Theater: Actress Inspired by Holocaust Survivor in Armenian Genocide Play ‘Beast on the Moon’

Jewish Journal
Aug 22 2019

Rachel Weck and Travis Leland in “Beast on the Moon” Photo by Tracy Roman

History is filled with examples of memorable events that remind us how great humanity is. It’s also filled with events that reveal the dark side of humankind. Among them is the Armenian genocide of 1915-16, perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkish government, which resulted in the deaths of 1.5 million of this Christian minority in a Muslim state. 

It’s this tragedy that forms the basis of Richard Kalinoski’s haunting play “Beast on the Moon,” which opens Aug. 23 at the International City Theatre at the Long Beach Performing Arts Center.

Kalinoski’s play debuted in 1995 at the Humana Festival of New American Plays at Actors Theatre of Louisville. The intimate four-actor show has subsequently been performed in 15 countries, winning more than 30 awards (including five Moliere Awards in Paris and five Ace Awards in Buenos Aires, and taking the award for best play in both cities).

The Holocaust comes to mind as another prime example of horrific crimes against the human race, and International City Theatre Artistic Director caryn desai, who doesn’t use capital letters to depict her name, told the Journal, “Anyone that survives this kind of trauma and genocide, I don’t think you ever forget. The difference is with the Holocaust you knew who the villain was. It was Hitler, and Germany had to accept responsibility for what they did. In this case, Turkey still has not. I think that must be especially painful — not to have someone acknowledge what they did to your family.”

“Beast on the Moon” begins in 1921 Milwaukee — six years after the genocide — and all the scenes take place in the dining room of Aram Tomasian, an Armenian immigrant who has paid to bring over a 15-year-old Armenian orphan, Seta, to be his wife. Burdened with the loss of their families and unable to have a child of their own, the scarred survivors struggle toward understanding and reconciliation.

In her role as Seta, actress Rachel Weck drew on her own experiences to help develop the character. While studying musical theater at UCLA, Weck, who isn’t Jewish, participated in a Jewish studies program to launch student-curated audio tours at the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust. As part of that program, the students met and interviewed Holocaust survivors and it was during this time that she formed a close bond with one
of the survivors — Helen Freeman — who died in 2017.

“Her story has stuck with me,” Weck said. “Seta is 15 when she immigrates to the U.S. as a mail-order bride. Helen was also young [when she came here] and there is something about Helen’s beauty and her belief in goodness in people. I will be drawing from Helen in playing Seta.”

In the play, Seta clings to a homemade doll, the one thing she has kept from her mother. Weck relates this to Freeman, who was able to keep and hide one earring from her mother — in the lining of her shoe — for years. 

“Wouldn’t it be nice if we could watch this play and say, ‘Oh, I’m so glad this was in the past?’ instead of saying, ‘Oh, this is still going on and these are the choices we continue to make.’  ” — Rachel Weck 

“Helen was in multiple work camps as well as Auschwitz and, throughout her entire journey, she carried this one earring,” Weck said. “I remember her so vividly telling me that every time she felt like giving up and just crawling into a hole in the ground, she would touch her shoe with the earring and she would be reminded of her family.” 

Even though the play covers events beginning more than a century ago, its relevance to the plight of refugees today resonates. 

“I think that’s the beauty of the play,” desai said. “Even though it is taking place in the 1920s and 1930s, the issues being talked about are still relevant and it make you question whether we are ever going to move forward.”

Continuing to work toward a better society is crucial, she added, “because without that, we are defeated. We just have to be reminded and vigilant to continue that struggle.”

Weck concurred. “There is this line in the play that is so ironic,” she said.  
“ ‘America, it is so easy for immigrants to get in. It seems like they welcome everyone.’ We read that line and just laughed. It is just a shocking world that we would turn away such pain and suffering after having hundreds of years of knowledge. That is what’s so disappointing.”

 Dreaming of a better world, Weck said, “Wouldn’t it be nice if we could watch this play and say, ‘Oh, I’m so glad this was in the past?’ instead of saying, ‘Oh, this is still going on and these are the choices we continue to make.’ We continue to turn people away and turn a blind eye toward suffering. It is really upsetting.”

“Beast on the Moon” runs Aug. 23 through Sept. 8. Visit internationalcitytheatre.org.




ACNIS reView #26, 2019_Վերլուծական_Ռազմական-քրեաօլիգարխիկ համակարգից անցում դեպի ամբոխավարություն

Վերլուծական  

 
ՕԳՈՍՏՈՍԻ 16 2019 

Յուրաքանչյուր իշխանություն ունի իր սոցիալական, քաղաքական եւ գաղափարական հենարանները: Ըստ այդմ էլ պետությունները կառավարման համակարգի տեսանկյունից ենթարկվում են տիպաբանական բաժանման։ Դեռեւս մ․թ․ա․ 4-րդ դարում հին հույն մեծանուն փիլիսոփա Արիստոտելը՝ առաջնորդվելով  իշխանական համակարգի էութենական բովանդակությամբ, նշում էր, որ իր համար ընդունելի պետական կառավարման մոդելներն են՝ արիստոկրատիկ, միապետական եւ ժողովրդավարական ձեւերը: Հատկանշական է, որ հեղինակը՝ զարգացնելով  կառավարման տիպօրինակների վերաբերյալ իր մտքերը, առաջ էր քաշում այն տեսակետը, ըստ որի՝ վերը նշած համակարգերից ոչ մեկն ապահովագրված չէ դեգրադացումից ու լճացումից, որոնց պարագայում արիստոկրատիան վերածվում է օլիգարխիայի, միապետությունը՝ բռնապետության, իսկ ժողովրդավարությունը՝  ամբոխավարության: Այսինքն՝ քաոսային միջավայրի։

