Armenian Orchestra’s Benefit Concerts In Tehran

ARMENIAN ORCHESTRA’S BENEFIT CONCERTS IN TEHRAN

IranMania, Iran
Nov 19 2006

LONDON, November 19 (IranMania) – Prominent Iranian musician Loris
Tjeknavorian is to conduct an Armenian orchestra in benefit concerts
at the Mahak Charity Society in Tehran from November 29 to December 5,
MNA reported.

Austrian pianist Gudwig Walsh and violinist Tomas Theodoroff will also
accompany the orchestra in the program, which has been organized by
the Mahak Charity Society, an institute supporting Iranian children
suffering from cancer.

The orchestra is scheduled to perform several pieces by Johann
Sebastian Bach and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart as well as Kurdish and
Iranian suites and pieces composed by Tjeknavorain during the program.

Tigran Torosyan Met With Chairman Of The RF Federal Council

TIGRAN TOROSYAN MET WITH CHAIRMAN OF THE RF FEDERAL COUNCIL

Public Radio, Armenia
Nov 16 2006

In the framework of the 27th plenary sitting of the CIS
Interparliamentary Assembly Armenian Parliament Speaker Tigran Torosyan
had a meeting with the Chairman of the Russian Federal Council Sergey
Mironov. During the meeting reference was made to the activities of
the CIS Interparliamentary Assembly, the Caucasus Four meeting, as well
as NA Chairman’s upcoming official visit to the Russian Federation.

The meeting of the Caucasus Four, featuring Parliament Speakers of
Armenia, Russia, Georgia and Azerbaijan was held the same day.

Armenia Says Pulling Troops Out Of Iraq "Senseless"

ARMENIA SAYS PULLING TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ "SENSELESS"
Tigran Liloyan

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
November 15, 2006 Wednesday 02:34 PM EST

Armenian Defence Minister Serzh Sarkisyan said it would be "senseless"
to withdraw Armenian troops from Iraq.

"The National Assembly of Armenia will consider the possibility of
extending the mandate of peacekeepers in Iraq. It’s a necessity,"
the minister said on Wednesday upon return from Baghdad, where he
had had talks with coalition troops commanders.

In his view, "Armenia cannot remain only a consumer of international
security but should make its own, even though modest, contribution
to this process."

He said the small but well trained contingent was carrying out its
mission on the level.

The national Iraqi government will take control of some provinces in
the spring of next year and the end of next year the Iraqi army and
police may control the whole country.

Turkish MPs Avoid Meeting British MPs to Discuss Armenian Genocide

PRESS RELEASE

Gomidas Institute
42 Blythe Rd
London W14 0HA

[email protected]

15 November 2006

Turkish MPs Avoid Meeting British MPs to Discuss Armenian Genocide

Over the past year, a group of British MPs and peers have been
considering allegations made by the Turkish Parliament (TGNA) that
Great Britain was responsible for articulating the Armenian Genocide
thesis; that this thesis was a wartime propaganda fabrication
published in the British Parliamentary Blue Book series in 1916 (The
Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire 1915-16); and that the
British Parliament today should rescind that report.

A group of British MPs and peers who looked at these allegations
disagreed with the Turkish position and invited the latter to a
face-to-face discussion. To date, Turkish Parliamentarians have
avoided any such discussion with their British counterparts.

Earlier today, the Gomidas Institute (London) issued a detailed
update on this on-going saga. See

In a press statement, Lord Avebury, Vice-Chair of the Parliamentary
Human Rights Group, stated:

"I very much regret the failure of every one of the 550 MPs of the
Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA) to reply to an invitation to
discuss the events of 1915-16, in which a million and a half Armenian
subjects of the Ottoman Empire lost their lives.

"Following a Letter from the TGNA to the British Parliament
challenging the veracity of the evidence published by the British
Government in 1916 in the Blue Book ‘The Treatment of Armenians in
the Ottoman Empire 1915-16′, a group of MPs and peers wrote proposing
a dialogue between British and Turkish MPs, with academic experts on
both sides, to examine the authenticity of that evidence.

"When no reply was received, I wrote to every Turkish MP
individually, asking if they would be willing to participate in such
a dialogue. Not a single one replied.

