Foreign Citizens Adopted 44 Children From Armenia In 2005

FOREIGN CITIZENS ADOPTED 44 CHILDREN FROM ARMENIA IN 2005

Yerevan, Julky 11. ArmInfo. Forty-four children from Armenia were
adopted by foreign citizens in 2005, Armenian Justice Minister David
Haroutiunyan told ArmInfo.

He said foreign citizens adopt about 40-50 Armenian children yearly
in average. 75% of foreign citizens adopting children from Armenia
are Armenians residing in the USA, France, Italy, Russia and other
countries. Of course, tragic cases cannot be overseen, however,
the government carefully studies the financial and social state of
parents. Psychologists work with them for a long time to find out
how the new family will perceive a new child, the minister said.

Presenting an International Convention on protection of children’s
rights when adopted by foreign citizens at the Constitutional Court of
Armenia, Minister Haroutiunyan said the document, which was signed
on 29 May 1993 in Hague, aims to create mechanisms guaranteeing
protection of children in case of their adoption by foreign citizens.

Among the commitments Armenia undertook when signing the document is
establishment of a consultative body regulating the adoption process.

To note, Armenia joined the Convention with a reservation related
Article 22: adoption of children by foreign citizens must meet the
Armenian legislation and not the provisions of the Convention. To
come into effect, the document requires ratification by the Armenian
National Assembly.

Armenian and Lebanese Foreign Ministers Discuss Issues On Agenda Of

ARMENIAN AND LEBANESE FOREIGN MINISTERS DISCUSS ISSUES ON AGENDA OF
BILATERAL COOPERATION

YEREVAN, JULY 11, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. On July 11, RA
Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian received Lebanese Foreign Affairs
and Diasporan Minister Fawzi Salloukh who is in Armenia on a three-day
official visit.

The sides expressed satisfaction that Armenian-Lebanese relations
are based on the centuries-old friendship, mutual sympathy and many
communities between the peoples.

Minister Oskanian said that Armenia highly evaluates the warm attitude
of the Lebanese people to the Armenian people after the Armenian
Genocide in Ottoman Turkey and attaches importance to the Armenian
community’s role in strengthening of bilateral relations.

In response, the Lebanese Foreign Minister emphasized that the
Armenian community of Lebanon played a great role in the country’s
restoration after the war and now continues to play a positive role
in the country’s internal life.

The Minister specially emphasized the role of a bridge of the community
in the relations between the two countries.

The interlocutors discussed issues on the agenda of bilateral
cooperation paying a special attention to deepening of cooperation
in the economic sphere.

They attached importance to organization of the meeting of the
Armenian-Lebanese Intergovernmental Economic Commissions in the
future. The sides also touched upon issues relating to development
of the legal-contractual base and cooperation at international
organizations between the countries.

The meeting participants also touched upon the developments around
the Iranian nuclear programs, Iraqi events, Israel-Palestine conflict,
as well as the current developments in the Nagorno Karabakh settlement
and other problems of the Caucasian region.

Below is the biographical data of the Lebanese Foreign Minister
provided to NT from RA Foreign Ministry Press Service:

Fawzi Salloukh was born in 1931 in Lebanon. In 1960 he was admitted
to the system of Lebanese diplomatic service. In 1978-1985 he was
the Ambassador of Lebanon in Nigeria, in 1985-1987 in Algeria. In
1990-1994 he was Ambassador in Austria, simultaneously representative
of Lebanon in UN and International Nuclear Energy Agency. In 1994-1995
he was the Ambassador of Lebanon in Belgium, Luxemburg, simultaneously
a representative in EU.

He has published books in Arabian, has been awarded numerous orders.

He is married, has three children.

Nairobi: OP’s Sh29bn vote under threat over Armenians

OP’s Sh29bn vote under threat over Armenians
Story by NATION Team | Parliament
Publication Date: 7/12/2006

The Nation, Kenya
July 11 2006

Opposition MPs threatened to shoot down a Sh29 billion vote for the
Office of the President, accusing it of inefficiency and corruption.

They demanded the resignation of minister John Michuki, saying he
had embarrassed the Government over the raid on the Standard Group
and the Armenians’ saga.

Several Kanu and Liberal Democratic Party MPs veered from debate
to demand that the minister quit for allegedly defending the two
foreigners and for admitting government involvement in the March raid
by masked gunmen.

But MPs on the Government side came to Mr Michuki’s defence, and
asked those opposed to him to confine their debate to the vote on
the ministry and not his personal conduct.