Ըստ Արիստոտելի ե՛ւ  միապետական, ե՛ւ արիստոկրատական, ե՛ւ իրական ժողովրդավարության պարագայում հնարավոր է ապահովել հանրույթի բնականոն զարգացումը, ինչը միայն կարող է խախտվել վերոհիշյալ դեգրադացիայի դեպքում։  Արիստոտելի մասին խոսելիս՝ նշենք, որ նա կառավարման լավագույն տիպօրինակը համարում էր արիստոկրատիան, իսկ առավել վտանգավորն ու ռիսկայինը՝ ժողովրդավարությունը, հիմնավորելով, որ վերջինիս դեպքում բաժանարար գիծը քաոսի եւ ժողովրդավարության միջեւ շատ նուրբ ու զգայուն է, ինչը միշտ չէ, որ հաջողվում է պահպանել։ Մեր կողմից հավելենք նաեւ այն, որ հասարակության զարգացման եւ, մասնավորապես, պետական ինստիտուտների արդյունավետ գործունեության ապահովման համար «խելագարված» եւ «լյումպենացված» ամբոխներն իրապես կարող են մահաբեր վտանգ ներկայացնել:

Սույն հոդվածով կփորձենք նկարագրել ներհայաստանյան քաղաքական այն միջավայրը, որն ի հայտ է եկել 2018թ․ գարնանային դեպքերից հետո, ինչպես նաեւ վեր հանել դրանից բխող  վտանգներն ու հնարավոր ռիսկերը պետական ինստիտուտների եւ, ընդհանրապես, պետականության գոյության համար։

Իտալացի նշանավոր մտածող Անտոնիո Գրամշին կարծում էր, որ իշխանության հիմքը հեգեմոն դիրքերի ապահովումն է կյանքի բոլոր ոլորտներում՝ իշխող  ուժը պետք է մշտապես հոգ տանի ապահովելու իր գերիշխող դիրքերը տնտեսական, մշակութային, ֆինանսական եւ մյուս բոլոր ասպարեզներում։ Սակայն, ըստ  Գրամշիի, իշխանության պահպանման կարեւորագույն երաշխիքը հեգեմոն դիրքերի ապահովումն է գաղափարական դաշտում։ Ասել կուզի, որ իշխող վերնախավը պետք է ամեն կերպ հիմնավորի իր իշխանության առավելությունները եւ դրական կողմերը հասարակության մյուս ներկայացուցիչների համար, համոզի քաղաքացիներին, որ իրենց առջեւ ծառացած խնդիրների լուծման՝ իշխանությունների առաջարկած տարբերակները գոյություն ունեցողների մեջ լավագույնն են, որ վերջիններիս աշխարհընկալման չափորոշիչներն առավելագույնս համապատասխանում են հանրույթի ընկալումներին։ Սրանով իշխող վերնախավը ամեն կերպ պետք է հասնի նրան, որ  շարքային քաղաքացիներն իր իշխանությունը համարեն անհրաժեշտ միջոց դեպի ավելի բարեկեցիկ ու ապահով ապագա։

21-րդ դարում այս խնդրի լուծման հարցում իշխանությունների թիվ մեկ «զենքը» մեդիա-դաշտն է։ Վերնախավի ներկայացուցիչները հնարավորություն ունեն ԶԼՄ-ների՝ մասնավորապես սոցկայքերի միջոցով զօրուգիշեր թմբկահարել իրենց իշխանության արդյունավետության ու հասարակական աջակցության փաստը: Միաժամանակ պետք է արձանագրել, որ մեդիա-դաշտի առանձնահատկությունն այն է, որ իբրեւ իշխանության հասնելու եւ պահպանելու մարտավարական «գործիք»՝ այն նույն հնարավորությունն ընձեռում է նաեւ ոչ իշխանական ուժերին։ Խոսելով մեդիա-դաշտի մասին՝ որպես 21-րդ դարի քարոզչության հիմնական միջոցի, հարկ է նկատել նրա ամենաբացասական կողմը․ ցավոք սրտի, այստեղ հիմնական որոշիչը ֆինանսն է, ինչի արդյունքում ողջ մեդիա-դաշտը հաճախ զրկվում է գաղափարական եւ կառուցողական բաղադրիչից՝ փոխարենը համալրվելով էժանագին ու անբովանդակ նյութով։

Գալով ներհայաստանյան կյանքին՝ նշենք, որ մեր իրականությունը զերծ չի մնացել վերոնշյալ եղելույթից։ Արցախյան շարժման հաղթանակից եւ անկախ պետականության վերականգնումից հետո իշխանության եկած վերնախավը, դժբախտաբար, բռնեց կաստայացման, դեգրադացման ու լճացման ուղին։ Անկախացումից մինչեւ օրս իշխանական վերնախավը մշտապես լծված է եղել իր իշխանության հիմնավորման եւ լեգիտիմացման գործընթացին։ Ամբողջ այս ընթացքում, իբրեւ գործիք, ծառայել է մեդիա-դաշտը։ Արցախյան պատերազմից հետո իշխանության եկած ռազմական կլանը փորձել է հիմնավորել իր իշխանության լեգիտիմությունը՝ անընդհատ շեշտելով հաղթանակի գործում ունեցած ներդրումը եւ իրենց առաջնորդության կենսական կարեւորությունը: Սակայն ժամանակի ընթացքում քարոզչական այս հնարքը սպառեց իրեն, քանզի այն ի վիճակի չէր լուծելու քաղաքացիների եւ պետականության առջեւ կանգնած մարտահրավերները։ Արդյունքը եղան 1990թ. պետական հեղաշրջումը եւ բարձրագույն իշխանության անցումը օլիգարխիային։

