Safin outclasses Armenian

Fox Sports, Australia
29 Oct. 2004

Safin outclasses Armenian
>>From correspondents in St Petersburg, Russia
October 29, 2004

RUSSIAN top seed Marat Safin outclassed Armenian Sargis Sargsian 6-4
6-2 today to reach the quarter-finals of the St Petersburg Open.

Earlier, Safin’s fourth-seeded countryman, Mikhail Youzhny, defeated an
error-prone Max Mirnyi of Belarus 7-5 3-6 6-2. And seventh-seeded
Michael Llodra of France eliminated German qualifier Michael Kohlmann
7-6 (7-3) 6-3, while Croatia’s Ivo Karlovic outlasted Spanish veteran
Alex Corretja 7-6 (7-3) 6-7 (7-5) 7-6 (8-6).

Safin, champion here in 2000 and 2001, is looking for a second
consecutive title, having won the Madrid Masters last week, and his
third this season.

“Everything worked out. I’m satisfied with my game today. If it goes
like this, I have good chances to play well in this tournament,” he
said.

Safin is sixth in the ATP Champions Race with 472 points, eight behind
Guillermo Coria and 12 behind Carlos Moya. With both skipping the
tournament this week, Safin has good chances to move into fourth next
week.

Youzhny, who won his only title in 2002, capitalised on Mirnyi’s 11
double faults. He broke the Belarusian in the 11th game of the opening
set to lead, but Mirnyi evened the match by breaking the Russian in the
sixth game of the second set.

In the third, Mirnyi double faulted at key moments, allowing Youzhny to
convert two break points.

Issues Of Armenian Genocide And Armenian-Turkish Relations ActivelyD

ISSUES OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AND ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS ACTIVELY DISCUSSED IN EUROPE
By Hakob Chakrian

What is EUâ~@~Ys Concern?

Azg/am
27 Oct 04

The European Commission issued a report suggesting the EU member state
leaders and governments to start accession talks with Turkey. All
the formulae unacceptable for Ankara and European statesâ~@~Y
preconceptions resulted in a debate long before December 17, EU summit
day that will set up the negotiation term.

The issues of Armenian Genocide acknowledgment as well as
Armenian-Turkish relations in general were not bypassed during these
debates neither in Europe nor in Turkey. Active involvement of NGOs
was very supportive in bringing issues up.

Eminent statesman Ilter Turkmen singled out Europeâ~@~Ys Friends
and Commission of Independent Turkey NGOs in an October 2 article of
Hyuriet. The former thinks that relations with neighboring Armenia
will be drawn forward if not now then at the accession stage, the
latter thinks that EU will suggest not only opening borders with
Armenia and putting right Armenia-Turkish relations but will also
exhort Turkey to recognize the tragic events of the past.

This is a hint about Armenian Genocide. Unlike the Commission of
Independent Turkey, the European-Armenians spoke out openly at their
first congress at the European Commission. They demanded EU member
states to include Armenian Genocide acknowledgment as a precondition
for Turkeyâ~@~Ys accession.

The EU December 17 summit will show if the European-Armenian
Federationâ~@~Ys demand was accepted or not. The fact is that the
discussions over Armenian Genocide acknowledgment and Armenia-Turkish
relations are not limited with the circle of European and Turkish
political fractions, Turkish NGOs and the European-Armenian Federation.

Scientific circles in their turn contribute to debates. The October 15
issue of Turkish Akos newspaper writes about a scientific conference
in Venice on October 28-30. Diaspora Armenians Levon Zekiyan, Ramon
Gevorgian, Iv Ternon, Turkish scientists Halil Terktay, Murad Belge,
Baskn Oran, Ferhat Qentel and Rag?p Zaraqolu, Tanem Akcam (USA) and
Ruben Safrastian from Armenia will take part at the conference called
“Armenian and Turks Throughout the History. Century-old Relations”.

Participation of Armenian Diaspora NGOs together with political circles
of Europe and Turkey at the Venice conference inspires hope that EU
will include the Armenian-Turkish relations in the precondition list
even though dropping out the Genocide acknowledgment.

EUâ~@~Ys New Neighborhood Initiative that took over the three South
Caucasian states on June 14 of the current year is also aimed at
that. But there is still an answered question: if the EU is concerned
with Armenian-Turkish relations why does Europe view this issue in
the context of the Armenian Genocide? By threatening Turkey with the
Genocide EU makes Turkey agree on improving relations with Armenia.

Therefore neither discussions over Armenian Genocide and
Armenian-Turkish relations nor the initiatives for those discussions
can be considered casual. It was in the interests of Europe that the
1st European-Armeniansâ~@~Y congress took place and that the Venice
scientific conference is to be held.

