Baku criticizes PACE position on Karabakh issue

BAKU CRITICIZES PACE POSITION ON KARABAKH ISSUE

Pan Armenian News
01.06.2005 03:59

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Yesterday in Paris the Political Committee of
the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) passed
a decision on expanding the composition of the subcommittee on the
Karabakh conflict. Representatives of the opposition forces of Armenia
and Azerbaijan represented in the PACE will be included in it, Milli
Mejlis deputy and member of the Azeri group Asim Mollazade stated,
Echo Azeri newspaper reports. In his words, head of the Azerbaijani
delegation to PACE addressed the sitting yesterday. “He subjected
the CoE to sharp criticism for inactivity in the Karabakh conflict
settlement”, Mollazade says. According to Mollazade, Seidov express
dissatisfaction with the implementation of the PACE resolution on
the Karabakh conflict. He stressed that 2 years have passed since the
adoption of the resolution, however no real steps were undertaken for
its realization. Besides, the parliamentarian said that the Azeri
delegation head offered to hold the sitting of the subcommittee in
Baku simultaneously with the sitting of the Monitoring Committee and
the Committee on Refugees (July 4-5, 2005). Mollazade also expressed
dissatisfaction with the principle of formation of the Committee on
Karabakh. “The principles of the Council of Europe are violated. For
some reason representatives of the ruling party only are included in
the Committee”, he said indignantly. According to Mollazade his remarks
were welcomed and “all agreed that the issue has an international
importance.” In this view the Azeri parliamentarian stressed that the
finite composition on the Committee on Karabakh will be ratified late
June during the Assembly Session. At that very time the decision on
expanding the composition will be taken, he assured.

Pipe dreams: BP’s Baku pipeline has begun pumping oil. But willAzerb

Pipe dreams: BP’s Baku pipeline has begun pumping oil. But will
Azerbaijan benefit from the wealth that will follow? Paul Brown
reports

The Guardian – United Kingdom
Jun 01, 2005

There are 800 manmade lakes on the edge of the Caspian Sea in an
area that is known simply as Twenty. The lakes contain oil, tar and
raw sewage as well as water – a mixture that in the summer months
provides potent fumes and a breeding ground for malarial mosquitoes.

On parts of the site – which, established in 1847, is the oldest oil
field in the world – a few remaining productive wells still work,
with “nodding donkeys” pumping up the last of the oil.

A few miles from this suburb of Azerbaijan’s capital Baku, in the
country’s section of the Caspian Sea, a newer story is unfolding.

British Petroleum is developing what it says is a state-of-the-art,
nearly pollution-free oilfield that will connect to the controversial
but almost complete 1,762km Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline,
which stretches from Azerbaijan to Turkey.

Last week the oil finally started to flow through the pipe towards
the Mediterranean where it will then travel by tanker to the UK to
be refined and keep Britain’s cars and aeroplanes running.

Before arriving at the new sea terminal, the pipeline runs through
environmentally sensitive areas in Georgia and has raised concerns
about the human rights of local villagers in Turkey. But BP believes
that all these problems have been settled and says the pipeline’s
advantage is that it avoids taking more oil tankers from the Black
Sea through the Bosporus strait. It describes BTC as the largest
energy project in the world.

Indeed, the pipeline will transport a million barrels of oil a day,
enough to turn impoverished Azerbaijan into a wealthy country almost
overnight. By 2007 it will have an income of $7bn (pounds 3.8bn)
a year, even if oil falls back from its current price of almost $50
a barrel to a modest $25 a barrel. But despite predictions of untold
wealth, there are concerns over whether the oil that will keep the
UK running will be a blessing or a curse for its country of origin.

Inayat Mehtiyeva, whose shop is a few yards from the nearest oil lake
that is fed by raw sewage from houses further up the hill, explains
that, so far, no benefits can be seen. She says people rarely pay
for the bread from her shop. “There is not much money, we operate a
barter system. We swap things. Some people take bread and say they
will pay later but they never come back. We really depend on God here.”

