Oil’s Vital New Power

TIME
Jan 12 2007

Oil’s Vital New Power

Friday, Jan. 12, 2007 By VIVIENNE WALT/BAKU
,9171, 1576858,00.html

In the control room of Azerbaijan’s sprawling oil terminal near the
capital, Baku, Bala Mirza sits peering at a fuzzy map on a computer
monitor. The outline of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey looks like
little more than a jumble of hills and farming towns. But for the
engineer, 41, what lies underground has rocked his world: a new
1,100-mile oil pipeline, which in recent months has tied this tiny
country on the edge of the Caspian Sea to the huge Western market.
"There is a lot of oil and a lot of money," says Mirza, who spent 14
years earning about $10 a month working on a creaking old Soviet oil
rig. "And because there is a lot of money, our lives will surely
improve."

The stakes in Azerbaijan’s new pipeline are far higher than the
fortunes of just Mirza and his family. This Muslim republic, directly
north of Iran and tucked into the southwest corner of the vast former
Soviet empire, is suddenly a central player in one of the West’s most
distressing problems: how the U.S. and Europe will secure enough oil
and gas to power cities, factories, airplanes and cars–in short, how
to keep our entire modern lives afloat. Since last June, hundreds of
thousands of barrels of oil a day have surged through a pipeline
running from Baku through Georgia’s capital, Tbilisi, to Turkey’s
Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. Named the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC),
the $4 billion pipeline is one of the world’s longest and is operated
by the British-American oil company BP, with partners that include
U.S. oil companies Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Hess. By spring, about
1 million bbl. a day will move down the pipe, and BP could increase
that soon after to about 1.5 million bbl. a day. A parallel BP
pipeline opened last month to send hundreds of billions of cubic feet
of natural gas from the Caspian to Western Europe, in order to break
the Continent’s overwhelming reliance on Russia.

As a piece of engineering, the BTC pipeline is a brilliant
geopolitical bank shot. Built over three years, the pipeline had to
skirt war zones in the Armenian-occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region in
Azerbaijan, and in Georgia, which has been in a conflict with South
Ossetian separatists. Then there were the engineering issues: the
pipeline had to pass under about 1,500 rivers. At one point BP hired
400 archaeologists to sift through the mountain of ancient artifacts
unearthed along the way. Equally daunting was the political
wrangling: two of the three countries changed Presidents during
construction, requiring lengthy renegotiations over the deal.

But to the countries and the global oil companies, the benefits are
so compelling that they trump politics and old ethnic rivalries. The
Caspian’s oil and natural gas reserves, which some estimates have put
as large as 200 billion bbl. (vs. 260 billion in Saudi Arabia), could
deliver economic independence to the South Caucasus region and energy
independence to the West. "This is about diversifying energy
supplies," says Michael Townshend, a BP executive who ran the project
in Baku until last year. "It is not from the Middle East and it is
not from Russia."

Fifteen years after the Soviet Union’s collapse, it’s tempting to
think of the cold war as history–until you land in Baku. This is the
front line of a new East-West contest, one that is as consequential
as the nuclear-weapons face-off of the past: the battle for energy
supplies among countries heavily dependent on imported oil and gas,
which include the U.S. and the E.U., plus the rocketing economies of
China and India. That necessity is a powerful weapon in this new
battle. Shortly before Christmas, Russian President Vladimir Putin
forced Royal Dutch Shell to cede control of Sakhalin II, the world’s
biggest oil and gas project, to the state-owned giant Gazprom,
opening the North Pacific island’s vast resources to Asian markets.
The $7.45 billion price was small to Gazprom, whose value has soared
from $9 billion in 2000 to $270 billion today, after years of record
energy prices.

