Glendale Councilman Calls For Recruitment Of More Armenian Firefight

GLENDALE COUNCILMAN CALLS FOR RECRUITMENT OF MORE ARMENIAN FIREFIGHTERS

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 17, 2011 – 10:34 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Glendale fire officials plan to develop a recruitment
strategy to diversify their ranks and make it easier for existing
personnel to be promoted from within and stay with the agency.

As part of the five-year strategic plan, officials will create a
recruitment committee to identify the city’s demographics and develop
methods for hiring applicants who reflect those ethnic categories.

They will also develop programs that would allow firefighters to learn
skills from more experienced employees and give them an opportunity
to promote to other positions.

Councilman Rafi Manoukian raised concerns at the meeting about the
department’s recruitment process, saying former Glendale Fire Chief
Christopher Gray had assured him 10 years ago that recruitment efforts
would generate more Armenian American firefighters to reflect the
local community.

“Ten years later, the result is zero,” Manoukian said. “Nothing
is there.”

But Scoggins said the department has made progress, recruiting one
woman and four Armenian American firefighters within the last decade.

And about 40% of the hires were from a variety of ethnic backgrounds,
including African, Armenian and Korean Americans, Scoggins said.

Among the other goals that came out of the strategy sessions: develop
plans to maintain and replace facilities and equipment; streamline
incident response planning; analyze workloads; and find ways to better
communicate and work together with other agencies for mutual aid.

Officials also want to evaluate the effectiveness of community
education programs, Glendale New-Press reported.

Commentary: Positioning For The Kazan Summit

COMMENTARY: POSITIONING FOR THE KAZAN SUMMIT
By Edmond Y. Azadian

Posted on June 16, 2011 by Editor

Expectations as well as doubts abound regarding the forthcoming summit
in the Russian city of Kazan, which will bring together the presidents
of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia June 25-26.

The same presidents have walked the same road in the past, raising
hopes for a breakthrough, but disappointment has followed each and
every meeting. After issuing declarations and verbal commitments,
the Azeri leaders have raised the ante upon returning home. Most
significant violations happened especially right after the Meindorf
declarations where the parties had agreed to refrain from military
solutions and concentrate on the negotiations. But the ink was not
yet dried on that declaration, when Azerbaijan’s President Ilham
Aliyev provoked a border skirmish, claiming many victims.

Based on this kind of checkered background, neither the pundits nor
the negotiating parties seem hopeful for a positive outcome. Although
the Kazan summit is ostensibly called to negotiate on the basic
principles worked out by the co-presidents of the OSCE Minsk Group,
symbolism still matters if a positive outcome will be ascribed to
Russia whose president, Dmitry Medvedev, will be mediating between
President Serge Sargisian and Aliyev. Certainly the other parties
do not wish to lose the limelight. The summit has already claimed
one casualty, which was Iran’s president’s visit to Armenia; it was
supposed to take place on the eve of Kazan summit, but was mysteriously
postponed indefinitely. Although the Armenian government presented the
lame excuse that the documents were not ready to be signed, another
possibility which may not be ruled out is that should there be any
tangible results at the summit, Iran should not share any credit.

The Armenian side is skeptical of the outcome of the summit. The Azeri
side is even vocally pessimistic and already gloomy predictions have
been issued by high government officials.

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian has announced that
Yerevan has positively responded to the basic principles worked out
by the OSCE group and has challenged Baku to do the same.

On the Armenian front, the negative voices are heard mostly from the
Karabagh leaders.

Recently, Ashod Ghoulian, the speaker of the Karabagh parliament, and
Georgy Petrossyan, the foreignminister, addressed a press conference.

Ghoulian’s prediction is: “No serious breakthrough is anticipated at
Kazan, because preconditions for that breakthrough are non-existent.

But a preliminary declaration is possible because the co-presidents of
OSCE and the mediators are hard at work to bring some results.” But
Karabagh leaders also add that any agreement at the summit cannot
be considered as final, if the Karabagh government does not give its
stamp of approval.

