Emmanuel Macron sends letter to Armenian President on the occasion of Armenian Genocide anniversary

Save

Share

 20:14,

YEREVAN, APRIL 23, ARMENPRESS. President of France Emmanuel Macron sent a letter to Armenian President Armen Sarkissian on the occasion of the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, ARMENPRESS was informed from the French Embassy in Armenia.

The letter runs as follows, ''Mr. President, dear Armen /handwritten/,

On the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide all my thoughts are directed to Armenia that bore the sufferings of the history. My thoughts are with the Armenian people, genocide survivors and refugees, whom once France hosted and the heirs of whom shaped our country. We will never forget.

I would like to be with you on this day full of emotions and dignity. I have asked Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne, Minister of State for Tourism, French Nationals Abroad and Francophonie, attached to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to represent me in Yerevan during the Genocide commemoration events.

As I had taken the commitment, April 24ha been officially declared Armenian Genocide commemoration day since 2019. France will commemorate this day included in our republican calendar everywhere, despite epidemic restrictions. More than any other day, on this April 24 our peoples are consolidated over the same commemoration.

Remembering the past, accepting the truth and showing respects to the deceased is our responsibility for preventing oblivion, denial and falsehood. Standing with you throughout the history, we also stand with you for the sake of the future, when you country passed through a devastating conflict, where extremely much blood was shed. A new page of peace, prosperity and reconciliation should be opened.

The struggle for the sake of justice and truth that France carried out with you and will continue to do that non-stop, since that's not the struggle of only Armenians. It's the fundament of fraternity principle of the French Republic.

On this day of sadness but also hope, when we together remember the terrible sufferings of the martyred people, friendship and fraternity unite France and Armenia.

Please accept, Mr. President, the assurances of my highest consideration.

With deep respect /handwritten/,

Emmanuel MACRON

 

Mr. Armen SARKISSIAN,

President of the Republic of Armenia''.


Anticipating Biden’s Genocide Decision, Armenians Fear a Cultural One in Azerbaijan

Christianity Today
The case of a vanishing church in Nagorno-Karabakh highlights the feared erasure of ancient Christian heritage, but also the Azeri countercharge of destructive occupation.
|
Image: Press Service of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan President Ilhan Aliyev visits St. Astvatsatsin Church in newly controlled Nagorno-Karabakh with his wife and daughter in March 2021.

Armenian fears of a new genocide were put on hold following the fall of Shusha, the crown jewel of Nagorno-Karabakh, high in the Caucasus Mountains. Last November, Azerbaijani forces captured the city—known to Armenians as Shushi—after which a ceasefire ended the military hostilities.


Last month, satellite imagery allegedly
 revealed the destruction of Shusha’s Armenian Genocide Memorial. Constructed in 2009, it leaves a bitter taste during this year’s April 24 remembrance of the 1.5 million lives lost when Turks expelled Armenians from their homes a century ago.But not the cultural.

President Joe Biden may recognize the atrocity by stating the word genocide in his commemorative speech.

But the horrors witnessed in Turkey reached also to Shusha, where Azerbaijanis massacred the local Armenian population.

“As in 1915, the Turco-Azeris are committing not only a human genocide against the Armenians, but also a cultural genocide,” said Rene Leonian, president of the Union of Armenian Evangelical Churches in Eurasia.

“Unfortunately, nations and international organizations are too passive to firmly condemn these abuses.”

They can now add the case of the disappearing church.

Following the war, video footage emerged of an Azerbaijani soldier shouting “Allahu Akbar” from the rooftop of the Holy Mother of God church in the town of Jabrayil.

In search of the simple stone-built chapel, the BBC discovered no trace whatsoever.

The escorting policeman first said it was destroyed in the war. He then changed his story saying the Armenians dismantled it before they left.

Presidential advisor Hikmat Hajiyev told the BBC the matter would be investigated, but then shifted the discussion to the nearly 30-year Armenian occupation.

It was not wholly inappropriate.

The church in question was built on a military base, after Armenia seized the disputed Caucasus enclave during the first Nagorno-Karabakh war in 1993. Jabrayil became a ghost town, as Azerbaijani residents fled. The area was later looted and left in ruins.