Երրորդ իշխանական վերնախավը, ինչպես ցույց տվեց ժամանակը, նույնպես զուրկ էր համազգային մարտահրավերներին պատասխանելու ունակությունից, հետեւաբար՝ մնում էր որդեգրեր այլ մարտավարություն իր իշխանությունը գոնե երկարաձգելու համար։ Այդ նոր մարտավարությունն առավելապես հենվում էր հասարակության քաղաքակրթական արժեքաբանության, մտավոր ներուժի, բարոյահոգեբանական իրավիճակի դեգրադացման գործընթացի վրա։ Ասվածը լավագույնս արտացոլված է նախկին նախագահ Սերժ Սարգսյանի հետեւյալ հայտնի արտահայտության մեջ՝ «Որքան պետք է, այնքան էլ կխփենք»։ Ամբողջ օլիգարխիկ համակարգը միջոցներ չէր խնայում ապահովելու հասարակական այնպիսի տրամադրություններ, համաձայն որի՝ «իրենց դեմ խաղ չկա»։ Այդ նպատակով «գնվում» էին քաղաքական գործիչներ, ստեղծվում «գրպանային» ընդդիմություններ, կազմակերպվում հասարակական-քաղաքական ուղղորդված միջոցառումներ (ցույցեր, երթեր, բողոքի ակցիաներ)։ Սակայն մեկ կենտրոնից կազմակերպված լինելու հանգամանքը կանխորոշում էր «բանից անտեղյակ» քաղաքացիների դժգոհության արտահայտության վերջաբանը։ Այս ամենն, իվերջո, հանգեցրեց քաղաքական դաշտում ապատիկ միջավայրի եւ հասարակական հուսահատության ու անկարողության զգացումի առաջացմանը։ Այսինքն՝ կարող ենք արձանագրել, որ քրեաօլիգարխիկ վերնախավի կողմից ամեն բան արվում էր հասարակությանը դեգրադացնելու ու մանիպուլացնելու եւ, այդպիսով, իրենց իշխանությունն ապահովագրելու համար։ Բայց այդ ամենը հնարավոր չէր իրականացնել միայն քաղաքական դաշտում․ հասարակության լիակատար դեգրադացման կարեւորագույն բաղադրիչը մշակութային ու բարոյահոգեբանական ասպեկտն էր, եւ սա քաջ գիտակցում էր քրեաօլիգարխիան՝ ի դեմս իր պարագլուխ Սերժ Սարգսյանի։ Հանրության մշակութային ու մտավոր դեգրադացիան գլուխ բերելու ճանապարհին առաջին եւ հիմնական հարվածն ուղղվեց կրթական համակարգին։ Կրթական համակարգի եւ, առհասարակ, «կրթություն» հասկացության աղճատումը հասավ այն աստիճանի, որ համատարած երեւույթ դարձավ «դիպլոմ գնելը»։ Կրթական համակարգը կազմաքանդելուց հետո հաջորդ հարվածն ուղղված էր մշակութային միջավայրին․ իշխող օլիգարխիկ վերնախավն իր կեղծ, «պսեւդո»-արժեհամակարգը սկսեց հանրայնացնել ու քարոզել 21-րդ դարում ի հայտ եկած մշակութային մի նոր ճյուղի՝ այսպես կոչված շոու-բիզնեսի ներկայացուցիչների միջոցով։ Կրթական համակարգի կազմաքանդման եւ ոլորտում պետականամետ գաղափարախոսության բացակայության պայմաններում երիտասարդության մի ստվար հատված սկսեց արագորեն կլանել շոուբիզնեսի եւ, ընդհանրապես, ցածրորակ մեդիա-դաշտի միջոցով քրեաօլիգարխիկ վերնախավի մատուցած բարոյական «պսեւդո»-արժեհամակարգը։ Այս ամենով պատկերը դարձավ ամբողջական։ Կեղծ արժեհամակարգով սնված բնակչության հիմնական հատվածին մանիպուլացնելն ու կառավարելու քրեաօլիգարխիայի մարտավարությունը առերեւույթ հասավ իր նպատակին։ Սակայն իրավիճակի խորքային, մանրակրկիտ եւ արհեստավարժ վերլուծության պարագայում ակներեւ էր դառնում իրական պատկերը․ իշխող «պսեւդո»-էլիտան՝ անկարող լինելով ճիշտ ժամանակին ու համապատասխան լուծումներ տալու համապետական նշանակության մարտահրավերներին եւ, այդպիսով, իր իշխանության պահպանման եսասիրական միտումով դեգրադացնելով հասարակական լայն զանգվածներին, ոչ միայն ձախողում էր իր այդ նպատակը, այլեւ վտանգում էր անգամ պետության, պետականության եւ համազգային շահերը։ 21-րդ դարին բնորոշ գլոբալացման պայմաններում ներքին եւ արտաքին բազում մարտահրավերների պարագայում հասարակությանը դեգրադացնելու, խավարի մատնելու միջոցով նրանց վրա իշխելու՝ միջնադարին բնորոշ գործելաոճը մեր օրերում ի սկզբանե դատապարտված էր անփառունակ վախճանի։ Արդյունքը եղան պետությանը հասցված անդառնալի վնասները եւ 2018-ի գարնան հայտնի դեպքերը, երբ օլիգարխիան՝ իբրեւ տնտեսական եւ քաղաքական կառավարման տիպօրինակ, վերջնականապես սպառեց իրեն ու տեղը զիջեց կառավարման նոր մոդելին։

Նոր իշխանություններն իրենց դիրքերը պահպանելու համար պետք է գտնեին սոցիալական, քաղաքական ու գաղափարական նոր հենարան, եւ վերջիններիս ընտրությունը կանգ առավ ժողովրդավարության քողի տակ «ծպտված» ամբոխավարության մոդելի վրա։ Վերջին մեկ տարվա ներհայաստանյան իրավիճակի վերլուծությունը, ըստ մեզ, ապացուցում է այն փաստը, որ, գլխավորապես նախկին քրեաօլիգարխիկ համակարգի ներկայացուցիչներով համալրված նոր իշխանական էլիտան եւս ի զորու չէ լուծել լրջագույն քաղաքակրթական մարտահրավերները։ Իշխանական ողջ վերնախավի գործունեության հիմքում ընկած են պոպուլիստական գործելաոճը, ապակառուցողական քաղաքական օրակարգերը, ինչպես նաեւ ազգային աշխարհընկալման եւ արժեհամակարգի հետ որեւէ աղերս չունեցող եղանակները։ Այդպիսի իրավիճակում, անտարակույս, իշխանության սոցիալական եւ գաղափարական հենարան կարող է հանդիսանալ բացառապես հուսահատված եւ դեգրադացված ամբոխը։ Հատկանշական է նաեւ այն, որ նոր իշխանությունների կողմից փորձ է արվում ամբոխավարության տրպօրինակը համադրել միապետական մոդելի ինչ-ինչ տարրերի հետ։

