First Tragedy: Simons shocked to discover truth on forgotten holoc.

Morning Star
September 20, 2004

The first tragedy;
PICK:GEOFF SIMONS is shocked to discover the truth about a terrible
forgotten holocaust of the 20th century.

by GEOFF SIMONS

THE BURNING TIGRESS by Peter Balakian (William Balakian, GBP 18.99)

MANY of us are familiar with the words Adolf Hitler uttered to his
military advisers eight days before the nazis invaded Poland:

“Who today, after all, speaks of the annihilation of the Armenians?”
– a prelude to the nazi extermination of the Jews, Gypsies,
homosexuals and other victim groups.

Few of us, I reckon, know about the sheer scale of the vast crime
perpetrated by the Turks against the Armenian nation.

This was the first holocaust of the 20th century, predating by
decades the horrors of the World War II. Regarding the Armenian
extermination, the US was to emerge as a principal holocaust denier.

Balakian describes in graphic and harrowing detail the three stages
of persecution of the Armenian people, from the relatively
small-scale massacres under Abdul Hamid II to the ethnic cleansing
undertaken by the forces of the Turkish Committee of Union and
Progress under the cover of the first world war.

Extensive use is made of eyewitness accounts of US diplomats,
missionaries, massacre survivors and others and of the gruesome
testimony of the persecutors themselves, given during the short-lived
trials of the 1920s.

The great powers failed to respond effectively, just as they failed
to halt later genocides.

As Hitler knew, the fate of the Armenians was largely forgotten and
the dreadful lessons of the genocide were largely ignored.

It is to Balakian’s credit that he has helped to restore an early
20th-century tragedy to its rightful place in history.

I read this book with a mounting sense of shock. It is enough to
quote, almost at random, from the account of the massacres:

“Acommon practice was to . . . begin with bastinado . . . which
consists of beating the soles of the feet with a thin rod . . . until
the feet swell and burst . . . not infrequently, they have to be
amputated.

“In some cases, the gendarmes would nail hands and feet to pieces of
wood . . . they even delved into the records of the Spanish
inquisition and other historic institutions of torture and adopted
all the suggestions found there.”

The tortures were perpetrated as a prelude to or during the massive
phases of ethnic cleansing. ” The deportations quickly became either
scenes of mass killing for the men, death marches for the women,
children and elderly who were whipped, raped, tortured and shot in an
ongoing procession.”

In one account, a soldier wrestles a donkey away from a young woman
with a baby. “The Turk’s scimitar descended on her wrist and the hand
fell off.”

Rivers and brooks were filled with “swollen” and “worm-eaten
corpses.” There was no time to bury the thousands of bodies. “Most of
them had been partially eaten by dogs.”

At the village of Mollahkeuy, one of thousands similarly treated,
hundreds of dead bodies were scattered on the plain, nearly all of
them women and children.

Many of the women lay flat on their backs, showing signs of barbarous
mutilation by the bayonets of the gendarmes.

Ammunition was too valuable to use, so most of the killings were done
with “axes, cleavers, shovels and pitchforks.” The Turks “dashed
infants on the rocks” before the eyes of their mothers.

The carnage around Ankara was so vast that Talaat Pasha ordered more
than 40,000 bodies to be quickly buried in mass graves, “but the
stench of death and the mounds of bodies overwhelmed the landscape.”

As one witness travelled from Keghvenk to Mezre, he saw thousands of
corpses half buried.

On the beach of Lake Goeljuk, hundreds of bodies were piled on top of
each other, almost all women and children, all “naked” and showing
“signs of the brutal mutilation” that the Turks had inflicted.

In the valley, there were no fewer than 2,000 corpses.

The witness estimated “that, in the course of our ride around the
lake, we had seen the remains of not less than 1,000 Armenians.” The
“fiendish purpose of the Turks” was “to exterminate the Armenian
population.”

Another witness described the “game of swords” played by the Turkish
killing squads with Armenian girls.

Swords would be planted in the ground with the blades uppermost.
Then, men on horseback would each grab a girl and ride at a gallop,
throwing the girl to impale her on a sword.