The Russian side is cautiously optimistic, while the spokesman for
the Minsk Group Anjei Kasprschik has even divulged some details about
the basic principles.

The US government has also sounded a positive note. Indeed in her
farewell message, the outgoing US ambassador, Marie Yovanovitch, has
expressed her regret that she is leaving Yerevan at a “critical” and
“historic” moment, indicating that an impending solution is about to
happen to the most intractable problem in the region.

The Russian president of the Minsk Group, Igor Popov, has specified
that “the documents which will be discussed at the summit need more
refinement and further deliberation, which are being conducted on
the Foreign Ministry level. We do hope that in Kazan the parties will
demonstrate some constructive approach.”

Even Turkey’s Foreign Minister Davutoglu has expressed a glimmer
of hope.

The basic principles are composed of six steps, while those steps
begin with the evacuation of “occupied territories” for Azerbaijan’s
Foreign Minister Mamedyarov and the expression of the will of the
people (referendum) about the Karabagh status, Kasprschik indicates
that the interim status of Karabagh cannot be less than what the
region enjoys at the present time, but what is crucial is that
Azerbaijan will have to acquiesce to that status which eventually
win international recognition.

One of the sticking points among the six principles is the composition
of the peacekeeping forces in the interim period while agreements
begin to be implemented on the ground. It is believed that the

Minsk Group negotiating parties will come up with that peacekeeping
force.

So much criticism was directed at the Minsk Group negotiations that
the pressure is mounting on the opposing parties to move forward.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry has, in a way, verbalized that pressure
through its official representative, Alexander Loukashevich. He has
stated: “There is great hope that the Deauville declaration by the
three presidents will help the sides to realize that the process for
a peaceful settlement has reached a limit after which they have to
come to an agreement to implement them. Any delay beyond that point
will indicate a destructive intention.”

The French co-president of the Minsk Group, Bernard Fazier, has
similarly expressed hope for action by stating: “We are hopeful
that the presidents will give their approval at the Kazan summit to
the final draft of the documents presented to them. We refer to the
documents which were delivered to them in March in Sochi.”

While pressure is mounting form all sides and hopeful signs are in
the air, Azerbaijan’s leaders continue their war threats or negative
statements. Thus the Azeri president has visited Serbia and although
Baku does not recognize Kosovo’s independence but Mr. Aliyev has
seized the opportunity to reiterate his eternal refrain: “Serbia,
like Azerbaijan, is suffering from separatism. We hope that your
territorial integrity will one day be realized.”

Two other contradictory statements from Azeri officials indicate that
Baku is in the process of using carrot and stick policy, hoping that
one of them will work.

Thus the spokesman for Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry, Elbar Sabiroglu,
has announced, “The Armenian side, through its actions is contributing
to the possibility of a military solution to the Karabagh conflict.

Azerbaijan will be liberating its occupied territories from the enemy.

We are in the process of getting ready for war.”

Any government, prepared to sign a peace agreement, would prepare
its population for that situation. These announcements are far from
preparing Azeri people for a peaceful solution.

On the other hand, the deputy foreign minister of Azerbaijan has
made an contradictory statement, perhaps intentionally, for public
consumption as a carrot policy, saying: “We are not interested to
renew the war. We still believe that there is possibility to resolve
the problem through diplomatic means. Why should we think about war?”

In this chaotic atmosphere where contradictory statements and political
pressures are in action, any positive step at the Kazan summit will
constitute a miracle and hailed by all parties.

http://www.mirrorspectator.com/2011/06/16/commentary-positioning-for-the-kazan-summit/

Rendahl: Sticky People

RENDAHL: STICKY PEOPLE
By: Kristi Rendahl

Thu, Jun 16 2011

A friend of mine describes many non-Western cultures as being
“sticky.” Sticky people don’t recognize arbitrary boundaries of
personal space. They assume carte blanche to invade, intrude, and
otherwise insert themselves into any given situation, whether with
family or a perfect stranger, and everyone expects it. No matter how
you slice the world-East and West, or North and South-this illustrates
a profound difference in how people interact.