Ասվածի լավագույն վկայությունը գործող քաղաքական համակարգի ուղղակի գոյատեւման հարցում ներկա քաղաքական ընտրախավի լիդեր Նիկոլ Փաշինյանի անձի ունեցած դերն ու նշանակությունն է։ Փաստորեն՝ 2018 թվականի գարնանից հետո Հայաստանում իշխանության եկած կամ միգուցե վերափոխված նախկին քաղաքական «պսեւդո»-էլիտան՝ սպառելով կառավարման օլիգարխիկ մոդելի բոլոր հնարավորությունները, այժմ փորձում է իր իշխանության համար գաղափարական եւ սոցիալական հենարան գտնել՝ հանձին դեգրադացված ու մոլորեցված ամբոխի։ Բայց, ինչպես նախորդ անգամները, այս անգամ եւս պետական մտածողությունից, ազգային գաղափարախոսությունից, ինքնութենական նորացման տեսլականից, մասնագիտական, մտավոր կադրային ռեսուրսից, հստակ մշակված եւ ժամանակի ու տարածության մեջ չափելի տնտեսական ծրագրից, պետական անվտանգության ռազմավարական հայեցակարգից զուրկ «պսեւդո»-էլիտան ձախողվելու է։ Արդյունքը, դժբախտաբար, լինելու են ժամանակի անտեղի կորուստը եւ հներին ավելացած ու իրենց լուծումներին սպասող նոր մարտահրավերները:

 

Հայկ Փայտյան


 


 

 

The California Courier Online, August 15, 2019

The California Courier Online, August 15, 2019

1 -        U.S. Appeals Court Makes a Wrong

            Decision on Armenian Demands

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-         Armenian Community Grieves Genocide Scholar Vahakn Dadrian

3 -        Lawsuit Against Turkey Proceeds In US Federal Court

4-         Commentary: Who Are Armenia’s Real Enemies From Within?

5-         Civilitas / CivilNet Welcome New Director Apo Boghigian

*****************************************

******************************************

1 -        U.S. Appeals Court Makes a Wrong

            Decision on Armenian Demands

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit made a
decision on August 8, 2019 to deny the appeal of two lawsuits brought
by several Armenian-Americans demanding compensation from the Republic
of Turkey and two of its banks for confiscating their properties
shortly after the Armenian Genocide.

The first lawsuit was filed in December 2010 by Alex Bakalian, Anais
Haroutunian, and Rita Mahdessian seeking $65 million from the Central
Bank of the Republic of Turkey, and Ziraat Bankasi. The second lawsuit
was filed by David Davoyan (administrator of the Estate of Garbis
Tavit Davoyan) and Hrayr Turabian against the Republic of Turkey, the
Central Bank of Turkey, and Ziraat Bankasi.

The U.S. Court of Appeals confirmed the 2013 decision of Judge Dolly
Gee who dismissed the two lawsuits declaring that “under the political
question doctrine which says certain questions—in this case,
determining whether Turkey’s actions were genocide—should be handled
by the executive branch, not the courts,” according to the Courthouse
News Service.

The Court of Appeals, however, rejected the appeal for a different
reason, claiming that the two Armenian lawsuits are time-barred. In
2006, a California statute had set the deadline of 2016 for such
lawsuits stating that: “Any action, including any pending action
brought by an Armenian Genocide victim, or the heir or beneficiary of
an Armenian Genocide victim, who resides in this state, seeking
payment for, or the return of, deposited assets, or the return of
looted assets, shall not be dismissed for failure to comply with the
applicable statute of limitation, if the action is filed on or before
December 31, 2016.”

Unfortunately, in 2012, Ninth Circuit Judge Susan P. Graber, in the
case of Movsesian vs. Victoria Versicherung AG, invalidated the
California statute extending the time for bringing certain insurance
claims based on the Armenian Genocide. Judge Graber wrote that “the
statute was preempted under the foreign affairs doctrine,” according
to the Metropolitan News-Enterprise.

The August 8, 2019 decision by the Court of Appeals is contradictory
in the sense that while Judge Andrew Hurwitz (who wrote the Appeals
Court decision) acknowledged the Armenian Genocide, he ignored the
fact that genocides have no statute of limitations, therefore
regardless of how much time has elapsed, genocide-related lawsuits
could not be dismissed on that basis.

Here is what Judge Hurwitz wrote in the decision of the Court of
Appeals: “From 1915 to 1923, in what is often referred to as the
Armenian Genocide, the Ottoman Empire massacred, forcibly expelled, or
marched to death 1.5 million of its Armenian citizens, seizing the
property of the dead and deported.”

In another section of the Appeals Court decision, under the subtitle
of ‘Facts,’ Judge Hurwitz added the following comments on the Armenian
Genocide: “During World War I, the Ottoman Empire began forcibly
relocating its Armenian subjects away from population centers and into
the desert, causing the deaths of over a million ethnic Armenians. The
Empire confiscated the real property left behind by the victims of the
Armenian Genocide.”

Judge Hurwitz agreed with the plaintiffs’ assertions in the lawsuits.
He wrote: “We assume for purposes of our accrual analysis the truth of
the plaintiffs’ allegations that either the Ottoman Empire illegally
seized the property of the plaintiffs’ predecessors, or the Empire and
the Banks placed the property in trust under Turkish law but later
illegally refused to return it. If the initial expropriation was
wrongful, the plaintiffs’ claims accrued by 1923. If the property was
placed in trust, the plaintiffs acknowledge that ‘laws passed in 1928
and 1929 formally ended Turkey’s disingenuous attempt at the
restitution of immovable property to its rightful Armenian owners.’
Thus, the plaintiffs’ predecessors should have known well more than
ten years ago that Turkey did not intend to return their property.”

Judge Hurwitz complained that the lawsuits were filed decades after
the Armenian Genocide which does not make them timely. “We have no
doubt that the survivors of the Ottoman Empire’s atrocities
experienced enormous hardships after the seizure of their property.
Indeed, we take as true the allegations in the operative complaints
that it ‘was impossible for Plaintiffs’ predecessors to seek
compensation for their stolen property or focus on anything but
rebuilding their lives.’ But, these suits are brought not by the
victims of the Armenian Genocide, but rather by residents of the
United States long removed from its carnage, many of whose
predecessors relocated to this country decades ago. And the current
plaintiffs do not allege any attempts to pursue these claims
judicially prior to 2010.”