–Boundary_(ID_5w2z6JQuiovyrWNrkmKJXg)–

Conference of South Caucasian Media

Conference of South Caucasian Media

CASCFEN, Baku
25 Oct. 2004

Published: 25.10.2004

Rustavi 2, Tbilisi, 25.10.2004 — Metekhi Sheraton is hosting the
two days conference of the South Caucasian Media, which has been
initiated by the OSCE mission representatives in Georgia.

Over 50 journalists from Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia are
participating in the conference dedicated to the discussion of
the issues on free media, slander and offense and the appropriate
legislative base in these countries.

The conference was opened by the representative of the OSCE mission to
Georgia Roy Reeve and the deputy foreign affairs minister of Georgia
Kote Kavtaradze.

PM Speaks Out On Recent EU Report As He Attends OECD Meet

PM SPEAKS OUT ON RECENT EU REPORT AS HE ATTENDS OECD MEET

IPR Strategic Business Information Database
October 25, 2004

According to Milliyet, speaking at a press conference at an
Organization of the Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) meeting
in Paris, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkey had
adopted all the values represented by the European Union, adding that
the Turkish nation favored these values being established. Erdogan
stressed that the decision on starting Ankara’ds EU talks at its
December summit would be a turning point not only for Turkish-EU
relations but also for the new world order. The premier further
stressed that he hoped Ankara’ds accession talks would begin as soon as
possible. Asked about the so- called Armenian genocide, Erdogan said
that Turkey was comfortable with the issue, adding that it should be
evaluated by historians and scholars. Also touching on the Cyprus
issue, Erdogan lamented the Turkish Cypriots’d continued exclusion from
the EU despite their approval of the UN Cyprus plan, while the Greek
Cypriots who rejected the plan had joined the Union.

Georgian, Armenian Presidents Do Not Go To Suspicious Concert Hall

GEORGIAN, ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS DO NOT GO TO SUSPICIOUS CONCERT HALL

Rustavi-2 TV, Tbilisi
23 Oct 04

(Presenter) Let’s now return to the incident at the Achara Music Hall
(in Tbilisi). As we have already reported, everything was ready in
this concert hall for the arrival of (Georgian President) Mikheil
Saakashvili and (Armenian President) Robert Kocharyan when the
security service discovered a sniper rifle and a Kalashnikov
sub-machine-gun.

In the end, the two presidents did not attend the concert. (Passage
omitted)

ASBAREZ ONLINE [10-13-2004]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
10/13/2004
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://

1) ANCA Presents Armenian American Issues in Ethnic Roundtable with Ambassador
Holbrooke
2) Armenian Archbishop Assaulted by Yeshiva Student
3) Armenian Caucus Protests Azeri Threats against Armenia
4) Iraqi Kurds Ready to Fight for Kirkuk

1) ANCA Presents Armenian American Issues in Ethnic Roundtable with Ambassador
Holbrooke

Leading advisor to Kerry-Edwards campaign welcomes dialogue with ethnic
leadership