Temporary deputy Speaker Samuel Pogishio (Kacheliba, Kanu) had a hard
time trying to control debate.

He told MPs that the issue at hand had nothing to do with the minister
as a person but the money voted for his ministry.

Mr Jakoyo Midiwo (Gem, Narc) rose on a point of order when Mr
Michuki stood up to move the motion on the vote soon after the end
of question time.

He said MPs would be demanding for Mr Michuki’s resignation since
had failed to run his ministry well by allowing Armenian foreigners
to treat the country with contempt.

Mr Joseph Nkaiserry (Kajiado Central, Kanu) said it would be bad for
Parliament to debate and pass a budget for a ministry that had been
voted the most corrupt in an opinion poll.

Mr Raila Odinga (Langata, Narc) described Mr Michuki as a political
liability who had failed President Kibaki and the Government.

He said the minister should be ashamed of asking for Sh29 billion,
adding: "Kenyans woke up one morning to the shocking raid on the
Standard Group, only for this minister to say two days later that the
government had ordered the raid. Are we being ruled by a government
of human beings or snakes?"

The former Roads minister accused the Government of harassing Narok
North MP William Ntimama for defending the rights of the Maasai.

Mr Odinga said if there was anybody who should be charged, it was Mr
Michuki. "Infact, Mr Michuki’s ministry should be renamed the ministry
of Internal Insecurity."

Armenian MOD delegation to participate in the exhibition of armament

Armenian MOD delegation to participate in the exhibition of armaments

ArmRadio.am
10.07.2006 13:20

Tomorrow the Armenian delegation will participate in the 5th
international exhibition of armaments, defense technology and
ammunition to open in Nizhniy Tagil. Press Service of RA Defense
Ministry informs that employees of the Armaments Agency, Colonels
Vasili Bondar and Ashot Danielyan have already departed.

According to Russian media, Mi-26 heavy-lift helicopters, SU-25
attack aircrafts, SU-24 fencers and Mi-24 military helicopters will
demonstrate their capacities during the exhibition of armaments. 16
countries will participate in the exhibition as guests.

General Amnesty Granted

GENERAL AMNESTY GRANTED

Lragir.am
07 July 06

On July 6 the National Assembly discussed President Kocharyan’s
proposal on general amnesty and adopted it on July 7. As we have
already informed, 300 people will be released.

There was only one change in the decision on general amnesty. The
representative of the president Davit Harutiunyan, Minister of Justice,
offered to include Article 268 of the Criminal Code as well, namely
defiling cemeteries and dead bodies. Amnesty will be granted to persons
who committed a crime before June 1, 2006, convicts sentenced to 3-5
years of imprisonment, inmates aged over 60, disabled convicts of
categories 2 and 3.

Karabakh Status Can Be Determined After Refugees Return – Azeri Spok

KARABAKH STATUS CAN BE DETERMINED AFTER REFUGEES RETURN – AZERI SPOKESMAN

Interfax News Agency
Russia & CIS Military Newswire
July 4, 2006 Tuesday 1:03 PM MSK

A decision on the status of Nagorno- Karabakh can be taken only after
all refugees return to the predominantly ethnic Armenian enclave and
after safe living conditions for the Azeri and Armenian communities
have been established there, Azeri Foreign Ministry spokesman Tair
Tagizade told Interfax.

"Only after the pre-conflict demographic composition of the
Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan has been restored, after
security has been guaranteed and after conditions allowing the two
communities to live side-by-side peacefully have been established,
will it be possible to speak about a democratic constitutional way
to determine the status of Nagorno-Karabakh," he said.

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian said on Monday that conflict
settlement initiatives presented by the OSCE Minsk Group "are generally
acceptable for Armenia. We are ready to continue talks with Azerbaijan
on ways to settle the Karabakh conflict," he said.

"In my opinion, it is obvious that Armenia could have and should
have accepted them. You do not have to search for anything new. The
statement by the [OSCE Minsk Group] co-chairmen overwhelmingly
confirmed it," Tagizade said.

"We are speaking about liberating all occupied districts of Azerbaijan
outside Nagorno-Karabakh, withdrawing Armenian troops from the areas,
carrying out mine-sweeping operations, restoring road links, helping
refugees return to the districts and guaranteeing security," the
spokesman said.