If she was only wounded, she would be scooped up again and thrown
until she was finally impaled. The bodies were then thrown in the
Tigris river.

In 2000, an Armenian genocide resolution, acknowledging the full
horrors perpetrated by the Turks, was proposed by the US congress.

Turkey, in response, mounted a massive propagan – da campaign with
the support of Israel, declaring that, if the Bill were passed,
Ankara would close its airbase to US planes.

President Clinton then instructed House Speaker Dennis Hastert to
kill the Bill. “Once again, the attempt to commemorate the century’s
first genocide had been effectively censored by a foreign
government.”

In October 2000, shortly after Clinton had caved in to Turkish
pressure, France passed an A r m e n i a n genocide resolution into
law, declaring the fact of the vast extermination.

Turkey protested hysterically and withdrew its ambassador from Paris.

Six months later, Turkish diplomatic relations with France were
resumed and business was back to normal.

Prague: Number of asylum seekers falls again

NUMBER OF ASYLUM SEEKERS FALLS AGAIN, IN AUGUST THREE HUNDRED

Czech News Agency
September 16, 2004

PRAGUE, Sept 16 (CTK) – Number of persons who seek asylum in the Czech
Republic has fallen to 301 in August, which is this year’s monthly
minimum, according to the latest data of the Interior Ministry’s
asylum and migration department.

Only 261 adults and 40 children applied for asylum in August, compared
to 354 persons in July. As for this year, the highest number of asylum
applications (988) was presented in March.

This tendency has been confirmed by the office of the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). According to the UNHCR report,
the number of applicants so far this year has been the lowest in the
last 17 years.

This is connected with the return of refugees to Afghanistan, Iraq
and Kosovo and stricter laws in European Union member states, the
report says.

The Czech Republic’s accession to the EU in May has been the main
factor behind the lower number of asylum applications, Jana Pintova
from the ministry’s asylum and migration department said.

Most of the asylum applications were filed in August by refugees from
Ukraine (106), China (57) and Russia (27).

>>From January to August, 4,123 applications were filed, most of them
(1,350 or 34 percent of the total number) by Russians, followed by
1,133 Ukrainians, 266 Vietnamese and 215 Chinese.

The number of applicants was the highest in 1990, when 18,094
foreigners sought asylum in the Czech Republic. Last year the number
was 11,400, this being the second highest. On the other hand, the
least applications (841) were presented in 1992.

This year, the applications were handed most frequently in the
refugee centre Vysni Lhoty, north Moravia, which has registered 193
applications, including 101 by Ukrainian citizens.

The Czech authorities granted asylum to 2,520 applications from July
1900 to August 2004. Most of the affirmative answers were given to
citizens of Romania (474), Afghanistan (296) and Russia (200).

>>From January to August, 95 refugees were granted asylum, including
29 Russians and 21 Belarussians. In 2003, 208 refugees were granted
asylum. The highest number of applications was approved in 1991,
when 776 people were granted asylum.

>>From July 1990 to August 2004, the Czech Republic granted Czech
citizenship to 533 refugees. Most often, citizenship was granted to
refugees from Armenia (87), Vietnam (85), Romania (79), and Ukraine
(29).

On the other hand, asylum was withdrawn from some 200 foreigners,
160 of them from Romania and 20 from Bulgaria.

ACNIS Releases Public Opinion Results on Corruption in Armenia

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Center for National and International Studies
75 Yerznkian Street
Yerevan 375033, Armenia
Tel: (+374 – 1) 52.87.80 or 27.48.18
Fax: (+374 – 1) 52.48.46
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Website:

September 16, 2004

ACNIS Releases Public Opinion Results on Corruption in Armenia

Yerevan–The Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS)
today issued the results of a public survey on “Corruption in Armenia” which
it conducted among 1956 citizens from Yerevan and all of Armenia’s regions.

ACNIS director of administration Karapet Kalenchian greeted the invited
guests and public participants with opening remarks. “It would be illusory
to hope that discussions and debates on corruption could solve the problem.
However, we must carefully examine the issue in order to clarify the
directions, strategy, conception, and practical priorities of our common
campaign. Corruption is a public evil, and each of us, alone and together,
should struggle against it,” he said.

