Presidential Oversight Service Reveals Serious Privatization Breache

PRESIDENTIAL OVERSIGHT SERVICE REVEALS SERIOUS PRIVATIZATION BREACHES AND FRAUD

Armenpress

YEREVAN, JULY 12, ARMENPRESS: The presidential oversight service
said it is now examining a set of privatization deals on the sale and
auctioning of state-run property and land plots to find out whether
the process was in compliance with Armenian legislation. The oversight
service said the examination is envisaged by its 2006 plan of actions.

Officials from the oversight service said inquiries into the first
instances of state-run property privatization have revealed serious
cases of abuse and fraud, which have caused heavy damages to the state.

The service said, particularly, the money that was paid by individuals
and organizations for the obtained assets, were not transferred to the
state budget by brokers or were transferred in part only. It said in
some instances faked documents were submitted to cadastre offices. The
oversight service said criminal cases were instituted on these cases.

Nairobi: Witnesses credibility queried

They are on politicians’ payroll, say lawyers
By MAXWELL MASAVA, EMMANUEL ONYANGO

Kenya Times
July 12 2006

Witnesses credibility queried

LAWYERS appearing for individuals adversely mentioned at the Kiruki
commission yesterday claimed that some witnesses were on the payroll
of unnamed politicians to lie to the commission.

Lawyer Gibson Kamau Kuria appearing for Winnie Wangui yesterday
accused two Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) officials who appeared to
testify yesterday and Tuesday, of having been ‘paid’ by politicians
to appear and lie to the commission.

Kuria said two senior customs officials attached to Jomo Kenyatta
International Airport had created fictitious stories surrounding the
Arturs’ gun drama at the airport to cover up the truth.

He accused Charles Nambale, a senior revenue official and Nelson
Ochieng of having lied to the commission about the Arturs drawing
out guns at the baggage hall.

Similar sentiments were raised at the commission last week when a
lawyer appearing for suspended CID director, Joseph Kamau, accused
another witness as having been ‘hired’ to give evidence.

Jane Ondieki told the commission that Dominic Opar Owiya, the
security manager at Panari hotel was a "witness on hire" and needed
investigations. The commission later launched investigations into
the claims.

Yesterday, Dr Kuria said that witnesses were lying to the commission
and a failure to seriously cross-examine them would lead to hiding
the truth and hurting those who have been adversely mentioned.

Ondieki appearing for the suspended CID director put Nambale to task
over his age.

She challenged the witness to tell the commission why he had lied
about his age to doctors who treated him after the scuffle.

Nambale, who still claimed to be in pains of June 8 scuffle told
the commission that he had erred by putting his age at 49 when he
visited doctors.

His actual age is 52.

He caused laughter at the hearings when he told the commission that
he was poor in mathematics and would revisit the hospitals to rectify
the anomaly.

Ondieki had sought clarification as to why the commission should
trust evidence of a man who had lied to doctors to get medical forms
and P3 forms.

The witness had a difficult time in explaining how he was injured as
the medical reports indicated that he was bruised on the head and
knee, despite his earlier account where he denied ever having been
punched in the face or suffering injuries in the legs. He told the
commission that the Arturs only pointed a finger in his face and he
never fell on the ground to suffer bruises.

However, the senior customs official who appeared a day after his
junior, Nelson Ochieng, caused light moments at the inquiry when kept
on asking for pain killers to contain the pain he now had to contend
with following the confrontation with the Arturs.

He told the commission that he was willing to sue the Artur brothers
over assault if he was to be facilitated with their true names and
pictures.

"My lords commissioners I may apply that you assist me with their
names and pictures to enable me sue them."

Medical reports from Nairobi Hospital and Nairobi West Hospital where
he had sought treatment showed he had been treated of severe head
bruises, disjointed hip-joint and a sprained right leg, and that he
had since been on psychotherapy and pain killers.

He at one point requested to be served with a pair of Panadol tablets
to reduce recurring pains from the beatings he received from the
Arturs.

Though contradictory, the witness insisted that so severe was the push
from the Armenian that he dislocated his hip joint in an attempt to
resist the push that would have confined him to "the grave."