Sticky people don’t recognize arbitrary boundaries of personal space.

They assume carte blanche to invade, intrude, and otherwise insert
themselves into any given situation, whether with family or a perfect
stranger, and everyone expects it.

Armenians are a sticky people. Those I know and love, and even
those I don’t, will not silently watch a child misbehave, even if
it’s someone else’s child. They will never stop commenting on other
people’s decisions or asking all-too-personal questions. They wouldn’t
even let me go very long with a bad haircut.

I can thank them for helping me develop a thick skin. It used to
offend me (more) when people offered frank advice that implied-nay,
asserted-that I was somehow falling short. Now, I filter most comments
through the sticky concept lens.

There is my salon favorite: “Haven’t you ever considered waxing your
eyebrows?” There was the seamstress who remarked while measuring my
waist, “Nihar es yerevum, bayc ahagin tumblik es” (You look thin,
but you’re actually kind of chubby). And then there is the running
commentary from day to day on whether one looks fatter or skinnier,
uglier or prettier, tired or rested.

No doubt, people are truly concerned about each other’s wellbeing.

I’ll never forget the panic in one man’s eyes when I sat on a pile
of cold stones. He ran to my side and grabbed my arm to pull me off
the pile, saying that it would hurt my “organism” and I wouldn’t be
able to have children. Of course, if you have children, you will be
on the receiving end of all kinds of unsolicited parenting advice. And
there is not enough space in this column to describe the never-ending
rebukes for not having children at all.

It is as though sticky people are saying, “Hey, we’re trying to do
something here and we need you to conform to the project. If you’re
going to do something different, then you had better seek approval
from us first.” Or maybe they’re saying, “We care about you, we want
you to be the best that you can be, and we can tell you how.” Maybe
they’re saying both.

Shortly after arriving in Armenia in 1997, someone I knew from the
U.S. remarked about how frustrating he found it that Armenians obsessed
about their physical appearance even to walk to the village store,
while in their homes the toilets didn’t flush properly. Over time,
I came to appreciate that pride. Appearance, after all, is one of
the few things a person has some control over when everything else
is in a perpetual state of transition. I suppose that’s part of the
reason there is a salon on nearly every block of central Yerevan.

Most of the time, Armenians appear just as willing to turn a critical
eye on themselves. They regularly berate themselves for taking too
much pride in their history and not spending enough time working to
make the country better today. They bemoan the decline of the quality
of the education system. They argue that absolutely everyone is engaged
in some level of corruption and that it will lead to the demise of the
nation. And they reminisce about how people used to help one another,
but now think only of themselves.

Knowing that there is this culture of inward and external critique,
I have always been surprised by what Armenians turn a blind eye
to. The classiest camping trip I’ve been part of was with a group of
friends in Armenia. Near Garni, we spread a tablecloth on the ground,
placed proper dish settings for some 15 people, and put out food and
drink fit for a Cilician king. En route to Yerevan after the outing,
we passed trash-filled ditches, but no one said a word about it. I
asked myself, and my companions, how could this exist in the same
country as gourmet camping?

It actually angered me when I went to the ski resort one winter and
saw that the outhouse door hadn’t been closed properly before a recent
storm. A simple bent nail could have kept the door shut. Instead,
the wind had blown snow inside, and people had defecated on top of
the snow and ice-covered squat toilet. When you’ve got to go, you’ve
got to go, I guess, but I couldn’t believe that the same people who
dressed in their finest to have coffee with their neighbors, and who
all but lit candles for a camping picnic, would be able to accept this.

A friend once explained what he believes are the roots of this
inconsistency. He said that during the Soviet Union, your home began
at the front door, and nothing else was your responsibility. There
was no understanding that your home might also be your building, your
neighborhood, your city, and your country. The explanation holds water,
but then what?