Armenians call Nagorno-Karabakh “Artsakh,” as named in its fifth-century kingdom. It changed hands throughout the centuries, and in 1923 then-Commissar of Nationalities Joseph Stalin had the Soviet Union designate the region as Azerbaijani territory, despite its majority Armenian population.

But beyond the disappearing outpost for military worship, Azerbaijani actions—and rhetoric—threaten historic churches also.

The Ghazanchetsots (Holy Savior) cathedral in Shusha, built in 1888, was struck twice by missiles early in last year’s war.

Following the ceasefire, Shusha’s Kanach Zham (Green Chapel) of St. John the Baptist, built in 1818, had its towers removed. And last month, arial footage showed the entire structure destroyed.

Azerbaijan stated the church originally belonged to the Russian Orthodox, saying it was subject to “Armenification.” It plans to return the church to its former shape—and owners.

But such actions are “cultural genocide,” said Davit Babayan, foreign minister of Artsakh. He and many Armenians believe Azerbaijan is pursuing a systematic campaign to erase their heritage from the region.

Cited as precedent is the destruction of more than 2,000 khachkars, ornately carved headstones from a Christian graveyard, in Nakhchivan. A non-congruous Azerbaijani enclave, a 2005 video depicts earlier efforts to wipe out historical evidence of Armenian populations.

A January 2021 report from the office of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Artsakh states that at least 1,456 Armenian historical, cultural, and religious sites are now under the control of Azerbaijan.

It lists khachkars, gravesites, and fortresses, and includes 161 monasteries and churches.

But for many of these, the Armenification accusation goes further. Many belong to the ancient Caucasian Albanian people, says Azerbaijan. Unrelated to the modern nation of Albania in the Balkans, this ancient Christian people are said to be the original inhabitants of Nagorno-Karabakh, before Armenians altered and laid claim to their heritage.

Today they are known as Udi, and Azerbaijan wants them to get it back.

Image: Press Service of the Republic of Azerbaijan

St. Astvatsatsin Church in Nagorno-Karabakh during March 2021 visit by Azerbaijan President Ilhan Aliyev.

Last month, Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev visited the Hadrut region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Filming for national television, he entered the 12th-century St. Astvatsatsin Church in the village of Tsakuri, highlighting the graffiti and general state of disrepair.

The Armenian inscriptions are “fake,” he said.

“If it was truly Armenian, would they be using it as [a] rubbish dump?” asked Aliyev. “This is our ancient history. This is our Udi friends’ church.”

During the war, he consistently called the Armenians “dogs.”

Aliyev later visited a graveyard, accusing Armenians of falsifying tombstones.

Similar tombstones have since been vandalized, stated the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). Since 2013, USCIRF has listed Azerbaijan as a Tier 2 nation—now called the Special Watch List—for its practice or tolerance of violations of religious freedom.

Two soldiers have been arrested by Azerbaijan for the crime.

But video footage has also captured the toppling of a khachkar in Hadrut.

And in the famous 13th-century Dadivank Monastery, video released by the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense was stated to reveal the removal of medieval Armenian inscriptions. An Udi priest had previously been dispatched to conduct services.

“Azerbaijan is trying to make Albania of equal value to Armenia,” said Ara Sanjian, associate professor of history at the University of Michigan–Dearborn and director of its Armenian Research Center, “and project today’s rivalry back into the past.

“I want to see evidence,” he said. “I can’t say it didn’t happen, but the onus is on the Azerbaijanis to prove otherwise.”

International academics find it difficult to examine all the historical sources. But Thomas de Waal, author of Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War, stated the Albanian theory has “little currency outside of Azerbaijan,” calling it “bizarre.”

Nagorno-Karabakh means “mountainous black garden,” in a combination of Russian, Turkish, and Persian names.

Such disputes are typically settled through UNESCO, the United Nation’s cultural body. But working only through recognized states, the institution had no jurisdiction to chronicle religious heritage during Armenian occupation.

And since the war ended, UNESCO stated in December that Azerbaijan is not cooperating. In January, Aliyev threatened to revise relations with UNESCO, claiming it was acting with bias toward Armenia, failing to investigate damage during the occupation.

