Remarks By Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan At A National

REMARKS BY TURKISH PRIME MINISTER RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN AT A NATIONAL PRESS CLUB NEWSMAKER BRIEFING

Federal News Service
November 14, 2008 Friday

MR. HICKMAN: Would you comment, please, on the latest developments
in another of your neighbors, Georgia? Is Turkey planning to promote
and play a role in a negotiation process?

PRIME MIN. ERDOGAN: Territorial integrity of Turkey is of great
importance for us. And we are a country defending the territorial
integrity of Georgia. And in the recent crisis, you are familiar with
the fact that we have been to Moscow. And we had met with Mr. Putin
and Mr. Medvedev and Mr. Lavrov, along with my foreign minister.

We had various talks. And at the end of these talks, we had declared
a project, which is the platform for solidarity and cooperation in
the Caucasus.

And this platform was going to be established upon the principles of
geography of the region.

Russian Federation, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia were going
to be — consisted within the structure. And this project is going to
focus on the needs of the region, whether it be the energy investments,
whether it be other needs. And this platform is going to function
within the framework of OSCE having the opportunity to move towards
the same goals on common grounds and with the capability of coming up
with solutions to certain problems that may arise in the region. This
is how we had explained the project to be.

And Russia said yes to such a project. And Georgia said yes to such
a project. And Azerbaijan said yes to this project as well. And in
the meanwhile, our foreign ministers started discussing the content
of this platform.

And there was a national football game organized between Armenia and
Turkey. And Mr. Sarkissian, President Sarkissian invited the Turkish
president to Armenia. And President Gul of the Republic of Turkey
has been to Armenia where we had stated this offer to Sarkissian
and Sarkissian said yes to this project. And this process is still
under way.

And for the past 17 years, the United States of America, France and
Russia have been continuing the Minsk Process. But no results had
yielded until so far. But with the introduction of this new process,
Azerbaijan and Armenia gathered together in Moscow. There were certain
talks. I believe there are certain positive signals coming along and we
are paying our efforts in order to sustain this positive process. And
I believe the United States of America will do everything within its
capability to contribute to this process.

And for the sake of the region, for the peace of the region, if
problems shall be solved, I believe it will have a direct impact
on the solution of the questions between Turkey and Armenia. And if
problems between Azerbaijan and Armenia shall be solved, it will have
a direct impact on Turkey and Armenia relations.

MR. HICKMAN: There’s another question related to Georgia. How do you
see the development of the — of the Black Sea region in view of the
recent conflict in Georgia?

Garry Kasparov: The master who won’t be Putin’s pawn

Garry Kasparov: The master who won’t be Putin’s pawn

The chess prodigy honoured by the Soviet Union now combines his Western
lecture tours with vociferous opposition to the Kremlin regime

Shaun Walker meets Garry
Sunday, 16 November 2008

Garry Kasparov was involved in some epic clashes during his time as
the world’s leading chess player, but of late, he’s picked an opponent
that he seems most unlikely to defeat: Vladimir Putin. Revered in
Russia as a chess legend, he has become persona non grata by dint of
his withering attacks on the country’s leader, who he says has
perpetrated "the greatest robbery in thehistory of the human race" by
dividing the proceeds of Russia’s wealth among his cronies.

