ARFD Member Albert Ajemian: Foundation Of Government Decentralizatio

ARFD MEMBER ALBERT AJEMIAN: FOUNDATION OF GOVERNMENT DECENTRALIZATION PRINCIPLE IS LAID DOWN BY YEREVAN COUNCIL OF ELDERS ELECTIONS

NOYAN TAPAN
MAY 4, 2009
YEREVAN

The reforms carried out in Yerevan so far had a local communal
nature: asphalting, planting of greenery, etc.: now elaboration and
implementation of strategic programs is already necessary.

Albert Ajemian taking the second place on ARFD Yerevan Council of
Elders elections electoral roll expressed such an opinion at the
May 4 meeting with party supporters. In his words, the foundation of
government decentralization principle is for the first time laid down
by Yerevan Council of Elders elections of May 31.

"Besides, Council of Elders consisting of 165 people comes to replace
the power of one person, Mayor," A. Ajemian said. In his words, the
other positive peculiarity of Council of Elders elections is that it
provides participation of Yerevan residents in the issue of city’s
government. The next positive circumstance, as A. Ajemian recorded,
is the "politicized and ideologized" nature of the May 31 elections,
which is expressed by presence of political forces’ proportional
lists and programs.

Karabakh disagrees with some of Madrid principles – minister

Interfax, Russia
April 30 2009

Karabakh disagrees with some of Madrid principles – minister

STEPANAKERT April 30

Foreign minister of the unrecognized Karabakh republic Georgy
Petrosian has voiced the disagreement of Karabakh authorities with
some of the Madrid principles -the foundation of the Karabakh
settlement process.

"None can thrust anything on us. We are ready to deter any challenge,
being guided by our own interests," he told the Karabakh parliament on
Thursday. According to the minister, the problem cannot be resolved
without bearing in mind the opinion of Karabakh.

The Karabakh position is invariable – Karabakh must remain
independent, develop freely and ensure its security, the minister
said.

Karabakh may tighten its position if necessary, Petrosian said.

Armenian opposition will press for fair elections

PanARMENIAN.Net

Armenian opposition will press for fair elections
01.05.2009 19:00 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian opposition will press for fair elections,
leader of People’s Party of Armenia said.

`Opposition can garner over 40% of votes. Protest is not an end in
itself. It’s the authorities, who provoke public protests,’ Stepan
Demirchyan told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

Asked about ARF Dashnaktsutyun’s secession from the ruling coalition,
Demirchyan reduced himself to saying, `Time will show.’

Armenian Party Withdraws From Ruling Coalition

ARMENIAN PARTY WITHDRAWS FROM RULING COALITION

Mediamax
April 27 2009
Armenia

Yerevan, 27 April: The [Armenian Revolutionary Federation]
Dashnaktsutyun party has withdrawn from Armenia’s ruling coalition
and will appear as a new opposition force.

Mediamax agency reported that Armen Rustamyan, a senior member of
Dashnaktsutyun, made a relevant statement today. He noted that
insuperable differences in foreign policy issues, including the
party’s disagreement with the policy of the Armenian leadership on
the normalization of relations with Turkey had led to the withdrawal
from the coalition.

The quadrilateral agreement on the formation of a political coalition
was sighed in Yerevan on 21 March 2008 between the parties: Republican
Party of Armenia, Orinats Yerkir [Law-Governed Country], Prosperous
Armenia and Dashnaktsutyun.

Google Launches Lebanon Domain

GOOGLE LAUNCHES LEBANON DOMAIN

ArabianBusiness.com
April 28, 2009 Tuesday

Google has announced on its Google Arabia Blog that they have setup
their latest Google domain for Lebanon,

According to Google Arabia, this brings the total number of Google
domains worldwide to over 170 with eleven domains in the Middle East
and North Africa (MENA) region.

The other Google domains in the region include Egypt
(), Saudi Arabia (), the United
Arab Emirates (), Bahrain (), Kuwait
(), Qatar (), Jordan (),
Morocco (), Algeria () and Libya
().

"For some time we’ve been working to provide Google homepages to as
many of the world’s recognized top-level domains as possible. Domains
are a first step for Google to provide a more relevant and local
experience for our users. When users access Google from their local
domain, we are better able to understand what kind of location related
content users want to see. Users can also restrict the Search to the
local country pages as an option," the Google Arabia team says on
their blog.