Well, obviously the sticky culture has rubbed off on me since I sit
here and freely offer my insights when no one in particular has asked
for them. Go figure.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2011/06/16/rendahl-sticky-people/

Activist Says Shirak Governor Refuses To Provide Information

ACTIVIST SAYS SHIRAK GOVERNOR REFUSES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION

Tert.am
16.06.11

Governor of Armenia’s Shirak province does not provide the president
of the council of Asparez journalists’ club with information related
to the 70-million dram aid delievered to residents from 2005-2009.

In a statement issued on Thursday, the club said that Ashot Giziryan
has been refusing Levon Barseghyan to provide him that information
for a year now.

It comes after Giziryan was obliged to provide the information under
question, following a court ruling over the case.

The statement also claims that the club has received only some
incomplete data, adding that a thorough examination of it reveals
that there are several names which match.

It also adds that the amount given to one person range from 10,000
drams to 1,5 million drams, mainly from 20,000 drams to 50,000 drams.

The club claims these numbers leave doubts and make them think that
the officials in charge of these funds have abused their power.

Hay Dat French Bureau Outraged Over UNESCO’s "Civilized Vandalism"

HAY DAT FRENCH BUREAU OUTRAGED OVER UNESCO’S “CIVILIZED VANDALISM”

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 16, 2011 – 20:25 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Hay Dat French Bureau expressed outrage over the
unpleasant occurrence at Paris-hosted Khachkar Craftsmanship exhibit,
where the signs describing original location of khachkars were removed.

As Hay Dat stressed in its statement, the “civilized vandalism” of
UNECSO, inconsistent with the Organisation’s mission, arose strong
protest in France’s Armenian community. As the statement said,
such attitude will be responded by the community accordingly. “The
incident proves the involvement of Azerbaijan and Turkey. By yielding
to political pressure, UESCO stained its good name,” the statement
stressed.

On June 15, a photo exhibition titled Khachkar Craftsmanship opened
in Paris in the framework of scientific conferences organized by
the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO).

“On the opening day of the exhibition hosting the Armenian Deputy
Minister of Culture and Armenian Ambassador in France Vigen
Tchitetchian, the guests faced an unpleasant surprise,” said Jean
Eckian, freelance French journalist.

The attendees were embarrassed to see that the quotations indicating
the place of origin of each Khachkhar (cross-stone), had been removed
without any clarification on the part of organizers of the event. Only
dates were indicated under the photos, according to Eckian.

He said that the Armenian organizations of France and Switzerland
vigorously protested against attempts to deny the cultural heritage
of Armenia.

On Nov 17, 2010, UNESCO decided to inscribe Armenian Cross-Stones
Art, symbolism and Craftsmanship of Khachkars on the Representative
List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Taking into
consideration the fact that Khachkar is the acting tradition for
all Armenians, its inscription on the UNESCO Representative List of
the Intangible Cultural Heritage provides grounds for maintenance
and transition of knowledge, rituals, traditions and craftsmanship
connected with Khachkars to next generations.

Meanwhile, Azerbaijan attempted to protest the decision and claimed
that Kachkars “are not Armenian.”

Ani Resort Hotel Complex In Hankavan Ready To Welcome Guests

ANI RESORT HOTEL COMPLEX IN HANKAVAN READY TO WELCOME GUESTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 16, 2011 – 20:12 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – On June 16, Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan
attended the opening ceremony of Ani Resort hotel complex in Armenian
town of Hankavan.

The new building was constructed on the site of Erebuni spa complex
demolished back in Soviet times. At present, Ani Resort contains
40 rooms and 12 cottages, with the capacity of 140 people. The
reconstruction was launched in 2005, when Harut Atchemyan, the founder
and owner of Ani Resort purchased the nearly-demolished building.

Ani Resort reconstruction took USD 7 million in investments, creating
2000 new jobs for residents of nearby villages.

Mr. Atchemiyan is further planning to open a farm to manufacture
agriculture products; construction of a skating-rink and ski tracks
will follow.

Armenian Delegation To Participate In St. Petersburg International E

ARMENIAN DELEGATION TO PARTICIPATE IN ST. PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 16, 2011 – 19:14 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian delegation led by Economy Minister Ara
Petrosyan will participate in St. Petersburg International Economic
Forum June 17.