Kasparov lives in a quiet and pleasant area of central Moscow. I am
escorted up to his apartment by a bodyguard and received by his
mother, Klara, who eyes me with some distrust. I wait for Kasparov in
the spacious living room of the apartment, which is done out in a
style best described as late-Soviet opulence. With glass chandeliers
and ornate mahogany cabinets overflowing with crystal and china
ornaments, it’s how I imagine the apartment of a 1970s politburo
bigwig might have looked.
Conical, spherical and chess-piece-shaped crystal trophies – the
spoils of two decades spent at the pinnacle of the chess world –
dominate theroom. In time, Kasparov breezes in and offers greetings in
his flawless English, spoken with twangs of American, Russian and – it
seems to me – Dutch, making up an accent that is difficult to
place. The furrowed brow is unmistakable, and behind it the intellect
of perhaps the greatest chess brain in history.
It’s nearly a year since he was arrested at one of the rallies of his
Other Russia coalition, which features everyone from Trotskyists to
libertarians united by their marginal status and opposition to the
Putin regime. He briefly entertained the hope of running for the
presidency, but administrative barriers were put in his way.
Since the election of Putin’s protégé, Dmitry Medvedev, in
March,Kasparov seems to have faded somewhat from public view, I
say. What’s he been up to?"I don’t like to call it an election: that
gives the wrong impression," he quickly replies. "Barack Obama had 65
million voters. Medvedev had one."
He makes nonsense of the idea that Medvedev might have a genuine
liberal agenda, immediately launching into a political diatribe. It’s
a "typical trick of undemocratic regimes" to put a supposed reformer
in place. (Medvedev has introduced a bill to extend the presidential
term from four years to six, setting off speculation that his mentor
intends to return to the post very soon.)
And in the new climate of financial doom, with oil prices plummeting,
Kasparov predicts a rocky ride for the Putin-Medvedev tandemocracy.
"I would be surprised if this regime lasts more than 18 months," he
says. "I don’t know what form change will take. We just have to hope
it won’t be violent: this country has had enough violence. But the
regime is pushing it towards that. Soon there will be hundreds of
thousands of people on the streets."
The National Assembly, a debating forum set up by Other Russia, is
there to help provide a transition when this happens, he says.
This sounds rather fanciful. The Other Russia politicians enjoy very
little public support. This is partly because state control of
television keeps them off the screens, but it is also because people
just don’t seem to want revolutionary change. The massed, street
protests he envisages would surely require a drastic change in the
public outlook, I suggest. Most people I know, even graduates who one
might expect to be politically involved, are thoroughly uninterested
in protest, even if they dislike Putin.
"The 15 per cent of people who make up this ‘new middle class’ – they
are Putin’s strongest support group – have had it good," he
says. "Theycould get credit, they could buy cars, maybe even an
apartment, travel abroad. Now they are facing major problems. You can
lose your job, you can lose your apartment because you cannot
pay. They are used to a passive political mode, but they read the
internet and they see all these billions of dollars disappearing.
Where does the money go? Into the hands of Putin’s buddies. These
people will learn quick political lessons."
Kasparov was born in 1963 in Baku, now the capital of independent
Azerbaijan, to an Armenian mother and Jewish father. His father’s
surname was Weinstein, and his mother’s Kasparyan, which was later
Russified to Kasparov. His talent was immediately visible, and at
seven he began the life of a chess prodigy, training at elite Soviet
academies. By the 1980s he was challenging Anatoly Karpov for the
title of world champion.
Their first match, in 1984 in Moscow, had Kasparov 4-0 down in a
"first to six" tournament. He then managed to draw 17 successive games
before eking a win. With the score at 5-3 to Karpov, after 48 games,
the match was calledoff. Kasparov was furious, feeling he had the
upper hand at last and would go on to win. The next year, he got his
revenge and won the title.
Karpov was always seen as an establishment character, while Kasparov
was the young rebel, a distinction that has remained until today:
while Kasparov leads the Other Russia coalition of dissidents, Karpov
sits in Putin’s Public Chamber.
Kasparov had always been politically engaged, but the decision to go
into politics properly didn’t come until the end of 2004, and was
swayed by two events. One was his win in the Russian chess
championships, the only major title to elude him previously. "I had my
final dream in chess. When my son was born in the mid-1990s, my dream
was for him to be old enough to see his father playing and winning."
The other event was the Beslan school siege, which ended with Russian
special forces storming the school and hundreds of children
dying. Although he had had his doubts about the Putin government since
its inception in 2000, Beslan was the final straw. "I had to make a
choice. Either you stay in this country and fight it, or you
leave. You can’t live here and pretend it doesn’t bother you."
Kasparov decided to stay. Is it a choice that he regrets now? After