Last month, presidential advisor Hajiyev said Azerbaijan was ready to accept a mission. But as of publication, UNESCO told CT it was still in the process of discussion “in a spirit of consensus and strict impartiality.”

International organizations, such as the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the World Council of Churches, have called for preservation.

Johnnie Moore, a USCIRF commissioner, agreed, but put the onus on Armenia.

“The religious freedom community should also do a report on the desecration of Islamic sites during the years Armenia controlled the area,” he said.

“Christians cannot expect the world to stand against destruction of their religious heritage, when we don’t stand against what others have suffered.”

In addition to hundreds of cultural sites damaged, Azerbaijan said more than 60 mosques had been destroyed. Another was turned into a pigsty. One in Shusha has been preserved, but labeled “Persian” after Iranian help in reconstruction.

“They even tried to steal our mosque,” said Mushfig Bayramov, an Azeri convert to Christianity. “It is incredible how these people hate us.”

Armenia stated Azerbaijan targeted this mosque during the war, narrowly missing.

Reciprocal accusations between the sides continue. Azerbaijan stated Armenia illegally removed 40,000 museum exhibits. Armenia stated Azerbaijan refused to return 1,500 art objects from Shusha.

Sensitive to the suffering of both sides, Rima Nasrallah, assistant professor of practical theology at the Near East School of Theology in Beirut, has paid special attention to the monastery of Dadivank.

The threats reminded her of the destruction of Armenian heritage in Turkey, but also the losses of Arab Christians in the Middle East.

In conjunction with scholars and theologians from Germany, she signed a statement rejecting the destruction of cultural heritage and its “ideological reinterpretation,” especially in service of a political agenda.

“Where monuments have been destroyed or changed, part of our Christian story was lost,” Nasrallah said.

“These are not just random halls for weddings and baptisms; they are sacred spaces where people have met God, and felt his presence.”

Aliyev has pledged to protect these churches—and give them to the Christians of Azerbaijan. Though Udis appear to be the beneficiaries, Aliyev stated that Armenians are free to remain in what he now calls “Karabakh,” dropping the “mountainous” descriptor that signaled Armenian-populated areas.

Nonetheless, the dehumanization continues.

Azerbaijan issued postage stamps which appear as if an exterminator is spraying the region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

And a Military Trophies Park was opened in Baku, the nation’s capital, in which Aliyev walked through an exhibit of helmets taken from slain Armenian soldiers.

While these images and violations have received abundant coverage in Armenian media, mainstream publications have been more cautious. Though USCIRF and the BBC are starting to notice, Armenians simply grow more frustrated.

Many put their hope in God.

“As the civilized world continues to turn a blind eye, Azerbaijan’s greatest strength is in denial,” said Leonian, who directed the Artsakh ministry of the Armenian Missionary Association of America for 17 years.

“But God’s patience is limited, and one day the nations will open their eyes.”

Armenian Genocide Massachusetts representative Young Turk Government

Telegram Gazette



April 24 is certainly a sacred day, as it is the 106th commemoration of the Armenian Genocide. Our Armenian history is well documented, save for a select few who seem to think that having a revisionist’s view of history somehow changes it.

It will never be forgotten that on April 24, 1915, most Armenian doctors, educators, writers, intellectuals, lawyers and community leaders were rounded up and viciously killed, or forced into death marches. This massacre left over 1.5 million Armenian dead from the actions of Young Turk Government members.

Genocide across the world has had a profound effect, and there is no doubt that this was a horrific incident, encased in a horrid part of history. Unspeakable crimes, committed by undeserving-to-mention individuals, and by a community and government who still to this day overwhelmingly denies this history. 

We must recognize the happenings of 106 years ago. Wounds heal, but scars certainly remain. The healing process truly begins when all involved take responsibility for their role. We will never be able to change what happened, but we can all help with continuing to educate, so that history never repeats itself.

Armenian-Americans and human rights supporters must continue to teach individuals of this history, and show pride in the Armenian heritage. We must take time to reflect and remember all of our family and friends whose lives were taken away from them.

There is no mistake that we have a dark cloud hanging over our heritage due to horrific actions from others. However, we also have a ray of sunshine shining through, and that is our successes and survival. 