"Since neither the TGNA collectively, nor any of its Members, was
ready to defend their position in an open and critical forum, it
became obviously that they would not stand up to an intellectually
rigorous examination. I believe the original Letter fromthe TGNA was
an attempt to stimulate wider Turkish denialism, rather than to
establish communication between Turkish and UK Parliamentarians which
might have clarified interpretation of the events of 1915-16. But the
invitation remains open, and I hope that by publishing this
statement, I may yet prompt some Turkish MPs with the courage to
engage in dialogue."

The Gomidas Institute is an independent academic organisation
dedicated to modern Armenian Studies

_________________________________________ ___________________________________

FROM THE GOMIDAS INSTITUTE WEBSITE

(For full statement with citations and relevant materials see
)

The British Parliamentary Blue Book and the Turkish Grand National
Assembly’s Foray Denying the Armenian Genocide, 28 April 2005

AN UPDATE from Lord Avebury, Vice-Chair of the Parliamentary Human
Rights’ Group and Ara Sarafian, Director of the Gomidas Institute,
London dated 14 April 2006

The 1916 British Parliamentary Blue Book, The Treatment of Armenians
in the Ottoman Empire 1915-16, was the first systematic thesis on the
Armenian Genocide.

This report was composed of:
(a) a significant collection of documents relating to the
treatment of Armenians
in the Ottoman Empire between 1915-16,
(b) an account of how these records were collected and used in
that report, and
(c) an analysis regarding the systematic destruction of
Armenians.

In 2000, the Gomidas Institute published a critical edition of what
has come to be known as simply ‘the Blue Book’, wherein the
original work was subjected to a detailed examination.

This edition:
(a) traced original sources to their archival originals and gave
citations
where original materials could be found,
(b) examined the manner in which the 1916 report was compiled
i.e. how
documents were accepted for inclusion in the British
report, and
(c) checked the final text of documents for fidelity to their
originals.

In doing so, this edition became the essential edition, allowing
students of the Armenian Genocide a far greater insight into the
genesis of Bryce and Toynbee’s work. The critical edition of the
Blue Book identified the United States Department of State as the
main source of information for the British report, and so it was
timely that the Gomidas Institute published United States Records on
the Armenian Genocide 1915-17 three years later.

That publication further facilitates our understanding of 1916
British Parliamentary Blue Book in light of the United States
records.

According to these published and archival sources, the 1916 Blue Book
was the result of a meticulous academic exercise that lent itself to
serious examination.

* * *
In April 2005, The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire
1915-16 was made the focus of a controversy by members of the Turkish
Grand National Assembly (TGNA) who claimed in a letter to the British
Houses of Parliament (‘the Letter’) that:
(a) the 1916 report was a forgery produced for British
propaganda during
World War I,
(b) the British Parliament was responsible for the Armenian
Genocide thesis
as we know it today; and
(c) British MPs today should publicly rescind the 1916 report.

The letter was forcefully worded, and the TGNA’s position included
some citations from
books and archives and bore the signature of all 550 Turkish
Parliamentarians.

On 28 April 2006 the Letter was sent to the Hon. Michael Martin MP,
the Speaker of the House of Commons in London, who was asked to bring
it to the attention of British Members of Parliament. Mr. Martin
forwarded the Letter with its enclosures to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, adding
that he had to ‘remain politically impartial’ in such matters and
that he wanted someone at the FCO to deal with it. Mr. Martin also
stated that he had placed a copy of the letter in the Library of the
House of Commons.

On 8 July 2005, the British Ambassador to Ankara, Sir Peter
Westmacott, responded to the TGNA on behalf of the FCO. Sir Peter
wrote to speaker Bulent Arýnc, explaining that the FCO could not
comment on the 1916 work because it was a ‘Parliament-owned
document’. He also informed Mr. Arýnc that copies of the TGNA’s
letter and enclosures were placed in the Library of the House of
Commons "to which historians have access." Sir Peter then questioned
some of the main axiom of the Turkish letter by adding: "the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office understands that whilst the publication of
the Blue Book may have been regarded as desirable at the time in the
context of the war effort [i.e. for propaganda purposes], none of the
individual reports has been refuted; and few have suggested moral or
intellectual dishonesty on the part of the authors, Lord Bryce and
Arnold J. Toynbee."