all, he had the money and the contacts to live a luxurious life in any
world city of his choosing.
"We all have our thoughts in the night," he says. "But how can you
leave all these people? As long as I can do it without immediate
physical danger for me and my family, I will do it. I am still
protected by my name – nota very reliable protection, but some
protection. A lot of other people in our movement don’t have that."
His name hasn’t stopped the harassment, however. Last year I was due
to interview him before the Duma elections, and had bought a plane
ticket to St Petersburg, where he was travelling for an opposition
rally. I had been promised an interview during the flight, but the
night before, he was arrested at the Moscow rally, and given five days
in prison. "They probably arrested me because you were planning to
interview me the next day," he jokes.
Vociferous critics of the Kremlin have a habit of coming to sticky
ends. One need only recall the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, shot
dead in Moscow, or Alexander Litvinenko, who died of polonium
poisoning in London two years ago.
Kasparov is permanently followed, he says, and his phones are
tapped. On the night of the US elections, a battered Soviet-era car,
without licence plates, rammed into his car while he was giving a
radio interview. He retains a retinue of bodyguards, one of whom sits
in on our interview. It’s not going to protect him against polonium,
but it does guard against attacks by young fanatics from
Putin-friendly youth brigades such as Nashi.
A "fan" once asked him to autograph a chessboard then beat him around
the head with it. His press conferences and speeches have been
disrupted by tear gas and a phallus-shaped mini helicopter that was
swatted into oblivion by a security guard.
Kasparov’s move into politics also revealed his real friends. "Many
people just disappeared," he says, with a smile that suggests he’s
happy to see the back of them. "When I was released from prison last
year I asked my mother who called during the five days I was inside. I
was quite surprised at how many people didn’t even call."
Support did come from many people, however, and in one case it was
thoroughly unexpected. Karpov, with whom Kasparov had not spoken for
years, tried to visit his former foe in prison. "The prison guard told
me he had a packageof chess magazines from Karpov and I thought he was
joking," says Kasparov. "We had a lot of bad blood; I didn’t and don’t
approve of his politics, but for him to put the champions’ brotherhood
above everything else was a big step."
Putin is less forgiving. One of the rare occasions when he so much as
acknowledged Kasparov’s existence was when he was asked by Time
magazine during his "Person of the Year" interview last December about
the former chess star’s arrest. "Why do you think Mr Kasparov was
speaking English rather than Russian when he was detained?" said Mr
Putin, looking irritated at the question. "Did this not occur to you?
First and foremost his deeds were not aimed at his own people but
rather at a Western audience. A person who works for an international
audience can never be a leader in his own country."
Perhaps Putin had a point. At times before the election, it seemed as
though Kasparov might be suffering from "Saakashvili Syndrome" –
assiduously courting the foreign press, like the Georgian President,
while neglecting his domestic audience. But in the case of Kasparov,
there’s a fairly good reason for this. Entrenched on the "stop-lists"
that name those people deemed unsuitable for airtime on
state-controlled television, he is invisible to most Russians. When
he is mentioned, it is usually in a defamatory context, with the
implication that he has an American passport, and is working for
foreign enemies of Russia.
"I know two languages, and if I speak to English-speaking journalists
I speak English," says Kasparov when I put Putin’s criticism to
him. "The problem is that there was no Russian TV camera when I was
arrested. I would be very happy to present my views on Russian
television. I can speak much better Russian than Putin. If he wants to
check, we can do it on television in public, and find out who speaks,
or writes, better Russian."
He makes his money now on the international lecture circuit, where he
brings chess strategy to bear on personal and business problems. Next
month he is speaking at the Leaders in London conference, along with
the likes of Rudy Giuliani, the former presidential hopeful, and the
business guru Jack Welch.
Does chess – a cerebral, individualistic pursuit if ever there was one
– really help solve real problems? Yes, says Kasparov: "I talk about
strategy, tactics, achieving your potential, decoding the complexity
of life, so it’s mainly about the big picture. I feel I have enough
experience to pull these things together."
Kasparov rules out a return to professional chess, saying that "the
river only flows in one direction". These days, his chess playing is
restricted to quickfire games online. Does he play anonymously, I ask?
"Maybe they know who I am," he says with a faint grin.
It seems unlikely that his successes in chess will be matched on the
political playing field, but ultimately, he says, that doesn’t
matter. "This is a battle I don’t care whether I win or not. For me it
was a moral imperative. You play, your chances are slim, but it’s
something you do because you believe you must do it."