Along with 80% of the other residents of Twenty, Mehtiyeva is a
refugee. She has lived there for 12 years after fleeing from her home
in Nagorno-Karabakh, an enclave of Azerbaijan on the border with
neighbouring Armenia, during the war between the two countries. UN
agencies say Armenia still occupies 14% of Azerbaijan, although the
Azeri government claims it is 20%.

Mehtiyeva, whose first name means faith, hopes that one day, with
her two sons, she can return home where life was simple but good.
“Perhaps the oil money will help, but I do not know how. I know I
cannot stay here. At the first opportunity, I will flee.”

Hasay Hasanov, a shipyard worker who works next to area Twenty,
says his $100 a month pay is not enough. He is worried that his two
children might catch malaria and wants the old oilfield cleaned up,
but he does not think he will see any benefit from the new oil money.
“What we want is a decent wage – $300 a month – so we can afford more
than just paying the rent and buying food.”

The World Bank’s country manager for Azerbaijan, Ahmed Jehani, is
unsure whether the oil will be “a benefit or a curse”. He is afraid
that other industries will wither away if the country relies on oil
revenue alone. Politicians might become less responsive to the needs
of the people, he says, because they would no longer rely on them for
taxes. Rich resources could also lead to ethnic and other tensions,
especially if the benefits are not shared.

Added to this are doubts about whether democracy in Azerbaijan is
robust following the country’s election in October 2003. President
Ilham Aliyev was voted in after the death of his father Heydar,
whose giant presidential portraits still appear in their thousands
all across the capital.

Furthermore, according to Transparency International’s 2004 index,
Azerbaijan is one of the world’s most corrupt countries. “This is
a major concern of the World Bank,” says Jehani. “We need to get
accountability in elections, in the assets. There is a deficiency of
justice, access to courts, and lack of general transparency.”

Jehani is hopeful, however. The government has set up an oil fund
which will publish all the details of money coming in and where it
is invested. “This is a shining example of what can be done. Let us
hope that temptations to divert money away from long-term investment
do not prove too strong,” he says.

T oday’s oil boom in Baku is not the first. At the end of the 19th
century, Azerbaijan provided more than half the world’s oil, and 60%
of Britain’s oil. It supplied the cash for some of the most sumptuous
Victorian stately homes in Britain, but left Baku with a legacy of
oil pollution that the Soviet empire added to and left behind.

As Azerbaijan returns to an oil boom, it will again bolster profits
far away, notably those of BP. But the oil from the new fields is
expected to last only until 2020, after which time the country will
produce just enough for the needs of its 8 million people.

Jehani sums up: “It is a question of whether the money generated
from these 15 years of the second oil boom will be invested to turn
Azerbaijan into a modern and wealthy state, or whether it will be an
opportunity wasted.”

Twenty vision: Baku’s manmade oil lake Photograph: Valentin Yemelin

Lebanon’s democracy “still has a long way to go”

NEWS FEATURE: Lebanon’s democracy “still has a long way to go”

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
May 31, 2005, Tuesday

18:37:49 Central European Time

Beirut — Lebanon began the first democratic elections in 30 years
at the weekend without Syrian presence or direct intervention from
former powerbroker Damascus.

But the low turnout in what were being dismissed as the “unpopular
elections” showed that something was lacking in what was expected to
be a democratic event.

“There was no electoral battle, so we cannot really speak of free
and democratic elections,” analyst Habib Malek told Deutsche Presse-
Agentur, dpa.

The elections in Beirut, first round in four-stage polls due to take
place each Sunday until June 19, saw a sweeping victory for the son
of late prime minister Rafik Hariri, Saadeddin.

But the poll was marred by a low turn-out – fewer than one-in-
three voters.

“People were not ready to vote because they knew the results ahead
of time. People were disappointed, because democracy means a real
race and unexpected results,” Malek said. “Lebanons democracy still
needs an overhaul.”