ANKARA: Reverberations In Armenian Community To Karekin II’s Comment

REVERBERATIONS IN ARMENIAN COMMUNITY TO KAREKIN II’S COMMENTS ON GENOCIDE

Hurriyet, Turkey
July 5 2006

The recent visit to Istanbul by the leader of the worldwide Armenian
Orthodox Church, Catholicos Karekin II, has reportedly divided
members of his wide spread community. Karekin II, who was in Turkey
between June 20-27, made several widely publicized statements about
Armenian claims of genocide by the Turks, noting that it was Turkey’s
responsibility to officially recognize the genocide.

Speaking after Karekin II’s departure from Turkey, Patriarch Mesrob
II, the leader of the Armenian Orthodox community in Turkey, stated
that he did not agree with Karekin II’s comments on Armenian claims
of genocide. These comments from Mesrob II in turn elicited an angry
reaction from the Turkey-based Armenian language "Agos" newspaper,
whose editor, Hrant Dink, claimed in an article that "a trap had been
laid" for Karekin II on his visit here. Dink’s comments were supported
by statements issued on the "PanArmenian" web site, which said that
the Turkish government had appointed Mesrob II to his position.

Russia Investigates Attacks On Minorities

RUSSIA INVESTIGATES ATTACKS ON MINORITIES
By Anton Troianovski, Associated Press Writer

Hinesberg Journal, Canada
July 3 2006

MOSCOW – Prosecutors said Monday that they are investigating the
weekend stabbings of five ethnic minorities as hate crimes.

Russia has seen a wave of hate crimes in recent years, with hundreds
of attacks reported, including many on dark-skinned immigrants from
former Soviet Central Asia and the Caucasus Mountains region.

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian condemned the attacks
and urged Russia to do more to head off a rising tide of violent
xenophobia.

Meanwhile, three suspects in the Saturday stabbing of a Kazakh
citizen were arrested for a racially motivated crime, the Interfax
news agency reported.

Alexander Brod, who heads the Moscow Bureau for Human Rights, said
the surge in attacks might be tied to two high-profile conferences
that opened in the capital on Monday before a summit of the Group of
Eight major industrialized nations that begins next week in St.
Petersburg.

Interfax quoted an Armenian community leader, Ara Abramian, as saying
the attacks were "a direct provocation before the G-8 meeting,"
and sharply criticized Moscow law enforcement for failing to prevent
such assaults.

ANKARA: Yerevan’s Futile Efforts

YEREVAN’S FUTILE EFFORTS
By Semih Idiz

Anatolian Times, Turkey
July 3 2006

MILLIYET- Armenia believes in the bad state of Turkish-US relations
and thinks it can take advantage of the international situation.

However, it couldn’t help being excluded from the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
pipeline project, which is very important for its interests in the
European Union and the US.

So now Armenia is exerting most of his efforts to hinder another
project between Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, the Kars-Ahilkelek
railway project. If this 100-kilometer railway worth $400 million can
be laid, Azerbaijan and Turkey will be connected through a railway
over Georgia.

This situation would make any resurrection of the Kars-Gumru railway
line irrelevant. In addition, it would further deepen Armenia’s
isolation in the region. Yerevan has set its strong Armenian lobby
in the US in motion and started to move on a bill in Congress banning
the issuance of credit for the Kars-Ahilkelek project by US financial
institutions. Officials from the EU Commission have been saying since
the beginning of this year that the EU wouldn’t support this project
financially. As a matter of fact, as Foreign Ministry Spokesman Namik
Tan stated recently, the countries pursuing this project don’t need
the EU or the US in terms of finding money. Yerevan saw this and now
started to send certain signals that it’s ready to make important
concession so the country’s isolation doesn’t get worse.

Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian visited Tbilisi last week
and, when he saw that he would be unable to convince the Georgian
government to give up Kars-Ahilkelek line, made an interesting
suggestion. As Armenian journalist Emil Danielyan wrote on the ‘Eurasia
Insight’ website, Oskanyan said that if this project was given up,
Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan would be use the existing Gumru railway
line on Armenian territory without Armenia’s participation.

In other words, Yerevan stated that he was ready to provide the
‘right of free entry.’ Of course, the three countries which have
serious problems with Armenia could never accept this suggestion. It
would also be hard for the Armenian people to accept this. If Yerevan
considers the issues at the root of its isolation more realistically,
instead of making such useless suggestions, it would better serve
their long-term interests. However, it can’t do this as a country
with its eyes fixed on the past, rather than the future.

Is GM ultimate risk for Kerkorian?

DetNews.com, MI
July 1 2006

Is GM ultimate risk for Kerkorian?

Billionaire investor appreciates dangers and rewards of betting on
ailing firms, analysts say.