The TGNA’s letter was not shown to British MPs as requested and the
British ambassador’s letter was somewhat out of character given the
FCO’s usual pro-Turkish stance on the Armenian Genocide issue.

According to one commentator at the Gomidas Institute, the placing of
the TGNA letter in the Library of the House of Commons and the FCO’s
the stern letter to Ankara were part of a common plan to bury the
issue to avoid further embarrassment to the TGNA and Anglo-Turkish
co-operation in the denial of the Armenian Genocide.

However, the continuing media frenzy in Turkey alerted some British
MPs to the existence of the Turkish letter and these MPs decided to
examine the TGNA’s letter and formulate a response to it.

* * *
On 27 January 2006, Holocaust Memorial Day in Great Britain, a cross
party group of 33 British MPs responded to the TGNA letter. Their
response was sent to the speaker of the TGNA, Bulent Arýnc, and the
Turkish embassy in London. In this letter, the British MPs expressed
their disagreement with the TGNA’s position regarding the 1916
report and they invited their Turkish colleagues to a meeting to
discuss their differences. The British response included a special
report from the Gomidas Institute, as well as a recent insightful
article published in the Journal of the United Services Institute.

There was no response to the British invitation and on 18 July 2006 a
second invitation was sent by email to every member of the TGNA,
again inviting them to discuss the 1916 report. There has been no
response from any member of the TGNA to date. Given the Turkish
Government’s supposed willingness to discuss the Genocide issue, it
would appear incongruous that they should not take up such a
proposition.

* * *
The TGNA’s original letter to London was written after much
deliberation and formal discussion in the TGNA, and in Turkish media
and academic circles throughout the months of March and April 2005.
Some of these discussions were broadcast by Turkish satellite
television, surreptitiously distributed on DVDs in TIME Magazine, and
placed on several web pages. Such discussions, like the TGNA letter,
drew on the voluminous output of Turkish academic institutions and
commentators of recent years. Much was made of the publications of
the Turkish Historical Society, the Historical Section of the General
Staff of the Turkish Army, and the publications of the Prime Ministry
Ottoman State Archives. Given the weight of such opinion, the TGNA’s
letter reflected the position of a powerful segment of the Turkish
state and its supporting institutions. In this sense, TGNA’s letter
was the single most important tract ever written denying the Armenian
Genocide.

However, neither the TGNA collectively, nor a single one of its
Members, were prepared to defend their position in an open and
critical forum, knowing that it was fundamentally contrived and would
not stand up to intellectual rigour. The original letter may have
been an attempt to invigorate wider Turkish denialism, rather than to
establish communication between Turkish and UK Parliamentarians which
might have clarified interpretation of the events of 1915-16. But the
invitation remains open, and it is hoped that by publishing this
statement, some Turkish MPs may yet have the courage to engage in
dialogue.

–Boundary_(ID_1HGiCCsISNqzXAuU80e3J Q)–

www.gomidas.org
www.gomidas.org
www.gomidas.org

ANKARA: Algeria To France: Recognize Your Own Genocide

ALGERIA TO FRANCE: RECOGNIZE YOUR OWN GENOCIDE

Hurriyet, Turkey
Nov 13 2006

Algerian Prime Minister Abdulaziz Belkadem has called on France to
"accept that it carried out genocide" in Algeria, an announcement
that carries particular weight as French Interior Minister Nicolas
Sarkozy leaves today from France for a 2 day visit to Algeria.

Belkadem recalled French President Jacques Chirac’s statement that
"Countries are called on to accept the dramas and mistakes that
they have led the way to" in reference to Armenian claims against
Turkey, and said "We call on France to accept that what it carried
out was a genocide during the years between 1830 and 1962 when it
occupied Algeria. This identification of genocide includes not only
genocide itself, but the attempt to wipe out our cultural and national
identity. They need to remember that in addition to massacring people,
they also erased the cultural wealth of a country."

Meetings between the central-right Sarkozy, who is seen as a likely
candidate for president next year, and Algerian officials are now
expected to take place in the shadow of these calls for genocide
recognition on the part of France.