That’s given Russia immense power to dictate terms for much of
Europe. In one power play, the Russians briefly blocked gas last
winter to Ukraine, leaving millions freezing. In December, Putin
threatened to do the same to Belarus unless it began paying
Western-level gas prices. Belarus agreed. Infuriated that
Azerbaijan’s new BP-operated pipeline to the West bypasses Russia,
Putin has said he intends to double gas prices for Azerbaijan, which
in turn threatened to stop exporting its oil through the
Russian-controlled section of the Baku-Novorossiysk pipeline to the
Black Sea. "We want to put an end to this!" says Khosbakht
Yusifzadeh, slamming his fist on his desk. He is the aging first vice
president of the State Oil Co. of Azerbaijan and spent decades as a
Soviet official. The country’s best shot at breaking Russia’s grip is
BP’s parallel gas pipeline, which in December began transporting gas
from Azerbaijan’s massive Caspian Sea gas field named Shah Deniz. "I
see it now," says Yusifzadeh, looking at a wall map of the Caspian
Sea in his office. "A photo of Shah Deniz with the caption: THIS IS
THE PLACE THAT MADE AZERBAIJAN INDEPENDENT OF RUSSIA."

That could take a while. Azerbaijan–which BP says stands to earn
about $230 billion from BP’s pipeline during the next 20 years–has
rarely been independent either of Russia’s influence or foreign
treasure hunters. Baku’s élite included the Rothschilds during the
1890s, when Azerbaijan produced half the world’s oil supply. Oil
production slid steadily as the Soviets let the infrastructure rot.
Today hundreds of rusted oil derricks and pump jacks, many predating
World War II, cram the seafront outside Baku like a scrap-metal
forest, with old Soviet tractors turning several wells. The
astonishing sight was memorialized in the 1999 James Bond movie The
World Is Not Enough. Towering over the area now is a 16,000-ton
water-injection platform being built by BP, which will be towed to an
oil field 75 miles offshore, where the company expects to pump about
320,000 bbl. a day beginning in April 2008. "This is a time of big
change," says Mushvig Osmanov, 26, an Azeri engineer for BP, standing
atop the half-built platform, gazing at the crumbling old oil wells.
"Suddenly we have Western styles and tastes."

Those new energy-fueled tastes are turning Baku into a boomtown,
despite widespread poverty in the rest of the country. Regular
Azeris, who have an average cash income of $1,140 a year, are reeling
from inflation (tomatoes have recently doubled in price). But much of
Baku is upbeat and partying. "There’s a mood that Azerbaijan is now
sustainable," says Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov. BP’s operation
has brought in thousands of oil workers and businesspeople, mostly
British, who pack nightclubs with names like Le Chevalier and Le
Mirage to dance with local women dressed in spiked boots and
miniskirts. Baku’s billboards announce this season’s store openings,
including Harry Winston, Cartier and Giorgio Armani. Others offer
18.7% interest at the Bank of Baku. One evening, I watched a fashion
show to open the new store of Escada, the German luxury label. Baku’s
rich sipped California Merlot, while models flown in from Moscow
walked the makeshift runway. There are 300 apartment buildings
currently under construction in Baku and 250 others have recently
opened, says Elnur Asadov, a real estate agent who guides me around a
new three-story mansion with an indoor swimming pool and sauna.
"People buy apartments when the ground is broken and sell when the
building is up," he says. "That way they can double their money."

The U.S. sees its alliance with a republic of just 8.4 million
people–about the same population as New York City–as key to
securing energy supplies at a time when China and the rest of Asia
are competing for new sources. The Caspian, which is largely
unexplored, probably accounts for 7% of the world’s oil reserves, and
the oil flowing through the new West-bound pipeline still represents
a mere 1% of global supply. But ultimately some of the gas from
Khazakstan and Turkmenistan’s much larger natural-gas fields across
the Caspian from Baku could flow through BP’s pipelines, turning to
the West rather than to Asia. "The pipeline is changing the strategic
map in a very major way," says a senior State Department official.