But he stressed that despite the low turnout, the elections gained
praise from world powers such as the United States and France, and
was given legitimacy – which was “good for Lebanon at this time”.

He noted that even European monitors hailed the “open and transparent”
conduct of the first round of voting, and there had been no big
difference in the 33.8 perc ent turnout from the last legislative
polls in 2000.

Observers saw Hariri’s success as a vote of loyalty for his late
father, who was assassinated in February – a murder which triggered
widespread protests that eventually pushed Syria to end its 29-year
military presence on April 26.

Turnout had been expected to be low because of the virtually guaranteed
success of Saadedin Hariri in the 19 seats up for grabs in Beirut. His
slate had already won nine of the seats uncontested before election
day.

But Hariri himself, and other anti-Syrian opposition figures expected
to take the lion’s share of seats in the 128-seat parliament, were
aware of the low turnout and promised to work on a new electoral law
to replace the current one.

“All the new deputies will work towards drafting a new law to replace
this one that was drafted by the Lebanese authorities under Syria’s
tutelage,” said Deputy Mohammed Kabanni, who was on Hariri’s list
and won a seat in parliament.

“The first mission of Saadeddine Hariri and his allies (in the
opposition) will be to start dialogue for a new electoral law,
following a compromise with all parties,” Hani Hamoud, spokesman for
the Hariri family, told dpa.

The so-called 2000 electoral law, tailored by the Syrians, did not
please the Christians because they say it allows Moslems to choose many
of the Christian deputies in the assembly in a power-sharing agreement.

Saadeddin Hariri and his allies in the anti-Syrian opposition have
also criticized the law, but decided it was more important to hold
elections on time than try to draft a new one in haste.

“We should not forget that the vote followed an earthquake in the
country which was Hariri’s assassination – so the opposition had
no choice but to go on with the elections on time than delay it,”
Hammoud said.

Turnout was particularly low in Christian districts of the capital.

Former exiled Christian General Michel Aoun, who recently fell out
with Hariri and his Moslem allies in the opposition, and the powerful
Armenian party Tashnag had called for a boycott.

A senior aide of Aoun, Alain Aoun, told dpa: “The Beirut voters have
expressed their wishes by rejecting to vote because there was no
battle, not because we called on them not to boycott.”

Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement, which decided not to participate in
the Beirut elections but will take part in the elections in other
districts, insisted the 2000 electoral law should be rejected because
it was drafted during the “Syrian hegemony over Lebanon”.

Malek said: “I think we will see battles in the coming rounds of
elections in areas like Mount Lebanon. So let every political force
fight for its place and show its real weight. This is what will lead
us to a democratic election in the country in the future.” dpa wh sc

Armenian President Receives Russian Federation Presidential Staff He

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT RECEIVES RUSSIAN FEDERATION PRESIDENTIAL STAFF HEAD

YEREVAN, May 31. /ARKA/. Armenian President Robert Kocharyan received
Tuesday Russian Federation Presidential Staff Head Dmitry Medvedev.

According to Armenian Presidential Press Service, issues related to
current stage of Armenian-Russian cooperation, particularly expansion
of economic ties between the two countries. Kocharyan pointed out
Armenian-Russian relations development at present.

In his words, Russian investments activation is seen recently in
Armenia.

Medvedev, in turn, passed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s greeting
to Kocharyan saying considerable work is already done to implement
the agreements reached in the course of the meeting between the two
countries’ Presidents in this year March. M.V. -0–

‘A trap was prepared for Mutalibov in Khojalu’

AZG Armenian Daily #098, 31/05/2005

Opinion

‘A TRAP WAS PREPARED FOR MUTALIBOV IN KHOJALU’

Rahim Ghaziev Tells about ‘Other Awful Actions’ of Azeris, about
Treason of Shushi

Rahim Ghaziev, one of the former Azeri defense ministers jailed for
10 years on charge of state treason. Particularly, he was accused
of leaving Shushi to Armenians. He was released only two months
ago. Ghaziev said in the interview to that a trap
was prepared for Mutalibov in Khojalu to remove him.