A dissenter’s moves

1963 Born Garry Weinstein, in Baku, Azerbaijan. At the age of 12, he
adopted his mother’s maiden name, Kasparyan, which was modified to the
Russian Kasparov.

1976 Won the Soviet junior championship in Tbilisi.

1978 Became a chess master after winning the Sokolosky tournament in
Minsk. He went on to become the youngest competitor in the Soviet
chess championship.

1980 Won the world junior chess championship before making his debut
for the Soviet Union at the Chess Olympiad in Malta.

1984 Won the right to play world No 1 Anatoly Karpov for the world
championship. After going down five games to nil, Kasparov fought back
to take the match through to 48 games. The match was ended without
result. Joined Communist Party.

1985 Became youngest world champion in history by defeating Karpov
13-11 in Moscow. Several rematches followed. The fifth and final one
took place in New York and Lyons in 1990.

1986 Created Grandmasters’ Association to give players greater say in
the world chess organisation, FIDE.

1987 Elected to the Central Committee of Komsomol.

1990 Left Communist Party to help form the Democratic Party of Russia.

1993 Played and beat Nigel Short outside FIDE jurisdiction under the
organisation of the Professional Chess Association. This meant that
there were two world champions: Kasparov in the PCA and Karpov in
FIDE.

1996 Campaigned for Boris Yeltsin.

1997 Defeated by Deep Blue – the first time a computer had beaten a
world champion in match play.

2000 Lost world championship to his former student Vladimir Kramnik.

2003 Published the first volume of his five-volume ‘My Great
Predecessors’.

2005 Retired from serious competitive chess. Created the United Civil
Front with the aim of preserving electoral democracy in Russia.

2007 Arrested for organising the March of the Dissenters. Later said
that he would run for the Russian presidency, but had to withdraw
after he claimed his party, the Other Russia coalition, was being
suppressed by the Russian government.

©independent.co.uk

OSCE Minsk Group co-charmen arrived in Nagorno Karabakh

Panorama.am

18:44 15/11/2008

OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRMEN ARRIVED IN NAGORNO KARABAKH

The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen Mattew Bryza, Bernard Fassier and
Yuri Merzliakov arrived in Stepanakert. It is planned that the
co-chairmen will have a meeting with the President of Nagorno Karabakh
Bako Sahakyan. Note that the President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan is
currently in Stepanakert. On Monday the co-chairmen will return to
Yerevan and have a press conference.

Add that yesterday the co-chairmen had a meeting with the Foreign
Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandyan.

Source: Panorama.am

Boxing: Darchinyan’s trash talk yanks Americans’ chain

Sydney Morning Herald, Australia
Nov 16 2008

Darchinyan’s trash talk yanks Americans’ chain

Stathi Paxinos
November 16, 2008

BROWSE through some of the American boxing forums on the internet and
you could come across some surprising criticism of Australia’s newly
crowned and undisputed super-flyweight world champion, Vic Darchinyan.

There among the entries of his fans are those who brand him as
arrogant and a trash talker. It is somewhat ironic criticism given the
boxing industry and many of its participants, particularly in America,
have perfected the art.

Darchinyan, who is winning a growing support base and the interest of
American television networks with his all-action style in the ring,
certainly does not lack belief in his abilities and is not afraid to
tell people about it. It is a style that has put some off-side – most
notably a possible next opponent in Mexican Jorge Arce.

But Australian boxing commentator Paul Upham said the criticism was a
case of the straight-talking Sydney-based Armenian being misunderstood
– because his predictions of beatings were delivered with such
conviction, "people [think] he is too serious or too arrogant".

"There’s no doubt that a lot of them don’t like him over the way he
talks," Upham said. "I found it to be completely misrepresented
because once you get to know Vic you find that it’s not arrogance,
it’s not cockiness, it’s just supreme confidence.