WASHINGTON, DCANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian participated this past week, along
with fifty of America’s ethnic community leaders, in a policy roundtable
featuring Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, a senior advisor to the Kerry-Edwards
campaign and a leading candidate for Secretary of State in the event of a
Democratic victory this November.
The private policy discussion was held on Thursday, October 7 in Cleveland,
Ohio. Topics ranged from a general review of ethnic priorities to specific
issues of concern to individual communities. A consistent theme raised by each
of the groups was that the Bush Administration has failed to meaningfully
engage America’s ethnic leadership or to seek out their special insights
during
the formulation and implementation of US foreign policy.
Speaking to concerns raised by the ANCA delegation, Amb. Holbrooke stressed
that Senator Kerry’s “friendship for Armenia goes back a long way. It’s well
established. He understands the issues. He’s taken a very strong stance on
Nagorno-Karabagh, on aid, on recognition of the Genocide, ending the blockades
of Armenia. There is a very clear cut difference between the two candidates.”
More broadly, the Ambassador noted that ethnic Americans “should make a
determination as to which candidate cares more about the issues of Central
Europe, including Macedonia, Armenia, and the other issues that we discussed
today. Without exception, the Democrats are going to do more. All of you in
this room know that… It’s just not a close contest here.” He added, “You
can’t represent the United States overseas if you don’t listen to the
people of
the United States…John Kerry and anybody he appoints to senior jobsdon’t
know
who he will appointbut he will listen to you all.”
“We welcomed this opportunity to represent the concerns of the Armenian
American community in this roundtable meeting of the leaders of our nation’s
ethnic communities,” said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. “Speaking to this
group,
Ambassador Holbrookea veteran foreign policy expert who has served at the
highest levels of the State Departmenthighlighted Senator Kerry’s strong
support for Armenian issuesincluding the recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
We were, of course, gratified by these remarks, as well as by his clearly
articulated expectation that a Kerry-Edwards Administration would pro-actively
seek the unique input and special insights of ethnic Americans on the often
complex foreign policy issues facing our nation.”
Richard Holbrooke served as US Ambassador to the United Nations in the
Clinton
Administration. He was also an Assistant Secretary of State and a special
envoy
to Bosnia and Kosovo. In this latter capacity he helped negotiate the Dayton
Peace Accords in 1995. He was introduced at the roundtable by his wife, Kati
Marton, who serves as the Chairwoman of the International Women’s Health
Coalition.
In addition to the Armenian American delegation, which included ANCA
Executive
Director Aram Hamparian and two leaders of the Ohio Armenian community, were
leaders from organizations representing Albanian Americans, Arab Americans,
Byelorussian Americans, Croatian Americans, Czech Americans, Greek Americans,
Hungarian Americans, Irish Americans, Italian Americans, Lithuanian Americans,
Muslim Americans, Polish Americans, Portuguese Americans, Romanian Americans,
Serbian Americans, Slovak Americans, Slovene Americans, Ukrainian Americans,
and Vietnamese Americans.

2) Armenian Archbishop Assaulted by Yeshiva Student

JERUSALEM (Combined Sources)An altercation that started when a yeshiva student
spat at the cross being carried by Armenian Archbishop in Israel Nourhan
Manougian during a procession near the Holy Sepulcher on Sunday, has exposed
growing tensions between traditional Christian denominations and religious
Jews
in Jerusalem’s Old City.
The student, Zvi Rosenthal, not only spat at the cross but also at Manougian
himself; Manougian reacted by slapping the yeshiva student.
The incident developed into a brawl during which Manougian’s ceremonial
medallion, which has been used by Armenian archbishops since the 17th century,
broke.
Both Archbishop Manougian and the yeshiva student were detained for
questioning.
Police are now considering whether to initiate criminal proceedings against
the Armenian archbishop and to charge him with assault. Meanwhile, the
incident
has sparked much anger among the clergy of the small Armenian community in
Jerusalem.
Religious Jews, among them yeshiva students, customarily spit on the
ground as
a sign of disgust on seeing the cross. The Armenians, who live adjacent to the
Jewish Quarter of the Old City, suffer from this phenomenon more than any of
the other Christian sects in the Old City.
Manougian says he and his colleagues have already learned to live with it. “I
no longer get worked up by people who turn around and spit when I pass them by
in the street; but to approach in the middle of a religious procession and to
spit on the cross in front of all the priests of the sect is humiliation that
we are not prepared to accept,” he notes.
A policeman is customarily posted to guard the Armenians’ religious
processions, but doesn’t generally do anything to prevent the spitting. The
Armenians took the matter up with Interior Minister Avraham Poraz some seven
months ago, but nothing has been done about until now.
“The Israeli government is anti-Christian,” Manougian charges. “It cries out
in the face of any harm done to Jews all over the world, but is simply not
interested at all when we are humiliated on an almost daily basis.”
“Incidents like these aim at ridding Jerusalem of its Christian and Muslim
populations in order to emphasize the city’s Jewish character,” emphasized
Catholicos of the Holy See of Cilicia Aram I.
Lawmaker Rabbi Michael Melchior (Labor Party) says the phenomenon should be
tackled through educational means. “I would expect prominent figures among the
religious and ultra-Orthodox sectors, such as the chief rabbis, to denounce
this phenomenon,” he says.
Yassir Arafat, leader of the Palestinian National Authority, condemned the
Israeli attack on Archbishop Manougian. Arafat held a telephone conversation
with the Archbishop inquiring about his health following the unwarranted
assault.

