Asbarez: Baroness Cox Urges Artsakh to Endure and Not Accept ‘False Promise of Peace’

Baroness Cox was one of the first people to visit Artsakh after the 2020 war


Caroline Cox, a member of the British House of Lords, has addressed a letter to the people of Artsakh offering them her support for their endurance and urging them continue to fight, rather than accept the “false promise of peace.”

Below is the text of Baroness Cox’s letter: 

To the people of the Republic of Artsakh, for whom I have profound  affection and deep respect.  I write to you today because 120,000 innocent civilians face an existential crisis. 

Conditions are now present for genocide against the Armenian Christians of  Artsakh.  

Your people have suffered, and continue to suffer, the most serious international  crimes. I have personally witnessed the results of massacres, atrocities and forced  displacement. Yet the world has chosen to turn a deaf ear to your suffering. Even  your closest international allies have either not paid attention to, or ignored, the  warning signs of genocide.  

During this darkest hour, I stand in solidarity with the Armenians of Artsakh. I  have great confidence in your ability to overcome this crisis with courage,  fortitude, sacrifice and love – not only will you survive but you will create beauty  from the ashes of destruction.  I am told that I have visited the Republic of Artsakh 88 times since 1990. I have  been privileged to experience the love of your history and your rich culture of  music, dance and art – all within the context of the breathtaking beauty of your  land’s rugged mountains, thick forests, fertile valleys and crystal rivers. I have  been blessed to meet a host of wonderful people, many the direct descendants of  victims of the Great Genocide in Anatolia, or themselves victims of anti  Armenian pogroms in Sumgait and Baku, and ethnic-religious cleansing in  Artsakh. I am struck by the unanimity with which they share a simple common  goal: it is to live in peace, dignity and security in their own historic land. This longing continues to fill my heart. 
 
I always carry with me the memory of a young woman I met in a hospital in  Martakert in 1992, after I had visited the village of Maragha, which had just been  subjected to a massacre inflicted by Azerbaijan. Whilst in the remains of the  village, I saw corpses of civilians decapitated by Azerbaijani militants; vertebrae  still on the ground; people’s blood still smeared on walls; homes that had been  set alight were still smoldering. The day I met this woman, she was in agony over  the deaths of her son and fourteen of her relatives who had been killed in the  1  massacre in Maragha. I wept with her. There are no words for a time like that.  But when she stopped weeping, I asked her if she had a message she would like  to share with the world. She replied, “All I want to say is thank you to those  people who have not forgotten us in these terrible days.” 

I do not think “thank you” are the words that would have come to my mind on  the day I had seen so many of my family killed in such horrific circumstances.  That is the dignity of the Armenian people. If I could speak to this woman today,  I would tell her: “We love you and we have not forgotten you, even as the dark  cloud of the Armenian Genocide, once again, looms over the mountains of your  land.” 

During the previous war, I met an Armenian man who had seen the body of a  five-year-old Armenian girl, cut in two, hanging from the branch of a tree. He  wept with horror and vowed revenge. Later, when his section of the Karabakh  army captured villages, he could not bring himself to harm an Azerbaijani child.  When this story was told at a dinner – in the Armenian style of making speeches  – a journalist commended the man for his humanity and dignity. To which he  replied: “Dignity is a crown of thorns.” The people of Artsakh have been wearing  your crown of thorns with inspirational courage and dignity.  I have never been as concerned about Artsakh’s future as I am today. Azerbaijan’s  conquest and ethnic-religious cleansing of two thirds of Artsakh in 2020, with the  direct assistance of Turkey and its allied jihadist militias; its detention, torture  and killing of Armenian hostages; its subsequent military incursions and  occupation of territory belonging to the Republic of Armenia; its current blockade  of Artsakh; and its territorial claims on the whole of Armenia all bear witness to  this grim reality. 

Conditions are present for genocide against the Armenian Christians of Artsakh. 