"I remember when he first came to start training under Jeff [Fenech]
after the Sydney Olympics in 2000. He hadn’t even had a pro fight and
he would talk about guys he would eventually fight and he would say,
‘I will fight him and I will beat him.’

"But to be the best in any weight class or to be one of the elites you
have to have that supreme confidence that no one else can beat you."

But ESPN’s Dan Rafael, one of America’s leading boxing writers, said
he had mainly come across positive feelings for Darchinyan.

"The boxing fans I encounter, most importantly, like watching him
fight because he doesn’t mess around," Rafael said. "He gets in there
and tries to knock your head off. He makes fights that are
entertaining, that people like to watch – so the trash talk, that just
goes with the territory.

"Some people think it’s funny, some don’t like it, some enjoy it but
mainly they like watching the guy fight, they’re boxing fans and they
know what they’re going to get with a Vic Darchinyan fight and that is
probably someone going to get knocked out."

Darchinyan has every reason to have a bit of a strut after his
nine-round demolition of highly regarded Mexican world champion
Christian Mijares earlier this month.

Darchinyan had gone into the fight as the International Boxing
Federation belt holder but a marked underdog against Mijares, who held
the World Boxing Association and World Boxing Council titles. Most
believed the Mexican would be too classy, with a poll of boxing
writers backing Mijares 26-6 before the fight.

Still, Rafael insisted the reporters had no disrespect for Darchinyan.

"I think everybody’s got respect for Vic," he said. "They just looked
at it as a style thing where Mijares was the type of guy who could
solve the kind of fighter that Vic is. Obviously we were wrong and
congratulations to Vic for doing what he said he’d do."

The question now is where to from here for Darchinyan, a former
flyweight world champion. The feisty 32-year-old has been talking big,
saying he wants to win as many world titles in as many weight
divisions as he can.

His manager, Elias Nasser, said the priority was a fight against Arce,
although he said the match-up was looking less likely as negotiations
dragged on. If it falls through, Darchinyan will probably move up to
bantamweight, where his camp has already made approaches to WBC
champion Hozumi Hasegawa and WBO title-holder Gerry Penalosa.

However, apart from potentially equalling Fenech’s effort of winning
world titles in three weight divisions, bantamweight holds little
attraction for Darchinyan because of its lack of big-name opponents. A
world title there would be used as a stepping stone to bigger paydays
in the super-bantamweight division against the likes of Israel Vazquez
and Rafael Marquez – and the possibility of a world title in a fourth
weight division.

First, however, Darchinyan has his eye on claiming the super-flyweight
WBO title from highly rated Fernando Montiel, thus putting his name
among the few to have held the four major belts in the one division at
the same time.

"If I collect four belts I don’t think it will ever happen again in
the history of boxing in this weight division," Darchinyan said.

"It’s too hard."

The Wave Vanishes And Nothing Remains

THE WAVE VANISHES AND NOTHING REMAINS
Lilit Poghosyan

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
14 Nov 08
Armenia

During the recent days the radicals diligently develop the version
of the inter-party crisis "ripening" inside RPA.

On this occasion RPA Vice-Chairman, MP Razmik Zohrabyan responds
our questions.

"They say the Republican Party again "splits", this time because
of sharp controversies linked with the appointment of the head of
the faction."

"Nothing special happened. But because you asked I must say that this
is not the issue to cause "serious discontent" inside the party. This
chitchat started when the head of the faction Karen Karapetyan was
appointed as the head of the Presidential staff and Hovik Abrahamyan
was elected as Speaker of NA. The appointment of the head of the
faction took a bit long, because here the standpoint of the Leader
of the Party is really important and at that time the President was
engaged in foreign policy issues, the preparation of the declaration
on the settlement of Karabakh issue, etc.

I must repeat that there is no discontent inside the party, but the
Republican Party is a living organism, living with its party-political
problems and naturally there can be different approaches, in the
issue of the appointment of the head of the faction as well.

What we need is a qualified person, someone who has experience in
working with people, a good organizer, to be able to work with 64 MPs
of the faction. In this regard Galust Sahakyan has great experience
in working with people, he used to be the head of the faction which
he implemented very successfully, and when the Leader of the Party
proposed his candidacy during the session of the council, we perceived
it quite normally.