The attorneys for the Armenian-American plaintiffs reacted with anger
at the Appeals Court decision. Kathryn Lee Boyd of the law firm Pierce
Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht—representing three Armenian-Americans
whose ancestors owned 122.5 acres of land that was confiscated—told
the Metropolitan News-Enterprise:

“It is a sad day for Armenian-Americans when a U.S. court has stripped
them of all access to justice, refused to consider or even recognize
the extenuating circumstances of the Armenian Genocide, and left them
with no remedy against Turkey, which continues to hold and use their
stolen property with impunity.”

Mark Geragos of the law firm of Geragos & Geragos, who represents the
second group of plaintiffs, was quoted by the Metropolitan
News-Enterprise:

“The Turkish Lobby has bought and paid for the United States Executive
Branch and State Department for decades. Sadly the Judicial branch is
left with very few options to remedy the blatant mendacity of the
Turkish lobbying machine.”

The Court of Appeals took the easy way out by basing its decision on
the unconstitutionality of the California statute which had given the
plaintiffs more time to file their lawsuits. If the Court of Appeals
had based its decision on the occurrence of genocide, the issue of
time-limitation would have been irrelevant and would have ruled that
the Turkish government and its two banks are liable for confiscating
the Armenian properties.

I hope the attorneys for the Armenian-American plaintiffs will appeal
to the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse this unjust decision.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

2-         Armenian Community Grieves Genocide Scholar Vahakn Dadrian

The Armenian scholarly community is grieving the loss of renowned
genocide researcher and author Vahakn Dadrian, who passed away on
August 2, 2019. He was 93 years old.

Vahakn Norair Dadrian was born on May 26, 1926 in Istanbul, Turkey.
“Vahakn Dadrian was born ten years after the Armenian Genocide,” noted
Armenian President Armen Sarkissian in his condolence letter to the
Dadrian family. “It is, probably, no accident that he dedicated the
major part of his life to genocide and especially the Armenian
Genocide studies, making a great contribution to the internalization
and the fight against denial of the Genocide through his valuable
monographies and publications,” wrote Sarkissian.

Over the course of his lifetime, Dadrian achieved degrees in
mathematics, philosophy, international law and sociology, studying at
the University of Berlin, University of Vienna, University of Zurich
and University of Chicago, respectively. His interdisciplinary
background coupled with his impressive mastery of six languages
(Armenian, English, French, German, Turkish and Ottoman Turkish)
supported his expertise of comparative genocide studies.

A Director of Genocide Research at the Zoryan Institute, Dadrian was
known for his voluminous writings on the Armenian Genocide including
his 1995 work, The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict
from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. Istanbul-Armenian member
of the Turkish Grand National Assembly Garo Paylan tweeted in Armenian
and Turkish that Dadrian’s book “played an important role in the
international recognition of the Armenian Genocide.”

In 2011, he co-authored Judgment at Istanbul: The Armenian Genocide
Trials with Clark University professor and historian Taner Akçam. In
his somber reflection on Facebook, Akçam recalled his formal remarks
during a 2005 event in New York City honoring his late friend and
invaluable, lifelong mentor. “There is no doubt that whatever
discussion we’ll have [in Armenian Genocide research field], it will
be built on the body of knowledge that Dadrian has provided for us,”
expressed Akçam.

There has been an outpouring of support and sympathy from admirers and
fellow scholars since Dadrian’s passing. He was a true trailblazer.
“More than anyone else at the time, Dadrian raised the study of the
Armenian Genocide to the academic level, and everyone who has come
after him is indebted to his work—even those who disagree with him,”
said Marc Mamigonian, National Association of Armenian Studies and
Research (NAASR) Director of Academic Affairs. “When we look at the
remarkable development of Armenian Genocide scholarship in the past
two decades, it must be understood that this was made possible by the
foundation created by Dadrian’s groundbreaking work.”

As Akçam put it, this “is a big loss for Armenians and humanity.”
Arguably the most influential authority figure in Armenian Genocide
research, Dadrian was “the master of us all whose hearts beat for
justice and humanity.” Among his numerous achievements is Ellis Island
Medal of Honor, U.S. Congress Medal of Esteem for Scholarship,
President of the Republic Prize Gold Medal of Armenia.

The Ararat-Eskijian Museum, in collaboration with the National
Association for Armenian Studies and Research and the Organization of
Istanbul Armenians, is organizing a “Celebration of Life” event. The
celebration will be held on Saturday, August 17 at 4 p.m., at the
Deukmejian Community Center at Ararat Home, located at 15105 Mission
Hills Rd, Mission Hills, CA 91345.

The event is open to the public and will be Live Streamed on the
museum’s website and Facebook page.

For more information, contact the Ararat-Eskijian Museum at (747) 500-7585.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

3 -        Lawsuit Against Turkey Proceeds In US Federal Court

A lawsuit filed against the Republic of Turkey moves forward in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California following a
federal court order on July 11, 2019.

The lawsuit, Ghazarian et al. v. Republic of Turkey, alleges
violations of international law as well as statutory and common law
claims against Turkey due to conduct committed by Turkey’s agents in
the United States. The case stems from an attempt by an elderly
California man to exercise cultural and religious rights at sacred
pilgrimage sites in Turkey as an Armenian Christian. The federal court
previously expressed doubt that it had jurisdiction in the matter
under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and ordered plaintiffs to
show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed.

Kerkonian Dajani LLC, which represents plaintiffs Barkev and Garo B.
Ghazarian in the case, filed a response brief addressing the
jurisdictional and sovereign immunity issues raised by the court.
Specifically referencing plaintiffs’ response, the U.S. federal court
did not dismiss the lawsuit and instead held, in its July 11 order,
that it would “defer a determination about its jurisdiction until
after Turkey has been served and had an opportunity to provide its
views on the issue.”