However, signatories to the Genocide Convention – including the United States,  France and my own Government in the United Kingdom – have refused their legal obligation to prevent the worst from happening, to provide protection to  those who need it, and to punish those who are responsible for atrocities. Not one  nation appears willing to prevent, provide or protect.  I am deeply disturbed by reports that the Republic of Armenia is being pressured  by international powers to contemplate sacrificing your homeland of Artsakh to  the Republic of Azerbaijan in return for a so-called peace treaty. If reports are to  be believed, those involved in the negotiation process say that the treaty will  secure the borders of the Republic of Armenia and allow trade to open up with  the Turkish world.  2  My dear friends, as you are aware, these promises of peace and prosperity come  at a price. If the treaty is signed in its current form, you would be expected to  surrender your international right of self-determination. You would be expected  to concede control over your lives, liberty and land. To use a recent phrase from  the Armenian Supreme Spiritual Council: By “recognizing the Republic of  Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan, the Armenian authorities will inevitably confront  our brothers and sisters in Artsakh with a new genocide and depatriation.” 

If a peace treaty is signed and later broken by Azerbaijan, history has shown that international powers would not be willing to respond. During the Russian brokered ceasefire in November 2020, Azerbaijan promised to ‘stop at their  current positions’ yet its armed forces have since advanced into new positions with impunity. Azerbaijan promised ‘the exchange of prisoners of war’, yet  dozens of Armenian military and civilian personnel remain in Azerbaijani  custody, many of whom have undergone speedy criminal trials. Azerbaijan has  not been held to account for breaking the 2020 ceasefire. One can only suspect  that an agreement that results from present-day negotiations, in their current form, will not guarantee peace for the Armenians of Artsakh.  

One of my great fears is the annihilation of all Armenian churches, monuments  and other cultural and spiritual treasures, which would fall under Azerbaijan’s  control. Many Armenian sites have already been targeted and badly damaged  since 2020, including the world-famous Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shushi, an  archaeological camp near Tigranakert, and a memorial dedicated to the victims  of the previous war. We must not forget the systematic erasure of centuries-old  Armenian religious sites in Nakhchivan, including the attack on the Armenian  Djulfa cemetery, where Azerbaijani soldiers, armed with sledgehammers and  cranes, destroyed hundreds of hand-carved cross-stones. Under Azerbaijan’s  control, there are strong grounds for belief that another ‘Nakhichevan’ would be  imposed in Artsakh – a priceless part of humanity’s common cultural heritage  will be destroyed.   I keep in mind a lesson from the Bible. In the last days of the kingdom of Judah,  the Prophet Jeremiah lamented that his countrymen were saying, “‘Peace, peace,’  when there is no peace.” In that case, the consequence of the nation accepting a  false sense of peace was the loss of its homeland and exile in a foreign country. 
 
When I was a young child, my own country was isolated and facing its darkest  hour. Great Britain was existentially threatened by an ultra-nationalistic,  genocidal dictatorship. Our then Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, promised  the nation “peace in our time”, but there was no peace. His successor, Winston  Churchill assumed the post of Prime Minister promising the nation nothing more  3  than “blood, toil, sweat and tears”. But the indescribable price of ‘blood, toil,  sweat and tears’ resulted in the privilege we now enjoy of living in freedom.  

It is my hope and prayer that the long-suffering Armenian nation will continue to  strive for the opportunity to live in peace and dignity in your own land. This is  the blessing that my family and I, along with all Britons, enjoy. For that great  privilege I am deeply indebted to those in my nation who, over eighty years ago,  chose to endure a great sacrifice, rather than accepting a false promise of peace.  Please be assured of my continued daily prayers, and of my continued advocacy  on your behalf. Every one of you means much to me and to many others around  the world.  I pray for God’s blessing on you all and that you will long live in a free Armenia  and free Artsakh.

President of Armenia extends condolences to India on train crash

 15:51, 3 June 2023

YEREVAN, JUNE 3, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Vahagn Khachaturyan has offered condolences to India on the tragic train crash.

“I express my most deepest and sincerest condolences to the friendly People and Leadership of India over the horrific train accident in Odisha, which claimed hundreds of innocent lives.  Sympathies to the bereaved families and wishes of speedy recovery to all injured,” President Khachaturyan tweeted.

Turkish Press: Armenia’s Pashinian to attend President Erdoğan’s inauguration

DAILY SABAH
Turkey – June 2 2023

Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian will travel to Türkiye on Saturday to attend President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's inauguration ceremony, as the two countries try to mend relations.

"Armenia received an invitation to attend the ceremony of inauguration of the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan," the statement said.

"Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will travel to Ankara on June 3 to take part in the ceremony."