3) Armenian Caucus Protests Azeri Threats against Armenia

WASHINGTON, DCSeventy members of the US House of Representatives joined last
week with the Co-Chairmen of the Congressional Armenian Caucus, Frank Pallone
(D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI), in calling on President George Bush to
press
Azerbaijan to back away from increasingly violent rhetoric aimed at Armenia
and
Mountainous Karabagh, reported the Armenian National Committee Of America
(ANCA).
“We share the concerns raised by this bipartisan group of US legislators
regarding the growing danger to Armeniaand to American interestsposed by the
increasingly angry threats coming from Azerbaijan’s senior leadership,” said
ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “Armenian Americans appreciate the
leadership of Armenian Caucus Co-Chairmen Joe Knollenberg and Frank Pallone on
this issue, and look forward to learning of the Administrations response to
Azerbaijan’s irresponsible and dangerous behavior.”
In the letter, dated October 8th, Members of Congress specifically asked
President Bush to publicly condemn Azerbaijan’s war rhetoric and other
increasingly bellicose remarks against the Republic of Armenia and Mountainous
Karabagh. The letter, states, in part:
“Efforts to reinforce stability and reduce the risk of conflict are in the
best interests of the United States and the region. The Nagorno Karabagh peace
process will achieve nothing if Azerbaijan is allowed to risk war and predict
ethnic cleansing with impunity. To this end, we urge that you condemn these
remarks and call upon the government of Azerbaijan to desist in making any
further threats against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh.”
Joining Reps. Knollenberg and Pallone were: Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Robert
Andrews (D-NJ), Xavier Becerra (D-CA), Shelley Berkley (D-NV), Howard Berman
(D-CA), Michael Bilirakis (R-FL), Jeb Bradley (R-NH), Michael Capuano (D-MA),
Dennis Cardoza (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI), Jerry Costello (D-IL), Joseph
Crowley (D-NY), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Vernon Ehlers (R-MI),
Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Tom Feeney (R-FL), Bob Filner (D-CA), Mark Foley (R-FL),
Barney Frank (D-MA), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Michael
Honda (D-CA), Steve Israel (D-NY), Jesse Jackson (D-IL), Sue Kelly (R-NY),
Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), Mark Kirk (R-IL), Gerald Kleczka (D-WI), James
Langevin
(D-RI), Sander Levin (D-MI), Nita Lowey (D-NY), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Carolyn
Maloney (D-NY), Edward Markey (D-MA), Karen McCarthy (D-MO), Betty McCollum
(D-MN), Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI), James McGovern (D-MA), Michael McNulty
(D-NY), Martin Meehan (D-MA), Candice Miller (R-MI), James Moran (D-VA), Grace
Napolitano (D-CA), Devin Nunes (R-CA), Collin Peterson (D-MN), Jon Porter
(R-NV), David Price (D-NC), George Radanovich (R-CA), Mike Rogers (R-MI),
Steven Rothman (D-NJ), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), Bobby Rush (D-IL),
Loretta
Sanchez (D-CA), H. James Saxton (R-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA), E. Clay Shaw
(R-FL), Christopher Shays (R-CT), Brad Sherman (D-CA), John Shimkus (R-IL),
Mark Souder (R-IN), John Sweeney (R-NY), Stephanie Tubbs-Jones (D-OH), Fred
Upton (R-MI), Christopher Van Hollen (D-MD), Peter Visclosky (D-IN), Henry
Waxman (D-CA), Anthony Weiner (D-NY), Joe Wilson (R-SC), and Albert Wynn
(D-MD).
The ANCA, in a September 28th note to Congressional offices in support of
this
letter, wrote: “If history is any guide, silence on our part will only
embolden
the leadership in Baku to escalate their rhetoric even further. Left
unchecked,
we run the risk that the Azerbaijani government will translate their angry
remarks into aggressive actions that will create a humanitarian disaster and
destabilize a region of great strategic importance to the United States.”
On September 28th, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) spoke on the House floor about
the dangers posed by increasingly inflammatory Azerbaijani statements by
President Ilham Aliyev and his Cabinet Members, calling for a military
takeover
of neighboring Armenia and the decimation of its population in the coming
decades. In his remarks, Rep. Pallone cited statements “made by officials in
the government of President Aliyev calling into question the very existence of
Armenia. For example, as reported by Radio Free Europe, the Azerbaijani
Defense
Ministry spokesman called for Azerbaijan’s takeover of the entire territory of
Armenia and removal of the entire Armenian population from the Caucasus. He
went so far as to say, and I quote, ‘Within the next 25 years there will exist
no state of Armenia in the South Caucasus.’ Given Azerbaijan’s history of
aggression against Armenians, these remarks can’t be dismissed as mere
rhetoric.”