CEOs of top international companies will be attending the 3-day forum
to be held under the aegis of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The
Forum aims at discussing solutions for the global challenges and
new approaches in handling a post-crisis economy. The event also
provides an opportunity to attract foreign investment as well as
increase tourist inflow.

WiFi Internet Test Launch In Armenia’s Buses

WIFI INTERNET TEST LAUNCH IN ARMENIA’S BUSES

hetq
14:22, June 16, 2011

Starting today, 5 buses in Yerevan will be equipped with free wi-fi
internet, in a pilot project by the Yerevan Municipality and Orange.

Five buses on mainly students routes are now equipped with Orange
MyFi 3G/wi-fi modems which create a mobile wi-fi zone and allow to
connect simultaneously 5 devices: smartphones, netbooks, tablets etc.

Bruno Duthoit, Orange Armenia CEO, said, “This is an interesting
and important project for us, as it will allow us to test our MyFi
service and its possibilities in different areas of the city, and
from the other hand it will make our services more accessible. I hope
that Yerevan inhabitants will like this opportunity of mobile w-fi
and they will profit from the time spent in the bus to make it more
interesting. If the pilot project is successful, we will think about
wi-fi-izing more buses”.

Congres US : Resolution Sur Le Genocide Armenien ?

CONGRES US : RESOLUTION SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN ?

Publie le : 16-06-2011

Info Collectif VAN – – ” Une nouvelle
resolution sur le genocide armenien va etre presentee a la Chambre
des Representants cette semaine. L’aspect positif de l’adoption
de resolutions reside dans la dimension ethique, psychologique et
politique qu’elles contiennent. La moralite exige que le massacre
de toute une nation ne soit pas oublie ou ignore. C’est la negation
continue du genocide armenien par le gouvernement turc qui pousse les
Armeniens a soumettre de telles resolutions au Congrès annee après
annee. ” Le Collectif VAN vous propose la traduction de l’editorial
du journaliste armeno-americain Harut Sassounian, publie par The
California Courier, le 16 juin 2011. Selon certaines sources, la
Commission des Affaires etrangères de la Chambre des representants,
qui avait adopte la resolution N252 en mars 2010, aurait recemment
envoye une lettre au Congrès pour y inclure le projet de loi sur
l’ordre du jour du 14 juin. Le texte des resolutions concernerait
egalement la protection du patrimoine architectural armenien chretien
en Turquie. Voir le texte de la resolution en pdf.

Legende photo : L’Eglise armenienne Sainte-Croix d’Aghtamar, sur l’île
de Van (Turquie), a ete restauree et rouverte en tant que ” Musee “.

Une seule messe annuelle y est autorisee par le gouvernement turc.

Pourquoi adopter une resolution sur le genocide armenien pour la
troisième fois ?

De Harut Sassounian Publie par The California Courier Editorial de
Sassounian du 16 juin 2011

Une nouvelle resolution sur le genocide armenien va etre presentee
a la Chambre des Representants cette semaine.

La première question est : pourquoi demande-t-on au Congrès d’adopter
une resolution pour la troisième fois ? Comme tout le monde le sait,
la Chambre des Representants a adopte deux fois des resolutions
reconnaissant le genocide armenien, en 1975 et en 1984. Qu’est-ce
l’adoption d’une resolution pour la troisième fois apporterait aux
Armeniens ? Et si elle est adoptee cette annee, il y aura-t-il une
autre tentative l’an prochain pour qu’elle passe une quatrième fois ?

D’aucuns pourraient avoir la fausse impression que de telles
resolutions aideraient les Armeniens a obtenir des compensations de la
Turquie pour leurs terres confisquees et leurs biens voles. Ce n’est
tout simplement pas vrai. Les resolutions commemoratives expriment
“le sentiment” du Congrès et n’ont pas force de loi. En outre, si ces
resolutions avaient un veritable avantage quelconque, les Armeniens
en auraient tire parti au cours des decennies qui ont suivi leur
adoption !