Armenia and Türkiye have never established formal diplomatic relations and their shared border has been closed since the 1990s.

Türkiye objects to presenting the 1915 incidents as “genocide,” and instead describes the events as a tragedy in which both Turks and Armenians suffered casualties in the heat of World War I.

Ankara has repeatedly proposed the creation of a joint commission of historians from Türkiye and Armenia under the supervision of international experts to examine the issue.

In December 2021, the two countries appointed special envoys to help normalize relations – a year after Armenia lost to Türkiye's ally Azerbaijan in a war for control of the Armenian-occupied Karabakh region.

Azerbaijan used the help of Turkish combat drones to recapture most of the contested territory that had been under ethnic Armenian control since the 1990s.

In 2009, Ankara and Yerevan signed an agreement to normalize relations, which would have led to the opening up of their shared border.

But Armenia never ratified the deal and in 2018 ditched the process.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/01/2023

                                        Thursday, June 1, 2023


Armenian Policeman Avoids Prosecution For Assault

        • Naira Bulghadarian

Armenia - Police officer iArsen Ghaytmazian.


Armenian law-enforcement authorities have decided not to prosecute a senior 
police officer who beat up a teenage waiter at a hotel in the resort town of 
Dilijan.

A video circulated by multiple news websites on Thursday shows Arsen 
Ghaytmazian, the chief of the Dilijan police department’s investigative unit, 
repeatedly punching the 16-year-old waiter, Araz Amirian.

According to Amirian’s lawyer, Sasun Rafaelian, a drunk Ghaytmazian assaulted 
his client after being told to pay for a hotel room upfront.

“He refused to pay [upfront,] saying that he will pay up when he wants to,” 
Rafaelian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.

Although the incident occurred on April 10, Armenia’s Investigative Committee 
commented on it only after the publication of the scandalous video. The 
law-enforcement agency said it has not brought criminal charges against 
Ghaytmazian because he has cooperated with its criminal investigation, “fully 
regretted” his actions and apologized to the victim. It said a prosecutor 
overseeing the probe has approved the decision.

Rafaelian said that he will challenge the decision in court because he believes 
it amounts to a cover-up.

Artur Sakunts, a veteran human rights campaigner, also criticized the 
investigators for not indicting Ghaytmazian. The officer must also be fired by 
the Armenian police, he said.

“The presence of such policemen in the police ranks must be deemed 
unacceptable,” added Sakunts.

The Interior Ministry announced, meanwhile, that the officer has been suspended 
pending an ongoing internal inquiry conducted by the police.

Incidentally, Interior Minister Vahe Ghazarian was the police chief of Dilijan 
when Nikol Pashinian swept to power during the 2018 “velvet revolution.” 
Ghazarian, who is reputedly a childhood friend of the Armenian prime minister, 
was repeatedly promoted in the following years.

Some Armenian civic groups objected to Ghazarian’s appointment as interior 
minister in January, saying that he has resisted police reforms and tolerated 
police brutality and corruption.




EU Hosts Another Aliyev-Pashinian Meeting


Moldova - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, Azerbaijani President Ilham 
Aliyev, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and EU 
chief Charles Michel meet in Chisinau, June 1, 2023.


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev 
met on Thursday for the third time in less than three weeks for fresh peace 
talks mediated by the European Union.

They reported no concrete agreements following the meeting held on the sidelines 
of a European summit in Moldova’s capital Chisinau.

Aliyev and Pashinian were joined by EU chief Charles Michel, French President 
Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

Michel said they focused on an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty as well as “the 
security and rights” of Nagorno-Karabakh’s population, the restoration of 
transport links between the two South Caucasus nations and delimitation of their 
long border. He did not say whether the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders 
narrowed their differences on these issues.

“This meeting has been a good preparation for the next meeting,” Michel told 
reporters after the talks that lasted for about 90 minutes. “It will take place 
in Brussels on July 21.”

“It means that we are working hard and we intend to support all the positive 
efforts in the direction of normalization of the relations,” he said, adding 
that the EU “will do everything” to facilitate the conflict’s resolution.

Michel described the talks as “substantive” on his Twitter page. “Important to 
implement commitments,” he wrote.

Pashinian’s office confirmed that he and Aliyev will hold another trilateral 
meeting with Michel on July 21.