The Armenian diaspora, although heartbreaking in its impetus, has given Armenian people a new opportunity. This opportunity gives us the chance to prove that we, and our culture, will survive and flourish everywhere that we live, throughout this great world. 

David Muradian is a proud Armenian-American and a state representative from Grafton

PACE’s Austrian delegate calls on Azerbaijan to refuse to bargain over Armenian POWs’ issue

News.am, Armenia

Austrian delegate of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Stefan Schennach calls on Azerbaijan to refuse to bargain over the issue of Armenian prisoners of war and simply release them and stated that he is speaking on behalf of his delegation, not as a rapporteur for Azerbaijan.

Schennach added that it is necessary to respect peace and that peace implies reconciliation and respect for those who fell in battles. He said there are missing persons and a tremendous amount of [Armenian] soldiers who are still in captivity in Azerbaijan and called on the latter to not bargain over when they will be released.

According to him, there are allegations of war crimes and there are international bodies that need to investigate those crimes.

Armenia Banking Market 2021-2027 Key Players, Marketing Strategies and Growth Analysis

OPEN PR
04-20-2021 05:27 AM CET | Business, Economy, Finances, Banking & Insurance

Latest Published Report by Allied Market Research Titled,”Armenia Banking Market by Sector (Retail Banking, Corporate Banking, and Investment Banking) and Type (Closed Joint-Stock Company [CJSC] and Open Joint-Stock Company [OJSC]): Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2019–2026″.

Report covers in-depth analysis of key players, marketing strategies, supply-side and demand side indicators and company profiles of market leaders, potential players, and new entrants. Armenia banking research report provides important market strategies and Latest trends with discussion of market consumption, major drivers, restraints and market share forecasted to 2027.

The global Armenia banking market report covers and explains a detailed analysis of the Armenia banking market segmentation, size, share, growth, trends and competitive landscape. According to the report the market is expected to register a considerable market growth by 2027. The impact of COVID-19, makes it important for the stakeholders to understand the Armenia banking industry. The report also describes and analyzes the growth of the Armenia banking market strategies.

Download Sample Report (Get Full Insights in PDF-90 Pages) @ https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/request-sample/6274

The Armenia banking market has grown rapidly over the past few years. Digital transformation projects across verticals witnessed huge uptake and are also expected to contribute further in the near future. The Armenia banking market gains popularity in various industries including IT & telecom, BFSI, and healthcare, owing to its supreme benefits such as high-speed random access of data and low power consumption.

The report provides the SWOT analysis of the key market players including, Ameriabank CJSC, ARARATBANK OJSC, ArmSwissBank CJSC, Converse Bank CJSC, HSBC Armenia, ID Bank, ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE BANK CJSC, ArmBusinessBank CJSC, Ardshinbank CJSC, and Inecobank CJSC, which gives the business overview, financial analysis, and portfolio analysis of products and services

Key Segments:
Based on sector, the market is divided into retail banking, corporate banking, and investment banking. The retail banking segment is held the largest share in 2018, accounting for almost half of the market. This is due to rapidly changing customer needs and technology trends with disruptive product offering and solutions via retail banking.

However, the corporate banking segment is estimated to manifest the fastest CAGR of 9.3% during the forecast period. This is owing to rise in small and medium-sized enterprises in Armenia, level of financing and lending from banks for SMEs.
On the basis of type, the market is closed joint-stock company (CJSC) and open joint-stock company (OJSC).

The CJSC segment dominated the market in 2018, accounting for more than four-fifths of the market. Moreover, the segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 8.7% from 2019 to 2026. This is attributed to the banking system in the country that is privately owned with no government share. The OJSC segment is anticipated to portray a CAGR of 7.5% during the forecast period.

To Enquire about the Purchase of the Report, Click on:https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/purchase-enquiry/6274

The Report Answers the Following Key Questions
• Which are the leading market players active in the Armenia banking market?
• What would be the detailed impact of COVID-19 on the Armenia banking market size?
• How current Armenia banking market trends would influence the market in the next few years?
• What are the driving factors, restraints, and opportunities in the Armenia banking market?
• What are the projections for the future that would help in taking further strategic steps?