ACNIS legal and political affairs analyst Stepan Safarian focused in detail
on the findings of the opinion poll. Accordingly, a majority of surveyed
citizens (62.4%) assert that corruption in Armenia exists in all spheres and
at all levels, 29.9% think it exists in some areas, 3.7% can identify it in
but a few categories, while 4% find it difficult to answer.

42.8% of citizens think that corruption is a political phenomenon, that is,
authorities that come to power through election fraud and bribery are forced
to sponsor or give privileges to those who supported their “election.” 19.4%
believe corruption to be an economic phenomenon, as it is the most effective
way of amassing money, 19.7% assert it is a social function, and 12% explain
it as a cultural matter.

14.8% of respondents have given bribes because they were forced to do it,
39.5% have done it to solve a problem quickly and easily, while 45.2% have
never given bribes. The majority of surveyed citizens think that the health
care system is the most corrupt in Armenia (19.4%), 10.6% point to the army,
17.5% the courts, 5.2% the prosecutor’s office, 7.5% the educational system,
7.7% tax and 1.7% customs agencies, 4.4% the state transport inspection, and
4.7% the police. 23.2% are convinced that the most corrupt branch of the
Armenian government is the executive, while 15.6% blame the judiciary and
5.7% the legislature.

Among the surveyed public, 37% were offered a bribe during the presidential
or parliamentary elections of 2003. 32.5% of these actually took it, whereas
only 66.4% did not take it.

As to the principal factor fostering corruption in Armenia, 35.9% pinpoint
the arbitrariness and unaccountability of the authorities, 20.7% the
prevalence of private and group interests, and 12.8% a tolerance toward
unlawfulness in people’s consciousness. 25.3% of respondents do not believe
in the success of the Armenian government’s program against corruption, only
4.9% are optimistic on this score, and 69.3% find it difficult to answer.
The main reason for the inefficiency of the campaign against corruption, in
the view of 49.1%, is that corrupt authorities cannot struggle against
themselves. 14.8% think it is hampered by clans and oligarchs, and 14.3% say
it is adversely affected by the fact that society is not engaged in the
struggle.

The second item on the day’s agenda was a presentation by economist Ashot
Tavadian on “The Aims of the Campaign against Corruption.” “I am convinced,
and the survey proves it, that Armenia’s substantive development is possible
only by way of a serious campaign against corruption, whereas the aims of
the government’s program are declarative and unclear. In reality, the
program must persuade us that over time Armenia will achieve an
internationally recognized benchmark on the existence or non-existence of
corruption. It also should be composed based on the consensus of a large
number of political forces,” he underscored.

The formal presentations were followed by contributions by Edward Aghajanov
of the “Armat” center; law professor Hrair Tovmasian; Ruben Torosian of the
Supreme Council Deputy Club; Yerevan State University professor Gagik
Galstian; Artsrun Pepanian, political analyst for AR television; Gayane
Markosian of the Harmonious World NGO; economist Gegham Kiurumian; Armen
Ktoyan of the Institute of Management and Economic Reforms; Haroutiun
Khachatrian of Noyan Tapan news agency; National Press Club chairperson
Narine Mkrtchian; and several others.

42.7% of participating respondents are male and 57.3% female; 11.9% are
18-30 years of age, 23.6% 31-40, 21.4% 41-50, 12.7% 51-60, and 23.4% 61 or
above. 48% of the citizens surveyed have received a higher education, 11.1%
incomplete higher, 20.5% specialized secondary, 17.1% secondary, and 3.1%
incomplete secondary training. 57.6% are actively employed, 25.3%
unemployed, 9.8% are pensioners, 0.9% welfare recipients, and 6.1% students.

Founded in 1994 by Armenia’s first Minister of Foreign Affairs Raffi K.
Hovannisian and supported by a global network of contributors, ACNIS serves
as a link between innovative scholarship and the public policy challenges
facing Armenia and the Armenian people in the post-Soviet world. It also
aspires to be a catalyst for creative, strategic thinking and a wider
understanding of the new global environment. In 2004, the Center focuses
primarily on public outreach, civic education, and applied research on
critical domestic and foreign policy issues for the state and the nation.