The three men made progress towards the Armenian-Azerbaijani peace deal at their 
last meeting in Brussels held on May 14. In particular, Pashinian confirmed that 
Yerevan is ready to recognize Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh through such 
an accord.

Aliyev and Pashinian also held talks in Moscow on May 25. The talks hosted by 
Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to focus on the reopening of the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border for commerce and cargo shipments.




Karabakh ‘Deeply Disappointed’ By U.S. Statement


NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- A view of Stepanakert, September 29, 2020


Nagorno-Karabakh’s leadership has criticized the United States for welcoming 
“amnesty” offered to it by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on the condition 
of its “surrender” to Baku.

Aliyev again threatened the Karabakh Armenians with military action on Sunday, 
warning that they must dissolve their government bodies and unconditionally 
accept Azerbaijani rule. “Only then can there be talk of amnesty,” he said.

The U.S. State Department spokesman, Matthew Miller, on Tuesday welcomed 
Aliyev’s “remarks on consideration of amnesty.”

The Karabakh foreign ministry said the U.S. reaction caused “deep disappointment 
and bewilderment” in Stepanakert and amounted to the endorsement of “Baku’s 
unconstructive and bellicose policy.”

“It is inexplicable how one can find any positive element worthy of 
encouragement in the Azerbaijani president’s statement, which is totally based 
on open blackmail and coercion,” the ministry said in a statement issued on 
Wednesday night.

It said Aliyev made clear that he will not engage in an “equal dialogue” with 
the authorities in Stepanakert and is only keen to forcibly impose Azerbaijani 
rule on them.

Armenia likewise expressed dismay at the U.S. praise of Aliyev’s remarks. The 
Foreign Ministry in Yerevan said they “contained clear threats” to the security 
of Karabakh’s population and Armenia’s territorial integrity.

Armenian opposition leaders and other critics of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
also denounced the State Department’s perceived pro-Azerbaijani stance. They 
said it was made possible by Pashinian’s recognition of Azerbaijani sovereignty 
over Karabakh.

“The fact that Washington ignores Azerbaijan's intensifying aggression and 
reacts to the covert Azerbaijani blackmail in a positive light is absolutely 
unacceptable and fraught with severe consequences,” Tigran Abrahamian, a senior 
lawmaker from the opposition Pativ Unem bloc, said on Thursday.

Former Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian claimed, for his part, that the State 
Department added “another drop” to “humiliations” which he said the Armenians 
have endured during Pashinian’s rule.

“One of the world’s most corrupt and authoritarian leaders promises to grant 
amnesty to the elected representatives of people who have lived in their 
historical homeland for millennia … and have never been part of an independent 
Azerbaijan. And the U.S. welcomes that step?” Oskanian wrote on Facebook.

“The United States should not be blamed. There is only one culprit here: the 
current authorities of Armenia,” he charged, calling, for the first time, for 
Pashinian’s removal from power.

As well as praising Aliyev’s offer of “amnesty” to the Karabakh leaders, the 
State Department spokesman also said that “aggressive rhetoric can only 
perpetuate the violence of the past.”


Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Authorities plan to launch regular Yerevan-Kapan passenger flights

Save

Share

 16:15,

YEREVAN, MAY 30, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian government plans to launch regular domestic passenger flights from Yerevan to Kapan, Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures Gnel Sanosyan told lawmakers on May 30.

“We have conducted one technical flight from Yerevan to the Kapan airport, certain specialized issues were outlined during that flight. We are now working in this direction, certain things must be changed in the navigation system, and some equipment must be added. We will soon conduct the second flight,” Sanosyan said. 

“We will conduct the second flight to be sure that the problems are solved, and our final goal is to have regular passenger transportation,” he added.

Armenia, Azerbaijan won’t sign peace treaty on June 1

MEHR News Agency, Iran

TEHRAN, May 29 (MNA) – Armenia and Azerbaijan haven’t yet agreed on a peace treaty that could be signed on the sidelines of the European Political Community summit in Chisinau on June 1, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said.

Nikol Pashinyan made the remarks at the country’s parliament on Monday.

There was a discussion if the peace treaty could be signed when the European Council president, the French president, the German chancellor, the Azerbaijani president and Pashinyan meet in Chisinau, according to the Armenian prime minister.