A glance at the map shows why: Azerbaijan is sandwiched between two
energy giants–Iran to the south and Russia to the north–allies and
old U.S. foes whose reserves will last decades. The U.S. has three
interests in Azerbaijan: securing energy, spreading democracy and
fighting terrorism. Vafa Guluzadeh, a former adviser to President
Heydar Aliyev, whose decade-long rule over Azerbaijan ended in 2003
when he maneuvered his son Ilham’s succession, remembers translating
a phone call from President Bill Clinton to his boss in 1994.
"Clinton said, ‘Mr President, we need to diversify the oil pipelines.
We need a new route.’ It was all a very strategic plan," says
Guluzadeh, sipping coffee in Baku’s Park Hyatt, where Western and
Asian businesspeople fill the $250-a-night rooms.

Thirteen years later, Azerbaijan is one of the few Muslim countries
to fight in Iraq alongside American soldiers. The U.S. has financed
two radar stations in Azerbaijan, one a few miles from the Iranian
border. U.S. Navy SEALs have trained teams to guard the Caspian’s
underwater pipelines, and U.S. Customs agents have overseen border
and airport security systems. With Baku just a couple of hours’ drive
from Iran, "Azerbaijan could be the world’s only secular country with
a Shi’ite majority," says the State Department official.

Azerbaijan might be secular, but it is hardly democratic. Local
elections in 2005 and the presidential vote that brought Ilham Aliyev
to power in 2003 were both flawed, according to U.N. and American
election observers. A free press? Hardly. One afternoon in December,
TIME’s team was taken to a police station near Baku and questioned
for three hours about our activities. In Baku, the late former
President’s face peers down from billboards, and a huge statue of him
stands in one of the many Heydar Aliyev parks. On the third
anniversary of Aliyev’s death, in December, government television
channels aired round-the-clock programming about his life. The
footage aired also on large screens on street corners.

But can Azerbaijan grow richer without growing freer? Some Azeris
believe Western governments prefer energy security to political
freedom, as was sought in the 2004 revolution in Ukraine–a major
transhipper of natural gas to Western Europe. "The U.S. will never
support democrats in Azerbaijan because of their oil interests," says
Guluzadeh. But Azeris might start to demand more democracy if oil
revenues do not trickle down. The country is listed as one of the
world’s most corrupt by the Berlin-based Transparency International.
"The average citizen is very suspicious of the government," says a
Western official in Baku, who did not want to be named. "But if the
oil wealth is not distributed, you will see people wanting a change."

Back in the oil terminal outside Baku, Bala Mirza, the engineer at
the computer monitor, says he has already reaped benefits from the
new oil boom. His life is barely recognizable from those days when he
earned $10 a month on that offshore Soviet rig. Since joining the
pipeline project in 2003, he has bought a car for himself and for his
father, who worked in Soviet oil production for 30 years. But the
real test of how Azerbaijan has changed will be the future of Mirza’s
daughter, who is now 10. "When all our oil is finished, say, in 50
years from now, there should be no problems for her." So until then,
party on, Baku.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0

ANKARA: Bush Renominates Controversial Ambassador Despite Armenian P

BUSH RENOMINATES CONTROVERSIAL AMBASSADOR DESPITE ARMENIAN PROTESTS

Turkish Daily News , Turkey
Jan 11 2007

Pro-Armenian lawmakers float genocide resolution draft at House to
find maximum number of cosponsors

U.S. President George W. Bush on Tuesday renominated Richard Hoagland,
viewed by Armenians as a "genocide denier," as ambassador to Yerevan
despite protests by American Armenian groups.

A White House statement said that Hoagland’s name was submitted to
the Senate for approval. His confirmation was blocked by a Senate
Democrat in the last Congress.

Analysts said pro-Armenian senators were expected to continue with
efforts to prevent Hoagland from becoming U.S. ambassador to Armenia.

The controversy erupted last May when Bush fired former U.S. Ambassador
to Yerevan John Evans after the latter classified World War I-era
killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide in violation
of the official U.S. policy.

Bush then nominated career diplomat Hoagland to replace Evans. But
Hoagland declined to qualify the Armenian killings as genocide during
his confirmation hearing at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
in June, prompting U.S. Armenians to launch a campaign to block
his appointment.