For further information on the Center or the full graphics of the poll
results, call (3741) 52-87-80 or 27-48-18; fax (3741) 52-48-46; e-mail
[email protected] or [email protected]; or visit or

http://www.acnis.am/pr/soc_corruption/Socio08eng.pdf
www.acnis.am
www.acnis.am

NATO names envoy to boost C.Asia, Caucasus links

NATO names envoy to boost C.Asia, Caucasus links

BRUSSELS, Sept 15 (Reuters) – NATO appointed U.S. diplomat Robert
Simmons on Wednesday as its envoy to the Caucasus and Central Asia
to build up cooperation between the 26-member alliance and states in
the two regions.

Former Soviet republics in the regions, especially Georgia, are widely
thought to have been the focus of threats last week by Russian Chief
of Staff Yuri Baluyevsky to mount pre-emptive strikes against terrorist
bases anywhere in the world.

“We’ve discussed Russia’s relations with Georgia with Russia and
Georgia for a long time … We urge both countries to cooperate
proactively,” said Simmons, who dealt with Eurasian policy at the
U.S. Department of State before going to NATO.

“Our focus is on greater inter-operability with NATO, helping them
with defence reforms and consulting on issues that are of concern to
them,” said Simmons.

Baluyevsky’s threat followed a Chechen rebel siege of a school in
the town of Beslan in Russia’s southern region of North Ossetia in
which more than 300 people — half of them children — were killed.

Moscow has traditionally seen the Caucasus and Central Asia as within
its sphere of influence.

The Caucasus states of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan have joined
a European Union programme to boost ties.

09/15/04 13:43 ET

Azeri minister, NATO chief fail to agree on Armenian presence at Bak

Azeri minister, NATO chief fail to agree on Armenian presence at Baku drills – TV

ANS TV, Baku
14 Sep 04

[Presenter] The position of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry over
the cancellation of NATO’s military exercises has been disclosed by
the ministry’s press service.

[Correspondent] The cancellation of NATO’s military exercises in
Baku has been discussed at a meeting attended by Azerbaijani Foreign
Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan
and NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, the head of the
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry’s press service, Matin Mirza, has said.

He also clarified reports by some media outlets suggesting that
the Azerbaijani minister had allegedly been summoned to the NATO
headquarters. No-one can summon the Azerbaijani foreign minister,
he simply met the secretary-general on the sidelines of his visit
to Brussels, end quote. Matin Mirza added that while in Brussels,
Elmar Mammadyarov stated that the Azerbaijani side had no intention
of issuing visas to Armenian officers.

[Matin Mirza, captioned, talking to camera] It was also stated that
the participation of the Armenian side in the exercises in Baku
could deal a blow to the efforts being taken ahead of the meeting
of the Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents on the sidelines of the
forthcoming CIS summit in Astana.

[Correspondent] The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry does not believe
that the cancellation of the exercises could damage Azerbaijani-NATO
relations in any way.

[Mirza] Although the Azerbaijani side regrets the fact that the
exercises have been canceled, we would like to say that this will
not damage Azerbaijani-NATO relations. Relations between NATO and
Azerbaijan will continue to develop.

[Correspondent] Having completed his visit to Brussels, Foreign
Minister Elmar Mammadyarov has left the Belgian capital for Astana
where the CIS summit is due to be held.

Mahir Mammadli, Ibrahim Telmanoglu, ANS.

BAKU: Public objects to =?UNKNOWN?Q?Armenian=92s?= planned visit

Public objects to Armenian’s planned visit

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Sept 14 2004

Azerbaijani people have not shared the presently-observed unity of
views for many years. Regardless of party affiliation, positions
held or views adhered to, the Azeri public has voiced a joint protest
against the planned arrival of Armenian officers to attend the NATO
exercises, which started in Baku on September 13.

The protest actions, which started early this month, are still
underway.