"I must say we haven’t received answers to the fourth package of our proposals to Azerbaijan. To date, there’s no agreed package that could be signed," he said.

The Armenian prime minister also said that he was dissatisfied with the results of talks with Russia that took place in Moscow on May 25 regarding the lifting of the Lachin corridor blockade.

"I would like to note that one of the issues of the discussion was related to the humanitarian situation in Nagorno-Karabakh and the illegal blockade of the Lachin corridor. We discussed this issue with our colleagues from Russia. I cannot say that the results of this discussion are satisfactory. It is a very sad situation that the closure of the Lachin corridor occurred in the presence of Russian peacekeepers. We will continue negotiations with our Russian partners to resolve this situation," TASS quoted him as saying.

Pashinyan also commented on some statements by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, adding that Yerevan was starting to doubt Baku's commitment to the agreements that were reached in Brussels on May 14.

MP/PR

https://en.mehrnews.com/news/201347/Armenia-Azerbaijan-won-t-sign-peace-treaty-on-June-1

Various scenarios considered regarding enclaves, says minister

 13:27,

YEREVAN, MAY 29, ARMENPRESS. Various scenarios are being considered regarding the enclaves in the Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations, Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures Gnel Sanosyan told reporters.

“There are discussions and various scenarios in the negotiations regarding the enclaves. Obviously, when this process gets matured the legal documents will have an important role. That is, there are legal grounds for any territory to have any status. I think that’s when our partners will see the legal grounds of given territories. One thing is clear, such territories exist on both sides, meaning, we too have numerous such sections. There are also territories especially in Tavush province that have been under Azerbaijani control since the war in the nineties. I think this will all be considered in one single package,” Sanosyan said.

Asked to elaborate which territories he is referring to, Sanosyan said: “Territories adjacent to a number of our settlements, administrative borders, which were once violated, and of course Artsvashen.”

Asked on the possibility of Azerbaijan gaining control over roads of state significance in the event of possible return of disputed territories, Sanosyan said they will find solutions in all scenarios like they did in Syunik by commissioning alternative roads.

At last, hints of a diplomatic thaw in the South Caucasus

ARAB NEWS

LUKE COFFEY

After years of fighting, frozen conflicts and diplomatic impasses, events are starting to change quickly in the South Caucasus — and in a positive way.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met in Moscow last week as part of a process toward peace and normalization.

This followed meetings on May 1 in Washington and May 14 in Brussels. After the Brussels meeting, European Council President Charles Michael said the “momentum should be maintained to take decisive steps toward the signing of a comprehensive peace agreement.”

The next step will be on June 1, with five-party talks (Aliyev, Pashinyan and Michel will be joined by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz) in Moldova at the European Political Community summit. If things continue to progress at tihs rate, then a lasting peace deal could be on the horizon.

The region of Karabakh has been the source of tension and conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the dying days of the Soviet Union. It is predominately populated with ethnic Armenians but is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan.

Pashinyan said last week that “the 86,600 sq km of Azerbaijan's territory includes Nagorno-Karabakh,” a significant breakthrough in the peace talks. No Armenian leader has acknowledged Karabakh being a part of Azerbaijan. Pashinyan’s political situation in Armenia is already precarious and his recognition of Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan has not been welcome at home. So it was politically brave of him to recognize Azerbaijani control over Karabakh, as this will probably unlock the next phase of peace talks.

Since the early 1990s Armenia and Azerbaijan have been in conflict. Sometimes this conflict has been “frozen,” while at others it has been “hot” — for example, during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War in 2020 when 44 days of intense fighting left thousands dead on both sides.

After intense fighting in the region in the early 1990s, Armenia ended up occupying a sizable area of Azerbaijan, including the Karabakh region, for almost three decades. However, after the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War ended, Azerbaijan regained most of its territory. The resulting ceasefire agreement left a small section of Karabakh out of the hands of Baku and under the supervision of a Russian peacekeeping force.

There have been many times in the past that Armenia and Azerbaijan have been close to a peace deal, only for it to fall through at the last minute.

Luke Coffey

Since the war ended, the situation has remained tense. While there have been no major battles, small skirmishes along the state border have left many soldiers dead and wounded on both sides. This localized fighting occurs in parallel to the diplomatic track that has been taking place on and off since November 2020. Both sides have also been arming. Azerbaijan has increased its military spending and has continued to import weapons from Turkey and Israel. Armenia has been procuring drones and other weapons from Iran and India.