As regards Edward Sharmazanov, whose name was also circulated, he is
an active, skillful, young political figure who could also work in
that position. In my view whole life is before him. So I don’t see any
problem among the old and new republicans, pro-Njdehs and "komsomols".

"Robert Kocharyan’s possible "return" is a matter of anxiety for some
people. Do you think the second President really intends to "take"
the majority of NA and form his own government as the representatives
of the Armenian Pan National Movement state in terror."

"Some months back Robert Kocharyan "handed over" the power and frankly
I don’t think he hurries to hold the position of the Prime Minister
or the Speaker of NA or any other post. Power is not that sweet. It
demands lots of suffering."

And besides that for such action there should be a demand. For example
if something jeopardizes the national security and the incumbent
President can’t solve that issue and there is20a requirement for a
second leader.

At the moment I don’t see such demand. Serge Sargsyan is quite able
to solve issues."

"Can Moscow declaration become a trap for the Armenian party. Don’t
you think Azerbaijan can breach the agreement and attack Karabakh?"

"I don’t think the declaration will blunt our vigilance. There
have been certain cases in the history, when the two parties signed
agreement on not using force, but one of the parties has breached
the agreement. But we shouldn’t overlook the fact that Russia, which
is a powerful superpower, is one of the parties to the declaration,
which has got its own interests in the region and will never allow
new start of Armenian -Azerbaijani conflict, even if the third party
tries to provoke the war."

"How do you estimate the situation created in the pro-oppositional
camp.

When will they start their active actions?"

"I have already underscored that when a political force is leaded
from outside they can’t take decision on when to become active. At
the moment they are disoriented. If tomorrow they are instructed from
outside that they must continue their demonstrations, they will do so,
speculating Karabakh issue.

If they are really guided by national interests and they consider
Madrid principles unacceptable for the Armenian party, they shouldn’t
quit demonstrations, on the con trary they should have tried to
put pressure on the international community and our authorities to
avert the signing of any agreement which enshrines these principles,
instead of stepping aside "to give possibility to the ruling power
to solve Karabakh issue without any obstacles."

Albert Mkrtchyan: "Psychological War Is The Worst"

ALBERT MKRTCHYAN: "PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR IS THE WORST"

Panorama.am
20:07 14/11/2008

"I am classified with those directors who don’t like to speak about
their films until revising themselves. That’s why I have presented
my new film "the sunrise of sad street" to my Russian colleagues,"
said Albert Lazarian. Mr. Lazarian said that movie critic Russian
Armen Medvedev told him that was one of his best films.

The presentation of the current film took place in Gyumri, on 30
October, and then it was accessible in "Moscow" cinema. Public TV
will show the film in the coming week. The film tells about Karabakh
war, Armenian blockade and a family. Though the film is about war,
only one shooting is heard through the film. "War scenes I’ve tried to
describe through psychological war, which I guess the most frustrating
type of war," said Lazarian.

The heroes of the film are Anahit Kocharyan, Guyzh Manukyan, young
actors Vardan Lazarian and Armen Sargsyan. According to the director
of the film, most of his heroes are not actors at all. "If I see what I
need in them, I put on other spices on them myself," said the director.

France Proposes Closer EU-Georgia Ties

FRANCE PROPOSES CLOSER EU-GEORGIA TIES

PRESS TV
Nov 14 2008
Iran

French President Nicolas Sarkozy (L) Georgian President Mikheil
Saakashvili (R) France has assured Georgia of closer ties with the
EU as the presidents of the two countries meet on the eve of an
EU-Russia summit.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy met with his Georgian counterpart
Mikheil Saakashvili on Thursday at the summit venue in the southern
French city of Nice.

Sarkozy assured Saakashvili that he would be pressing for closer
Georgian links with the European Union, Reuters reported. He suggested
that Georgia and the EU develop a special partnership.

This is while officials of the French presidency said that the
timing of Sarkozy’s meeting with Saakashvili contained a political
signal. "Even if tomorrow there is an important summit between the EU
and Russia, that doesn’t mean that Europe has abandoned its positions
on Georgia, quite the contrary," said the official who spoke on
condition of anonymity.