The text of the Congressional letter is provided below:

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing to strongly urge you to condemn the ongoing Azerbaijani war
rhetoric and other increasingly bellicose remarks made against the Republic of
Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh. These statements undermine US interests in the
region.
As you know, a cease-fire in the conflict over Nagorno Karabagh was
established in 1994 and sensitive peace negotiations to achieve a final
agreement are ongoing. However, the government of Azerbaijan continues to make
dangerous claims and threaten war against Armenia. This war rhetoric has
continued unabated and has intensified in recent months.
In July, as reported by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Azerbaijani
Defense Ministry spokesman called for Azerbaijan’s takeover of Armenia and
removing its entire population. He said, “In the next 25-30 years there
will be
no Armenian state in the South Caucasus. This nation has been a nuisance for
its neighbors and has no right to live in this region. Present-day Armenia was
built on historical Azerbaijani lands. I believe that in 25 to 30 years these
territories will once again come under Azerbaijan’s jurisdiction.” Mr.
President, this reprehensible call for ethnic cleansing and even genocide
warrants the strongest possible reply from our country.
The President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, has repeatedly declared that
Azerbaijan could launch a new war in Karabagh. Just two months ago, he stated,
“At any moment we must be able to liberate our territories by military means.
To achieve this we have everything.” Aliyev has directly linked Azerbaijan’s
economic progress to its military “superiority.” “Under these circumstances we
cannot react positively to those calling us to compromise,” Aliyev stated.
Last year, as reported by BBC Monitoring, Azerbaijani Defense Minister
General
Safar Abiyev said that occasional violations of the cease-fire were “natural”
since Azerbaijan is still “at war.” Statements like this not only undermine
the
peace process, but can also serve to actually encourage attacks against
Armenia.
Just this month, NATO canceled its Cooperative Best Effort (CBE) 2004
exercises in Baku, Azerbaijan after the government of Azerbaijan barred
Armenia
from participating. US General James Jones, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces
in Europe, expressed regret over Azerbaijan’s refusal to honor its host
obligations to accept delegates from all interested partners. As part of its
commitment to international security in the Caucasus, Armenia welcomed both
Azerbaijan and Turkey to participate in the NATO CBE 2003 exercises in
Yerevan,
Armenia.
Efforts to reinforce stability and reduce the risk of conflict are in the
best
interests of the United States and the region. The Nagorno Karabagh peace
process will achieve nothing if Azerbaijan is allowed to risk war and predict
ethnic cleansing with impunity. To this end, we urge that you condemn these
remarks and call upon the government of Azerbaijan to desist from making any
further threats against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh.

4) Iraqi Kurds Ready to Fight for Kirkuk

ANKARA (AFP)Iraqi Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani said that the oil-rich
city of
Kirkuk in northern Iraq had a Kurdish “identity” and vowed to fight any force
attempting to oppress its people, whether Kurds or other ethnic groups.
Barzani, head of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), was speaking after
talks in Ankara with Turkish leaders, who are worried that the Iraqi Kurds are
plotting to take control of the city, which also has a large population of
Turkmens, a community with Turkish roots.
“If anyone, if any regime or system wants to continue the Arabization or
oppression of the people of Kirkuk, we will defend their rights and we are
ready to fight for them,” Barzani told AFP through an interpreter.
He said the Iraqi Kurds would defend not only the Kurdish people of Kirkuk
but
“any other group or minority” in the city.
The Iraqi Kurds say Kirkuk was overwhelmingly Kurdish in the 1950s before
Baghdad started a deliberate campaign of “Arabization,” during which thousands
of Arabs were encouraged to settle in the city.
Many also demand that Kirkuk be made the capital of an independent Kurdish
state.
The Iraqi Kurdish leadership, however, says that city should be incorporated
in an enlarged autonomous Kurdish region but reject the idea of independence,
knowing it would be unacceptable to Turkey and other neighbors.
Ankara has repeatedly warned the Iraqi Kurds against attempts to upset the
demography of the region.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul
reiterated the warning in their meetings with Barzani on Monday, Turkish
diplomats said.
In an apparent bid to placate Ankara, Barzani promised that Iraqi Kurds would
work for peaceful co-existence between the ethnic groups of Kirkuk.
“Our position is that the identity of Kirkuk is part of Kurdistan. But it is
an Iraqi city,” he said. “The promotion of co-existence and fraternity (in
Kirkuk) has to be a priority for everybody. We are working in that
direction.”
Ankara fears that Kurdish control of the area’s oil resources could further
strengthen the Iraqi Kurds whom it suspects of plotting to break away from
Baghdad.
Such a prospect, Ankara worries, could fan separatist sentiment among its own
restive Kurds in southeast Turkey.
“Kirkuk is a city where all ethnic elements can settle. It is not a place
where a certain party can claim control,” Erdogan told the Aksam daily in an
interview published on Tuesday.
“We are in favor of Iraq’s territorial integrity. We are against any ethnic
group establishing control over another,” he said.
The question of the Kurds’ return to Kirkuk has fueled tensions in the city.
The interim government in Baghdad has so far roundly rejected calls for the
expulsion of the Arab settlers.
Barzani said his talks in Ankara confirmed that Turkey and the Iraqi Kurds
continued to differ on some issues on the future of Iraq even though they
shared the same vision on many others.
“But in general I can say very happily that it was a very positive
atmosphere…We both agreed that there should be continuous contacts and
consultations between us,” he said.