Le Lapin Nabaztag: reussite francaise qui attend nouvelle version

Agence France Presse
11 novembre 2006 samedi 12:23 PM GMT

Le lapin Nabaztag : une réussite française qui attend une nouvelle version

PARIS 11 nov 2006

Le lapin Nabaztag, le premier objet qui communique grce à sa liaison
avec internet, s’est déjà vendu à 65.000 exemplaires depuis son
lancement l’année dernière, et le petit animal français espère
doubler la mise avec une version plus sophistiquée.

Si son apparence n’a pas changé avec ses 23 cm de haut, son
revêtement blanc et ses deux oreilles mobiles, Nabaztag –lapin en
arménien–, se voit affubler d’un petit nom supplémentaire:
Nabaztag/tag, précise la start-up française Violet qui l’a conçu.

Mais un oeil averti remarquera que l’animal a désormais un nombril
qui cache… un micro. "Le problème de Nabaztag était sa surdité",
fait remarquer l’un de ses concepteurs, Olivier Mével. Il est l’un
des fondateurs de Violet en 2003 avec Rafi Haladjian, autre
précurseur de l’internet.

Le micro permet de parler à son lapin, lui demander d’aller chercher
des informations sur internet avec lequel il est relié en permanence
grce à une carte wifi.

Si vous voulez connaître la météo à New York ou les cours de Bourse,
il ira piocher ces informations sur le réseau. En panne sur la
signification d’un mot, il fouillera l’encyclopédie en ligne
wikipédia pour vous apporter la réponse.

Il lit les podcasts, les fichiers musicaux (MP3), les webradio et
engage même des conversations avec d’autres lapins à l’autre bout du
monde grce à la technologie déjà largement utilisée de la VOIP (voix
sur internet).

Autre innovation : le passage d’un objet devant le nez du nabaztag
déclenchera une action, grce à des étiquettes numériques (RFID). Le
propriétaire d’un lapin attribue une action à une étiquette qui est
lue par un lecteur caché dans le nez. Un enfant pourra ainsi écouter
son histoire favorite en passant sa poupée devant le nez du lapin.

Cet objet bourré de technologie a été présenté en septembre au "Demo
Fall", le rendez-vous des entreprises innovantes de San Diego. La
société Violet espère séduire le marché américain pour atteindre les
300.000 lapins vendus à la fin de 2007.

Signe du succès, une recherche sur Google suscite déjà plus de 2,82
millions de résultats, plus que Jacques Chirac (2,69 millions).

Third Mobile Operator To Appear In Armenia By 2009

THIRD MOBILE OPERATOR TO APPEAR IN ARMENIA BY 2009

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Nov 8 2006

YEREVAN, November 8. /ARKA/. The third mobile telecommunications
operator will appear in Armenia by 2009, Andranik Manukyan told
reporters Wednesday. He explained that the government has made
a commitment that it will not grant a license to a new operator
until 2009.

"The Armenian market of mobile communications is so small that two
operators fully share it," the minister said.

The Russian VimpelCom OJSC (Beeline brand) signed an agreement with the
Greek Hellenic Telecommunications Organization SA (OTE) on purchasing
90% shares of the Armenian ArmenTel Company for EUR 341.9mln.

According to the report by VimpelCom, the company will take the debts
and liabilities of ArmenTel for about EUR 40mln.

ArmenTel Company is one of the two mobile operators in Armenia. It has
the biggest number of subscribers in Armenia. The company holds 40%
of the mobile communications market of Armenia.

In July 1, 2005, the second mobile operator K-Telecom of VivaCell
brand entered the Armenian market of mobile communications.

BAKU: Hungarian Appeals Court Judge: Ramil Safarov’s Motives Extenua

HUNGARIAN APPEALS COURT JUDGE: RAMIL SAFAROV’S MOTIVES EXTENUATING

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Nov 9 2006

The motives that made Ramil Safarov to act this way are not ordinary.

The court should pay attention to them and consider as extenuating
circumstances," the judge of Hungary Court of Appeal Andrash Braqyova
who is on visit to Azerbaijan told the journalists. Hungarian judge
said that Hungary press gives enough information about lifer Ramil
Safarov. Braqyova stressed that Armenian Diaspora’s interference to
the court affairs is inadmissible.

"I do not rule out any political declaration after court’s decision.

These declarations can even be made by Azerbaijani President.