Key Benefits to the Stakeholders
• The report provides a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the current Armenia banking market trends, forecasts, and market size from 2020 to 2027 to determine new opportunities.
• Porter’s Five Forces analysis highlights the potency of buyers and suppliers to enable stakeholders to make strategic business decisions and determine the level of competition in the industry.
• Top impacting factors & major investment pockets are highlighted in the research.
• The major countries in each region are analyzed and their revenue contribution is mentioned.
• The market player positioning segment provides an understanding of the current position of the market players active in the Armenia banking industry.

Get Customization of the Report with COVID-19 Impact Analysis@https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/request-for-customization/6274?reqfor=covid

Chapters of the Report are Mentioned Below:
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Report description
1.2. Key benefits for stakeholders
1.3. Key market segments
1.3.1. List of key players profiled in the report
1.4. Research methodology
1.4.1. Secondary research
1.4.2. Primary research
1.4.3. Analyst tools and models
CHAPTER 2: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1. Key findings of the study
2.2. CXO perspective
CHAPTER 3: MARKET OVERVIEW
3.1. Market definition and scope
3.2. Key findings
3.2.1. Top winning strategies, 2018
3.3. Top player positioning, 2018
3.4. Porter’s five forces analysis
3.5. Market dynamics
3.5.1. Drivers
3.5.1.1. Robust economic growth
3.5.1.2. Increase in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
3.5.1.3. Rise in development of digital banking
3.5.2. Restraint
3.5.2.1. High dollarization
3.5.3. Opportunity
3.5.3.1. Expansion of products and services
3.5.4. Impact Analyses
CHAPTER 4: ARMENIA BANKING MARKET, BY SECTOR
4.1. Overview
4.1.1. Market size and forecast
4.2. Retail Banking
4.2.1. Key market trends, growth factors, and opportunities
4.3. Corporate Banking
4.3.1. Key market trends, growth factors, and opportunities
4.4. Investment Banking
4.4.1. Key market trends, growth factors, and opportunities
And Continued……..

Key offerings of the report:
1. Key drivers & Opportunities: Detailed analysis on driving factors and opportunities in different segments for strategizing.
2. Current trends & forecasts: Comprehensive analysis on latest trends, development, and forecasts for next few years to take next steps.
3. Segmental analysis: Each segment analysis and driving factors along with revenue forecasts and growth rate analysis.
4. Regional Analysis: Thorough analysis of each region help market players devise expansion strategies and take a leap.
5. Competitive Landscape: Extensive insights on each of the leading market players for outlining competitive scenario and take steps accordingly.

Is there any query or need customization? Ask to our Industry Expert
@https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/connect-to-analyst/6274

David Correa
Portland, OR, United States
USA/Canada (Toll Free): +1-800-792-5285, +1-503-894-6022, +1-503-446-1141
UK: +44-845-528-1300
Hong Kong: +852-301-84916
India (Pune): +91-20-66346060
Fax: +1(855)550-5975
[email protected]
Web:https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com

Allied Market Research (AMR) is a full-service market research and business-consulting wing of Allied Analytics LLP based in Portland, Oregon. Allied Market Research provides global enterprises as well as medium and small businesses with unmatched quality of "Market Research Reports" and "Business Intelligence Solutions." AMR has a targeted view to provide business insights and consulting to assist its clients to make strategic business decisions and achieve sustainable growth in their respective market domain.

We are in professional corporate relations with various companies and this helps us in digging out market data that helps us generate accurate research data tables and confirms utmost accuracy in our market forecasting. Allied Market Research CEO Pawan Kumar is instrumental in inspiring and encouraging everyone associated with the company to maintain high quality of data and help clients in every way possible to achieve success. Each and every data presented in the reports published by us is extracted through primary interviews with top officials from leading companies of domain concerned. Our secondary data procurement methodology includes deep online and offline research and discussion with knowledgeable professionals and analysts in the industry.

This release was published on openPR.

Azerbaijan fires info war salvo against Russia

EurasiaNet.org
April 16 2021
Joshua Kucera Apr 16, 2021 

Azerbaijan has launched a public campaign against Russia, with the government and other public figures lining up to air choreographed grievances against Moscow.

The pretext is clear: the alleged use of state-of-the-art Russian missiles against Azerbaijani targets in the waning days of last year’s war. But what’s less clear is what exactly Baku is trying to get out of Moscow as a result.