Bryce G. Hoffman / The Detroit News

Global stunner: Link GM, Renault-Nissan

Kirk Kerkorian, the billionaire General Motors Corp. shareholder
angling for a three-way alliance of GM, Renault SA and Nissan Motor
Co., has always liked taking risks.

But this is a big one, even for a guy who owns 9.9 percent of ailing
GM, the world’s largest automaker.

Some observers say Kerkorian is drawn to GM by the same thing that
drew him to the casinos of Las Vegas, where he became one of Sin
City’s original high rollers.

"It’s the love of the game," said Joe Phillippi, president of Auto
Trends Consulting in Short Hills, N.J. "It’s not for money per se,
because he’s got plenty. And it’s not about saving a great American
icon, though he uses that phrase a lot."

Phillippi thinks Kerkorian is attracted to the automotive industry by
its scale.

"Every bet in the automotive business is a billion dollars," he said.
"It’s a very expensive game to play."

Born in California to Armenian immigrants in 1917, Kerkorian dropped
out of school in the eighth grade and earned his pilot’s license by
milking cows for a flight instructor. He went to Canada to join
Britain’s Royal Air Force before the United States had even entered
World War II, volunteering for what many fliers regarded as suicide
missions in exchange for $1,000 a trip.

Kerkorian not only lived to tell about it, but also used his earnings
to start a small charter service back in the States when his tour of
duty ended. That took him to Vegas.

In 1962, he bought 80 acres on the Strip for just under $1 million.
He leased it to the builders of Caesars Palace and made $4 million
off the deal before selling it to the casino for another $5 million
in 1968.

Kerkorian went on to become one of the most successful hotel and
casino tycoons in Las Vegas and became the 19th richest person in
America, according to Forbes, which estimates his personal fortune at
more than $10 billion.

The billionaire investor manages his vast empire through his Beverly
Hills, Calif.-based Tracinda Corp. His interest in the automotive
industry dates back to 1990, when he started buying shares of
Chrysler Corp.

Kerkorian soon became Chrysler’s largest shareholder and a close ally
of then-CEO Lee Iacocca. Five years later, with Iacocca retired and
the company’s share price slumping, the pair made a play for control
of the company. Their hostile takeover bid failed, but Kerkorian did
convince Chrysler to put a Tracinda representative on its board, buy
back shares to increase their price and boost dividend payments.

Kerkorian acceded to what was pitched as Daimler-Benz AG’s "merger of
equals" with Chrysler in 1998. But he later sued the new company,
DaimlerChrysler AG, after then-CEO Juergen Schrempp told a London
newspaper he called the deal a "merger" just to get it done.

Kerkorian, represented on Chrysler’s board, claimed he had been duped
into supporting what had all along been a straight acquisition of
Chrysler. From the beginning, the Germans referred to the deal as
"die Uebernahme," or the takeover.

Last year, in a closely watched case, a federal judge ruled against
Kerkorian. But John Casesa, who follows the industry as a principal
of the Casesa Shapiro Group LLC in New York, said Kerkorian had
little to regret.

"I doubt very much it would have happened without him," Casesa said.
"He did get them to sell the company a high price. He made a lot on
that deal."

Last year, Kerkorian set his sights on GM. Already a major
shareholder, he began increasing his stake in the company even as
other investors were abandoning it. By December, he had amassed 9.9
percent of GM’s shares and was ready to start shaking things up.

In January, Tracinda demanded that GM cut its dividend payments in
half, cut executive compensation and consider selling off some of its
weaker brands. The company agreed to the first two demands. A month
later, Kerkorian forced GM to give Tracinda representative Jerry York
a seat on its board.

Kerkorian’s moves were seen as a challenge to GM Chairman and CEO
Rick Wagoner, even though the savvy mogul insisted in regulatory
filings that his interest was purely "passive."

"They’re persistent in pushing their agenda," Casesa said. "These
guys will not let up."

Why does Kerkorian do it?

Casesa said Kerkorian is a contrarian investor who fully appreciates
the risks and rewards of betting on troubled companies like GM, and
Chrysler before it. When he invests in a company, it is usually with
an eye to altering the corporate course to boost share price and book
a profit on his usually sizable investment.

"It is hard to rival buying into Chrysler at the bottom but he
certainly has been one to see the restructuring alternatives on the
other side of the blind panic that often creeps into these
situations," said Glenn Reynolds, an analyst with CreditSights, a New
York-based research firm. "He buys when others run scared, and he
uses his leverage or even the fear of his leverage to effect change."