According to the Hungary Legislation Ramil Safarov’s being granted
amnesty or pardon is possible only after trial will over," he said.

It should be noted that the court will consider Ramil Safarov’s appeal
in spring next year.

Children Leaving Orphanage Will Get Apartments

CHILDREN LEAVING ORPHANAGE WILL GET APARTMENTS

Lragir, Armenia
Nov 7 2006

The minister of employment and social affairs Aghvan Vardanyan told
news reporters that the government has allocated 379 million drams to
provide the children leaving the orphanage with apartments. He says
this is a novelty in Armenia. "In 2007 it is foreseen to provide
50 children leaving the orphanage with apartments," he said. The
government has allocated 1.2 billion drams for 935 children of 8
orphanages of Armenia. For 1010 residents of 4 old people’s homes
the government allocated 1.1 billion drams. The salaries of workers
of orphanages and old people’s homes will grow.

Armenian Reporter – 11/04/2006

ARMENIAN REPORTER
PO Box 129
Paramus, New Jersey 07652
Tel: 1-201-226-1995
Fax: 1-201-226-1660
Web:
Email: [email protected]

November 4, 2006

1. Armenia will invite long-term election observers, President
Kocharian confirms

2. Former Pentagon official: Azerbaijan’s oil revenue will not make a
military difference

3. President Kocharian confirms details of Russia-Armenia pipeline deal

4. Vincent Lima is the new editor of the "Armenian Reporter"

5. Editorial: Vote

******************************************** *******************************

1. Armenia will invite long-term election observers, President
Kocharian confirms

YEREVAN–President Robert Kocharian confirmed on October 27 that
Armenia would invite Western monitors to observe the 2007 National
Assembly elections, which are expected to be held in May. The
invitation would include "both long-term and short-term international
monitoring missions," the president told a meeting of the ambassadors
of European Union countries in Yerevan.

Long-term monitors generally arrive up to 100 days before an election
to meet with local and national officials and observe electoral
campaigns. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE), which observes elections through its Warsaw-based Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, sends observers six to eight
weeks before election day.

According to National Assembly chairperson Tigran Torosian,
observation missions have not yet been invited because no date has
been set for the elections.

An elections expert at one of the international organizations in
Yerevan told the Armenian Reporter that Armenia does not need to issue
formal invitations before January. Timing is more critical in the
reform of the electoral code, which is now underway. Amendments to the
law on elections are likely to be signed into law in January, which
will put training and implementation on a very tight schedule, the
expert noted.

****************************************** *****************************

2. Former Pentagon official: Azerbaijan’s oil revenue will not make
military difference

by Emil Sanamyan; special to the "Armenian Reporter"

WASHINGTON, D.C.–"Outlines of a settlement in Nagorno Karabakh are
very clear…. The Armenians get Karabakh and Lachin corridor and the
Azeris get the surrounding territories."

E. Wayne Merry, a former State and Defense Department official who
dealt with the conflict, said this in a lecture on Wednesday, October
25, 2006, titled "Diplomacy and War in Karabakh: An Unofficial
American Perspective," hosted by the Johns Hopkins University’s
Central Asia Caucasus Institute.

Speaking in an unofficial capacity, Mr. Merry said that in the case of
Karabakh it makes no sense for the U.S. to cling to Soviet-era
administrative borders drawn up by Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

In the end, Mr. Merry stressed, "The solution is to recognize reality
and redraw the borders."

In 1991, Nagorno-Karabakh used existing laws and international norms
to secede from Soviet Azerbaijan following years of brutal
anti-Armenian pogroms and Soviet government-enforced crackdowns and
violence against the population of Karabakh. Azerbaijan subsequently
launched a full-scale war, trying to expel Karabakh’s Armenian
population. The war eventually resulted in Azerbaijan’s defeat and a
cease-fire agreement in May 1994. While Armenian-Azerbaijani talks
have continued since then, Azerbaijan’s government has grown
increasingly bellicose, demanding control over Armenian-populated
Karabakh and threatening renewed use of force.

But the Pentagon’s former Caucasus expert argued that Azerbaijan’s
growing oil revenue would not give it sufficient advantage to resolve
the issue militarily. Mr. Merry said there were five main reasons for
this: geography, firepower, reserves, military art, and strategic
depth.