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2004 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt
HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
WWW.ASBAREZ.COM

ANC of NY meets with Prime Minister of Taiwan

PRESS RELEASE

Armenian National Committee
Eastern United States
69-23 47th Avenue
Woodside, NY 11377
Contact: Doug Geogerian
Tel: 917 428 1918
Fax: 718 651 3637
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

ANC of New York and City Council Member Gioia Welcome Prime Minister
of Taiwan to New York City

Armenian National Committee of New York (ANC of New York) Chairperson
Tony Vartanian and activist Nazo Haroutunian joined City Council Member
Gioia and other community leaders to welcome Taiwanese Prime Minster
Yu Shyi-kun to Queens on September 3, 2004 at a cocktail reception
at the Water’s Edge Restaurant, scenically located on the East River
across from the United Nations.

Prime Minister Yu concluded a two-week journey to North America,
completing a trip meant to promote trade and build diplomatic
friendships, including stops in the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua,
and Honduras. The ANC of New York was proud to participate in a
private ceremony where New York dignitaries and prominent members of
the community honored Prime Minister Yu and presented him with gifts
in an expression of goodwill.

The ANC of New York has a close, working relationship with City Council
Member Gioia. In April 2003, Council Member Gioia spoke movingly at
the ANC of New York Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide held at City
Hall. Mr. Gioia applauded the community’s efforts to fight for official
recognition and vowed to support the effort in anyway he could.

Chairperson Vartanian said, “We thank Council Member Gioia for
recognizing the ANC of New York as the resonating voice of the
Armenian-American community and a leading organization in our diverse
New York City landscape. The private event honoring Prime Minister
Yu shows the Council Member’s commitment to the inclusion of the
Armenian-American voice”.

Mr. Vartanian added, “Queens is the most diverse borough of recent
immigrants, composed of many ethnic communities including a strong
Armenian-American community. The Armenian-American community has
been especially pro-active at reaching out to elected officials. In
an effort to gain a stronger voice for the diverse communities of
Queens, the ANC of New York is enthusiastic about fostering a strong
relationship with leaders of other ethnic communities”.

http://www.anca.org/

Russia to benefit from NATO expansion into Caucasus, US envoy says

Russia to benefit from NATO expansion into Caucasus, US envoy says

Mediamax news agency, Yerevan
12 Oct 04

NATO’s expansion into the Caucasus should not worry Moscow since
the alliance’s major goal is to boost security cooperation in
the region to ensure peace and stability, US ambassador to NATO
Nicholas Burns has said in an exclusive interview with Armenian
Mediamax news agency. The reason for NATO’s shift of focus is that
it faces common security threats with the nations in the region.
“These are the threats Russia faces as well, and Russia can only
benefit from NATO’s work in this area,” Burns said. However, he said
that despite active cooperation with the South Caucasus countries,
it was premature to consider NATO membership for these countries. The
following is an excerpt from the interview in English by Mediamax on
12 October headlined “NATO’s special focus on the Caucasus should not
raise concerns in Moscow”; subheadings have been inserted editorially:

[Mediamax correspondent] For the last two or three years Armenia-NATO
relations have entered a qualitatively new level. What factors do
you think played the main role in Armenia’s decision to activate its
relations with the alliance?

[Nicholas Burns] I remember listening to your president’s speech at
the summit meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council [EAPC]
in Prague in November 2002. He announced that Armenia would hold its
first Partnership for Peace (PfP) exercise and contribute to NATO-led
peacekeeping operations. Since then, Armenia successfully hosted the
Cooperative Best Effort 2003 exercises, joined the KFOR operation in
Kosovo, announced its intention to launch an Individual Partnership
Action Plan with NATO, and nominated its first ambassador to be
accredited solely to the alliance. So you are certainly right that, as
your president pledged, Armenia has been increasingly active with NATO.

As to why, of course, only your government can provide an authoritative
answer.