The campaign launched on April 2, when Azerbaijan’s state mine-removal agency ANAMA announced that it had found remains of two exploded Iskander missiles as it was clearing ordnance in Shusha, in Nagorno-Karabakh. This revived a long-running controversy over whether or not Armenia had used the missiles during the war, an issue that had previously led to serious political crisis in Armenia but which Azerbaijan had previously been content to stay out of.

When Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan notoriously claimed in February that Armenia had used the Iskander missiles, but that “90 percent of them didn’t explode,” Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said that his side had no evidence that the missiles had been fired at them, and mocked Pashinyan for making “another public blooper.”

Now, though, the tone from Baku has changed. And ANAMA’s announcement included an extra-spicy accusation: that the missiles used against Shusha were not the Iskander E variant, designed for export and which Armenia was known to have had, but the M variant, which is known only to be operated only by Russia. And the report has been followed by a seemingly coordinated PR campaign against Russia of the type that is often seen when Baku wants to make things difficult for Moscow.

As usually happens in these kinds of cases, senior Azerbaijani officials, including Aliyev, have been relatively muted, taking a “just asking questions” tone. On April 12, at the official inauguration of a new “Military Trophies Park” where the Iskanders were on display (among far more notorious exhibits), he said: “Armenians fired at Shusha with these Iskander-M missiles. Where did the Armenian military get these missiles from? They shouldn’t have had them.”

The next day, Aliyev reported that in a phone conversation with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin two weeks earlier, “we discussed this question. On my orders, Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry sent an official letter with photographs, evidence. But so far we haven’t received any answer.”

The dirtier work, meanwhile, is being done by semi-official sources.

“The Iskandar M, the remnants of one of which were discovered in Shusha, is in the sole possession of the Russian Federation,” wrote Esmira Jafarova, an analyst at the state-run think tank Center of Analysis of International Relations. “The story behind this discovery definitely has a dark side that needs to be clarified, as the absence of plausible answers may generate dangerous speculation.”

Another analyst, Elchin Mirzabayli, suggested the M variant had been supplied illegally to Armenia. “These missile systems were illegally delivered to Armenia by criminal groups engaged in the arms trade,” Mirzabayli told the local news site Azernews. “Either Russia is holding back the truth about the sale of Iskander-M missiles to Armenia, or its leadership has not been informed about it. Anyway, the fact must be seriously investigated.”

Russian officials have repeatedly denied it. Putin spokesman Dmitriy Peskov said immediately after ANAMA’s announcement that Moscow confirmed that Iskanders (of any variety) hadn’t been used in the war and that they had no information about where Azerbaijan’s evidence was coming from. But he continues to be asked about it, and on April 11 he said that: "Military officials are engaged in a close dialogue. All corresponding questions are being discussed.”

Armenian military officials have refused to comment.

There have been reports in the past that Armenia did in fact get the M variant from Russia. A 2018 story in the Russian newspaper Kommersant cited an unnamed source in Russia’s defense industry saying that Armenia got a division’s worth of the Iskander M systems in 2016. Somewhat vaguely, it explained that this violated export protocols (the domestic version has a longer range than the export version), but that “Moscow was forced to take the step” because Armenia had no other option to defend itself in case of an Azerbaijani attack on Nagorno-Karabakh. 

The publicly available evidence, though, doesn’t prove whether the E or the M version was used. The images published by Azerbaijan could be from the rocket used in either system, Dmitriy Kornev, an analyst of Russian military hardware, told Eurasianet.

At this point, though, whether the Iskander was used and if so, what kind, has become a secondary issue. Its role as a political instrument by Armenians, Azerbaijanis, and possibly Russians, is far more significant. The question, as yet unanswered, is what Baku is now trying to get out of Moscow.

This kind of information campaign by Azerbaijan isn't new, especially against Russia. But it is especially sensitive given Russia's newly empowered role in the region.

It doesn’t appear that there is any one specific issue, but rather an overall dissatisfaction with Russia’s new role as virtually the sole mediator between the two sides, including the crucial peacekeeping mission.