According to Mr. Merry, Armenians have a clear geographic advantage,
with their forces dug in on higher ground along most of the Line of
Contact. This in turn creates an opportunity for a more effective use
of firepower–even if both sides have similar military hardware.
Armenians can also count on ample reserves of both combat veterans and
ammunition.

"To put it bluntly, Azerbaijan would run out of young men before
Armenians run out of ammunition," Mr. Merry explained.

Further, the Armenian side has a proven ability to conduct military
operations. "Azerbaijan has armed forces, Armenia has a military" Mr.
Merry noted. In terms of strategic depth, only Turkey is likely to
support Azerbaijan. The four other major players, including Russia,
Iran, United States, and the Europeans, have no interest in imposing
an Azerbaijani solution on Armenians.

According to Mr. Merry, Azerbaijan would need to overcome all of these
obstacles to claim victory. "I doubt they could overcome any…. If
Azerbaijan resumes armed conflict, it will be defeated," Mr. Merry
warned. "People [in Azerbaijan] who say ‘let’s go to war because we
won’t be any worse off’ are very dangerous people, because wars always
make things worse–often unpredictably and catastrophically worse."

Mr. Merry argued that there are three major forces in international
affairs: demography in the long term, economics in the middle term,
and war in the short term. "Diplomacy is not a force, it is a
mechanism," he said. "This is a mechanism for ratifying, not reversing
the battlefield." But, Mr. Merry said, most of the diplomatic effort
around the Karabakh conflict focused on management of the conflict
rather than resolving it. The major reason for this is that a
continued status quo is politically an easier option for each side,
while a solution would require difficult compromises.

Mr. Merry’s remarks were welcomed by two former U.S. ambassadors to
Armenia in the audience. Retired ambassador Harry Gilmore (1993-95)
noted that a "great opportunity" was missed in April 2001, when
Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents met under the mediation of the
U.S. secretary of state at the time, Colin Powell, in Key West, Fla.
According to credible reports, a deal discussed at the time also
entailed Karabakh’s formal unification with Armenia.

Ambassador John Evans (2004-06), speaking in a private capacity, noted
that a breakthrough in the Karabakh peace process remains unlikely.
Ambassador Evans noted in a February 2005 lecture that placing
Karabakh within Azerbaijan, as the latter demands, would be "a
disastrous step."

During his 26-year career with the U.S. Foreign Service, Mr. Merry
dealt with the Karabakh conflict while serving as a political officer
at the U.S. Embassy in Russia (1991-94), during a tour with the
Department of Defense as its regional director for Russia, Ukraine,
and Eurasia (1995-97) and as senior adviser to the U.S. Commission on
Security and Cooperation in Europe (1997-98). Merry is currently a
senior associate at the American Foreign Policy Council, a D.C. think
tank.

************************************* **************************************

3. President Kocharian confirms details of Russia-Armenia pipeline deal

YEREVAN (Combined sources)–President Robert Kocharian confirmed on
Monday, October 30, 2006, that Russia’s state-run Gazprom monopoly
would gain a controlling stake in Armenia’s national gas distribution
company that will likely own the incoming gas pipeline from Iran.

Mr. Kocharian gave the information as he met with Russian president
Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin. "I would like to immediately inform you
that all of our serious agreements on energy projects with Gazprom are
entering the implementation phase," he said in remarks posted on the
Kremlin’s website. "Just a few days ago, they were finally approved by
the Gazprom board."

On the previous Friday, Gazprom’s board had approved and announced the
issuance of additional shares in the ArmRosGazprom (ARG) operator,
saying that it will buy all of them and thereby raise its ARG stake
from 45 percent to 58 percent. Karen Karapetian, director general of
the ARG network, said Tuesday that Gazprom will pay $118.8 million to
increase its shares.

The Armenian government has until now owned another 45 percent of ARG,
with the remaining 10 percent belonging to ITERA, a private Russian
gas exporter.

The pipeline deal was among the economic issues on the agenda of Mr.
Kocharian’s talks this week with Mr. Putin. The latter described as
"shameful" the fact that Russia is only the third largest foreign
investor in Armenia. "I say ‘shameful’ because it is odd that Russia
does not occupy the first place in terms of investments in the economy
of its strategic partner," Mr. Putin said.