Cooperation with NATO to help reduce regional tension

I will say, however, that, given NATO’s role as the primary guarantor
of peace and stability in Europe, cooperation with the alliance offers
a range of benefits to Armenia. Moreover, the September 2001 terrorist
attacks stimulated a closer relationship between NATO and all members
of Partnership for Peace, as it brought home the recognition that we
face new, immediate, and common threats.

Participating in NATO’s Partnership for Peace can also help reduce
regional tensions. It is therefore natural that Armenia would want
to be an active part of Partnership for Peace, which embraces all
nations in the Caucasus.

[Correspondent] Many people in Armenia think that sooner or
later Armenia will have to choose between maintaining close
military-political relations with Russia and striving for further
integration into NATO. There is another opinion as well: Armenia
can become kind of a link between Russia and NATO in the South
Caucasus. Which of these two positions is closer to you?

[Burns] [Armenian] Foreign Minister [Vardan] Oskanyan speaks of
the principle of “complementarity” between closer relations with
the Euro-Atlantic community and Armenia’s historical relationship
with Russia. The fact that other CIS members also participate
in Partnership for Peace, that Russia itself enjoys a unique and
constructive relationship with NATO, and that we cooperate with Russia
in security issues from the Mediterranean to the Arctic support your
minister’s view.

At the same time, there are indeed substantial differences in the
ways NATO and Russia organize their military forces and defence
organizations. If Armenia wants to significantly improve its
interoperability with NATO, it will have to revise some of those
structures. So there are practical issues that may convince your
government to take a hard look at the future structure of Armenia’s
armed forces.

NATO membership for Caucasus countries premature

[Correspondent] It is very often noted in the western press that
despite the activation of relations with NATO, pro-Russian Armenia
is less preferred than Georgia and Azerbaijan, which are allegedly
“more sincere” in their desire to enhance cooperation with the
alliance. That’s why the authors of such statements say that NATO
should “forget” about Armenia and pay special attention to Georgia
and Azerbaijan. What do you think about this?

[Burns] At the Istanbul Summit in June, NATO decided to put a special
focus on the Caucasus and Central Asia, assigning liaison officers and
appointing a special representative for the two regions. The amount
of time and effort devoted to individual nations within those regions
will be largely demand-driven, depending on the level of interaction
that each nation chooses to have with NATO.

Partnership for Peace is a “26+1” arrangement meaning that partners
individually choose which joint activities they want to participate
in. These can range from training and seminars to participation in
full-fledged peacekeeping operations. None of these activities is
required of any partner. So it is really up to you how much attention
Armenia gets from NATO.

Georgia and Azerbaijan have been active in Partnership for Peace
and the EAPC, as has Armenia. I would mention especially Armenia’s
contribution to peacekeeping operations in Kosovo and successful
hosting of the Cooperative Best Effort 2003 exercise last year. Armenia
recently announced its intention to prepare an Individual Partnership
Action Plan IPAP a demanding and ambitious program for restructuring
defence institutions along more transparent and efficient lines. That
is a strong commitment to continuing cooperation with the alliance,
and NATO appreciates this.

[Correspondent] Do you agree with the point of view that NATO is
ready to go as far in its relations with Armenia as Armenia itself
is ready for it?

[Burns] Through the IPAP, the Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism
and for Defence Institution Building, joint peacekeeping operations,
and Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council consultations, NATO and Armenia
can go long ways together indeed.

[Correspondent] This April, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan
said: “If Georgia and Azerbaijan become NATO members at last and
Armenia does not, this will obviously bring about new separation
lines in the Caucasus.” He noted that “these issues not only caused
our concern but also worried NATO, the United States and Russia,
and that’s why they will be very careful and will try to avoid such
a scenario”. Are you really trying to avoid such a scenario?

[Burns] In Istanbul, NATO reaffirmed its “open door” policy and stated
that its seven new members would not be the last but it is premature
to consider eventual membership for any nation in the Caucasus.

NATO’s goal is to increase security cooperation in regions and we
are ready to work closely with the Caucasus countries for peace
and stability.

Russia to benefit from NATO expansion

[Correspondent] After the recent NATO Summit in Istanbul it became
obvious that the South Caucasus has become one of the top priority
regions for the Alliance. Won’t this arouse a new wave of concern on
the part of Russia?

[Burns] Compared to the broad range of interests that Russia shares
with NATO promoting peace, stability, and growth, and combating
terrorism, proliferation, and illegal trafficking areas of difference
are relatively few.

NATO’s special focus on the Caucasus should not raise that kind
of concern in Moscow. Via the NATO-Russia Council, NATO allies and
Russia are addressing our shared interests and seeking to combat common
threats. The reason for NATO’s shift of focus is the recognition that
we face common security threats with the nations in those regions, and
many of those threats arise from the periphery, beyond Europe. These
are the threats Russia faces as well, and Russia can only benefit
from NATO’s work in this area.