Even with the progress in negotiations, there are still problems between the two sides in addition to the frequent skirmishes. For example, there has been a lack of progress to implement the terms of the November 2020 ceasefire agreement that brought the 2nd Nagorno-Karabakh War to an end. Specifically, in Article 9 of the ceasefire agreement, Armenia pledged to “guarantee the security of transport connections” between Azerbaijan proper and its autonomous Nakhchivan exclave via Armenia’s Syunik province. This has yet to happen. Understandably, the lack of progress has frustrated Baku.

Another issue of contention is the so-called Lachin Corridor, a road that connects Armenia to the ethnic Armenians communities in Karabakh. As part of the same ceasefire agreement, Azerbaijan pledged to allow its use by Armenia. While it has done so, in recent months Azerbaijan has limited the flow of traffic due to concerns that Armenia was smuggling weapons into the region.

There is also a mutual concern about the Kremlin’s role in the region, albeit for different reasons. The geopolitical reality on the ground means that Moscow will have a role in brokering any peace deal. While peace building efforts are not formally coordinated between Washington and Brussels on one side and Moscow on the other, all these efforts indirectly build off each other. However, Azerbaijan is becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the actions of Russian peacekeepers on its territory. Baku even accuses Russian peacekeepers of helping Armenians smuggle illicit goods and weapons into Karabakh. Meanwhile, Yerevan is frustrated by that it perceives to be a lack of Kremlin support in the conflict with Azerbaijan, even though Armenia and Russia are in the same security alliance. These tensions with Moscow come at a time when Russian influence in the region is declining because of its problems in Ukraine.

There have been many times in the past that Armenia and Azerbaijan have been close to a peace deal, only for it to fall through at the last minute. However, with Pashinyan’s recognition of Azerbaijani control of Karabakh, and with the flurry of diplomatic activity with Washington DC and Brussels, the prospects of a lasting deal have never been so high.

The South Caucasus has missed out on billions of dollars in foreign investment because of frozen conflicts. Armenia, a poor and landlocked country, has been left out of important and lucrative regional energy and infrastructure projects too.

The region needs peace in order to find prosperity. The forthcoming meeting in Moldova could make history. For the sake of peace and security in the South Caucasus let’s hope for the best.

• Luke Coffey is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. Twitter: @LukeDCoffey

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Azeri envoy to France sees chance of Armenia peace deal at Europe summit




By John Irish

PARIS, May 26 (Reuters) – Azerbaijan and Armenia could sign a peace settlement in their decades-old conflict over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh when their leaders meet at a European summit next week, Baku's envoy to France said on Friday.

Up to 47 heads of state, government and EU institutions are expected to attend the summit of the European Political Community (EPC) in Moldova next Thursday, which brings together EU member states and 17 other European countries.

On the sidelines, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azeri President Ilham Aliyev are due to hold high-level talks with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, diplomatic sources said.

"On June 1 in Chisinau we hope that finally a peace treaty can be signed," Leyla Abdoullayeva told a small group of reporters in Paris.

"It's a historic moment and a momentum that can't be missed," she said.

The two leaders met on Thursday in Russia, traditionally the main power broker between the two countries on the southwest edge of the former Soviet Union which have fought two major wars in the last three decades.

But there was no accord at the meeting beyond agreeing to new trilateral talks between officials from the three countries next week.

Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-populated enclave inside Azerbaijan, has been a source of conflict since the years leading up to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

In 2020, Azerbaijan seized control of areas that had been controlled by ethnic Armenians in and around the mountain enclave, and since then it has periodically restricted access to the only access road linking Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia.

There has been progress lately towards a settlement based on mutual recognition of each other's territorial integrity.

The European Union and the United States have made their own attempts to bring the sides together hoping to take advantage of Russia being distracted by the war in Ukraine.

Reporting by John Irish; Editing by Nick Macfie

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/24/2023

                                        Wednesday, 


Opposition Members Again Forced Out Of Armenian Parliament

        • Astghik Bedevian

Armenia - Opposition and pro-government deputies clash on the parliament floor, 
.


Two lawmakers representing the main opposition Hayastan alliance were forcibly 
removed from Armenia’s parliament on Wednesday after arguing and jostling with 
pro-government colleagues.