On Monday the EU states had agreed to re-launch talks on a partnership
agreement with Moscow that had been frozen following Georgia’s August
7th military adventure into the breakaway province of South Ossetia
which was followed by a robust Russian response and brief occupation
of parts of Georgia.

"After the Georgian crisis this summer, the Europeans realized
that they needed to develop cooperation between the EU and European
countries that are not members like Ukraine, Georgia and Armenia,"
said an official at the French presidency.

France currently holds the rotating presidency of the 27-member
EU until the end of the 2008 and Sarkozy played a leading role in
diplomatic efforts to resolve the Georgian crisis.

Officials from Sarkozy’s office have said that the proposed EU-Georgia
partnership would be similar to the agreement that is being negotiated
between the EU and Ukraine.

Armenian Fund For Information Technologies: 25% Of Population Use In

ARMENIAN FUND FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: 25% OF POPULATION USE INTERNET IN ARMENIA AND 10% – USE IT EVERY DAY

ArmInfo
2008-11-14 16:04:00

ArmInfo. 25% of population use Internet in Armenia and 10% – use it
every day, the leader of the Armenian Fund for Information Technologies
Garegin Chugaszyan told journalists today.

He also added ‘About 80 thsd families or 1/10 of Armenian population
use Internet every day. The figure is not strict since no relevant
poll was held, though we need it, as the number of permanent Internet
users serves a certain criterion of education level of population and
its involvement in the modern life. This is very important to us as
highly appreciating our past we also want to become a country of the
present and future’, – Chugaszyan said.

BAKU: OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen Hope Azerbaijan’s Occupied Lands

OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRMEN HOPE AZERBAIJAN’S OCCUPIED LANDS WILL BE RETURNED

Trend
Nov 13 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, November 13/ Trend News, corr A. Badalova/
"The co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group on the settlement of
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict hope that Azerbaijan’s occupied lands will
be returned.

"We hope that Azerbaijan’s occupied lands will be returned to this
country," Matthew Bryza, US co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group said
to journalists in Baku on November 13.

"Presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia should find a common ground on
this issue. Today there is confidence and respect between Presidents
of Azerbaijan and Armenia," Bryza said.

Concerning Turkey’s mediation on settlement of conflict, Bryza said
Turkey is a member of Minsk group, but not co-chairman. "Turkey
is a very important country. It is NATO ally and it should play an
important role in Caucasus which is happening at the moment," he added.

Armenia has occupied 20% of Azerbaijan’s territory – Nagorno-Karabakh
and seven surrounding regions. The occupation began in 1988. Azerbaijan
lost the Nagorno-Karabakh, except of Shusha and Khojali, in December
1991. In 1992-93, Armenian Armed Forces occupied Shusha, Khojali and
Nagorno-Karabakh’s seven surrounding regions. In 1994, Azerbaijan
and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which time the active
hostilities ended. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Russia,
France, and the US) are currently holding peaceful, but fruitless
negotiations.

ANKARA: EU Silent Despite AKP’s Mounting Sins

EU SILENT DESPITE AKP’S MOUNTING SINS

Hurriyet
Nov 14 2008
Turkey

It should be much more apparent to European diplomats today, that
the relative leniency with which the European Union is approaching
the Erdogan government’s sins against democracy and human rights,
is being used to the advantage of the ruling Justice and Development
Party, or AKP.

We have been trying for weeks to warn that selective criticisms
leveled at Turkey by EU officials are disheartening pro-EU elements
in Turkey. For example, the same officials who made negative remarks
against the AKP over the closure case, have not been vocal in the
face of some highly telling, and to that extent worrying, salvos from
government quarters.

Granted the 2008 progress report touches on, almost with kid gloves
and indirectly at that, Prime Minister Erdogan’s attacks against
the media in connection with corruption cases, and on Chief of the
General Staff Gen. Basbug’s threats to the media in connection with
the fight against terrorism.