Despite Armenian efforts, the committee in September approved
Hoagland. But before a floor vote Menendez, a key backer of the
Armenian cause in the Senate, put a hold on his nomination for his
refusal to use the word genocide.

The State Department had hoped that Menendez would lift his veto
after the Nov. 7 congressional elections, won by the Democrats,
but he did not.

Under U.S. law, all senior government officials, including ambassadors,
must win the Senate’s approval, and any senator can indefinitely
block a nomination, however, such moves are rare as they put such
dissenting senators under intense pressure.

Bush needed to resubmit a nomination, because it effectively expired
at the end of the previous Congress in December.

But U.S. Armenians and their backers in Congress continue to oppose
Hoagland. Menendez and the Senate’s top Democrat, Harry Reid, wrote a
letter to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last month asking
the Bush administration to withdraw the nomination.

Also, 97 percent of Armenian Americans oppose the confirmation of
Hoagland as U.S. ambassador to Armenia, according to a new Internet
poll conducted over the past two weeks in nineteen western U.S. states,
the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) said on Monday. Most
U.S. Armenians live in the west.

After his renomination, Hoagland again should appear at the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee for a new confirmation hearing.

Bush’s strategy in reappointing Hoagland is not clear, as it remains
extremely difficult to win the Senate’s approval for the diplomat. He
has an option to install Hoagland in a "recess appointment" when
Congress is not working, but this appointment would be limited to
less than two years. Also recess appointments are politically risky
in general.

In a related development at the House of Representatives, pro-Armenian
lawmakers this week began to float a draft resolution for Armenian
genocide recognition among legislators in an effort to gather a
maximum number of cosponsors for the measure.

The resolution, expected to be sponsored by Adam Schiff, a Democrat,
and George Radanovich, a Republican, is due to be formally introduced
at the House within two weeks, congressional sources said.

U.S. Armenian groups have already said they will seek congressional
passage of at least one genocide resolution before April 24, designated
by U.S. presidents as a day of remembrance for the Armenian killings.

Earlier Armenian efforts for genocide recognition failed during the
first six years of Bush’s administration as the then Republican House
leadership prevented a full floor vote for the measures.

Nevertheless, the Armenians’ Democratic allies won a landslide
victory in the Nov. 7 elections, winning control of both the House
of Representatives and the Senate. In addition, the new Democratic
congressional leaderships favor the Armenian position. New House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, another Californian Democrat, announced before
the elections that she would back the Armenian genocide’s recognition
in the new Congress.

The Bush government, like earlier U.S. administrations, has declined
to qualify the Armenian killings as genocide and urged Congress to
refrain from passing a genocide resolution, saying such a move would
damage ties with Turkey, a key strategic ally.

Turkey’s public is extremely sensitive on Armenian claims, and
successive Ankara governments have warned Washington that any
congressional recognition of genocide allegations would lead to a
review of the entire U.S.-Turkish relationship.

Egemen Bagiş, a top foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, on Tuesday had talks with two legislators
and some staffers at the House to explain that the passage of a
genocide resolution would greatly harm ties between Turkey and the
United States.

John Evans: "My Statement On Armenian Genocide Was Not A Slip Of The

JOHN EVANS: "MY STATEMENT ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE WAS NOT A SLIP OF THE TONGUE"

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.01.2007 14:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ John Evans’s, US previous ambassador to Armenia
statement on the Armenian Genocide ‘was not a slip of the tongue’,
stated John Evans himself in the interview to the Los Angeles
Times. "I knew it was not the policy of the United States to use
the word ‘genocide’. But ninety years is a long time and at some
point you have to call a spade a spade," said John Evans. It is worth
mentioning that the diplomat departed from Armenian on September and
last month officially left the State Department. In his words, by
July 2005, it was absolutely clear that he would be forced out. It is
worth mentioning that during his meeting with San Francisco Armenian
Diaspora on February 19, 2005 John Evans said, "Today I’ll call it
Armenian Genocide." Later, on February 28, 2005, speaking in US Embassy
to Armenia, Evans wanted to introduce clarity into his February 19
statement. "I used the word ‘genocide’, which reflects personally my,
John Evans’s viewpoint, and not of a political figure." he said.