"Up until recently, Arabic-speaking users in Lebanon have had
to visit foreign domains (e.g. google.com.eg in Egypt) in order
to search in Arabic. Going forward, Lebanese users will be able to
access google.com.lb for their local Arabic search, with an option
to access their local search in French, English and Armenian. These
are small steps towards fostering a greater local web experience for
our users around the world," the blog post concludes.

www.google.com.lb.
www.google.com.eg
www.google.com.sa
www.google.ae
www.google.com.bh
www.google.com.kw
www.google.com.qa
www.google.jo
www.google.com.ma
www.google.dz
www.google.com.ly

Steady Development Of Social-Labor Relations – Imperative For Armeni

STEADY DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL-LABOR RELATIONS – IMPERATIVE FOR ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
01.05.2009 16:35 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia is required to introduce the practice of
developing social-labor relations as an effective tool promoting high
employment rate, social partnership and consent. "It’s a work-style
practiced in many states," Eduard Toumasyan , RA Trade Union
Confederation Chairman, told a news-conference dedicated to May 1.

According to Mr. Toumasyan, the previous agreement between the RA
Government and Trade Union Confederation was signed in 1995, however,
the document remained on paper because of social hardships of the
given period. "In contrast to the previous document, this trilateral
agreement is based on labor legislation, and all parties will bear
responsibility in case of non-compliance," he noted.

The republican and collective agreement will contribute to labor
market development and protect employers’ rights. Employment ads
setting age limits (e.g. looking for someone aged 20-30) will
no longer be permitted," Chairman of Trade Unions Confederation
stressed. Mr. Toumasyan finds that the trilateral agreement will
provide solution to many problems related to security norms and
labor organization, establishment of minimum permissible payment
limit and possibilities for salary increase, especially in time of
global crisis. "It’s no secret that the global economic recession
negatively impacts situation on labor market, hence the document is
especially important in the present-day situation," Mr. Toumasyan said.

On April 27, 2009, the RA Government, Trade Union Confederation and
Republican Union of Armenian Employers signed a trilateral agreement
establishing extra guarantees regulating social-labor relations and
requiring Parties’ joint action. The document was signed by RA Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan, Chairman of RA Trade Union Confederation
Union Eduard Toumasyan and Head of Republican Union of Employers
(manufacturers and entrepreneurs) Arsen Ghazaryab.

The Republican Collective Agreement will enter into force on April
30, 2012.

Gold evangelist spreads the word

Gold evangelist spreads the word
Uta Harnischfeger

Last Updated: April 30. 2009 11:52PM UAE / April 30. 2009 7:52PM GMT

Aram Shishmanian, the chief executive of the World Gold Council,
believes gold will retain its allure. Jonathan Player for The National
Aram Shishmanian understands the connections that bind people to
gold. For 35 years, he has worn a matte gold watch, a graduation
present from his father.

That sentiment, and a 33-year career as a consultant and business
philanthropist, has helped him run the World Gold Council (WGC) in an
age when the metal’s appeal is under pressure from a growing array of
consumer attractions such as mobile phones and designer handbags.

In recent years, gold has lost `some of its aspirational character’,
Mr Shishmanian says. He points out that many young consumers in major
emerging economies such as China and India are more interested in
western-style luxury goods than beautifully crafted gold
jewellery. `Heavily exposed to the media, they aspire for western
consumer and luxury goods as part of a stereotyped western lifestyle.’

Since about 50 per cent of these consumers are under 20, the WGC needs
to reposition its gold products towards the youth market. `Today gold
is competing head on with high-branded products from the mobile phone
to the Louis Vuitton handbag,’ Mr Shishmanian says. `We must ask
ourselves the question: what does it take to reignite that passion and
aspirational demand for gold?’

He already has a model for his rebranding plan. `Diamonds have done a
fantastic job in creating demand,’ he says, somewhat grudgingly. But
then, Mr Shishmanian, 57, has never been frightened of change. Before
moving to the WGC, he spent 27 years at the accounting firm Accenture,
moving up the ladder every few years. Eventually, he launched and
later headed the finance division. `[I] never once sat in a corner
office,’ he says.