Ghaziev said that he received information about the attack of the
Armenian forces against Khojalu on February 16, 1992. “On February 25,
I again received information about the preparations of the attack,”
Ghaziev said. He added that the Azeri Armed Forces had enough arms to
help the Khojalu people and stop the Armenians. Those days, the Azeri
defense minister said that it was possible to avert the disaster and
keep their positions.

The journalist that recently visited Nagorno Karabakh, asked Ghaziev
the following question, “They showed me the humanitarian corridor
provided by the Armenians in Askeran that was used by the majority
of the people living there. The corridor stretches along the Karkar
River. Is it true and whether the activists of the People’s Front
misled the Khojalu people?”

“I also heard about that and about other awful things that our
people did. But you should understand that I was blamed so much that
now I am afraid to be condemned again. Eldar Baghirov, an activist of
People’s Front in Aghdam told me of the instructions that he received
from the leaders of the People’s Front. He began telling but soon he
stopped. He was about to lose his mind when he was telling about the
treason of the soldiers of the People’s Front,” Ghaziev said.

The journalist said that when he was in Shushi, the Armenians showed
him the restored church, adding that it was filled with ammunition
when they arrived in the city. Ghaziev said that there were about 12
thousand shells. “I swear to God that I didn’t receive a single gun
from the state. The whole ammunition was gathered by volunteers. And
they left all that in Shushi,” Ghaziev said. There were 4 tanks,
9 armored vehicles, 2 Grad mounts and 20 mortars. “Most of this
ammunition was not used during the defense of the city,” the former
Azeri defense minister said.

www.realazer.com

NA Takes Annual Report on 2004 Activities of Securities Commission

RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY TAKES ANNUAL REPORT ON 2004 ACTIVITIES OF RA
SECURITIES COMMISSION INTO CONSIDERATION

YEREVAN, MAY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. At the May 26 meeting, the RA National
Assembly took the annual report on the 2004 activities of the RA
Securities Commission into consideration. According to Commission
Chairman Eduard Muradian, in 2004, the total amount of trade at the
Stock Exchange of Armenia made 851.4 mln drams or about 1.6 mln USD. A
total of 3,289 transactions were concluded in shares only. In the year
under review, the stock capitalization of shares in transactions was
assessed at 8.6 bln drams or 17.8 mln USD against 13 bln drams in
2003. It was noted that last year the Commission conducted checks of
44 issuers, as a result of which 1,708 violations of the requirements
were revealed. Breach of the corporate management legislation
requirements was registered in all the companies checked.

Une commission parlementaire turque en visite en Suisse en juin

Schweizerische Depeschenagentur AG (SDA)
SDA – Service de base français
26 mai 2005

Une commission parlementaire turque en visite en Suisse en juin

Berne (ats) Une délégation de la commission de politique extérieure
du Parlement turc effectuera une visite en Suisse du 13 au 17 juin, a
annoncé jeudi l’ambassade de Turquie à Berne. Les députés turcs
répondent à une invitation de leurs homologues du Conseil des Etats.

Les discussions porteront notamment sur les relations bilatérales, le
début des négociations d’adhésion de la Turquie à l’Union européenne,
la politique européenne de la Suisse et la situation au
Proche-Orient, a précisé à l’ats le secrétaire de la Commission de
politique extérieure du Conseil des Etats, Paolo Janke.

Cette dernière s’était rendue en Turquie en septembre dernier. Des
nuages sont apparus ces dernières années entre les deux pays
notamment au sujet de la question arménienne. Ankara s’est ainsi
offusqué récemment d’une enquête ouverte par un procureur de
Winterthour contre un historien turc de renom pour négation du
génocide arménien.