This, however, does not appear to have made much of an impression
on the government, which is supposed to take Turkey closer to the EU
by initiating reforms and making headway according to the Copenhagen
Criteria. Put another way, the Erdogan government does not consider
itself reprimanded by the Progress Report. It behaves, rather, as if
it could care less about what is in the report.

However its "sins against the Copenhagen Criteria" are increasing,
yet no one, other than European deputy Joost Lagendijk that is, appear
to have much to say on this front. Just a look at the government’s
recent record should send shivers up European spines. Especially
among those who invested so much hope in this government.

w Prime Minister Erdogan calls for media boycotts because of the way
it reported the Deniz Feneri corruption case in Germany, an extension
of which clearly existed in Turkey and involved quarters very close
to the AKP.

w Prime Minister Erdogan justified the use of sawed-off shotguns by
individuals against pro-Kurdish demonstrators, saying citizens have
the right to protect themselves. The fact that he is inciting armed
violence does not appear to concern him much.

w Prime Minister Erdogan started to play the ultra-nationalist and
told pro-Kurdish politicians to either respect the flag and nation
or leave the country. He conveniently forgot there were times his
party had been attacked for being "Islamist" by opponents who said,
"Either respect secularism or go to Saudi Arabia."

w In the same vein, AKP Yozgat deputy Abdulkadir Akgul while arguing
with pro-Kurdish deputy Hasip Kaplan in Parliament, went as far as
saying, "I would of course take pleasure in shooting those who are
against their own state and nation."

w State Minister Nimet Cubukcu is more concerned with slinging mud
at Sarah Ferguson and the ITN network for exposing abuse in centers
for disabled children in Turkey, than explaining what she intends
to do to bring these centers up to EU standards. Having been caught
out two years ago in a similar incident in Malatya, exposed by the
Turkish media on that occasion, she clearly has done little in the
meantime to improve standards in these centers.

w Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul came out with remarks justifying what
amounts to ethnic cleansing by saying that if Greeks and Armenians
remained in Anatolia, Turkey would not be a national state today. He
totally disregarded the pain and suffering of Greek, Armenian and
Turks alike in the past, and left open the question of his opinion on
the Kurdish problem in this country, relative to his despicable views.

w The government continues to be reluctant to act in the face
of mounting police brutality, torture, and abuse of women, which
continues unabated, with impunity, and remains committed to the
tradition of protecting those guilty of the crimes. When it does
act, on the other hand, it does not do so on its own initiative,
but because the issue has caused a major public outcry.

w The Prime Ministry tries to ban "undesirable reporters" from
covering Prime Minister Erdogan by canceling their accreditation,
even though it can not accuse the banned reporters of writing untruths
or of fabrication. The government followed the lead of the General
Staff in this respect, showing once again how much of a defender
of the traditional status quo it has become. The bottom line here
is that Mr. Erdogan wants "AKP friendly news" and loses control,
both verbally and otherwise, when he does not get it.

Even this list and the relative silence in the face of it in Europe
makes one wonder if Brussels is following these developments as closely
as one would expect, with a view to giving appropriate signals at the
right time to Ankara, to try and reign in some of the abuses and spur
the government toward an EU perspective.

Granted the EU’s hard working envoy in Ankara, Ambassador Marc Pierini,
said in a piece he wrote for the Daily News recently, "The Progress
Report is not meant to comment on the acts and words of a given set
of personalities, nor on specific events." He is absolutely correct
about this, as the progress report by its nature is about principles
and criteria rather than personalities. But what we are referring
to here is other Europeans, be they from individual EU countries,
the European Commission or the EU Parliament, who were so vocal on
issues such as 301, Orhan Pamuk, the Hrant Dink murder and the AKP
closure case in the past, but prefer to remain silent in the face of
further serious abuses by the AKP.

Europe should not, however, be blinded by what appears to be support
for the AKP, and against those elements it finds undesirable in
Turkey. Especially now the Erdogan government has started to behave
just like those elements.

The whole idea behind the EU perspective is positive change under
the umbrella of lofty ideals, which include human rights and press
freedom. If this does not happen, then the EU will start to lose its
meaning, even for Turks who have supported this perspective strongly
hitherto.