Five months ago, he began his stint as a gold evangelist, after
accepting an offer from Gregory Wilkins, the WGC chairman, to lead the
council.

At the time, he was holding an average of five non-executive
directorships at FTSE 100 firms, after retiring from Accenture five
years earlier. The board positions ranged from a start-up insurer to
biotech companies and a carpet manufacturer. Then came the phone call
from Mr Wilkins and he moved into the gold business.

Since then, Mr Shishmanian has become a passionate student of the
traditions of the world’s largest gold consumers – India, China and
the Middle East. In these regions, gold serves as a key component of a
woman’s wealth, through a marriage dowry.

`In the West, gold is easily linked to conspicuous consumption,’ he
says.

`But I love the way it is ingrained in, for example, India. When you
have a good harvest, you buy gold. Gold is an investment, a wealth
creation and a protection.’ During the recent economic boom, luxury
goods became `affordable’ and reached a broader market, challenging
gold’s supremacy in India and China. Simple gold jewellery became a
relic to some customers.

But the global downturn has reignited interest in the metal because of
its reputation as a haven, boosting gold’s price earlier this year to
just below a peak of US$1,032 an ounce in March 2008. `Now, they are
rediscovering it as a means to preserve wealth,’ Mr Shishmanian says.

Even so, once the economy improves, he wonders whether gold will
retain its allure to future customers. He believes it will. After all,
his first challenge when he took over the WGC was to convert his wife
to gold. She was, he says, `a diamond and platinum lady’.

Following an invitation to his first official WGC event in Italy, he
realised his wife had to wear gold. To encourage her interest in the
precious metal, he took her to a renowned Italian jewellery
designer. `She caught the gold bug and looks gorgeous in it,’ he says.

Just like the product he promotes, Mr Shishmanian has a colourful
past. Born in Iran in 1951, he went to what he says was `boarding
school in London’ – when he was only nine months old. His parents
travelled the globe as textile merchants and felt they could not take
him along every time they moved. But when he reached his teens, he
joined his parents in Iran and Kuwait, where the family lived for
extended periods. So, while he says he feels close to his Armenian
heritage, Mr Shishmanian describes himself as a mixture of cultures
and attitudes, born out of living on four different
continents. `Emotionally, I feel like an Armenian… in terms of my
thinking, I am English because of my education, and culturally I feel
very open because I have lived outside of the UK half of my life.’

It was a visit to his family in Iran that eventually shaped his life
and career after accompanying a family friend, a consultant, to a
client meeting. During the course of the discussions, he was impressed
with how the company acted on his friend’s advice. At that point, Mr
Shishmanian decided to study economics at City University in London,
receiving an MBA from its Cass Business School. He joined Arthur
Andersen, as Accenture was then called, in 1976.

During his time there he developed an interest in philanthropy. It was
initially sparked when he accompanied another family friend to his
work at the UN office in Tehran. Mr Shishmanian says he then decided
to do `some good in life’. But it was not until many years later, in
1988, when a devastating earthquake struck Armenia, that he `made good
on that vow’.

Using marketing skills honed during decades of closing business deals,
he raised `unbelievable sums’ for hospitals and schools for an
Armenian charity. `That made me believe that you can make a difference
through the action you can take.’

He later served on the board of the Marie Curie Cancer Care charity
for many years and visited projects in Vietnam as a Save the Children
goodwill ambassador. `I will definitely take on more charity work,
when I am an old man,’ he says with a smile.

[email protected]

Symposium on Adana Massacres at NAASR, May 7

PRESS RELEASE
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR)
395 Concord Ave.
Belmont, MA 02478
Tel.: 617-489-1610

Contact: [email protected]

CENTENARY OF ADANA MASSACRES
TO BE MARKED WITH SYMPOSIUM AT NAASR

The 100th anniversary of the Adana Massacres will be marked with a
special symposium entitled "The Adana Massacres of 1909: Legacy and
Perspectives," on Thursday, May 7, at 7:00 p.m., at the National
Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR) Center, 395
Concord Avenue, Belmont, MA.

The Adana Massacres of April 1909 took the lives of more
than 20,000 Armenians in the province of Adana and elsewhere in
Armenian-inhabited areas of the Ottoman Empire. In addition to the
appalling loss of life and property, the massacres were a bitter blow to
the Armenians who had expressed such optimism at the Young Turk
Revolution of 1908. Many see in these massacres an indication of what
was to come in the genocide of 1915.