The complaint specifically alleges that Turkey’s agents harassed,
demeaned and degraded Barkev Ghazarian, an elderly man from Glendale,
Calif., because he sought to exercise religious and cultural rights in
Turkey as a native Armenian Christian in 2017.

It further alleges that Turkey’s agents interfered with the
inheritance of Garo B. Ghazarian, Barkev’s son, by thwarting his
father’s efforts to pass to him direct knowledge of such native
traditions as practiced by generations of Ghazarians at certain sacred
sites situated within the present borders of Turkey. Plaintiffs allege
that, in doing so, Turkey ensured that Barkev’s direct knowledge of
his family’s ancestral traditions and pilgrimage sites would not pass
to future generations of Ghazarians. According to the complaint, the
acts committed by Turkey’s agents were undertaken pursuant to a
specific policy of Turkey targeting native Armenian Christians.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

4-         Commentary: Who Are Armenia’s Real Enemies From Within?

            By Vic Gerami

In the first six months of 2018, nine women in Armenia have been
killed because of domestic violence. Between 2010 and 2017, more than
50 women have been killed at the hands of their intimate partners.

According to Zaruhi Hovhannesyan, Communications Director for the
Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women, more than 2,000 cases of
domestic violence are registered in Armenia. The Coalition alone, in
2017, registered 5,600 reports of domestic violence. The Special
Investigative Service in Armenia investigated 458 cases of domestic
violence in 2017.

How is it that most Armenians in Armenia and diaspora are not outraged
to see their sisters, mothers, cousins, and daughters beaten, abused
and harassed? How is it that the same people vilify, denounce and
commit hate-crimes against LGBT Armenians?

Why are gay Armenians treated with such disdain when the
aforementioned disturbing statistics show that largely heterosexual
men are a menace to society? How is it that Armenia is one of the few
countries where homophobia is just as rampant among women and younger
generations as it is with elders and men?

Why are queer Armenians scapegoated for breaking the ‘traditional
Armenian values’ when straight men are destroying their own families,
beating their wives, girlfriends, and daughters? Is wife-beating a
part of traditional Armenian values?

Where is the outrage? Why such hypocrisy? Why is the Church silent
while spewing homophobia? Where are Armenia’s ‘leaders’ to stop the
abuse? Nikol Pashinyan might be the new Prime Minister, but the band
plays on…women are beaten…LGBT are beaten… yet most still talk of
‘Armenian Values.’

************************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Civilitas / CivilNet Welcome New Director Apo Boghigian

The Board of the Civilitas Foundation has welcomed Apo Boghigian as
the foundation’s new director. Since its establishment in 2008,
Civilitas has pioneered civil society strengthening through open
public discussions and polling, reporting and analysis, collaborated
in cross-border activities and most notably, established the
ground-breaking, trendsetting media outlet, CivilNet.

Boghigian, who was born in Anjar, Lebanon, studied in Los Angeles, and
has lived in Armenia for 18 of the last 30 years, will head both
entities.

“CivilNet.am is now a globally recognized bilingual source for news
and analysis, a proud achievement of the Civilitas Foundation, which
was established precisely to bring meaningful change in Armenian
society. This work will expand and diversify under Apo Boghigian’s
able leadership and exceptional commitment to the ideals that drive us
— a fair society, a welcoming country where individuals can prosper
and contribute to humanity,” said Salpi Ghazarian, the founding
director of Civilitas.

Boghigian was a Candidate in Philosophy, studying with the late
Professor Avedis Sanjian, when he interrupted his doctoral studies in
Armenian literature to take on the position of editor-in-chief of the
Asbarez daily newspaper, in Los Angeles, in 1985. Under his
leadership, the newspaper grew to become one of the Diaspora’s two
most influential media outlets.

In 1990, in the last years of the Soviet Union, as the Karabakh
movement had ushered in a political awakening, and the call for
reunification and independence gained momentum,  Boghigian repatriated
to Armenia to establish several media outlets, including the Yerkir
newspaper. He also set up the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Press
Office, which provided indispensable daily reports from the frontlines
of the Karabakh War and soon after, the newly independent Armenia. As
founding editor of Yerkir Daily, he adopted the principles of
independent journalism to satisfy an international public clamoring
for news and analysis from the region.

“The movement had awakened a whole nation,” he says. “I couldn’t, with
a clear conscience, appeal to the Armenian people to become a part of
it, while sitting in Los Angeles.”

Upon returning to the United in 2008, he assumed the editorship of
Asbarez once more, and expanded the newspaper’s capacity, reach and
coverage. He stayed with the Asbarez until August 2019.

“I always intended to return to Armenia. And to return as a member of
the CivilNet family is a compelling and meaningful opportunity. It is
also a huge responsibility. To be working among and to be defining a
vision with a group of committed young professionals is very
exciting,” says Boghigian.

With a staff of three dozen, CivilNet focuses on LIVE broadcasts,
investigative, as well as advocacy and solutions-based journalism.
Bilingual (Armenian and English) reporting, data-driven analysis from
all corners of Armenia, Karabakh, and the Diaspora are at the heart of
CivilNet’s work.

In 2013, CivilNet was the only Armenian media organization to report
from Syria. In 2018, 16 million people viewed CivilNet’s 24-hour LIVE
broadcast of the “velvet revolution”. In between, it was CivilNet’s
pioneering efforts to cover each of the small, targeted civil
protests, which culminated in the successful political transformation
of 2018.

“Civilitas was founded by former foreign minister Vartan Oskanian, at
a time when civil society work needed to expand and be more impactful.
Today, Civilitas can and will serve a new role as a center for
exploration and analysis. CivilNet is an integral part of that
operation to bring nuanced, complex understandings of the challenges
facing Armenians to the public, in Armenian and in English. Apo
Boghigian’s experience and passion are the perfect combination to
carry forward this mission,” concluded Ghazarian.

Boghigian will step into his new position on September 1, 2019.

“We are tremendously grateful to Apo for his unwavering commitment to
Asbarez, which can be seen in its daily growth and reach throughout
the community in the Western United States and throughout the world,”
said Avedik Izmirlian, the chairman of the Armenian Media Network,
Asbarez’s parent company. “We wish him the best of luck and success in
his future endeavors, knowing full well that he will continue the
pursuit of the just aspirations of the Armenian Nation and the
Armenian Cause, wherever he goes and whatever he undertakes.”