2006 Was Marked By Effective Cooperation Between Armenia And Georgia

2006 WAS MARKED BY EFFECTIVE COOPERATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND GEORGIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.01.2007 15:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In 2006 the Armenian-Georgian relations were
marked by effective cooperation in the spheres of economy, energy,
transportation, agriculture and tourism, says the RA Foreign Ministry
annual report on Armenian foreign activities in 2006.

"A number of visits have taken place between Armenia and
Georgia on high level, actively was working the Armenian-Georgian
intergovernmental economic cooperation commission. In the sphere of
economy continues the construction of Power Transmission Line-400. In
the field of transportation an agreement was reached on transporting
Armenian products through Georgian territory by preferential tariffs
during 2007. The demarcation works of Armenian-Georgian 110-km
borderline are over, and the work in this direction is still going
on." says the document.

As is mentioned in the report, during the last year the Armenian and
Georgian Foreign Ministries continued active cooperation in political
issues. During January and June bilateral visits the foreign ministers
of the two countries discussed issues of cooperation in international
structures, coordination of positions in the sphere of regional
conflicts and the possibilities to deepen the relationship towards
European integration. In 2006 the issues of Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi
railway and the situation in Samtskhe-Javakheti region, where Armenian
population makes up majority, were at the center of attention of the
Armenian Foreign Ministry.

97% Of Armenian Americans Oppose Hoagland Nomination

97% OF ARMENIAN AMERICANS OPPOSE HOAGLAND NOMINATION

Yerevan, January 9. ArmInfo. 97% of Armenian Americans support
opposition to the confirmation of Richard Hoagland as U.S. Ambassador
to Armenia, according to a new Internet poll conducted by the
ANCA-Western Region over the past two weeks in nineteen Western U.S.
states.

This viewpoint is aligned with the policy position of the Armenian
National Committee of America (ANCA), which has been leading and
vigorously pursuing this issue in Congress and with the Administration.

The 97% figure is based on polling conducted between December 28,
2006 and January 8, 2007.

The controversy over the Hoagland nomination began with the firing of
his predecessor, John Evans, for speaking truthfully about the Armenian
Genocide. This firing, for breaching the State Department’s policy
of complicity in the Turkish government’s denial of this crime, was
compounded by Hoagland’s outright denial of the Genocide in response
to questions posed during and after his June 2006 confirmation hearing
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Based on growing reservations over the Evans dismissal and, later,
Hoagland’s deeply offensive responses, more than half of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee members and over 60 U.S. Representatives
formally raised their concerns on this matter with the Administration.

Meanwhile, The Los Angeles Times reminds that nearly two years ago,
the former ambassador John Evans did something no U.S. ambassador to
Armenia before him had done: He used the word "genocide" – in public
– to describe the deaths of about 1.2 million Armenians at the hands
of Ottoman Turks.

It has long been a sore point with Armenian Americans that the U.S.
government does not refer to the killings that began in 1915 as
genocide, and Evans’ use of the word did not signal a change in that
policy. It did set off a slow-boiling controversy that eventually
cost him his job.

In a short interview, his first since leaving the State Department,
Evans declined to discuss his motives in making the genocide statement,
but said that "it wasn’t a slip of the tongue."

"I knew it was not the policy of the United States" to use the word
"genocide," Evans said.

"Ninety years is a long time," Evans added, referring to the decades
since the genocide began. "At some point you have to call a spade
a spade."