The NAASR symposium will bring together four scholars who
will present their research on various aspects of the terrible events of
a century ago.

Aram Arkun, former co-director of the Krikor and Clara
Zohrab Information Center in New York City and editor of Ararat
Quarterly will speak on "Armenian Self-Defense During the 1909
Massacres: The Case of Dörtyol (Chorkmarzban)"; Dr. Bedross Der
Matossian of the Department of History, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, will present "Revisiting the Adana Massacres of 1909:
Revolution, Power, and Violence"; Dr. Dikran Kaligian, author of the
recently-published Armenian Organization and Ideology Under Ottoman Rule
1908-1914, will discuss "Impact of the Adana Massacre on ARF-CUP
Relations"; and Dr. Lou Ann Matossian, program director of the Cafesjian
Family Foundation, Minneapolis, and eastern U.S. community news editor
of the Armenian Reporter, will speak about "Missionary Witness: The
Christie Family Papers on the Cilician Massacres of 1909."

More information on the Adana symposium may be had by
calling 617-489-1610, e-mailing [email protected], or writing to NAASR, 395
Concord Ave., Belmont, MA 02478.

www.naasr.org

Cooperation With NATO Is One Of Most Important Elements Of Armenia’s

COOPERATION WITH NATO IS ONE OF MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF ARMENIA’S FOREIGN POLICY

NOYAN TAPAN
APRIL 28, 2009
YEREVAN

RA President Serzh Sargsyan receiving Ambassador, NATO Deputy
Secretary General Claudio Bisogniero on April 28, said that the
European direction remains one of the priorities of Armenia’s foreign
policy, and cooperation with NATO is one of its most important
elements. He considered cooperation with NATO within the framework
of the Partnership for Peace program as a component of Armenia’s
national security.

Claudio Bisogniero, in his turn, said that they are content with the
progress recorded in various spheres of NATO-Armenia partnership so
far. He highly assessed the reforms carried out in the defence sphere,
as well as Armenia’s participation in a number of programs implemented
within the framework of NATO, in particular, in the directions of
fighting international terrorism, peacekeeing mission, and others.

According to the report of the RA President’s Press Office,
the interlocutors also exchanged thoughts over issues of ensuring
security and stability in the region. S. Sargsyan considered important
settlement of current conflicts and problems for improving the
security environment.

C. Bisogniero said that NATO welcomes the Armenian-Turkish dialogue
and progress recorded in that direction. As to the Nagorno Karabakh
settlement, he said that though NATO is not directly involved in that
process, it attentively follows those developments and welcomes any
effort that will lead to problem’s peaceful solution.

The sides held the same opinion that the conflict should be solved
in accordance with all principles of international law: no principle
can dominate or work at the expense of another.

Turkey Uneasy Over Obama’s Statement On Armenia

TURKEY UNEASY OVER OBAMA’S STATEMENT ON ARMENIA
Saban Kardas

Jamestown Foundation
he=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=34914&tx_ttnew s%5BbackPid%5D=7&cHash=d2c09bc5b0
April 28 2009

Remembrance Day caused mixed reactions on both sides of the
dispute. Although Obama refrained from referring to the killing of
Armenians as "genocide," which reflected well on Turkish diplomacy,
his clear expression of support for the Armenian position caused
anger in Turkey. In his statement, Obama said:

"Ninety four years ago, one of the great atrocities of the twentieth
century began. Each year, we pause to remember the 1.5 million
Armenians who were subsequently massacred or marched to their death
in the final days of the Ottoman Empire. The ‘Meds Yeghern’ must live
on in our memories, just as it lives on in the hearts of the Armenian
people" (, April 24).

Obama came under criticism by the supporters of the Armenian genocide
claims for stopping short of using the word "genocide" to describe
the events of 1915 -a pledge which he made during his election
campaign. Like other presidents before him, Obama apparently
prioritized realpolitik and did not want to harm the strategic
relationship with Turkey by risking a negative Turkish reaction
over the controversial issue. Moreover, there is a more immediate
reason for him to avoid the term: Obama does not want to jeopardize
the rapprochement between Armenia and Turkey. His carefully worded
statement is yet another indication of his support for the bilateral
talks, to which Turkey and Armenia responded positively by announcing
a roadmap to work toward the normalization of their relations.

