commando?

Although one cannot underestimate one’s enemy, nevertheless, the fact
is that the Azerbaijani army lacks professional personnel. We have
information that in the subversive operations of the recent period,
namely after the August beating, the enemy has been involving veterans
of war for a significant fee. There is a question why. I think the
answer is obvious – the lack of personnel who are psychologically
ready to fight, who can stand a battle, because one of the most weak
sides of the enemy is the chaotic retreat of the members of commandoes
shortly after the beginning of the fight. In other words, the enemy is
trying to fill in the gap of personnel ready to fight all the way
through with hired veterans. I think you will agree that this is a
desperate action because, I repeat, it indicates insufficient training
of special units. On the other hand, involving hired veterans in
special operations is convenient in terms of hiding the possible
losses. You know, we can hardly imagine that but hiding the death of
soldiers killed in a battle is something very typical of the
Azerbaijani reality. There is information that the hired veterans
acknowledge in written form that their relatives will not be informed
if they die in a battle. Anyway, even the involvement of hired
veterans did not produce the anticipated result.

What is the way out of this situation?

I have stated earlier that the enemy’s recent commando and sniper
activity, aside from military purposes, intends to shape an unhealthy
psychological atmosphere in Armenia. The enemy is trying to create the
impression of permanent killings and mature the idea of surrendering
liberated Artsakh against this heavy psychological backdrop. And since
we have no right to cede even a patch of land, we have only one way
out – painful counteraction.

Minister Ohanyan has set one goal before his team – not to wait until
the Azerbaijani side will take the initiative, hit all the time and
painfully, not letting the enemy to come round. Thanks to this we have
prevented a lot of attacks recently. It will continue until Azerbaijan
acknowledges that it has lost Artsakh forever.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/interview/view/33871

Vilen Khachatryan. "In the case of single currency, the Central Bank

Vilen Khachatryan. “In the case of single currency, the Central Bank
will lose its functions.”

April 4 2015

The Chairman of National Assembly Finance and Budget Affairs Committee
Gagik Minasyan, during the roundtable discussion on “Eurasian Economic
Prospects” held at the National Assembly, said the introduction of the
single EaEU currency will contribute to facilitation of mobility of
services, goods and capital between its member countries. Aravot.am
talked on this to economist Vilen Khachatryan. He said that the
capital mobility within the EU is happening very easily because when
dealing with a single currency, this problem is solved. “The problems
related to transition from one exchange rate to another and causing
fluctuations, thus, disappear. But there is a problem here. If a
country has high prices, these high prices are transferred to other
countries. And as for the capital and the entire transaction system,
unified system functions in a unified way and everything is done for
it.”

The economist believes that problems may arise in the process of
strengthening the EaEU countries’ central banks partnership as the
central banks of different countries are managed by different systems.
He noted that there was also a single currency during the Soviet
Union, but Armenia was able to attract more money. “Under the EaEU
market conditions, this might be more difficult, nevertheless, the
Central Bank will lose its functions, in this respect, it is negative.
I am raising the issue of financial sovereignty because, in the case
of single currency, the Central Bank cannot conduct an independent
financial policy in the monetary industry.” Ami CHICHAKYAN

From: A. Papazian

http://en.aravot.am/2015/04/04/169596/