The incident followed a speech delivered by Hayastan’s Artur Sargsian during a 
parliament debate on the appointment of new members of Armenia’s Court of 
Cassation nominated by a state judicial watchdog. The nominees included Armen 
Danielian, a lower court judge who approved in 2021 Sargsian’s arrest declared 
by the Constitutional Court illegal a few months later.

“Speaking from this podium today, you proudly claimed that you made all your 
decisions within the bounds of the law,” Sargsian said, appealing to Danielian. 
“The fact is that you made an illegal decision to arrest me.”

After finishing his speech, he walked towards the judge, telling him to “look me 
in the eyes before I leave.”

Sargsian’s behavior angered deputies from the ruling Civil Contract party. One 
of them, Hovik Aghazarian, apparently shouted an insult at the oppositionist. 
The latter shouted back in anger, triggering a scuffle with other Civil Contract 
lawmakers.

Parliament speaker Alen Simonian responded by ordering security officers to 
forcibly remove Sargsian from the parliament auditorium. Another Hayastan 
deputy, Gegham Manukian, was also forced out after attempting to stop the guards 
from dragging away Sargsian.

Hayastan leaders condemned the use of force, saying that the incident was 
provoked by Aghazarian. The pro-government parliamentarian, who is known for his 
flamboyant behavior and statements, did not deny insulting Sargsian.

Simonian afterwards reprimanded both Sargsian and Aghazarian. Still, he blamed 
the opposition for the ugly scenes on the parliament floor.

A group of opposition lawmakers were similarly evicted from the chamber last 
month after occupying its podium in protest against Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s statements on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.




Pashinian Stands By Plans To Recognize Azeri Control Of Karabakh

        • Ruzanna Stepanian

Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian addresses the Armenian parliament, 
Yerevan, .


Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on Wednesday reaffirmed plans to formally 
recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan despite vehement objections 
from Karabakh’s leadership and the Armenian opposition.

Pashinian insisted that signing a relevant Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty is 
vital for Armenia’s own security and territorial integrity.

“Do we all realize that we have been living in our beloved homeland for 35 years 
without a land ownership certificate?” he claimed during his government’s 
question-and-answer session in the parliament. “Throughout its millennia-long 
existence Armenia has never had an ownership certificate.”

“If we manage to do what we want to do, then for the first time in our history 
we will get an ownership certificate and will be not only a de facto but also a 
de jure owner [of modern-day Armenian territory] … We want to have a land title 
called a state with internationally recognized delimited and demarcated 
borders,” he said.

Pashinian publicly confirmed on Monday that the peace deal currently discussed 
by Baku and Yerevan would uphold Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh. The 
statement drew strong condemnation from Armenian opposition leaders.

One of them, Armen Ashotian, was quick to decry the premier’s latest claims 
meant to justify his stance on the conflict with Azerbaijan.

“Never mind that international bodies and countries of the world had recognized 
Armenia’s territorial integrity … It’s the ‘ownership certificate’ signed by 
[Azerbaijani President Ilham] Aliyev that counts,” he wrote sarcastically on 
Facebook.

A “death certificate for Armenia” is what Pashinian has been striving for, 
charged Ashotian.

Karabakh’s parliament expressed outrage at Pashinian’s plans in a statement 
unanimously adopted on Monday night. It said that any document ignoring the 
Karabakh Armenians’ self-determination would be “null and void” for Stepanakert.

The Armenian Apostolic Church added its voice to the uproar on Tuesday. It 
Supreme Spiritual Council said that restoration of Azerbaijani control over 
Karabakh “would inevitably leave our brothers and sisters in Artsakh facing a 
new genocide.”




Russia Warns Armenia Over CSTO Exit Talk


RUSSIA – Russian Foreign Ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova attends the 
congress of the International Russophile Movement in Moscow, March 14, 2023.


Russia on Wednesday described as “dangerous” Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s 
public threats to pull Armenia out of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty 
Organization (CSTO).

Earlier this year, the Armenian government cancelled a CSTO military exercise 
planned in Armenia and refused to appoint a deputy secretary-general of the 
military alliance over what it sees as a lack of CSTO support in the conflict 
with Azerbaijan. It also rejected a CSTO offer to deploy a monitoring mission to 
the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

The tensions have called into question Armenia’s continued membership in the 
organization. Deputy Foreign Minister Mnatsakan Safarian said on May 16 that an 
exit from the CSTO is “not on Armenia’s agenda now.” Pashinian claimed the 
opposite, however, during a news conference held on Monday.