Nonetheless, this prudent act on Obama’s part did not entirely
satisfy Turkish expectations. Ankara focused on the aspects of Obama’s
description of the events of 1915 which are regarded as unacceptable
from the Turkish perspective. In spite of this, the phrases Obama
chose to depict the Armenian suffering were a serious blow for
Turkish diplomacy, which had done its utmost to exclude the word
"genocide" from the White House statement. Despite backtracking from
his campaign promise, Obama called the killing of Armenians a great
atrocity and used the Armenian term "Meds Yeghern" (great disaster)
to describe the events, as well as noting that his views on that
period of history remained unchanged.

Turkish officials and politicians uniformly criticized Obama’s
statement, calling it one-sided and historically inaccurate. Turkish
President Abdullah Gul said he disagreed with parts of Obama’s
statement, adding that "in particular, there are hundreds of thousands
of Turks and Muslims who lost their lives in 1915. Everyone’s suffering
has to be shared." A press statement released by the Turkish Ministry
of Foreign Affairs also maintained that some expressions in Obama’s
statement combined with the interpretation of the events of 1915 were
unacceptable from Turkey’s perspective (Anadolu Ajansi, April 25).

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was more pointed in his criticism:
"the statement is far from satisfying. We cannot accept it as it
is." Erdogan questioned Obama’s attitude and argued that by giving
credence to Armenian claims, Obama had bowed to short-term political
considerations. "We are deeply saddened by politicians’ attempts
to exploit the events of 1915 for electoral concerns," Erdogan
added. Reflecting a sense of "disappointment" with Obama, Erdogan
maintained that Turkey is not a country that can be manipulated with
empty promises (Hurriyet, April 27).

Representatives of the opposition parties also criticized Obama’s
statement. The leader of the main opposition Republican People’s Party
argued that he used only the Armenian side’s terminology. Whereas the
leader of the Nationalist Action Party alleged that the statement
taken in its entirety, supported unequivocally Armenian genocide
claims. The opposition found Obama’s account of the 1915 events as
distorting historical reality. Moreover, they capitalized on this
incident to criticize the government’s foreign policy, maintaining
that in order to prevent Obama from using the word "genocide" involved
making concessions to Armenia in breach of Turkey’s national interests
-which also alienated Azerbaijan. Characterizing Obama’s statement
as the starkest proof yet of the government’s failed approach, they
called for a reversal of such "submissive" policies, and backing away
from the rapprochement with Yerevan (Anadolu Ajansi, ANKA, April 25).

The strong reactions from both the government and the opposition raised
questions as to how this development might damage Turkish-American
relations. Since Obama’s inauguration, Turkey and the United States
have revitalized their strategic partnership. Yet Ankara made it
clear that a miscalculated American intervention in the Armenian
issue might spoil Turkish-American relations.

In its official responses so far, Turkey has not taken punitive
measures to protest against Obama’s statement. Turkish diplomatic
sources reported that U.S. Ambassador to Ankara, James Jeffrey, was
invited to the Foreign Ministry to discuss the developments. Ankara’s
concerns and uneasiness regarding the statement were relayed to him,
but no official note of protest to Washington was presented (ANKA,
April 27).

For its part, Ankara must have realized that despite its intensive
diplomacy, it has failed to influence Western public opinion in
favor of its view of the events in 1915. This episode shows that the
government cannot sustain its policy of denial, and should develop
a new approach to explain its own version of events. Nonetheless,
Turkey is unlikely to sever ties with the United States, though
the controversy demonstrates how the politics of the Armenian
"genocide" can potentially undermine Turkish-American relations. The
periodic resurrection of this debate in American politics hijacks
Turkish-American relations, perpetuating a crisis of trust. Nor
does it further the interests of Turkish-Armenian rapprochement,
since American intervention threatens to derail any genuine desire
to find a solution in Ankara. In the face of domestic opposition,
no Turkish government can afford to proceed with a dialogue with
Armenia or maintain friendly relations with the United States if
Washington is perceived as taking sides.

http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cac
www.whitehouse.gov