L’aspect positif de l’adoption de resolutions reside dans la dimension
ethique, psychologique et politique qu’elles contiennent. La moralite
exige que le massacre de toute une nation ne soit pas oublie ou
ignore. Et pourtant, c’est la negation continue du genocide armenien
par le gouvernement turc qui pousse les Armeniens a soumettre de
telles resolutions au Congrès annee après annee. Malheureusement, les
Administrations americaines successives, qui ont soutenu et encourage
les negationnistes turcs, et ont fait des jeux de mots contraire a
la morale sur l’extermination de 1,5 million d’hommes, de femmes et
d’enfants innocents, ont aussi leur part de responsabilite dans cette
histoire sordide.

Les avantage psychologiques de l’adoption de ces resolutions est la
satisfaction ressentie par les descendants des victimes du genocide
de voir leur douleur et leurs pertes reconnues par la legislature de
la plus grande democratie du monde.

Le tumulte politique, a chaque fois qu’une resolution sur le genocide
armenien est presentee au Congrès, est dû au comportement scandaleux
du gouvernement turc. Des dizaines de resolutions commemoratives sur
diverses questions sont adoptees chaque annee par le Congrès americain,
et pourtant pas une seule ne fait la une des journaux.

Mais, puisque les dirigeants turcs creent un tel chaos en menacant les
Etats-Unis, en envoyant des delegations de haut niveau a Washington,
en utilisant les services d’entreprises de lobbying très puissantes, et
en depensant un capital politique precieux, ils finissent par attirer
l’attention de millions de gens sur le genocide armenien. Bien que
l’intention du gouvernement truc soit de dissimuler le massacre des
Armeniens survenu il y a presque un siècle, leur reaction hysterique
permet involontairement de faire connaître au monde entier les crimes
lâches commis par leurs ancetres.

Avec un peu de chance, le gouvernement turc recourra encore une fois
a ses tactiques habituelles d’intimidation, attirant ainsi l’attention
de la communaute internationale sur la question du genocide armenien.

La nouvelle resolution ne pourra que profiter de cette publicite
generee par les Turcs, puisque la Chambre a majorite republicaine ne va
sans doute pas s’y interesser rapidement, non pas que les Democrates
mieux disposes aient fait preuve d’un plus grand degre d’enthousiasme
pour la faire adopter l’an dernier, lorsqu’ils etaient majoritaires !

Il est certain que les responsables turcs seraient encore plus utiles
s’ils pouvaient declencher des crises inattendues avec les Etats-Unis,
forcant ainsi la main tant de l’Administration Democrate que de la
majorite Republicaine de la Chambre a soutenir la resolution sur le
genocide. Entre temps, la communaute armeno-americaine doit rester
active sur cette question et prete a agir au moment opportun, ce
qui obligera les Turcs a depenser des millions de dollars pour son
lobbying !

Cette opportunite se presentera peut-etre a la fin du mois, avec
une possible confrontation sanglante entre la seconde flottille
“humanitaire” turque et la Marine israelienne, ce qui pourrait
declencher la colère des Etats-Unis et des dirigeants israeliens,
les obligeant a soumettre au vote de leur legislature respective
les resolutions en attente sur le genocide. Bien que les Armeniens
puissent etre indignes de voir la question du genocide transformee
en match de football politique, ils n’ont pas vraiment le choix,
puisqu’ils ont ete pareillement offenses lorsque la resolution n’a
pas ete adoptee pour toutes les mauvaises raisons !

Allant au-dela de la question du genocide, les Armeno-Americains vont
sans doute presenter d’autres resolutions cette annee au Congrès, liees
aux relations armeno-turques : — Exhorter la Turquie a restituer au
Patriarcat armenien d’Istanbul les eglises armeniennes confisquees,
et les autoriser a retrouver leur fonction religieuse et non etre
des musees, des mosquees ou des sites touristiques ; — Honorer le
juriste distingue Raphael Lemkin, qui inventa le terme genocide suite
aux massacres des Armeniens en 1915 ; — Recommander la levee du
blocus sur l’Armenie, impose par la Turquie et l’Azerbaïdjan ; et —
Soutenir la protection des droits humains de toutes les minorites en
Turquie (Alevis, Armeniens, Assyriens, Grecs, Juifs et Kurdes).