Last week, Ondieki claimed that Owiya who had appeared at the
commission to testify on Arturs’ presence at Panari Sky Centre the
same evening, was a known "witness on hire" who had testified in a
murder case involving businessman, Kamlesh Pattni.

BAKU: Aliyev: Armenia, Azerbaijan far from peace accord

Aliyev: Armenia, Azerbaijan far from peace accord

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Posted July 11 2006

Baku, July 10, AssA-Irada

President Ilham Aliyev has said Azerbaijan and Armenia are far from
reaching a peace accord.

"The proposals made by the OSCE Minsk Group [mediating settlement
to the Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh conflict] show the position of
its co-chairs. But we haven’t agreed them," Aliyev told Turkey’s
Jumhuriyyat (Republic) newspaper.

"The co-chairs just disclosed some of the proposals in their latest
statements. We didn’t object to this, as we are not interested in
shrouding talks in secrecy," President Aliyev said, but added that
Azerbaijan agreed to hold talks in private considering Armenia’s
proposals.

The document outlining the core settlement principles issued by the
mediators from the United States, Russia and France caused a great
deal of debate. The statement, made public by the US co-chair, said
there is a "framework agreement" on discussion and disclosed all of
its provisions. The deal covers the withdrawal of Armenian forces from
the occupied Azeri territories, followed by normalizing diplomatic
and economic relations between the two countries, deployment of
peacekeepers in the conflict zone and finally, a vote to determine
the future status of Upper Garabagh.

The head of state said that first of all, Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity must be restored to settle the Garabagh conflict. Any
compromises are out of the question, as the occupied territories must
be liberated and Azeri refugees and IDPs returned home, Aliyev said.

With regard to the future status of Upper Garabagh, the president said
the positions of the two communities of Garabagh should be taken into
account, as both Azerbaijanis and Armenians had lived in Upper Garabagh
before the outbreak of the conflict. The return of Azerbaijanis to
Upper Garabagh is a condition for the solution of the status issue,
he said.

"They must return and re-settle there. Afterwards, both communities
and Azerbaijan – as Upper Garabagh is its integral part- may hold
talks on the status of the region. Time will show how long these
talks will last." President Aliyev went on to say that the OSCE
mediators and the leadership of Armenia realize that Azerbaijan will
never allow violating its territorial integrity, although Armenia is
trying to put forth unrealistic claims.

"The truth is that Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity is not a subject
of discussion and Upper Garabagh will never be granted the status of
independence," Aliyev said.

He said Armenia is currently trying to annex Upper Garabagh, which
is impossible.

"I may want to annex Azerbaijani historic land – the Irevan Khanate
(currently the territory of Yerevan) to Azerbaijan. But this is not
realistic now," the president said.

Aliyev did not rule out that a new war will be launched if the Garabagh
conflict is not settled in peace.

"We see that the Armenian side is acting insincere in talks. We should
therefore be prepared for all options. Azerbaijan’s increasing economic
potential military power, regional situation and our ever-growing
world image certainly puts us at a prevalent position.

This will be more evident as years go by. Armenia should realize this
and will bear responsibility for any possible consequences."*

Liberated Territories In NKR Constitution

LIBERATED TERRITORIES IN NKR CONSTITUTION

Lragir.am
11 July 06

"Unfortunately, neither official Yerevan nor official Stepanakert treat
the liberated territories duly," Kiro Manoyan, ARF representative
in charge of political affairs and Hay Dat, stated July 11 at the
Hayeli Club. Expressing the standpoint of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation, he said they even propose setting down the dominance of
NKR over these territories in the NKR Constitution. In the meantime,
Yerevan and Stepanakert view these areas as an object of compromise
in the Armenian and Azerbaijani negotiations, states Kiro Manoyan.

The ARF member assures that these territories cannot be conceded,
and Armenia should concede something else. Kiro Manoyan hints at
the agreement of Armenia to hold a new referendum on the status of
Karabakh. According to Kiro Manoyan, it is a compromise, for Karabakh
has already held a referendum and established its will.

Kiro Manoyan says the fault of the Armenian side is that NKR and
Armenia have announced on the level of defense ministers that
they are ready to concede territories. These statements did not
produce any results, says Kiro Manoyan. He says the fact that the
self-determination of NKR is on the table of negotiations may be
considered a result, but "it is highly disputable," says Kiro Manoyan.