PARIS: Le genocide armenien prive de debat

Le génocide arménien privé de débat

Sous pression du gouvernement Erdogan, l’université du Bosphore annule
son colloque

Liberation (French)
jeudi 26 mai 2005

Par Marc SEMO

Le génocide arménien de 1915 reste tabou au niveau officiel en Turquie.
Soumise à de lourdes pressions du gouvernement de Recep Tayyip Erdogan
(issu du mouvement islamiste) la présidence de l’université du Bosphore
a finalement annulé hier au dernier moment un colloque , le premier du
genre à Ankara, avec des historiens turcs qui, comme Taner Akçam,
remettent en cause la version officielle et reconnaissent l’évidence du
caractère génocidaire de ces tueries planifiées qui ont fait entre un
million et un million et demi de morts. Ankara avance le chiffre de 350
000 victimes et affirme que les massacres ont eu lieu des deux côtés.
«C’est un coup de poignard dans le dos du gouvernement et de l’Etat que
d’organiser une telle réunion dans un tel moment», avait martelé mardi
devant le Parlement le ministre de la Justice Cemil Cicek accusant les
organisateurs de «trahison» de l’intérêt national. Alors qu’Ankara
devrait commencer en octobre prochain les négociations d’adhésion avec
l’Union européenne, de plus en plus de voix s’élèvent parmi les 25 pour
inciter la Turquie à affronter cette page tragique de son histoire. Les
autorités appellent sans conviction à «un débat d’historiens». Une
partie de l’intelligentsia est bien décidée à assumer ce travail de
mémoire. «Ce colloque sans précédent montrait que les choses
commençaient à bouger, souligne Ahmet Insel, professeur à Paris-I et à
l’université de Galatasaray, son interdiction de fait ne peut que servir
les franges les plus radicales de la diaspora arménienne qui veulent
démontrer que rien ne peut changer sur ce sujet en Turquie.»

BAKU: Azerbaijan gets poor human rights rating

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
May 26 2005

Azerbaijan gets poor human rights rating

27/05/2005 02:17

The Amnesty International has issued its final 2004 report on the
situation with human rights in world countries where it said: “the
trials of 40 people held in Azerbaijan after October 2003 fell short
of international standards and courts ‘turned a blind eye’ to the
facts that prisoners were forced to give testimonies under torture.”

“In April, courts issued verdicts on about 100 opposition members
based on the testimonies forced by torture and 33 people were
sentenced from 3 to 6 years in jail,” the report says, Assa Irada
reported today.

The Amnesty International indicated that about a thousand people,
including those considered as ‘political prisoners’ by the Council of
Europe, were released on President Ilham Aliyev’s decrees issued in
March, May and
September 2004. Among those pardoned were former prime minister Surat
Huseynov, who was charged with high treason, and Alakbar Hummatov
charged with a state coup attempt.

Touching on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno Karabakh,
the report says that the issue on the status of Karabakh, which has
not been recognized by the international community, remains unsettled.

Date for OSCE MG Co-Chairs Visit to Yerevan Is Not Specified Yet

DATE FOR OSCE MG CO-CHAIRS VISIT TO YEREVAN IS NOT SPECIFIED YET

YEREVAN, MAY 26. ARMINFO. The date for a visit of the OSCE Minsk Group
Co-chairmen on Nagorny Karabakh conflict settlement to Yerevan is not
specified yet, Press-secretary of Armenia’s Foreign Ministry Hamlet
Gasparyan stated ARMINFO. In his words, Co-chairs’ meeting with
Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan is planned during the
visit. However, Oskanyan is in Finland at present and he will return
Yerevan on May 28. It is also unknown whether the MG Co-chairs visit
Stepanakert.

At the same time, as Azeri mass media inform, the OSCE MG Co-chairs
Steven Mann (USA), Bernard Fassier (France) and Yuriy Merzlyakov
(Russia) is arriving in Baku today. -r-