Les elections parlementaire et presidentielle se profilant, et les
evenements imprevus se deroulant dans les pays de la Mediterranee
orientale, nous serons peut-etre confrontes a une saison politique
chaotique et agitee. Pour les Armeno-Americains et leurs partisans,
rester bien informes, actifs et engages dans la poursuite des interets
armeniens est decisif.

©Traduction de l’anglais C.Gardon pour le Collectif VAN – 16 juin
2011 – 07:17 –

Lire aussi :

Armenian genocide bills ramp up diplomatic tension, cables show

Resolutions Demanding Return of Confiscated Churches, Genocide
Recognition to Be Introduced

Urging the Republic of Turkey to safeguard its Christian heritage
and to return confiscated church properties.

Update: Resolution pressing Turkey to return churches and calling
for U.S. recognition of armenian genocide introduced

Retour a la rubrique

TELECHARGER : Le texte de la resolution

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=54996
www.collectifvan.org
www.collectifvan.org

13 Armenians Are Prisoners In Moscow Hotel

13 ARMENIANS ARE PRISONERS IN MOSCOW HOTEL
By Alex Chachkevitch

Moscow Times

June 14 2011
Russia

Valida Avanesyan has been a prisoner in the Hotel Yuzhny on Moscow’s
Leninsky Prospekt for more than six months.

She stays in a friend’s room. When she gets hungry, she asks friends
to shop for her and bring her some food. Her only connection with
the outside world is the balcony.

She cannot leave because the guards at the entrance won’t let her
back in.

“I’ll keep fighting for a place to live for me and the other people
here until the end,” she said.

Avanesyan, 59, is one of 13 Armenian refugees who had lived in Yuzhny
for two decades and are now being kicked out. The residents were
among hundreds of thousands of Armenians who fled Azerbaijan in 1990
to escape ethnic violence that escalated into war the next year.

Hotel Yuzhny became a temporary shelter for more than 100 displaced
Armenians, most of whom were eventually provided with permanent housing
elsewhere in the country. However, some stayed, purportedly tricked
by their informal leader into rejecting offers that he deemed unworthy.

Since then, the residents have sunk ever deeper into a legal quagmire
that would give Franz Kafka a migraine. The actions of all parties
involved in the conflict are justified to some degree – but the
stalemate has resulted in elderly people being evicted with nowhere
to go and no time to gather belongings.

The crackdown began June 3, when court marshals attempted to put Galina
Mesropyan and Raisa Gasparova out on the street. A spokesman for the
nongovernmental Committee for Human Rights and a representative of
the residents managed to talk the marshals into putting the eviction
on hold Tuesday.

But the armistice will last only 10 days, said Valery Gabisov,
secretary for the committee, which has been working with the residents
for eight years. He could not say what’s next.

The trouble began in 1994, when state-owned Yuzhny was privatized. It
has since changed hands several times before ending up with the
current shareholders, led by Guta Group, which has a 65 percent stake
in the premises.

The owners have not announced what they plan to do with the property,
but Yana Kuzina, a real estate consultant with CB Richard Ellis,
said they most likely would demolish the hotel and replace it with
a residential building.

The neighborhood could indeed yield a gold mine, with a two-room
apartment in the area fetching about 5.8 million rubles ($208,000),
according to the web site of real estate agency Stolichniye Metry.

The owners have offered to resettle the 13 former refugees to the town
of Furmanov in the Ivanovo region, about 320 kilometers from Moscow.

They have also offered an alternative compensation of 1 million
rubles per resident, Gabisov said. But with the average cost of a
square meter in Moscow at 197,500 rubles ($7,000), the compensation
would not be enough for a single room in a shared apartment.

The residents have refused, triggering a court battle that they
lost earlier this year when the Gagarinsky District Court authorized
Yuzhny’s owners to move the Armenians to 11 apartments in Furmanov,
despite their refusal to move.