BAKU: Yerevan has not yet received proposals from Gazprom to acquire

Yerevan has not yet received proposals from Gazprom to acquire Iran-Armenia pipeline

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
July 10 2006

Source: Trend
Author: À.Mammadov

10.07.2006

(REGNUM) – The Armenian side has not received any proposals from
Gazprom concerning acquiescence of the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline,
which construction is now underway; spokeswoman for the Armenian
Energy Ministry Lusine Arutyunyan is quoted as saying by a REGNUM
correspondent. According to her, the ministry received no proposals
and has no talks concerning sale of the pipeline. Commenting on a
recent statement of Gazprom Deputy CEO Alexander Ryazanov, who said
the company was intending to buy the pipeline, spokeswoman for the
Armenian energy ministry noted, "it was probably an intention by the
company itself."

It is worth reminding, late June Gazprom deputy CEO announced that
the company intended to buy the Iran-Armenia pipeline. According to
him, putting the pipeline into operation would let secure stable gas
supplies in Armenia. "There are problems with gas transit to Armenia
via Georgia, as Georgia presumes unsanctioned pumping out of gas,"
Ryazanov said, reports Trend.

The Iran-Armenia pipeline is supposed to be put into operation in
the end of this year. The pipeline that connects Iran and Armenia
has a diameter of 700 mm, and its estimated capacity is 1.2 bln cubic
meter of gas per year. The project of constructing the Iran-Armenia
pipeline 141 km long has estimated cost of $120 million.

–Boundary_(ID_tHJUMk5LbeQBr5pvtEDeJw)–

BAKU: Creative opportunities of mediators exhausted, leaders of cont

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
July 7 2006

Creative opportunities of mediators exhausted, leaders of confect
countries should take initiatives – U.S. Amb at OSCE MG

Source: Trend
Author: E.Huseynov

07.07.2006

The statements by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs in a meeting of the
OSCE permanent committee, who stated that they ‘can’t do anything more
in the definition of peaceable principles of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict’ do not mean a deadlock, U.S. Ambassador Matthew Bryza,
the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair told Azerbaijani Service of BBC.

The statement means the creative opportunities of mediators have
exhausted and therefore, there is necessity for initiatives in decision
making by leaders of the confect countries. "It is not a deadlock. It
is the moment in the negotiation process when the co-chairs say the
leaders can take a resolution that they want," Bryza underscored.

Both leaders possess political will, wish cooperation, but we still
do not know whether they are ready to take final and difficult steps
to summarize the major principles of frame agreement, he said. "Now
it is high time when the leaders should explain their nations the
benefit of the peace plan, show the way for progress with the help
of compromises. This is the way of diplomacy," the mediator emphasized.

Bryza underlined that thee are fair and encouraging principles.
"These are the best of all proposals put so far. I’d say that we are
too far to peace as never. But I can’t guarantee that the Presidents
using their sovereign rights will accept these proposals or inject
changes, which would satisfy both sides," he stressed.

According to the co-chair, the statement by the United States on
support to territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and a principle on
self-determination do not contradict each other. "If you pay attention
to the statements by the co-chairs, they refer to both principles. The
most important is to find the contacts between these principles at
the table of talks.

Geopolitical Reality Is Changing

GEOPOLITICAL REALITY IS CHANGING

Lragir.am
07 July 06

Mathew Bryza’s statements show that the geopolitical situation is
changing in the region, stated Ruben Safrastyan, expert of Turkish
Studies, who commented Mathew Bryza with Hrant Khachatryan on July
7 at the Hayeli Club.

Ruben Safrastyan believes that the geopolitical status quo established
10-12 years ago is changing, the evidence to this is the pullout of the
Russian force from Georgia, the operation of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline. Ruben Safrastyan thinks that another display of changes
underway will be the alleged membership of Georgia to NATO, which
will happen in the nearest future, says the expert of Turkish studies.

Ruben Safrastyan says Bryza’s statement implies that the United States
is likely to have political processes in the region, including Armenia,
adjusted to the new geopolitical state of things. Ruben Safrastyan,
expert of Turkish studies, thinks that connecting Turkish-Armenian
relations and the resolution of the Karabakh conflict, which Bryza did,
is in this context.