The Russia-Azerbaijan dyad is probably the single most important relationship for determining the future contours of the conflict. It was Russia’s intervention following Azerbaijan’s victory in Shusha that prevented Azerbaijan from quickly completing its conquest of all of Nagorno-Karabakh, and it is the Russian peacekeeping mission that remains the only thing protecting the Armenian civilians remaining in Karabakh today. It’s not clear how Russia convinced Azerbaijan to stop its offensive, and it’s not clear how Moscow intends to convince Baku to extend the mandate of the peacekeeping mission when it expires in late 2025.

Analyst Shahin Jafarli told BBC Azeri that the government’s grievances against Russia were general, that its peacekeeping mission has been excessively favoring the Armenian side. He added that it appeared that the Russians were building barracks and other infrastructure that suggested they were preparing for a larger mission. And he argued that the Iskander claims were “a sign of growing tensions between the two sides.”

Azerbaijan may also be leaning on Russia so that Russia in turn leans on Armenia to do take some of the steps that Azerbaijan has been demanding, like withdraw Armenian military forces from the region and provide maps of the land mines the Armenian side laid during the war.

All of these negotiations are opaque, however, and Russia isn’t tipping its hand. A couple of other developments this week only added to the number of moving parts.

The first was Pashinyan’s announcement that Armenia was "conducting effective discussions with our Russian colleagues" about setting up a second Russian military base in the country, in the southern Syunik region. There hasn’t been any mention of this from the Russian side. But if it came to pass, it obviously would only deepen Russia’s role as Armenia’s security guarantor.

The second was a report in the Russian newspaper RBK about discussions around Azerbaijan participating in an upcoming meeting of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the Russia-led trade bloc. It has been a long-standing Russian goal to get Azerbaijan to join the EAEU (along with every other post-Soviet state that isn’t already a member), and Azerbaijan has never been particularly interested. Further, the Armenian sources for the story say that Armenia (a current EAEU member state) is blocking Azerbaijan’s participation until the latter releases the Armenian captives it has been holding since the end of the war.

Why would Baku take this step that it’s been unwilling to take thus far in order to participate in a meeting of a group it doesn’t want to join? RBK acknowledges that is unlikely to happen ahead of the meeting (scheduled for the end of April in Kazan). But if there are real discussions about Azerbaijan at least participating in the EAEU, it could potentially be a way to score points with Moscow while allowing Azerbaijan access to another platform it can use to pressure Armenia. It doesn’t hurt that most EAEU member states probably have better relations with Baku than with Yerevan, a fact that was underscored by the visit this week by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko to Azerbaijan, where he got a warm welcome including an invitation to participate in the reconstruction of Azerbaijan’s newly retaken territories.

“I said again that we will invite only companies from friendly countries to participate in the reconstruction of the territories. And Belarus is a friendly country for Azerbaijan,” Aliyev told Lukashenko at a joint press appearance on April 14.

Lukashenko, for his part, offered a very Lukashenkian call for reconciliation between the two sides.

“Thank god this is all over. It’s great that you ended it, and I’m sure that you will turn this page like this, that Azerbaijan is not planning to humiliate the Armenians who live in Azerbaijan, after all they don’t live in Karabakh but in other places also,” he said, using a Belarusian criminal slang phrase that refers to prison rape. “And I haven’t seen any evidence that any Azerbaijanis are humiliating Armenians. We will offer any kind of help wherever you ask. We will offer our own variants.”

Azerbaijan’s post-war behavior, though, suggests that humiliation is precisely what it is trying to achieve, a revenge for 26 years of its own humiliation. It’s been pushing its advantage against on-its-heels Armenia, but it’s a risker gambit to try against Russia.

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of The Bug Pit.

No response from UN to Russia’s request for help in demining Nagorno-Karabakh, Shoigu says

Panorama, Armenia

The United Nations has not responded to Russia’s invitation to join mine clearance works in Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said in an interview with a documentary aired by the Zvezda television channel on Friday, TASS news agency reported. 

"As soon as it happened in November, we asked the United Nations mine action service to come. The area was stuffed with mines inside out. People cannot return there. Has anyone come? No, no one," he said, adding that only Russian and local bomb specialists are working in the area. "But no one else has come," he stressed, as quoted by the source. 