Some 400 members of non-government organizations (NGOs) held an
unsanctioned march on September 11 which ended in signing a joint
declaration by over 250 NGOs. On the same day, another march, started
by the Garabagh Liberation Organization (GLO) from the Cemetery
of Martyrs, was prevented by the police. Employees of the ANS TV
channel also visited the Cemetery. Then, ANS TV and Radio suspended
their broadcastings for two hours, and showed films displaying the
atrocities and numerous crimes committed by Armenian soldiers against
the Azeri people.

On September 12, representatives of socio-political organizations and
other individuals held a sanctioned rally outside the Khatai cultural
palace in protest against the Armenians’ planned arrival.

The protesters held slogans “Keep away Armenian murderers”, “Death
to aggressor”, “Down with NATO’s double standard”, “Not train with
Armenians, but fight them”. In conclusion, a resolution was read out.

Parliament members have also expressed acute protests against the
Armenian officers’ intended visit. Seven MPs refused to attend a
parliamentary session on September 7 in this connection. Speaker
Murtuz Alasgarov said he agreed with the objections voiced by the MPs.

On September 10 Defense Minister Safar Abiyev said he strongly
objects to Armenians’ intended arrival, since there are no diplomatic
relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia. He also mentioned that
Azerbaijan refused to attend NATO exercises held in Armenia last
year. On September 11, President Ilham Aliyev, during his meeting
with the refugees living in Barda, expressed his disagreement with
Armenian’s intended participation in NATO exercises in Azerbaijan.*

BAKU: Azeri pressure group pickets Foreign Ministry over Armenianoff

Azeri pressure group pickets Foreign Ministry over Armenian officers’ visit

ANS TV, Baku
13 Sep 04

Members of the Karabakh Liberation Organization [KLO] are holding their
unsanctioned picket outside the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry at the
moment to protest against the [possible] visit by Armenian officers
to Baku within the framework of NATO exercises. The KLO members will
express their protest outside the Defence Ministry tomorrow.

To recap, protest actions are also planned in some districts of
Azerbaijan.

BAKU: Opening Ceremony Of Secondary School Named After Zarifa Aliyev

OPENING CEREMONY OF SECONDARY SCHOOL NAMED AFTER ZARIFA ALIYEVA IN BARDA
PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN ILHAM ALIYEV ATTENDED THE CEREMONY

Azertag
September 11, 2004

A solemn opening ceremony of the secondary school named after renowned
ophthalmologist, Academician Zarifa Aliyeva was held on September 11
in the city of Barda. President of Azerbaijan Republic Ilham Aliyev
attended the ceremony.

Tens of thousands of the Barda residents gathered near the school
building to meet the Head of State. They greeted President Ilham
Aliyev with warm cheers. A monument to Academician Zarifa Aliyeva
sculpted by Peopleâ^À^Ùs painter of Azerbaijan, Academician Omar
Eldarov had been erected in front of the school building. President
Ilham Aliyev unveiled the monument and laid flowers at its pedestal.

Opening remarks were made by Head of Barda Executive Power Elman
Allahverdiyev.

President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev addressed the ceremony as well.

Greeting the citizens of Barda, the Head of State congratulated them
on the occasion of the opening new school. I am especially happy
that the school build in the ancient Karabakh land bears the name of
outstanding scientist, good doctor, Zarifa Aliyeva, the spouse and
friend of our national leader Heydar Aliyev, and my mother, thank
you so much, he said.

The President noted as well that the newly built school meets
modern requirements, and expressed confidence that children would be
prived here with high-level education. Speaking of the development
of education in the country he mentioned that the budget spends 20%
on solving the problems of and develop this sphere. Over 4500 schools
will be equipped with modern computers and provided with the access
to the Internet that will become a revolution in our education as
compared with other countries of the region, the Head of State said..

Touching upon the socio-economic development of Azerbaijan, President
Ilham Aliyev noted that the state budget increases every year, and
its funds would be mainly spent on solving social problems. Our goal
is to provide better life for our citizens, and I donâ^À^Ùt doubt
we will reach the goal, he said.

The President also dwelt on the problem of Nagorno-Karabakh. He
emphasized that although a compromise may play an important role in
resolution of any problem, no compromise, however, is possible in
relation to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

We want the problem to be solved peacefully, we want peace, but we
must be ready to liberate our land by military way at any moment,
the Azerbaijani leader said.