Ruben Safrastyan stresses that this approach is not new and,
unfortunately, expresses the approach of the United States to
this issue. He says Armenia should do its best to divide the
Turkish-Armenian relations and the resolution of the conflict over
Karabakh by changing the approach of the United States.

The leader of the Constitutional Right Union Hrant Khachatryan
agrees with Ruben Safrastyan. According to him, the geopolitical
frontier has moved towards the East since 1985. In his opinion,
Armenia should be more alert and attentive in such a situation, get
rid of historical complexes and make realistic decisions. Therefore,
according to Hrant Khachatryan, there are quite favorable international
components, and we only have to find a correct and effective solution
of national problems.

BAKU: Iran FM: Larijani-Solana Talks On Iran Nuclear Issue Called Of

IRAN FM: LARIJANI-SOLANA TALKS ON IRAN NUCLEAR ISSUE CALLED OFF
Author: À.Mammadov

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
July 5 2006

(IRNA) – Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki here Wednesday said that
talks scheduled for today between Supreme National Security Council
(SNSC) Secretary Ali Larijani and European Union foreign policy chief
Javier Solana will not be held.

Larijani and Solana were scheduled to hold talks on Europe’s package
of incentives to Iran on Wednesday (today).

Mottaki made the disclosure on the sidelines of the official
welcoming ceremony held this morning to welcome Armenian President
Robert Kocharian who is in the country for a two-day official visit,
reports Trend.

Mottaki made the disclosure when asked about the Larijani-Solana
talks and what he predicted would be the outcome.

–Boundary_(ID_oaGOlOpKosibfvKLKx2gcg)–

Today Armenia Celebrates Constitution Day

TODAY ARMENIA CELEBRATES CONSTITUTION DAY

ArmRadio.am
05.07.2006 12:10

The Constitution of the Republic of Armenia is 11. In 1995 the first
Constitution in the Armenian history was adopted. In the 10th year
of its existence the Major Law of the country faced the necessity of
amendments. During the past decade the Constitution has many times
demonstrated its vitality and has shown ways out of the most complex
situations, the authorities mention, simultaneously stating that the
Constitutional amendments are of great importance for the progress
of the Republic of Armenia. The reformed Constitution is already in
force today.

"11 years ago the new Constitution laid the legal basis of our
statehood," says RA Ombudsman Armen Harutyunyan.

BAKU: Foreign Ministry Answers To OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ Last S

FOREIGN MINISTRY ANSWERS TO OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS’ LAST STATEMENT

Today, Azerbaijan
July 4 2006

There is nothing new in the statement of OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs,
the principles enumerated there are known to all of us, Azerbaijani
side for several times held talks about its position and details
discussed.

Our approach is very simple. The settlement of the conflict is of
packet and staged character, within the first stage 8-10 components
should be implemented as well as liberating of occupied territories
around Nagorno Karabakh, withdrawal of Armenian troops from the
occupied territories, demining of the territories, restoration of
infrastructure, returning of refugees, provision of their security
and etc. After the first stage implemented, the second stage might
be matter of talk.

After the ethnic demographic restoration of the population of the
Nagorno Karabakh region as before the time of the conflict, and
provision of two communities’ security, the talk might be held on
legal, constitutional, democratic way that identifies the status of
Nagorno Karabakh.

This only might be possible on the base of Constitution of Azerbaijan
Republic and within territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. The third
article of the Constitution provides that way; this might be the way
of national referendum. Foreign Ministry Press and Information Policy
Office chief Tahir Taghizade has told in his statement related to
OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs’ statement made yesterday.

As concerns the role of presidents in the statement of co-chairs, the
diplomat reminded the main format of the Prague process to be meetings
of foreign ministers and foreign ministers’ to create possible base
for meeting of Presidents.

"Without this ground the meeting of Presidents will not be efficient
and can not start." Expressing attitude to the opinion in the
statement "We stand ready to assist the parties to conclude an
agreement if the Presidents indicate they are prepared to do so"
Tahir Taghizade stated that OSCE Minsk Group mandate’s duty is to
solve the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

"They might be considered the other party, Azerbaijani President
stated for several times the Azerbaijan is ready to peace talks and
diplomatic ways."

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/27843.html