Tariffs For Services Increase By 0.2% In 2006 December In Armenia

TARIFFS FOR SERVICES INCREASE BY 0.2% IN 2006 DECEMBER IN ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan
Jan 08 2007

YEREVAN, JANUARY 8, NOYAN TAPAN. A 0.2% growth of tariffs for services
rendered to population was registered in 2006 December as compared
with November in Armenia.

According to the data of RA National Statistical Service, the growth
was mainly conditioned by 0.2-0.8% growth of tariffs for services in
spheres of rest organization, domestic services, medical, transport,
cultural services.

Tariffs for services of housing, communal, communication, education
system, public catering, legal and banking spheres have remained
unchanged as compared with November.

Sergey Parajanov’s Films And Collages To Be Presented Within The Fra

SERGEY PARAJANOV’S FILMS AND COLLAGES TO BE PRESENTED WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF YEAR OF ARMENIA IN FRANCE

Noyan Tapan
Jan 08 2007

YEREVAN, JANUARY 8, NOYAN TAPAN. Within the framework of the Year
of Armenia in France, on January 9, Sergey Parajanov’s birthday, the
exhibition of more than three dozens of collages of the world famous
film director will open at Toulouse film library. As Zaven Sargsian,
the Director of the Parajanov House-Museum informed the Noyan Tapan
correspondent, the artist’s works will be presented in a number of
other cities of France as well.

In his words, the film director’s collages and sketches prepared for
films will be presented at the National Art Higher School of Paris
from February 13 to April 8. Retrospective show of S.Parajanov’s
films will be organized in the city of Bobigny, on March 14-31, and
an exhibition entitled "Parajanov: Demonstrative Art" will open in
Saint Etienne from April 20 to June 18 where more than 8 dozens of
the film director’s works will be presented.

Rush to hang Saddam seen as legally questionable

Rush to hang Saddam seen as legally questionable
By Steve Negus

FT
January 1 2007 18:00

Iraq’s government hanged Saddam Hussein only three days after his
final appeal was overturned on December 27, even though it had 30 days
to do so and the decision to rush the deposed dictator to the gallows
was legally questionable.

Most interpretations of Iraqi law would require the signature of
Iraq’s President Jalal Talabani to carry out the execution, or
possibly one of his two vice presidents. Instead, Prime Minister Nuri
al-Maliki himself signed the warrant ` an exception that was
apparently approved by the special tribunal that convicted Mr Hussein,
but irregular nonetheless.

In off-the-record statements to the US media at the weekend, US
officials distanced themselves from the decision. The New York Times
reported that officials had been `privately incensed’ by the rush to
execution, although an unnamed Iraqi official was quoted as saying it
had only gone ahead following a late-night meeting between Iraqi and
US representatives at Mr Maliki’s office.

The US has long insisted that the trial and punishment of Saddam
Hussein were a fundamentally Iraqi process.

BAKU: Nazim Ibrahimov: I Am Not Satisfied With The Idea Of Inactivit

NAZIM IBRAHIMOV: I AM NOT SATISFIED WITH THE IDEA OF INACTIVITY OF AZERBAIJANI DIASPORA

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Dec 29 2006

There is no controversy among Azerbaijani Diasporas

The chief of State Committee on Work with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad
Nazim Ibrahimov’s interview to APA

– Are you satisfied with the present situation of Azerbaijani
Diasporas?

– Azerbaijani Diasporas are developing rapidly. We have not thought
about so dynamic development of the Diasporas. President Ilham
Aliyev’s special care created turning point in the development of our
Diasporas. Now we should prefer to strengthen lobbyism and to choose
the tactics of attacking using our solidarity. We have begun to work
on it. Azerbaijan has always had Diaspora. If Azerbaijani citizen
lives abroad, it means our Diaspora exists.

– How would you estimate the power of the Diaspora?

– Every Diaspora has its history and it has subjective and objective
factors. We have begun to work with our Diasporas recently. At the same
time I do not agree with the idea of the inactivity of Diasporas. Our
national self-esteem does not lag behind, but goes forward. Some forces
tried to make Azerbaijanis forget national back-ground. Azerbaijanis
living abroad establish their organizations and strengthen. And it
means that Azerbaijani Diaspora is strong. In future we will be able to
say that Azerbaijani Diaspora is the strongest Diaspora of the world.