In conclusion, President Ilham Aliyev once again congratulated the
Barda citizens on the school opening and wished them good health
and happiness.

The Crime at Beslan

Pakistan Tribune, Pakistan
Sept 9 2004

The Crime at Beslan

Anwaar Hussain

Is it possible that a people who have lost everything may think they
have nothing more to live for, that a parent, who sees his children
blown to smithereens, loses love for others’ too? That it is blood
revenge, however unpardonable, that governs this mindless violence
rather than any thing else.

Let us state the obvious from the start without mincing any words.
The horrifying and tragic death of hundreds of blameless human beings
in the Beslan school tragedy, most of whom were innocent children, is
barbaric, unparalleled, inhuman and unpardonable. It is a crime of
heinous proportions and defies religion as equally as it does logic
and rationality.

Nothing, repeat nothing, justifies this despicable act of certain
individuals whatever their validation. Nor does it advance whatever
cause the militants are fighting for. Like the senseless killings in
Iraq, where innocent people – Muslim and non-Muslim – are being
murdered without a qualm, the crime at Beslan, too, will be viewed
with utter revulsion by the rest of the world. Any man, with even a
modicum of humanity, must condemn this horrendous act
unconditionally, categorically and unreservedly.

One does wonder though, as any thinking mind should, as to what
propelled the perpetrators to inflict a pain such as this? What led
them to take this horrendous leave from reason to commit an offence
that is as unpardonable as it is unthinkable? Could it be that they
themselves have been victims of similar atrocities? Or is it just a
one-time malfunction of their thinking faculties? Is it their
religion that exhorts them to indulge in some satanic rituals
offering human sacrifices to satiate the blood lust of their deity?
Or more unbelievably still, killing children is a pleasure pursuit in
which the Chechens indulge from time to time? I do not know.

What I do know is that the story of Chechen suffering is a long one.
In the early 19th century, independent Chechnya was conquered by
Russia after a long and bloody war. The heroic struggle of the
Chechen religious leader Imam Shamil and the inhuman conduct of the
Russian forces compelled the young Leo Tolstoy, who served in the
Russian Imperial Army in Chechnya in the 1840s, to resign in disgust
and write stories praising the Chechen leader.

What I do know is that in the 20th century Josef Stalin, the “Great
Father of the Nation” sought to purge the scourge in one go with the
religious and ethnic cleansing of the Northern Caucasus. He ordered
the deportation of an entire people on Feb. 23, 1944. This event is
to Chechens what the Holocaust is to the Jews or the genocide is to
the Armenians.

What I do know is that on that day, when Stalin packed the Chechen
population of 1 million into cattle cars and shipped them to the
wastes of Siberia and Central Asia, an indelible mark was forever
engraved on the collective memory of the Chechens.

What I do know is that blood-curdling stories of people crowded into
cattle cars without food, water, or bathrooms; corpses traveling with
children; the killing of protesters at the railway stations by KGB
guards, haunt the Chechens to this day. One-third of the population
died on the journey. Many others perished under the ruthless
conditions of exile.

What I do know is that more recently Chechnya was devastated by the
war in 1994-6, which left more than 80,000 dead. It watched in horror
as its basic infrastructures were again systematically destroyed.
Since September 1999, more than a third of the local population –
around 200,000 people – have been forced to flee the fighting and
seek a humiliating refuge in neighboring Ingushetia.

What I do know is that the world’s conscience was collectively
hibernating when a 12-year-old Chechen girl died of internal injuries
after being raped repeatedly by vodka guzzling Russian soldiers; when
a young pregnant woman had her body split open by machine gun fire
simply to check the effectiveness of that weapon from a certain
range, when an 84-year-old man had his throat slashed and was left to
die by the roadside, when a one-year old Chechen baby was impaled
with an AK-47’s bayonet as his mother was forced to watch on.