[Passage omitted: Armenia is working on the Individual Partnership
Actions Plan with NATO; NATO regrets cancellation of PfP exercises
in Baku; Turkey-Armenia partnership possible within NATO]

Visa-free territory for Russian army group in Caucasus

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
October 6, 2004, Wednesday

VISA-FREE TERRITORY FOR THE RUSSIAN ARMY GROUP IN THE CAUCASUS

SOURCE: Krasnaya Zvezda, October 2, 2004, p. 3

by Oleg Gorupai

TBILISI PREVENTS NORMAL LIFE SUPPORT OF THE RUSSIAN MILITARY BASES
LOCATED ON THE TERRITORY OF GEORGIA

The authorities of Georgia do what they can to prevent normal life
support of the Russian military bases located on the territory of
this country.

For example, Foreign Ministry of Georgia is deliberately taking its
time to provide entry visas for servicemen assigned to the 12th
(Batumi) and 62nd (Akhalkalaki) military bases of the Russian Army
Group in the Caucasus. As of this June, over 400 servicemen
(conscripts, officers, and warrant officers) cannot reach their
destination in Armenia (the 102nd Military base). Some of the
conscripts have to be demobilized now.

The situation of whoever already been to Georgia and serves in the
Tbilisi, Batumi, or Akhalkalaki garrisons is somewhat better. Because
of unprecedented and unexplained delays with visas, many of them
cannot take a vacation in Russia and actually run the risk of being
jailed to violation of the visa regime.

Lieutenant General Alexander Studenikin (commander of the Russian
Army Group in the Caucasus), his Chief-of-Staff Andrei Popov, Colonel
Ramazan Krimcheyev (of the department of organization and
mobilization who tackles visa problems), and Russian diplomats
regularly appeal to the Defense Ministry of Georgia, Foreign
Ministry, and presidential administration… with nothing to show for
it. Only a few servicemen were given the necessary documents
permitting them to cross the Russian-Georgian border – even though
finances are not a problem because the Army Group has a special
foundation to tackle these matters. Even though official Tbilisi
claimed for the entire world to hear that Russian military bases had
not been involved in the Adjarian events.

It is common knowledge that the term of presence of the Russian
military bases in Georgia is a subject of negotiations between
Georgia and Russia. According to the international norms and
standards, unless the matter is settled Georgia is not supposed to
create any barriers or make life harder for the bases or servicemen
assigned to them. Unfortunately, official Tbilisi is quite selective
when it comes down to international standards. In other words, it
does not always apply them to its relation with Russia.

Translated by A. Ignatkin

BAKU: Official Rules Turkey in but Karabakh out of talks on Karabakh

Azeri official rules Turkey in but Karabakh out of talks on Karabakh

ANS TV, Baku
8 Oct 04

[Presenter] The Russian co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Yuriy
Merzlyakov, has stressed the importance of Turkey’s involvement in the
settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict. At the same time, Yuriy
Merzlyakov insists on the participation of Nagornyy Karabakh as a
party in the talks.

[Correspondent] A lasting solution to the Nagornyy Karabakh problem
cannot be practically found without Turkey’s involvement, the Russian
co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Yuriy Merzlyakov, said in an
interview with the Armenian Regnum news agency.

[Passage omitted: Merzlyakov on criticism of the Minsk Group]

Merzlyakov said once again that one could not expect the co-chairmen
to come up with a secret settlement formula. In his opinion, the
problem cannot be resolved without agreement in principle between the
parties to the conflict.

Mr Merzlyakov said that the next visit by [OSCE] co-chairmen to the
region would depend on the presidents of the two countries [Azerbaijan
and Armenia]. He did not rule out that the visit could take place
before the end of this year.

In his interview, the Russian co-chairman said once again that
Nagornyy Karabakh should be involved in peace talks as an independent
party. Many issues could not be discussed and resolved without
Nagornyy Karabakh’s participation, end of quote.

Commenting on Yuriy Merzlyakov’s statements, the head of the
international relations department at the presidential administration,
Novruz Mammadov, said that Azerbaijan wanted Turkey to be involved in
the peace talks. This country could play a pivotal role in the
settlement of the conflict. We take this into consideration and we
have said on many occasions that Turkey could join in the
negotiations, end of quote.

However, Mr Mammadov noted that the Russian co-chairman’s opinion that
Nagornyy Karabakh should take part in the talks was not real. Azerbaijan
is not going to talk to separatists.