– You are speaking about the power of Azerbaijani Diaspora, but we
do not observe real solidarity.

– When Heydar Aliyev returned from Moscow, I asked him whether the
growth of industrial potential of some USSR countries depend on
leadership or there is another reason. He retold me an interesting
event. He noted that, USSR Political Bureau raised some issues to
take Air-conditioner Plant to Baku. But this plant was built in
Ukraine. Actually not leadership of Ukraine, but the leadership of
the union realized it. If we compare the activity of the Diaspora
with this event, we can say that Armenian Diasporas do not have their
own power. On the other hand there is another factor. Some forces are
for Armenians in information war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. We
should struggle to make world believe that we are just. Though there
are no Armenian Diasporas in some countries of the world, they are
supported. It means when we say that Armenian Diaspora is stronger,
every-one should understand that it is not their power. Azerbaijan
remained under occupation of other empires and states for centuries
and our compatriots lived in different social structures. Therefore
there is difference in mentality. Sometimes it impedes our solidarity.

– The information was spread that an Armenian living abroad transferred
$120m to Armenian state budget. Why don’t we observe these facts in
our country?

– We have not reached this stage yet. Our aim is to help strengthen
the Diaspora in the countries where Azerbaijanis live. You know that
there are strong Armenian businessmen in the world…

– But there are strong Azerbaijani businessmen in the world too.

– We are different from Armenia… I think that Azerbaijan’s economy
is developing rapidly and our financial sources are enough to provide
the country. We intend to help most Azerbaijani organizations in
the world to strengthen. A day will come when rich Azerbaijanis will
define what spheres need help. But now we have no intention to ask
somebody for help.

– Several Diaspora organizations have separated recently, and in most
cases the committee you lead was said to be the cause of it.

– Azerbaijani government’s care and attention on Diasporas’
activity caused fight for the leadership in a number of Diaspora
organizations. There is no controversy in Diaspora organizations.

Even separated organizations unite around Azerbaijan. They can not
agree on the problem leadership.

– What about people leaving Azerbaijan and coming to the country?

– Most of the people left Azerbaijan repent. Most of the emigrants
have returned. We get a lot of letters from Azerbaijanis living
abroad. The majority of them want to return to the country.

– How many Azerbaijani organizations are there in the world?

– Over 300.

– Where is our strongest Diaspora?

– I do not want to answer. Most of our Diaspora Organizations are
working hard.

– When Ramil Safarov murdered Armenian officer Gurgen Markaryan, your
approach to the case was not welcomed. You said that his actions were
not heroic and it was against Azerbaijan. Later you realized several
programs in the direction of recognition of Azerbaijan in Hungary.

What were the results of it?

– We did much. We have never made idle statements. Those who want
to form their policy on Ramil Safarov’s actions are wrong. Ramil
Safarov’s actions had a negative influence on the international image
of Azerbaijan.

– But some think that this incident had positive features…

– Armenians claim in the international organizations that Azerbaijanis
are cut-throat and display facts. I repeat that this incident had a
negative influence on Azerbaijan.

– What is the State Committee established on the struggle against
illegal migrants in Russia doing?

– There is nothing to worry. Corresponding bodies of both countries
are working on it. We try to solve the problem quietly. Azerbaijan
state supports every Azerbaijani.

BAKU: Armenia accused for non-execution of PACE commitments

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Dec 29 2006

Armenia accused for non-execution of PACE commitments

[ 29 Dec. 2006 12:04 ]

The report on implementation of Armenia’s PACE commitments will be
announced in PACE winter session, APA reports.

Some items about non-execution of the commitments are reflected in
the report. The report contains some notes about Armenia’s holding
elections not on international principles, falsification in election
process and unpunished persons having serious legal irregularities.
/APA/