“I don’t exclude that Armenia may make a de jure decision to terminate or freeze 
its membership in the CSTO,” he said. “But that will happen only if we conclude 
that the CSTO has left Armenia.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, claimed to be bemused 
by Pashinian’s remarks while warning of their potential consequences.

“If this is a figure of speech designed to promote a position on Armenia's 
withdrawal from the CSTO, then it seems to me that one needs to understand the 
whole danger of manipulating words,” she told a news briefing in Moscow. “How 
the CSTO could leave Armenia … it’s not quite clear what they are talking about.”

Russia - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian attends a military parade in 
Moscow, May 9, 2023.

The estrangement from the CSTO highlights Yerevan’s broader tensions with Moscow 
that also stem from the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. In January, Pashinian 
went as far as to declare that close military ties with Russia may be putting 
Armenia’s security and territorial integrity at greater risk. The Russian 
Foreign Ministry dismissed the claim as “absurd.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov last week accused the West of pressuring 
Armenia to end Russia’s military presence in the South Caucasus country and rely 
instead on the United States for defense.

Pashinian insisted on Monday that there is no such “agenda” in his 
administration’s dealings with the U.S. or the European Union. He said that 
Yerevan is only discussing security issues with the Western powers because the 
Russian-led “security architecture” comprising Armenia is “not working for 
objective or subjective reasons.”




U.S. Official Lauds Pashinian’s Karabakh Stance


Serbia - USAID Assistant Administrator Erin Elizabeth McKee speaks during a news 
conference in Belgrade, December 2, 2022


A senior U.S. government official has praised Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian for 
agreeing to recognize Azerbaijani sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh through an 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty.

Erin Elizabeth McKee, an assistant administrator of the U.S. Agency for 
International Development (USAID), pointed to Pashinian’s statement to that 
effect, made at news conference on Monday, when she spoke during a congressional 
hearing in Washington on Tuesday. She spoke of an “important first step” towards 
a U.S.-backed resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

“Prime Minister Pashinian asserted for the first time, sort of very publicly, 
Armenia’s recognition of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity … This assertion is 
inclusive of Nagorno-Karabakh,” McKee told the U.S. House Subcommittee on Europe.

Pashinian’s statement drew strong condemnations from Karabakh’s leadership and 
Armenia’s leading opposition groups.

In a televised address aired late on Tuesday, Arayik Harutiunian, the Karabakh 
president, urged Yerevan to refrain from any “action or statement” that would 
help Baku restore control over the Armenian-populated region.

“Artsakh was not and will not be a part of Azerbaijan because that is the will 
of our people,” said Harutiunian. He urged Armenia’s citizens to show support 
for this position “in an active and resolute way.”

In Yerevan, some opposition leaders signaled plans to stage street protests to 
try to prevent Karabakh’s “surrender” to Azerbaijan.

Nagorno-Karabakh - People protest against Azerbaijan's blockade of the Lachin 
corridor during a rally in Stepanakert, December 25, 2022.

In recent weeks, the United States has intensified its efforts to facilitate the 
signing of the Armenian-Azerbaijani peace accord. The Armenian and Azerbaijani 
foreign ministers reportedly made progress towards the deal during four-day 
negotiations held outside Washington earlier this month.

Dereck Hogan, a U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state, revealed on Tuesday 
that Washington is now trying to help the two sides overcome the remaining 
sticking points. He said they relate to the delimitation of the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border, “the distancing of Armenian and Azerbaijani forces” 
deployed along the frontier, and “the rights and security of ethnic Armenians in 
Nagorno-Karabakh.”

“We put forward a number of ideas that help the two sides come together on these 
particular issues,” Hogan told the House Subcommittee hearing. “And so they are 
looking at, reviewing our ideas.”

Hogan added that Washington is looking forward to a fresh meeting between 
Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev which will be organized and 
mediated by European leaders in Moldova on June 1.

Aliyev and Pashinian are also due to meet in Moscow on Thursday for talks hosted 
by Russian President Vladimir Putin.


Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.