Armenia dancers pay tribute to martyrs of Armenian Genocide with group dance

News.am, Armenia

Dancers and dance figures commemorated and paid their tribute to the martyrs of the Armenian Genocide with a pan-national group dance at the Armenian Genocide Memorial Complex in Yerevan. This is what artistic director of the Gevorgyan Dance Center Karen Gevorgyan posted on his Facebook page, attaching a video and adding that a video of the group dance will be presented to the public on April 23. 

video at link

Armenia to set up Ministry of Interior

Public Radio of Armenia
     

Armenia will set up a Ministry of Interior. A relevant draft was approved by the government today.

It is proposed to form the Ministry of Internal Affairs – a state governing body that will develop and implement the state policy in the field of domestic affairs.

According to the draft, the Police, the Migration and Citizenship Service, as well as the Educational Complex of Police of the Republic of Armenia will be subordinate bodies of the Ministry.

The heads of the subordinate bodies, except for the Police troops, will be appointed to the post and dismissed by the Prime Minister upon the proposal of the Minister of Internal Affairs.

The chief of Police Troops will be appointed and dismissed by the President.

Asbarez: EPIC Chosen as National Organizer for Entrepreneurship World Cup in Armenia



Entrepreneurship World Cup 2019 Trophy

The Entrepreneurship and Product Innovation Center of the American University of Armenia is the official national organizer of the Entrepreneurship World Cup in Armenia. The program offers entrepreneurs across the country the opportunity to compete globally for a share of US $1 million in cash prizes, plus additional investments and another US $750,000 of in-kind support. EWC is now accepting applications for 2021, aiming to exceed the past mark of 175,000 contestants from 200+ countries in its first year.

“EPIC, through the Open Center of Excellence for Innovation Advancement, is proud to accept responsibility for hosting this event in Armenia. We hope to use EWC as a platform for not only supporting and promoting Armenia’s entrepreneurs, but also as a vehicle for collaboration and purpose with our local venture and industry partners.  To this end, we are in dialogue with our local startup ecosystem partners, universities in Armenia, the government, and the local business community to share responsibility for the success of this event. Together, as national co-organizing partners, we will plan, promote and execute the national competition for the benefit of all,” shares Dr. Michael Kouchakdjian, director of the Open Center of Excellence for Innovation Advancement and EPIC.

EWC is more than just a global pitch competition with a shot at securing life-changing prizes. It elevates entrepreneurs from all stages — idea-stage, early-stage, growth-stage or beyond — by providing them with tools and resources to grow their ventures.

EWC Accelerates is a virtual training and mentorship program that helps entrepreneurs hone their skills and increase their chances of winning in their national competitions, and advancing to the Global Finals.

The EWC online platform also offers all contestants who complete the application access to more than $25,000 in perks from partners such as Google Cloud, Hubspot, Stripe, and more.

“We strive to make the EWC Armenia a truly pan-national event that will include the entire spectrum of Armenia’s entrepreneurship ecosystem, from individual entrepreneurs to government and from IT industry to fine arts. Thus, we don’t consider any limitation for the type or nature of entrepreneurial ideas and ventures that may compete for the Entrepreneurship National Cup. As a growing entrepreneurial nation, we believe that Armenia must have at least one deserving representative in the EWC Global Finals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” remarks Nejdeh Hovanessian, assistant director of the Open Center for Innovation Advancement and Entrepreneur-in-Residence at EPIC.

National Finals are held through July 2021 in Yerevan. In November 2021, the 100 winning startups from around the world will be flown to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to participate in the EWC Accelerates program for an intensive startup bootcamp and to compete in the EWC Global Finals.

Presently, EPIC is seeking potential sponsors for the EWC Armenia competition. Businesses and organizations interested in sponsoring awards and prizes can contact EPIC at [email protected].

The Entrepreneurship and Product Innovation Center is a platform of the American University of Armenia for promoting entrepreneurial education, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and startup venture incubation. EPIC provides an ecosystem for emerging entrepreneurs consisting of first-class facilities and collaborative workspace, programs and events, and a network of mentors, advisors, and investors. EPIC fosters the understanding and application of entrepreneurship in students and faculty at AUA to craft high-impact multidisciplinary ventures.