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation Western U.S. Central Committee
also extended its well wishes to Boghigian.

“We are grateful to Apo for his efforts in making Asbarez a unique
platform that rallied the community together around the ideals and
objectives of the ARF, and its goal to serve the Armenian people,”
said Dr. Carmen Ohanian, the co-chair of the ARF Central Committee.“We
wish Apo success in his future endeavors and are confident that the
newspaper will continue to expand and flourish because of the vision
and commitment he brought to the publication on a daily basis.”

************************************************************************************************************************************************

California Courier Online provides viewers of the Armenian News News Service
with a few of the articles in this week's issue of The California
Courier.  Letters to the editor are encouraged through our e-mail
address, However, authors are
requested to provide their names, addresses, and/or telephone numbers
to verify identity, if any question arises. California Courier
subscribers are requested not to use this service to change, or modify
mailing addresses. Those changes can be made through our e-mail,
, or by phone, (818) 409-0949.

Parts of Azerbaijani MIG 29 wreckage recovered from Caspian Sea

Parts of Azerbaijani MIG 29 wreckage recovered from Caspian Sea

Save

Share

13:52, 9 August, 2019

YEREVAN, AUGUST 9, ARMENPRESS. More than two weeks after an Azerbaijani Air Force MIG 29 crashed into the Caspian Sea during a training flight, local authorities have recovered parts of the wreckage from the sea, Azertac news agency reported.

According to the report the recovery team included experts from Turkey.

The fate of the pilot remains unknown.

The MIG 29 of the Azerbaijani military disappeared from radar screens around 22:00, July 24 while conducting a training flight over the Caspian Sea.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan

PM Pashinyan attends cultural event in the sidelines of Eurasian Intergovernmental Council session

PM Pashinyan attends cultural event in the sidelines of Eurasian Intergovernmental Council session

Save

Share

19:53, 9 August, 2019

YEREVAN, AUGUST 9, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia NIkol Pashinyan is in Kyrgyzstan, Cholpon Ata city on a working visit.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan attended a cultural event following the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council session.

Together with the Heads of Government of the EAEU member states and the Board Chairman of the Eurasian Economic Commission Pashinyan attended “Tengri-2019”” international musical festival.

PM Pashinyan’s visit to the Republic of Kyrgyzstan is over. Today Pashinyan will return to Armenia with his delegation.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan




Sports: Armenia’s Greco-Roman team in Cadet World Championship

MediaMax, Armenia
Aug 5 2019
 
 
Armenia’s Greco-Roman team in Cadet World Championship
 
 
Photo: UWW
 
 
Eight athletes from Armenia national Greco-Roman wrestling team will participate in Cadet World Championship.
 
Led by Armen Babalaryan, the team to participate in World Championship on August 14-16 in Tallinn includes Tigran Minasyan (55kg), Sahak Hovhannisyan (60kg), Hrachya Poghosyan (63kg), Shant Khachatryan (67kg), Samvel Grigoryan (72kg), Vahe Poghosyan (77kg), Karen Khachatryan (82kg) and Hakob Baghdasaryan (87kg).
 
According to the Wrestling Federation of Armenia, the team holds the last training in Yerevan before the tournament.

Jersey-registered mining company in $2bn dispute

Jersey Evening Post
Aug 2 2019
 
 

News | Published: Aug 2, 2019

A JERSEY-registered mining company is embroiled in a $2 billion dispute with protesters and campaigners in Armenia who claim its operations are threatening their environment and livelihood.


Concerns were first raised about Lydian International’s Amulsar project in the former Soviet republic in 2013, with environmentalists claiming that it could contaminate nearby Lake Sevan, damaging the region’s ecosystem and threatening the entire water supply.

A documentary produced by London-based non-governmental organisation Global Justice Now claims that pollution has already affected water supplies, affecting the local economy including its spa facilities, fish farms and agriculture.

Local protesters have been blocking access to the gold mine for the last year, bringing work to a standstill.

A statement on the website of Lydian, a multinational mining company whose registered office is at Bourne House, Francis Street, St Helier, says: ‘Illegal blockades have prevented access to Amulsar since late June 2018.

‘Amulsar will be a large-scale, low-cost operation with production targeted to average approximately 225,000 ounces annually over an initial ten-year mine life. Open pit mining and conventional heap leach processing contribute to excellent scale and economic potential.

‘Lydian is committed to good international industry practices in all aspects of its operations including production, sustainability and corporate social responsibility.’

Nick Dearden, a director of Global Justice Now, said he believed that that Lydian was threatening to use special ‘investor-state dispute settlement’ clauses in British trade agreements with Armenia to sue its government for $2 billion over the matter.

‘The Lydian case is a great example of how companies use corporate courts or ISDS to bully governments and force them to put profits ahead of their democratic obligations to their people,’ he said.

‘Local communities are clear they don’t want this mine, yet Lydian is threatening to sue the Armenian government for a fortune – far more than they ever invested – for responding to those demands of their citizens and halting this project.

‘The grounds used by Lydian are that the Armenian government has “failed” to remove the protesters.’

He added: ‘We know that Lydian, which has its main office in Colorado, has set up a letterbox in London, and we fear that they are essentially “treaty shopping”, using different jurisdictions to give access to international treaties so they can use this awful ISDS system.


We don’t know the nature of their operations in Jersey, but if they are using the Island, with little or no real presence, simply to sue another country, that’s an outrage.

‘We urge the governments of Jersey and Britain to speak out and say their investment agreements should not be used in this way.’

Last year Jersey was granted greater independence to sign international trade deals by the UK. Mr Dearden said at the time that he was concerned that the move could allow large firms to sue governments of developing or third-world countries using Jersey companies, if ISDS clauses were included in the trade deals.