What I do know is that Chechnya has been reduced to a wasteland of
death and destruction. That the Chechen capital of Grozny does not
have a single building left intact after heavy bombing in a campaign
Russia dubbed as “the liberation of Grozny.” That human rights
violation are tremendous, as evidenced by many television broadcasts
that showed grisly footage of Russian soldiers piling mutilated
Chechen bodies into mass graves and that this is only the tip of the
iceberg.

What I do know is that countless villages in southern Chechnya have
been completely razed to the ground and the economy of Chechnya is
non-existent, that the Russian army is intent upon ridding Chechnya
of all its civilians and completely taking over the land once and for
all.

What I do know is that when a people declare its independence, a
central state can either let them go or beat them into submission.
But in the case of Chechnya, and adjacent Ingushetia, we have seen
some of both.

What I do know is that the Kremlin has done a brilliant job of
convincing the world that Chechens are bandits and terrorists despite
the fact that Putin’s own predecessors have gone down in history as
the biggest mass murderers of their own citizens. Stalin and Lenin
together caused the death of more than 30 million Russian citizens in
the first half of the 20th century alone.

What I do know is that with the misery it visited upon humanity, the
political creed of his forefathers is known as the most dreadful
thing ever to have hit the human race, without exception, even worse
than both world wars, the slave trade and bubonic plague all put
together.

What I do know, and with a sense of ominous foreboding, is that the
recent threats that Putin is hurling all around are bringing back
ghastly images from the past when horrific concentration camps had
been built in Russia aimed at imprisoning all Chechen males between
15-60 years of ages.

What I do know is that an international correspondent Eric Margolis
did once write, “We begin the 21st century watching silently as a
brutish Russia, which knows neither shame nor mercy crushes the life
out of a tiny but heroic people who refuse to bend their knees to
Moscow’s tyranny.”

Is it possible that a people who have lost everything may think they
have nothing more to live for, that a parent, who sees his children
blown to smithereens, loses love for others’ too? That it is blood
revenge, however unpardonable, that governs this mindless violence
rather than any thing else.

I do not know but I wonder.

WP Soccer: Finland beats Armenia 2-0

World Cup: Finland beats Armenia 2-0

Associated Press Worldstream
September 8, 2004 Wednesday

YEREVAN, Armenia — Mikael Forsell and Alexei Eremenko Jr. scored a
goal each to lift Finland to a 2-0 victory over Armenia in a World
Cup qualifier Wednesday.

It was the second consecutive win in European Group 1 for Finland
after losing an away opener 2-1 to Romania and beating Andorra 3-0.

Finland controlled the game and Forsell put the visitors on the
scoreboard in the 24th minute, when he fired from the left corner of
the penalty box past Armenian goalkeeper Armen Ambartsumyan into the
left corner of the goal.

The home side came close to equalizing in the 45th minute – its only
clear chance before the interval – but Artur Petrosyan’s header off
a corner kick was blocked by Finland goalkeeper Antti Niemi.

Eremenko beat Ambartsumian one-on-one into the left corner to make
it 2-0 in the 68th minute.

Four minutes later, second-half substitute Pehha Lagerblen had a
chance to make it 3-0 when he made his way past three defenders but
his lob over Ambartsumian missed.

Edgar Manucharyan, who came on as a substitute for Albert Sargsyan
in the 54th minute, nearly scored with a solo effort from the center
of the pitch, but his shot from inside the box shaved the right post.

Lineups:

Armenia – Armen Ambartsumian, Yeyshine Melikyan, Karen Dokhoyan, Sargis
Hovsepyan, Artur Lazarian, Romik Khachatryan, Artur Petrosyan, Rafael
Nazaryan (Karen Aleksanyan, 73), Albert Sargsyan (Edgar Manucharyan,
54), Artavazd Karamyan (Davit Grigoryan, 79), Andrey Movsesyan.

Finland – Antti Niemi; Petri Pasanen, Sami Hyypia, Mika Vayrynen,
Mika Nurmela, Mikael Forsell, Jari Litmanen (Pehha Lagerblien, 46),
Joonas Kolkka (Antti Pohja, 85), Toni Kuivasto, Aki Riihilahti,
Alexei Eremenko Jr (Peter Kopteff, 73).

Referee – Paulius Malzinskas, Lithuania.