The judge was scheduled to instruct court marshals on how to proceed
with the eviction next week. But they never waited for instructions,
beginning to remove unwanted residents earlier this month by putting
them out on the street – not on a train to Furmanov.

“I guess business is more valuable than people,” Mesropyan said.

The marshals forced Mesropyan, 59, who uses crutches to walk, out of
the hotel without a chance to pack her clothes, medicine and other
belongings, she said. Gasparova managed to sneak into her son’s room,
not targeted by marshals at the time, and lock herself inside.

Mesropyan was left outside with one set of clothes, a purse and
two crutches.

“They don’t have the right to kick us out on the street without giving
us a normal place to live,” Mesropyan said.

She said the early eviction was an attempt to pressure the residents
into accepting the Furmanov housing. “Nor can they make us unwillingly
sign anything,” Mesropyan said, standing in the street near the hotel.

She found temporary housing at her friends’, but said it was only a
short-term solution.

A previous owner of the hotel tried to clear it out in 2004 without
providing alternative housing, but residents fought back in the same
court that now sanctioned their removal.

The hotel’s director, Alexander Markin, declined to comment to The
Moscow Times, as did representatives of Guta Group.

The residents, who obtained Russian citizenship in the early 2000s,
said they don’t want to move because they are Muscovites after
20 years.

“Why would I move somewhere else far away?” said Grigory Khachaturyan,
62, who works as a metals worker in Moscow. “My granddad and mother
are buried here. I have my son, daughter and grandson, whom I raised,
here. I don’t want a second displacement.”

Lawyer David Gariashvili, who represents the residents, said providing
housing to residents is still the government’s job.

The court, however, refused to consult with representatives of state
agencies, including City Hall’s housing department, in the dispute,
he said.

City Hall could put the residents on a program to provide housing
if they can prove they have been living in the capital for more than
10 years, Nikolai Kolesin, a spokesman for the city’s housing policy
department, said by telephone.

But they cannot do that – at least from a bureaucratic point of view.

The Armenians have never obtained residency papers because the hotel’s
private owners have refused to issue them. Several attempts to prove
in court that they have lived in Moscow for years ended in failure,
Gariashvili said.

In fact, the Armenians are not even refugees legally speaking,
because when they fled Baku it was part of the Soviet Union – so no
one crossed any borders.

Because of that, the residents cannot turn to the Federal Migration
Service for help with housing, Gariashvili said.

“The problem started when that building was first put on the auction
table,” said Andrei Stolbunov, head of the rights group Spavedlivost
(Justice). “The government was supposed to make someone responsible
for these people then.”

The owners, however, cannot be faulted for trying to clean up their
legally obtained property, Stolbunov conceded.

The residents blamed the confrontation on the leader of their group,
whom they appointed by consensus upon arriving to Moscow. The leader,
Rachik Sarkisov, rejected all offers of apartments in other parts of
Russia in the mid-1990s, hoping for housing in Moscow, and he acted
without informing the others, the residents said.

Sarkisov left when the crackdown began, the residents said, adding
that they believed he was paid off to move out. Repeated attempts to
reach him for comment were unsuccessful.

“Back then, if I were offered a place in Chukotka, I would’ve gone
there,” balcony prisoner Avanesyan said, referring to the region
near Alaska. “But now, with my health going downhill, I can’t imagine
moving anywhere that far.”

Unlike other residents, Mesropyan said any normal place would suffice
her as long as the town had an ambulance.

“I’m not asking for a palace here, but I want to be sure that I don’t
get fooled,” she said, adding that she and other residents feared
they might not actually receive the promised apartments.

Gariashvili said his main worry was that the case might set a
disastrous precedent in which private corporations are able to take
on the rights and functions of the government.

“If the government comes and tells me to move because it’s planning
to lay down a road where I stand, I will,” he said. “But if some
stranger says he likes my car and wants to take it from me and give
me something else for it, I don’t have to agree.”

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/13-armenians-live-like-prisoners-in-moscow-hotel/438810.html