‘A window to the past’: how old photos brought my parents’ empty house back to life

The Guardian(London), UK
August 2, 2019 Friday 12:00 PM GMT
'A window to the past': how old photos brought my parents' empty house back to life
For Aram Balakjian, clearing the family home after his father's death led to a ghostly photographic project
 
by Paula Cocozza
 

 
After his father died, Aram Balakjian began the long job of clearing the family home. The house was large, with seven bedrooms and a cellar, and had belonged to the Balakjians for 27 years. The scale of the task overwhelmed him; both parents were artists and printmakers, with busy studios full of objects he had never been allowed to touch. His mother's death from cancer four years earlier had already triggered a career change: in the year that followed, Aram wound down his web design business to develop his passion for writing and photography, and now, as he started clearing it, he began to take pictures of the house.
 
"I thought, 'I'll never really see this again,'" he says. "I wanted to capture how the house was. I wanted to get those things in my head." He knew that the process of dismantling nearly three decades of family life would be laborious and painful. He was six when the family moved into the house in north London, and the photographs were a way of securing the memories for him, his sister Tamar and any future children.
 
But it was hard to know where to start. The house was awash with loss. His father, Marc Balakjian, had died in the living room, the same room in which his mother, Dorothea Wight, had passed away four years earlier. Together, his parents had built up the business of Studio Prints, printers to Lucian Freud, Frank Auerbach and Paula Rego among others, and it took Balakjian a week, "intermittently breaking down", just to sort through the papers in the room they called "the computer room". He thought, "How can we ever let go of this house? How can this ever not be our house?"
 
Daily he was floored by "emotional grenades": a diary his father kept after his mother died, his grief-stricken poems, the sheer volume of stuff, or as Balakjian puts it, "all these things that meant so much to someone who meant so much to you". Each one required an emotional valuation. "You're dismantling their lives. It's the end of their story. You really have this sense of what's left after we die. Just a bunch of things, really." And, of course, hundreds of family snapshots.
 
When Balakjian had finished, he reached for his camera again, this time to photograph the empty rooms. "It wasn't the house I was struggling to let go of. It was the memory of our parents, that whole life, growing up, our youthful innocence."
 
He had the idea of juxtaposing or conflating these empty images with the ones he had taken of the house immediately after his father's death when it was still full of his parents' things, "to show this weird contrast of what I experienced as I was clearing the house… this slow hacking away of emotions, and separation of them from the physical space". He held up a printed photograph of a room full of family paraphernalia, and reshot it in exactly the same place, now empty. The image, showing both the before and after in a single frame, excited him. He tried the same with one of the hundreds of family snapshots he had unearthed. "That's interesting," he thought. "I can make the two images line up. It feels like looking through a window of the past."
 
Here was the warmth of a family moment – each one raising the spectre of a lifetime of similar moments – suspended within a bright, empty room. Sometimes the inset pictures overlap with their host image; others butt up against them starkly. Still others show family moments appearing to hover in thin air. It is hard to tell which image feels more ghostly, the occupied or the unoccupied room. They haunt each other.
 
Making the two photographs line up seamlessly, as Balakjian first intended, proved impossible. As a result, the viewer sees both the continuities and discontinuities between the spaces the two cameras captured, the parquet kinks and the wood panelling warps where the past and present meet.
 
Bookshelves burst with books then terminate in emptiness. Flames flicker in one half of a fireplace while the neighbouring coals lie cold. The leaves of a copper beech glow burgundy, then abruptly wither. Random and bizarre episodes from years of family life are held to the light: a child (Balakjian himself) larks around the kitchen holding an orange, with a silly hairdo; his father carries a packet of flour; teenage girls, one of them Balakjian's sister, rock face masks in a stupendously carpeted bathroom. All families know their lived space by heart, but every image here ends with the same heart-wrenching dispossession.
 
Yet for Balakjian, the process felt constructive. "The only way I could do the project was to detach myself from what I was looking at," he says. "Most of the time, I didn't look at the snapshot I was holding. I wouldn't allow myself to 'go there' and to be in that room. I was thinking from a very technical point of view."
 
Over two months, he took nearly 3,000 photos. Each time, he had to place himself in the footprints of the person who had taken the original image – usually his father. Marc, the son of Armenian genocide survivors, was "not emotionally open at all", says his son. Presumably, trying to see long-forgotten family moments from his perspective must have created its own challenges.
 
"By the end, it wasn't emotional," Balakjian says. The process of clearing, sharpened by the practise of photography, led to a sort of disinvestment. "I was actually really happy to hand the house over to a new family," he says. "I felt we'd borrowed this space for 30 years. We built these amazing things, and now it was time for someone else to come in."
 
Go to arambalakjian.com/work/the-house to see more images from Aram's project
 
If you would like a comment on this piece to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine's letters page in print, please email , including your name and address (not for publication).
 
more photos at
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/aug/02/window-to-past-old-photos-empty-house-aram-balakjian

Watch: Sushmita Sen gives us sneak peek into her Armenian vacation with Rohman Shawl and daughter

Times of India

Syria’s Grand Mufti expresses gratitude for humanitarian mission of Armenia

Syria's Grand Mufti expresses gratitude for humanitarian mission of Armenia

Save

Share

21:14,

YEREVAN, JULY 18, ARMENPRESS. The Consulate General of Armenia in Aleppo organized on July 18 the visit of the delegation led by Syria's Grand Mufti Ahmad Badr Al Din Hassoun to the location of the Armenian humanitarian mission in Aleppo.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia, during the meeting Syria's Grand Mufti talked about the unique role of the Armenian community in Syria, noting that Armenians were and will always remain the inseparable part of the Syrian society. Ahmad Badr Al Din Hassoun spoke about the contribution of the Armenian community to the culture, science and education of Syria, stressing the fact that the Armenian Genocide survivors not only found safety in Syria, but, as a sign of great gratitude, set to the mission of bringing prosperity to Syria, building bridges of friendship between the two fraternal peoples of Syria and Armenia.

Syria's Grand Mufti conveyed the gratitude of the Syrian authorities to the authorities and peoples of Armenia for the activities of the Armenian humanitarian mission, noting that the activities of the mission, including the medical support and de-mining, are greatly appreciated by the Syrian people.

Edited and trenslated by Tigran Sirekanyan