******************************************* ********************************

4. Vincent Lima is the new editor of the "Armenian Reporter"; Aris
Sevag steps down

Minneapolis, Minn.–Vincent Lima has been appointed the editor of the
"Armenian Reporter," CS Media Enterprises, LLC, the newspaper’s
publisher, announced. Aris Sevag stepped down last week, after 15
years as the paper’s managing editor.

Mr. Lima joined the senior management of CS Media in March. He has
worked closely in that capacity with Mr. Sevag and Sylva Boghossian,
publisher of the "Armenian Reporter."

"Vincent brings a wide range of skills and experience, as well as
energy and excellent judgment to the ‘Reporter,’" said John Waters,
vice president of CS Media. "He is charged now with making the
‘Reporter’ a resource that can inform, entertain, and inspire ever
more readers."

Mr. Lima has long had a high profile in the Armenian-American
community as an editor and public intellectual. He edited the
scholarly journal "Armenian Review" from 1989 to 1996. He then started
"Armenian Forum: A Journal of Contemporary Affairs" with his colleague
Ara Sarafian. He served also as director of the Gomidas Institute,
which has published dozens of books in the last few years.

"As editor, I hope to build on the strengths of the ‘Armenian
Reporter,’" said Mr. Lima. "One of these strengths is our coverage of
Armenian-American community affairs and advocacy. Next week, we will
start introducing new talent that is joining us to bring greater depth
to this coverage."

Asking readers to be vocal about their opinions, Mr. Lima said, "We
have ambitious plans for the newspaper, both in print and online. We
will roll out many innovations over the weeks, months, and years to
come. As we do so, we will be listening closely to what our readers
have to say."

"The ‘new’ ‘Armenian Reporter’ is going to be true to its roots and
loyal to our faithful readers," said Sylva Boghossian, publisher of
the "Armenian Reporter." "But we are also reaching out to a new
generation of readers. I am looking forward to working closely with
Vincent as we make this happen together. I also want to take this
opportunity to wish Aris the best at his new job. I will miss the
close collaboration we have had over the years, and credit him with
helping make the ‘Armenian Reporter’ such a vital part of our
community."

Before joining CS Media, Mr. Lima worked in the testing industry,
where he developed content for high-stakes tests. For the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, he worked on innovative
products (such as auditing simulations) for the Uniform CPA
Examination; prior to that he wrote and reviewed questions for the
Analytical sections of the GRE and the Critical Reasoning sections of
the GMAT.

Mr. Lima is a graduate of the New School for Social Research in New
York City. He did graduate work there under Eric J. Hobsbawm; he
continued his graduate studies in history at the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, under Ronald Grigor Suny and Juan Cole. He has
taught at the University of Michigan and Tufts University. He recently
moved to Yerevan with his partner Martha Boudakian and their two
daughters.

********************************** *****************************************

5. Editorial: Vote

Day in and day out, American citizens of Armenian descent reach out to
their elected representatives by letter, by e-mail, by phone, and
through their lobbying and advocacy organizations. We give generously
to the campaigns of our friends.

That is every day. But November 7, Election Day, is the moment of truth.

Will we show up at the polls and elect the candidates who best
represent our values and our interests? Will we display the collective
might that our lobbying efforts claim on our behalf? We believe so.

We urge our readers to vote on Election Day.

* * *

Voters in Armenia, meanwhile, will get to exercise their right to vote
in just over six months.

We welcome President Kocharian’s announcement this week confirming
that Armenia will invite international monitors to observe the
elections. An important element of the announcement was that the
invitations would encompass long-term observers. These observers will
follow the campaign season closely. Their presence will help
discourage violations and ensure that voters are aware of all their
options on Election Day.

Indeed, while our focus today is on Election Day, we must not lose
sight of the ongoing nature of democratic participation. There is no
question that Armenia’s elections must be free and fair. But the
hallmark of a true democracy is a culture of vigorous and thoughtful
debate on the issues that matter to the country and its people.

Still, it is on Election Day that the people make their choices. And
it is then that they gain–or lose–faith that their voice counts.

***************************************** **********************************
Direct your inquiries to [email protected]
(c) 2006 CS Media Enterprises LLC. All Rights Reserved

http://www.armenianreporteronline.com